Sunday, April 19, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the rightwing campaign to "reopen the economy"

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
April 19, 2020
 
Hello All – Hello All – Last week small groups of rightwing activists received massive publicity on cable news for their protests against the economic lockdown and "social-distancing" measures put in place to slow the virus crisis. Demonstrations, usually at state capitols, took place in California, Kentucky, North Carolina, Wyoming, Michigan, Wisconsin, Texas, Maryland, Utah, and Ohio, and probably in other places as well.  Numerous reports (e.g. here and here) describe the participants as a mix of Trump supporters and people associated with far-right organizations. The protests in Michigan, the largest I believe, are credibly linked to the wealthy DeVos family, of which Betsy DeVos is US Education Secretary.  And in broad daylight President Trump has encouraged these protests (here and here), targeting especially the governors of those states (mostly Democrats) who are (mostly) resisting the President's campaign to re-open the nation's economy for business.
 
What is this about?  Why is this happening?  An explanation that fits the fact-pattern is that Trump and his billionaire supporters see an economic recovery and a booming stock market as the key to retaining power in 2021. Conversely, a sustained Depression or Recession foretells political ruin.  Deluded by their own deep-thinking, they believe that vast stretches of the country, conveniently including the "battle-ground" states of the Mid-West, are relatively virus free, and that the risk in lives (to workers) is outweighed by the consequences (to them) of a failure to restart the economic machine.  A friendly amendment to this explanation is that conservatives, in and out of Congress, fear the effects of successful/popular relief programs for those displaced from the economy, and want to return to normal-suffering as soon as possible, before a social-democratic version of capitalism gets too popular.  Many medical people, of course, say that it is only a matter of time before waves of the virus reach territories so far untouched, and ending social distancing and opening for business would accelerate the spread of the virus.  Thus the pushback against the protesters' and Trump's calls to restart the economy is an attempt to save thousands of lives and minimize chaos.
 
Finally, how ominous is it that the demonstrations demanding the re-opening of the economy, though small, seem to have a broad representation from the 57 varieties of USA fascist groups, some of them armed? Historian Juan Cole points to an analogy in the rise of Mussolini, and cites another historian who describes Mussolini's fascist movement as "the marriage of an electoral party and a private militia."  "There has all along been a danger," writes Cole, which became dramatically apparent at Charlottesville, that Trump's fascist rhetoric would unleash violence by the far right. With millions out of work and a pandemic threatening us with a second wave of mass infections if we end social distancing too soon, the country is a powder keg. And we have a firebug for president" [Link]. So we have been warned.
 
News Notes
In an op-ed in today's New York Times, Bernie Sanders writes:  "In the midst of the twin crises that we face — the coronavirus pandemic and the meltdown of our economy — it's imperative that we re-examine some of the foundations of American society, understand why they are failing us, and fight for a fairer and more just nation. …  If there is any silver lining in the horrible pandemic and economic collapse we're experiencing, it is that many in our country are now beginning to rethink the basic assumptions underlying the American value system."
 
Responding to the anger and dismay among younger activists that Joe Biden is the only thing standing between them and another four years of King Trump, leaders of the 1960s Students for a Democratic Society write an Open Letter to the New New Left urging them to support the Democratic candidate while working to make the campaign more radical.
 
The fight to save the Postal Service is real, as its already shaky financial condition has been further shaken by the expected loss of $13 billion this year because of the pandemic.  This useful New York Times editorial explains that it is not "the market," but foolish congressional legislation that is imposing impossible-to-meet financial burdens on the Postal Service, setting it up for economic collapse and privatization.  A bill to rescue the Postal Service by removing some of these burdens is sponsored by Elizabeth Warren and Ro Khanna (HR 2382).  It passed the House with a strong, bi-partisan majority and now awaits Senate action.  The point is that the "crisis" of the Postal Service is a self-imposed one, motivated by neo-liberalism gone amuck.
 
Hastings and nearby towns are served each year by a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) program, now planning to open on June 3 and seeking more households to participate in the weekly "shares" of fresh produce grown locally.  For information about how this works, here's the link - www.stoneledge.farm/csa-program/csa.cfm?csaID=11. To contact the local coordinator, email hastingscsa@gmail.com.
 
Finally, today – April 19th – is the anniversary (1775) of the American Revolution.  When the British army occupying Boston sent a routine search-and-destroy mission to nearby Lexington and Concord, they were met by local militia lined up on Lexington Common and later (at the "rude bridge that spanned the flood") in Concord.  It is thought provoking that, unlike, say, the French and their "Bastille Day," Americans commemorate their birthing moment from the signing of a manifesto by slave owners and lawyers some 14 months after the armed struggle was underway, rather than credit the rank and file on the battlefields. But the USA has always been "exceptional," and so we struggle to remember our true history and wish it Happy Birthday!
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Until shut down by the virus, we have been meeting for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.) In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting (by Zoom conference) each Saturday afternoon at 2 p.m.  If you would like to join our meeting, please send a return email to get the meeting's access code. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
Singer John Prine died recently from the coronavirus. This week The Nation put up an interesting article about Prine, his life, and his music. In "John Prine Taught Us New Ways to Listen," author Shuja Haider writes "Prine loved music; he'd had his dad mail him his guitar while he was in the Army, and he and his buddies would stay up late singing their favorite songs, … but it was on his mail route that he really started doing what he would go on to do for the rest of his life, better than nearly anyone else who did it."  The article comes with a link to all the songs on Prine's first (1971) album, "John Prine." Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
Annals of the Plague Year
The Coronavirus in America: The Year Ahead
By
---- The coronavirus is spreading from America's biggest cities to its suburbs, and has begun encroaching on the nation's rural regions. The virus is believed to have infected millions of citizens and has killed more than 34,000. Yet President Trump this week proposed guidelines for reopening the economy and suggested that a swath of the United States would soon resume something resembling normalcy. For weeks now, the administration's view of the crisis and our future has been rosier than that of its own medical advisers, and of scientists generally. In truth, it is not clear to anyone where this crisis is leading us. … Exactly how the pandemic will end depends in part on medical advances still to come. It will also depend on how individual Americans behave in the interim. If we scrupulously protect ourselves and our loved ones, more of us will live. If we underestimate the virus, it will find us. [Read More]
 
Coronavirus Advice From Abroad: 7 Lessons America's Governors Should Not Ignore as They Reopen Their Economies
By Stephen Engelberg, et al., ProPublica [April 18, 2020]
---- Figuring out how and when to let people go back to work during an outbreak of life-threatening disease is the most consequential decision any of you will ever face. You've already seen the stakes in New York, New Jersey and Michigan. Get this wrong and thousands of people in your state will die. As the presidential election campaign heats up, count on the president to blast you for high unemployment rates in your state (you lifted restrictions too slowly) or clusters of deaths (you went too far, too soon). To help you and your aides think about this decision over the next few weeks, we've interviewed experts and frontline officials from Italy, Germany, Spain, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea. While they differ on the details, their views formed a startlingly united consensus of what's needed …. We also asked American experts whether states can meet all or most of these benchmarks. Their answers coalesced around a single point: None of you are close to being ready. [Read More]
 
(Video) Pandemic Is a Portal: Arundhati Roy on COVID-19 in India, Imagining Another World & Fighting for It
From Democracy Now! [April 16, 2020]
---- Officials in India say six major cities are coronavirus hot spots, including the capital city, New Delhi. We go there to speak with writer and activist Arundhati Roy, who has a new essay on how "The Pandemic Is a Portal." She says, "You have the sense that you're sitting on some kind of explosive substance," and describes how the government of Narendra Modi is using the pandemic to crack down on opponents and dissidents. [See the Program]
 
De-Funding the World Health Organization: Unethical, Cruel, and Dangerous for the World
By
---- Just when we thought things couldn't get any worse than a global pandemic that has reached all corners of the earth, infecting over 2 million people and killing over 146,000 — over 33,000 so far in the U.S. — President Trump has announced that the U.S. will suspend all funding to the World Health Organization. Trump's reasoning — supported by such Republican Senators such as Tom Cotton and Todd Young — is that China has too much influence over the WHO, that the WHO failed to disseminate accurate information to governments in the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis, and that the U.S. is best positioned to address the crisis on its own without global cooperation. This is wrong and dangerous not only for the U.S., but for the entire world. For countries whose COVID-19 responses are already crippled by U.S. sanctions and U.S.-supported wars, it is especially and unimaginably cruel. According to Richard Horton, editor of the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, it is "a crime against humanity" and healthcare providers, scientists, and everyday citizens must "rebel against" it. [Read More]
 
More good essays about the virus and our times – "The Epicenter: A week inside New York's public hospitals," a photo essay by Philip Mongomery and Jonathan Mahler, New York Times [April 15, 2020] [Link]; "I Want My Death to Make You Angry," by Emily Pierskalla, RN, Minnesota Nurses Association  [Link]; "Coronavirus does discriminate, because that's what humans do," b, The Guardian [UK] [April 17, 2020] [Link]; "Learning From Coronavirus: We Can't Rely on Capitalism to Serve Our Most Basic Social Needs" by [Link]; and "'The most stressful time ever': how coronavirus affects children's mental health," The Guardian [UK] [April 17, 2020] [Link].
 
This Week's Featured Essays
America Can Afford a World-Class Health System. Why Don't We Have One?
By Anne Case and
[FB – Professors Case and Deaton are the authors of the important book, Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism, reviewed in an essay in the last Newsletter.  It investigates the causes of the dramatic increase in the death rate for esp. middle- and lower-income white men in the USA over the last two decades.]
---- In March, Congress passed a coronavirus bill including $3.1 billion to develop and produce drugs and vaccines. The bipartisan consensus was unusual. Less unusual was the successful lobbying by pharmaceutical companies to weaken or kill provisions that addressed affordability — measures that could be used to control prices or invalidate patents for any new drugs. The notion of price control is anathema to health care companies. It threatens their basic business model, in which the government grants them approvals and patents, pays whatever they ask, and works hand in hand with them as they deliver the worst health outcomes at the highest costs in the rich world. The American health care industry is not good at promoting health, but it excels at taking money from all of us for its benefit. It is an engine of inequality. … But the virus also provides an opportunity for systemic change. The United States spends more than any other nation on health care, and yet we have the lowest life expectancy among rich countries. And although perhaps no system can prepare for such an event, we were no better prepared for the pandemic than countries that spend far less. [Read More]
 
UN Ceasefire Defines War As a Non-Essential Activity
By
---- At least 70 countries have signed on to the March 23 call by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres for a worldwide ceasefire during the Covid-19 pandemic. … But 23 of the original 53 countries that signed on to the UN's ceasefire declaration still have armed forces in Afghanistan as part of the NATO coalition fighting the Taliban, while Qatar and the UAE are part of the Saudi-led coalition fighting in Yemen. Have all 25 countries ceased firing now? To put some meat on the bones of the UN initiative, countries that are serious about this commitment should tell the world exactly what they are doing to live up to it. … Let's insist that the U.S. government call off its airstrikes, artillery and night raids in Afghanistan, Somalia, Iraq, Syria and West Africa, and support ceasefires in Yemen, Libya and around the world. Then, when the pandemic is over, let's insist that the U.S. honor the UN Charter's prohibition against the threat or use of force, which wise American leaders drafted and signed in 1945, and start living at peace with all our neighbors around the world. The U.S. has not tried that in a very long time, but maybe it's an idea whose time has finally come. [Read More] Also useful/interesting is "We Need a Coronavirus Truce" by John Feffer, Foreign Policy in Focus [April 1, 2020] [Link].
 
(Video) Mehdi Hasan and Noam Chomsky on Biden vs. Trump
From The Intercept [April 15, 2020] – 30 minutes
---- The Intercept's Mehdi Hasan spoke with world-renowned political dissident and linguist Noam Chomsky on the 2020 presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. Now that Bernie Sanders has dropped out and endorsed Biden, does the progressive left have a moral obligation to hold their noses and vote for the former vice president, despite his many sins? [See the Program] Also this week, Democracy Now! broadcast the second part of its interview with Chomsky, (Video) "Gangster in the White House": Noam Chomsky on COVID-19, WHO, China, Gaza and Global Capitalism" [Link].  If you missed Part I, linked in last week's Newsletter, see it here.
 
'We Don't Just Interview People Once' [Filmmaker Julia Reichert]
By Karen Nussbaum, American Prospect [April 10, 2020]
[FB - A discussion with documentary filmmaker Julia Reichert, whose work chronicles labor, women, and the American left, and who won an Oscar this year for "American Factory" [available on Netflix].  Reichert also made the film "Union Maids" (1976) and other fine documentaries. Her interviewer, Karen Nussbaum, was a co-founder of the clerical workers' organization 9 to 5, the subject of Reichert's current film project.]
KN: I'm interested in how your films were situated in the historical moment and what you were trying to accomplish with them.
JR: They all come out of a historical context. Another significant thread is how it came out of me personally—growing up female in the '50s into the '60s, but also me as a person who did not come from any kind of privileged background. Working-class Republican union dad, working mom, four kids in the house. I didn't realize until I went to college that we were working-class. I just thought we were fine. So there's two things going on. One is the movements for social change which I luckily ended up being part of. We came of age in the '60s, we get swept up into all these amazing movements, but for me it was a first time ever. We didn't know about it in our little town. So it's partly the movements, the history I was swept up in and partly just who I was. And it has a huge impact on all the films. [Read More]
 
What People Power Looks Like in a Pandemic Democracy
By Corey Robin, New York Review of Books [April 17, 2020]
---- If we cannot gather to assemble or vote, much less deliberate, in what sense can we have a democracy? How do we do politics in a pandemic, self-governance under quarantine? Is it possible to supervise the supervisors if we're too sequestered—or sick—to vote? Yet the end of mass populist rallies has also entailed (Wisconsin aside) the postponement of primaries and elimination of voting booths—the suspension of politics itself, as least as that term is conventionally understood in the United States. Must it be so? Denied access to existing political institutions, they must find ways to discover that connection, that power. They must turn themselves, writes Dewey, from an "inchoate, unorganized" and "formless" collection into a self-conscious collective. They must "break existing political forms" and create new ones; they must destroy old connections and forge fresh ones. Democracy, in this account, is never "the product of democracy," that is, of current political institutions. It is "the convergence of a great number of social movements" working to "remedy evils experienced in consequence of prior political institutions." [Read More]
 
Our History
How ACT UP forever changed patients' rights, protests and American political organizing as it's practiced today. [The AIDS epidemic]
April 13, 2020]
[FB – The AIDS epidemic is still with us: according to the UN, 32 million people have died from the disease, including an estimated 770,000 during 2018. The "curve is flattened," but people continue to die.]
---- Submicroscopic infectious agents have a way of revealing the worst in us, and the best. That is the story of the AIDS epidemic generally, and in particular of ACT UP — the 33-year-old radical direct-action group formally and loftily called the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power. For nearly a decade in the 1980s and 1990s, ACT UP was a ubiquitous and unnerving presence, not only in America but in 19 countries worldwide. At its peak, it claimed 148 chapters, and though its ranks remained relatively small — numbering perhaps no more than 10,000 — it terrified and angered much of the population.  … Generally, the news media didn't think much of their work, branding the group both vulgar and counterproductive. "Far from inspiring sympathy," The New York Times said of ACT UP in 1989, their methods were "another reason to reject both the offensive protesters and their ideas." Coverage wasn't much warmer in some gay newspapers, which were owned by older and more conservative types who saw them as churlish mobsters, spoiled and rude. ACT UP didn't entirely disagree. They were, as their motto goes, "united in anger." [Read More] As part of this main essay, read "12 People on Joining ACT UP: 'I Went to That First Meeting and Never Left' [Link].
 
The Radical '70s Magazine That Shaped the Hong Kong Left
By Promise Li, The Nation [April 17, 2020]
[FB – The spectacular pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong some months ago set records for imaginative tactics and all-around stalwartism.  Where did this movement come from?  In this essay, the author finds the roots of Hong Kong's resistance to authoritarianism in the days of the '60s student movement.  Check out this fabulous story.]
---- When Ng Chung-yin met Augustine Mok Chiu-yu, they were doing a sit-in protest on the steps of Chu Hai College in Hong Kong. It was August 1969, and 12 students had just been expelled from the college for criticizing the administration—namely, its censorship of student newspapers, corruption, and ties to the Nationalist Party in Taiwan. Ng, then 23, was a former student leader who had just graduated from Chu Hai. Mok, 22, had recently returned to the city after studying in Australia. The Chu Hai protests were the first in Hong Kong history in which student unions from schools across the city took to the streets together. The protests ended in failure, and local newspapers smeared the students, claiming they were disrupting public order. Nonetheless, the short-lived movement marked the beginning of a new generation of activism. It had politicized young Hong Kongers, getting them ready for a larger fight. … The 70's Biweekly was a profoundly DIY operation. It was only published for a few years. … Nonetheless, The 70's Biweekly's dedication to organizing students and workers, its demands for new kinds of engagement, informed the Hong Kong political scene far beyond the publication's brief lifetime. Its most enduring lesson may be that the model for liberation can only be found in solidarity with all marginalized people—that no single dogma or past experience can show us how to do that best. In a fight that involves millions, the Hong Kong left is still finding its way forward. [Read More]

Thursday, April 16, 2020

CFOW statement on why the NYS Democratic presidential primary must be held

Hello All – There is a possibility that the New York Democratic presidential primary will be canceled.  The letter below, from Concerned Families of Westchester, states why we think the primary should be held.  In a nutshell, to defeat Trump in November, a united and mobilized Democratic Party is necessary.  To cancel the primary election will work against (re)building this unity.  Please use this letter – or the ideas in it if helpful – in any way that works for you to encourage Democratic elected officials and community leaders to speak up for holding the primary. – And if you/others have time to do only one thing, please call Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins ((518) 455-2585) and ask her to work to keep the primary. Please do this now, as the decision may be made very soon.
 
Thanks,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
The CFOW Letter/Statement
 
Dear XXX,
 
We are an organization of citizen activists located in the Rivertowns of Westchester County.  We are focused on defeating President Trump in November.  It is from this perspective that we are writing to express our concern about the possible cancellation of the New York Democratic presidential primary, now scheduled for June 23rd.
 
To defeat Donald Trump, we believe it is essential to mobilize all possible voters; and to do this we believe we must unify the Party and the campaign around a program that makes such a mobilization possible.
 
It is evident that Senator Sanders has attracted not only progressive voters but millions of young people and people of color to his campaign.  We need these voters to support Joe Biden in November.  For the Sanders campaign to mobilize these voters, the Democratic Party must reach out to them – and to the Sanders campaign – with meaningful assurances that their voices are heard.
 
To this end, we believe it would work against the process of uniting the Party if the June presidential primary were canceled.  In his speech suspending his campaign, Senator Sanders stated that he expected to continue to gain Convention delegates in the two dozen primary elections still to come.  He stated his hope that additional delegates would help his campaign to influence the Party's election platform and the Party's rules going forward. Hundreds of thousands of Senator Sanders' supporters – perhaps millions – share his hope that the ideas animating his campaign will continue to have an impact. To cancel New York's Democratic presidential primary would be to shatter these hopes, and would send the wrong message to those who have until now have not supported Vice President Biden, but must be persuaded to do so.
 
Additionally, we believe that it is important to preserve and execute the most fundamental democratic right in our society, regardless of political belief, the right to vote.  At a time when the Republicans are engaged in voter suppression, the Democrats should at all cost avoid even the appearance of doing this as well.
 
Clearly there is a financial cost to the State in holding a presidential primary, especially if much of the voting is done by mail. We have seen no estimates of this cost, nor of the expected savings in reducing the number of polling places. But we believe that the political cost to our Democracy will be substantial if the June Democratic Party presidential primary is not held.
 
Concerned Families of Westchester was formed in the days after 9/11/2001.  We are a grassroots group with scores of members, a newsletter that goes to hundreds of Westchester residents, and an established record of working for peace and justice.  As an organization we do not support political candidates for office, but at this time are focused on defeating President Trump in November.
 
Yours sincerely,
 
Frank Brodhead
For Concerned Families of Westchester
 
 

Monday, April 13, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on: After Sanders, What Now for the Democrats?

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
April 13, 2020
 
Hello All – Last Wednesday Senator Bernie Sanders suspended his presidential campaign.  In his speech announcing his decision, Bernie portrayed his campaign, accurately in my view, as having restored for millions of people the hope that things could be different, that a nation with healthcare, housing, and many other things FOR ALL was within our reach.  He also explained that by suspending his campaign, not ending it, he hoped to continue to amass delegates and to be in a position to exert influence on the Democratic Party's platform and other party issues as people assembled in Milwaukee for the Convention.  He indicated that he hoped that his campaign supporters would continue to strive to realize the goals that had united the campaign, and indicated that he would eventually endorse Joe Biden for president after the policy/platform discussions had been concluded.
 
The day after Sanders announcement, Democracy Now's Amy Goodman interviewed Sanders supporter Naomi Klein. She made many thoughtful points about the significance and impact of the Sanders campaign, starting with the observation that the 2016 and 2020 campaigns "helped us find each other."  By this, she explained, she meant that since the Age of Reagan, the secular religion of the United States has been neo-liberalism, the claim that "the market" is the best and most efficient way to determine how government should operate and how we must live; and that by "breaking the spell" of neo-liberalism, the campaigns helped to "defeat the conspiracy of lowered expectations," teaching us that we had been lied to all this years about what was possible and why we should want so little.  And the Sanders campaigns helped all those who thought this was garbage, suddenly learned that they were not alone. In concluding, Naomi Klein went on to make the interesting observation, new to me, that while Sanders was able to gain the support of younger people, older people – the generation of the 1960s [my generation] – was still traumatized by memories of state violence and the threat of a new Red Scare, and whatever their/our beliefs about the issues, were reluctant to challenge the powers that be.  I wonder….
 
Our goal now is to defeat Donald Trump in November.  As Noam Chomsky states in the video interview linked below, while the best we can hope from a President Biden is a re-run of the Obama presidency, with all its inadequacies, four more years of President Trump would likely be a world-class catastrophe and a threat to human civilization.  Yet a cogent argument made by the Sanders campaign over the past few months is that the Biden campaign is unlikely to mobilize a sufficient number of voters to win the election.  Lacking charisma and rejecting much of the political programs advocated by Senator Sanders that attracted young people and mobilized enthusiastic support, a successful Biden campaign will have to find a way to re-unite the party and mobilize millions of people.  In an article (linked below) by Glenn Greenwald, the author assesses the reasons why so many people don't vote, especially low-income people, and finds that the main reason is the lack of any perceived difference in how contending candidates speak to their needs and hopes.  It may be that fear of another four years of Trump will generate the mass mobilization of voters needed to defeat him, but we can't count on this.  The dilemma now for supporters of Sanders and Warren – and for CFOW – is how to persuade the Official Democrats to change and become the more progressive political campaign that we need to win.  As Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez spells out in an interview in today's New York Times, the reunification of the party and the presidential campaign is a process, not simply a matter of a few generic statements about how we are all in this together: "And what I hope does not happen in this process is that everyone just tries to shoo it along and just brush that under the rug as an aesthetic difference of style."  For the progressive wing of the party to fail to work hard to defeat Trump in November is unacceptable; but the official wing of the party – those who have supported Joe Biden – also needs to take strong measures to make party re-unification possible. We are, indeed, all in this together.
 
News Notes
As of Monday morning, more than 1.8 million cases of the coronavirus had been recorded worldwide, with 115,275 deaths.  In the United States, more than half a million cases had been recorded, with 22,115 deaths. Continuously updated data can be found here.
 
Richard Brodsky, a political force in the Democratic Party for nearly three decades, died last week from the coronavirus.  Brodsky served in both the Westchester County Board of Legislators and represented many of our communities in the New York State Assembly.  MaryJane Shimsky, who represents the Rivertowns on the County Board of Legislators, began her political life as a staff member in Brodsky's office.  This week she wrote: … intellectually brilliant and strongly principled, Richard fiercely stood up for the people of his district and for the entire State. Years of his dogged, and often lonely, legislative oversight resulted in the first major law regulating public authorities in a generation." Shortly before he died, Brodsky wrote an article for the Albany Times Union in which he stated that "The human carnage, and the economic carnage, of the coronavirus pandemic are well reported. There will be other consequences. There is also profound damage to the world of ideas that will persist long after the pandemic ends and we return to normal lives." A warning from someone who knew a lot about the world of politics. RIP.
 
The Trump administration is making a strong effort to shut down the Post Office.  Without something happening, the Post Office will run out of money in June.  The Washington Post reported Saturday that "Trump threatened to veto the $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or Cares Act, if the legislation contained any money directed to bail out the postal agency."  A useful background article on the Post Office crisis was posted last week on Common Dreams.  In The Nation, Mike Davis suggests saving the Post Office by nationalizing Amazon "and the rest of the essential infrastructure of the digital age."
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Until shut down by the virus, we have been meeting for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for the rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting (by Zoom conference) each Saturday afternoon at 2 p.m.  If you would like to join our meeting, please send a return email to get the meeting's access code. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
For stalwart readers, here are some Rewards.  John Prine died from the virus last week.  He made thoughtful/protest music for decades; and this week the excellent news site Shadowproof posted Prine's song about "Paradise," where his father had worked as a miner before the strip mining Peabody Coal Co. "had hauled it away." And after another week of President Trump's leadership, I thought of late Mario Savio, who said a few words in December 1964 that has him living in our hearts forever.
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THIS WEEK'S FEATURED ESSAYS
 
(Video) Noam Chomsky on Trump's Disastrous Coronavirus Response, Bernie Sanders & What Gives Him Hope
From Democracy Now! [April 10, 2020]
---- How did the United States — the richest country in the world — become the worldwide epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak, with one person dying of COVID-19 every 47 seconds? We spend the hour with Noam Chomsky, the world-renowned political dissident, linguist and author, discussing this unprecedented moment in history, and its political implications, as Senator Bernie Sanders announces he is suspending his campaign for the presidency. Chomsky also describes how frontline medical workers and progressive organizing are giving him hope. [See the Program]
 
Nonvoters Are Not Privileged. They Are Disproportionately Lower-Income, Nonwhite, and Dissatisfied With the Two Parties.
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept [April 9 2020]
---- Those who choose not to vote because of dissatisfaction with the choices offered are disproportionately poorer and nonwhite, while rich white people vote in far larger percentages. And the data also makes clear that the primary motive for nonvoting among those demographic groups is not voter suppression but a belief that election outcomes do not matter because both parties are corrupt or interested only in the lives of the wealthy. … While voter suppression is unquestionably a serious stain on U.S. political life that does (by design) impede voting, the overwhelming reason people stay home is due to cynicism toward or dissatisfaction with the political process and the choices they were presented. … Those who make the choice to abstain from voting in presidential and midterm elections are overwhelmingly anything but "privileged." The claim that they are is deliberate disinformation spread by the political and media elite class to suppress the reality of their own systemic failures when it comes to serving the needs of the vast majority of the population and to try to shame, rather than persuade, disaffected people to vote for their candidate. [Read More]
 
Why Americans Are Dying from Despair
e, The New Yorker  [March 16, 2020]
[FB – This is a review of Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism, by Annie Case and Angus Deaton.]
---- Why has the steep rise in deaths of despair been so uniquely American? Case and Deaton identify a few factors. The United States has provided unusually casual access to means of death. The availability of opioids has indeed played a role, and the same goes for firearms (involved in more than half of suicides); we all but load the weapons of self-destruction for people in misery. The U.S. has also embraced automation and globalization with greater alacrity and fewer restrictions than other countries have. Displaced workers here get relatively little in the way of protection and support. And we've enabled capital to take a larger share of the economic gains. … A more unexpected culprit identified by Case and Deaton is our complicated and costly health-care system. There is, to be sure, a strong correlation between lack of health coverage and increased risk of suicide (not to mention over-all mortality), but the problem doesn't end with the plight of the uninsured. The focus of Case and Deaton's indictment is on the fact that America's health-care system is peculiarly reliant on employer-provided insurance. [Read More]
 
Fear, bigotry and misinformation – this reminds me of the 1980s Aids pandemic
[FB – Edmund White writes interesting fiction and nonfiction.  I recently read his book on Proust and was astounded to learn that all the girls/women in In Search of Lost Time were actually transposed from the personalities of the men in Proust's life!]
--- I am a gay man who lived through the Aids pandemic, so many people have asked me to compare that crisis with the one we now face. The main difference between the two is that Aids at first appeared to afflict specific populations, while coronavirus is an equal opportunity malady. … Aids bore a badge of shame even in the gay community – if you were infected it was your own fault for not practising safe sex – whereas everyone feels sympathy for coronavirus victims. Whereas Aids was a death sentence for almost all who were afflicted, most people with coronavirus show only mild symptoms and even those who are hospitalised mostly recover. … Ironically, the same doctor, Anthony Fauci, was the "villain" of the Aids epidemic (the activist group Act-Up accused him of not releasing life-saving drugs) and is the hero of coronavirus (the voice of scientific reason in the Trump administration). In both epidemics he has insisted on running studies of new drugs. In the crazy Trumpian far right he has been accused of undermining the president's looniest pronouncements. [Read More]
 
A Malignant Contagion: Trumpism's Mindlessness on Coronavirus and Albert Camus' 'The Plague'
---- Albert Camus' The Plague evokes the malign contagion of Trumpism — the mindless death cult that contaminates America with its disdain for facts, science, experience, democracy and human life. In Camus' 1947 novel, the plague begins with infected rats invading the Algerian city of Oran. Like the Nazis who invaded France with a toxic ideology, the plague-carrying rats occupy the city, infect the population, provoke terror and suspicion, bring about police-enforced imprisonment in death camps, and unleash widespread suffering and death. Once the graves become overcrowded, the Oran authorities are forced to use mass burials and the crematoria leaving no doubt as to Camus' historical reference. The Plague is both a grim account of a city under invisible siege by a pathogen as well as a vivid allegory of the then-recent Nazi occupation of wartime France, the so-called "brown plague." The fascist plague that inspired the novel may have been defeated, but in the 80 years since The Plague was written, other varieties of political pestilence keep this book urgently relevant. "No one will ever be free as long as there are pestilences," wrote Camus, a fighter in the French Resistance and an existentialist philosopher. [Read Moe]
 
Annals of the Plague Years
He Could Have Seen What Was Coming: Behind Trump's Failure on the Virus
By Eric Lipton, et al., New York Times [April 11, 2020]
---- Throughout January, as Mr. Trump repeatedly played down the seriousness of the virus and focused on other issues, an array of figures inside his government — from top White House advisers to experts deep in the cabinet departments and intelligence agencies — identified the threat, sounded alarms and made clear the need for aggressive action. The president, though, was slow to absorb the scale of the risk and to act accordingly, focusing instead on controlling the message, protecting gains in the economy and batting away warnings from senior officials. It was a problem, he said, that had come out of nowhere and could not have been foreseen. [Read More]  (Eric Lipton discussed his article on Democracy Now! on Monday morning.) For more on "they should've known," "The Military Knew Years Ago That a Coronavirus Was Coming," by Ken Klippenstein, The Nation [April 1, 2020] [Link]. And when they finally get in gear, they're incompetent: "How Did the U.S. End Up with Nurses Wearing Garbage Bags?" br, The New Yorker [April 9, 2020] [Link].
 
(Video) "Exposing U.S. Racism in a Stark New Way": COVID-19 Kills Disproportionate Number of Black Americans
From Democracy Now! [April 9, 2020]
---- We speak with family physician and epidemiologist Dr. Camara Phyllis Jones about how the coronavirus is taking a devastating toll on black Americans, who are disproportionately dying from the virus across the country as a result of entrenched racial inequality. Black Americans are more likely to have chronic health problems and less likely to have insurance. They also make up significant numbers of frontline workers that are still going to work amid the pandemic. Jones is the former president of the American Public Health Association. [See the Program]  For Part 2 of this interview, go here.  For Dr. Jones' recent piece for Newsweek magazine, "Coronavirus Disease Discriminates. Our Health Care Doesn't Have To," go here.  AOC spoke on Democracy Now! last week about the impact of the coronavirus on her district in Queens and the Bronx, "the epicenter of the epicenter" in the USA [Link]; and for a New York Times' perspective, "Black Americans Face Alarming Rates of Coronavirus Infection in Some States" [April 7, 2020] go here.
 
The Political Economy of the Virus/Crisis
The Deficit Is Exploding! And That's a Good Thing.
By Robert Pollin, The Nation [April 9, 2020]
---- The fact that nobody's asking where the money is coming from shows how much our politics have changed since 2008. … The US government today possesses the unique financial capacity to mount an effective fight at the historically unprecedented scale required against both the pandemic and the economic collapse. It also has the wherewithal to move the economy onto an ecologically sustainable recovery path, with Green New Deal investments generating jobs and new opportunities throughout the country. Whether the government embraces these challenges, or, instead, continues to squander its resources on giveaways to giant corporations and Wall Street, will depend on the balance of political forces in the months ahead. Effective political mobilization will therefore be imperative for pushing this balance in the direction that it so badly needs to go. [Read More]
 
Colonialism Made Puerto Rico Vulnerable to Coronavirus Catastrophe
By Chris Gelardi, The Nation [April 9, 2020]
---- The New York Times, The Washington Post, [etc.] have all published maps tracking the spread of Covid-19 across the United States. None of them have included the entire country in their graphics. Missing are all or most of the five non-state US territories—four of which have confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus. Even though they're home to more than 3.5 million US citizens and nationals, and they're administered by the US government, the territories—Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa—are often forgotten. During this crisis, inattention from the mainland—in the form of disregarded pleas for supplies, funds, or relief from the colonial framework—could spell disaster. ,,, Yet even with Washington and Wall Street working against it, Puerto Rico's officials, health care workers, citizens, and diaspora are mounting a defense against the coronavirus. As of today, the island has 573 confirmed infections and 23 deaths. Facing its third major public health crisis in as many years, the territory is hoping to prevent a worst-case scenario: overrun hospitals, economic collapse, and thousands of deaths.    US territories have a difficult battle ahead. And for Puerto Rico, this pandemic is just the latest tribulation. [Read More]
 
The EU's new coronavirus relief deal is a gift to Europe's enemies
By Yanis Varoufakis, The Guardian [UK] [April 11, 2020]
[FBYanis Varoufakis is an economist and the former finance minister in the Greek government, serving in the Syriza government, an initially radical government that appeared willing to challenge the European central banks' austerity program for Greece.  This didn't end well for Varoufakis – or Greece.]
---- The challenge facing the 19 countries of the eurozone is unique. The massive boost in public debt that is now so necessary is hampered by the quaint arrangement of sharing a central bank that, on the one hand, has no common treasury to lean against and, on the other, is banned from backing directly the 19 treasuries that must borrow in euros to fight the crisis. The euro crisis that began in 2010 stretched this monetary architecture to its limits. The coronavirus recession is now pushing it beyond them. … The message today to Italians, Spaniards and Greeks is: your government can borrow large amounts from Europe's bailout fund. No conditions. You will also receive help to pay for unemployment benefits from countries where employment holds up better. But, within a year or two, as your economies are recovering, huge new austerity measures will be demanded to bring your government's finances back into line, including the repayment of the monies spent on your unemployment benefits. This is equivalent to helping the fallen get up but striking them over the head as they begin to rise. [Read More]
 
Our History
(Video) "Supreme Inequality":  The Supreme Court's 50-Year Battle Against Justice
From Democracy Now! [March 6, 2020]
[FB – Thanks to the coronavirus lockdown, I read this book and highly recommend it as user-friendly for those knowing little/nothing about the Court.]
---- The makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court has come under intense criticism in recent years after two Trump-nominated justices joined the bench. Senate Republicans confirmed Neil Gorsuch in 2017 after having refused to consider President Barack Obama's nominee in his final year in office, and they confirmed Brett Kavanaugh a year later despite multiple allegations of sexual misconduct against the judge. During the 2020 Democratic presidential contest, several candidates floated the idea of "packing the court" — appointing more than nine justices — in order to counter the court's rightward drift. But while the current Supreme Court often earns the ire of progressive lawmakers and activists, our guest Adam Cohen says it has actually been a force for injustice for the last 50 years, despite what Americans are taught about the court's role in protecting the rights of marginalized people. "The Supreme Court — which is an institution that we think of as the bastion of fairness, the advocate for the underdog — has actually been a major driver of inequality," says Cohen. His new book is "Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court's Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America." [See the Program]
 
How Generals Fueled 1918 Flu Pandemic to Win Their World War
By Gareth Porter, American Conservative [April 4, 2020]
---- On Thursday, the captain of the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, on which the virus was reportedly spreading, was relieved of command. He was blamed by his superiors for the leak of a letter he wrote warning the Navy that failure to act rapidly threatened the health of his 5,000 sailors. Secretary of Defense Mark Esper justified his decision to continue many military activities as usual by declaring these activities are "critical to national security… Esper's decisions reflect a deeply ingrained Pentagon habit of protecting its parochial military interests at the expense of the health of American troops. This pattern of behavior recalls the far worse case of the U.S. service chiefs once managing the war in Europe. They acted with even greater callousness toward the troops being called off to war in Europe during the devastating "Spanish flu" pandemic of 1918, which killed 50 million people worldwide. It was called the "Spanish flu" only because, while the United States, Britain and France were all censoring news about the spread of the pandemic in their countries to maintain domestic morale, the press in neutralist Spain was reporting freely on influenza cases there. In fact, the first major wave of infections in the United States came in U.S. training camps set up to serve the war. [Read More]