Sunday, March 15, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Coronavirus Crisis

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
March 15, 2020
 
Hello All – Within the last week the coronavirus outbreak in the United States has gone from being a potential menace to gaining a vise-like grip on our economy and society. While the US death toll stood at 68 this morning, a New York Times article using estimates from the Centers for Disease Control warned that 200,000 to 1.7 million people could die if no action were taken to slow transmission.  Moreover, the same article estimated that 2.4 million to 21 million people in the USA could require hospitalization, though fewer than 100,000 staffed hospital beds are available for people who are critically ill.  Perhaps we can see our future in the crisis now engulfing Italy, which reported new 3,590 cases and 398 deaths (the largest one-day toll so far) on Sunday.  Given limited hospital and medical resources, doctors in Italy are forced to consider who will live and who will die, as treating everyone becomes impossible.  Is this America's future too?
 
The articles and analyses linked below target several key issues facing all of us as we struggle with the virus crisis and attempt to avoid worst outcomes.  They include the effort to gain and broadcast accurate information, now limited not only by our own uncertainty, but also by the Trump administration's kneejerk lying. Another arena of struggle is the demand that protection from and treatment of the virus be provided broadly and equitably, not limited by money or race.  Thirdly, as Naomi Klein points out in an article linked below, we must be alert to the "Shock Doctrine": the efforts of government and big business to gain power in the confusion of the crisis, promising solutions that only enrich or empower themselves.  Finally, as the shock of our New World begins to lessen, let us hope that throughout Westchester many voluntary networks of mutual aid spring up to assist those who need assistance.  Solidarity may be our best defense in this crisis.
 
Some readings on the coronavirus and our system crisis
America has no real public health system – coronavirus has a clear run
The dirty little secret, which will soon become apparent to all, is that there is no real public health system in the United States. …Instead of a public health system, we have a private for-profit system for individuals lucky enough to afford it and a rickety social insurance system for people fortunate enough to have a full-time job. … There is no public health system in the US, in short, because the richest nation in the world has no capacity to protect the public as a whole, apart from national defense. Ad-hoc remedies such as House Democrats and the White House fashioned on Friday are better than nothing, but they don't come close to filling this void. [Read More]
 
Who Gets Forgotten in a Pandemic?
By Mike Davis Yesterday 5:27 pm
The outbreak has instantly exposed the stark class divide in healthcare: those with good health plans who can also work or teach from home are comfortably isolated provided they follow prudent safeguards. Public employees and other groups of unionized workers with decent coverage will have to make difficult choices between income and protection. Meanwhile millions of low wage service workers, farm employees, uncovered contingent workers, the unemployed and the homeless will be thrown to the wolves. Even if Washington ultimately resolves the testing fiasco and provides adequate numbers of kits, the uninsured will still have to pay doctors or hospitals for administrating the tests. Overall family medical bills will soar at the same time that millions of workers are losing their jobs and their employer-provided insurance. Could there possibly be a stronger, more urgent case in favor of Medicare for All? [Read More]
 
A Health Emergency Demands Treatment Not Tax Breaks
By Frank Emspak, Portside [March 10, 2020]
---- The Covid-19 virus shows the complete inability of the US health system to serve the majority of its citizens. But one thing is clear- a tax break and a bail out of the cruise industry will not deal with the virus. Progressives need to need to enunciate and fight for a plan to deal with the potential pandemic. Leaving solutions up to those who have made the situation worse makes no sense. Any successful plan must be based on fulfilling several criteria designed to assure that all working people have access to needed services.   As we take these first steps, we also must provide the needed support to first responders. All medical personnel as well as fire fighters need the supplies to protect themselves while they help others. Also in this mix are airline pilots, flight attendants  and all those public servants who come in contact with the public. Their unions are already in discussions with the employers to develop effective responses to the virus. What are  the criteria for a plan that could respond to the needs of working people? [Read More]
 
And also: "Cancel Everything: Social distancing is the only way to stop the coronavirus," by Yascha Mounk, The Atlantic [March 10, 2020] [Link];  "Big Pharma Prepares to Profit From the Coronavirus" by Sharon Lerner, The Intercept [March 13 2020] [Link]; "Donald Trump Is Using the Coronavirus Crisis to Attack Social Security" by Nancy J. Altman [March 11, 2020], [Link]; "To Help Stem Coronavirus, Lift Sanctions on Iran" by Medea Benjamin and Ariel Gold, Common Dreams [March 13, 2020] [Link]; "How Prisons and Jails Can Respond to the Coronavirus" by [Link];
And finally, "Coronavirus and climate change: 6 ways the Trump administration has botched responses to both, by Dawn Stover, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [March 11, 2020] [Link].
 
Politics
Strong pressure is coming from the Democratic Establishment and the mainstream media for Bernie Sanders to drop out, even though half of the convention delegates remain to be chosen.  While the party leaders want to move as quickly as possible to a consensus around Biden, while keeping him out of the campaigning spotlight, earlier in the week, Sanders stated that he planned to stay in the race, keeping the issues he is raising before the public and hoping to influence the Democratic platform and campaign, even if he is not the candidate.  So far in the primary campaign we have learned that Biden's support rests primarily on the belief that he is that candidate most likely to beat Trump, while exit polls show that Sanders' issues (such as Medicare for All) are strongly supported, even in Republican/Southern states. Also, there are many reasons to think that Sanders would be the stronger candidate against Trump. Finally, for two interesting/useful surveys of Sanders and the Democrats, read "Bernie Sanders: Now More Than Ever" by Jane McAlevey, The Nation [March 11, 2020] [Link]; and "Democratic Party Failures Since the Cold War" by Michael Brenes, The Nation [March 11, 2020] [Link].
 
News Notes
After spending almost a year in jail for refusing to testify about Wikileaks in front of a grand jury,  Chelsea Manning was released from jail on March 12th.  However, while released, the judge ordered her to pay the $1,000 per day in fines that she had accumulated because of her refusal to testify – a total of $256,000.  The very heartening news, therefore, is not only that she is free, but GoFundMe site has raised enough to cover her fines, and a second campaign, to help with her living expenses, has exceeded its goal of $30,000, with 1,000 contributors.
 
Last week the Trump administration signed a semi-peace agreement with Afghanistan's Taliban, by which the USA promised to withdraw all its troops within 14 months, 4,000 of them very soon. . In return for Taliban promises to break ties with al Qaeda and ISIS, and to begin negotiations with the U.S.-backed Afghan government.  In this useful article, Phyllis Bennis says "The U.S.-Taliban Deal Won't Bring Real Peace, But It Could Reduce the Bloodshed." [Link]. For an on-the-ground perspective from writers living in a refugee camp, read "Afghans Imagine a Future of Lasting Peace" [Link]
 
One of the most complex wars in modern history – the multi-faceted conflict in Syria – may be nearing its end – or not. Turkey, the latest entry into the wars, is on the edge of a military engagement with Russia over control of the northwest corner of Syria.  Turkey has already attempted to engage NATO in the fighting, but as of this writing this is not working.  For a useful and reader-friendly overview of what's going down in Syria, read "Erdogan's Failed Gamble in Syria" by Conn Hallinan, Foreign Policy in Focus [March 9, 2020]. [Link].
 
Finally, The Sunrise Movement, the young peoples' climate action group, is holding a virtual town hall with congressional candidate Jamaal Bowman on Monday, March 16th, at 8:00 PM via Zoom or by dialing +19292056099,,490615233#. Submit your questions for Bowman here.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THIS WEEK'S FEATURED ESSAYS
 
Naomi Klein: Coronavirus Is the Perfect Disaster for 'Disaster Capitalism'
Interviewed by Marie Solis, Vice [March 13, 2020]
---- Let's start with the basics. What is disaster capitalism? What is its relationship to the "shock doctrine"?
NK: The way I define disaster capitalism is really straightforward: It describes the way private industries spring up to directly profit from large-scale crises. Disaster profiteering and war profiteering isn't a new concept, but it really deepened under the Bush administration after 9/11, when the administration declared this sort of never-ending security crisis, and simultaneously privatized it and outsourced it—this included the domestic, privatized security state, as well as the [privatized] invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. The "shock doctrine" is the political strategy of using large-scale crises to push through policies that systematically deepen inequality, enrich elites, and undercut everyone else. In moments of crisis, people tend to focus on the daily emergencies of surviving that crisis, whatever it is, and tend to put too much trust in those in power. We take our eyes off the ball a little bit in moments of crisis.
Right now we have multiple crises happening: a pandemic, a lack of infrastructure to manage it, and the crashing stock market. Can you outline how each of these components fit into the schema you outline in The Shock Doctrine ?
NK: The shock really is the virus itself. And it has been managed in a way that is maximizing confusion and minimizing protection. I don't think that's a conspiracy, that's just the way the U.S. government and Trump have utterly mismanaged this crisis. Trump has so far treated this not as a public health crisis but as a crisis of perception, and a potential problem for his reelection.
It's the worst-case scenario, especially combined with the fact that the U.S. doesn't have a national health care program and its protections for workers are abysmal. This combination of forces has delivered a maximum shock. It's going to be exploited to bail out industries that are at the heart of most extreme crises that we face, like the climate crisis: the airline industry, the gas and oil industry, the cruise industry—they want to prop all of this up. [Read More] For another perspective on the relation between the coronavirus and the economic crisis, read "Trump Wouldn't Save You From This Pandemic Even if He Could" by Nomi Prins, The Nation [March 13, 2020] [Link]
 
Arundhati Roy: How to Think About Empire
An interview with Avni Seipal, Boston Review [January 3, 2019]
Avni Sejpal: In your book, An Ordinary Person's Guide to Empire (2004), you identify a few different pillars of empire: globalization and neoliberalism, militarism, and the corporate media. You write, "The project of corporate globalization has cracked the code of democracy. Free elections, a free press and an independent judiciary mean little when the free market has reduced them to commodities on sale to the highest bidder." How would you update this today?
Arundhati Roy: That was fourteen years ago! The updates now would include the ways in which big capital uses racism, caste-ism (the Hindu version of racism, more elaborate, and sanctioned by the holy books), and sexism and gender bigotry (sanctioned in almost every holy book) in intricate and extremely imaginative ways to reinforce itself, protect itself, to undermine democracy, and to splinter resistance. It doesn't help that there has been a failure on the part of the left in general to properly address these issues. In India, caste—that most brutal system of social hierarchy—and capitalism have fused into a dangerous new alloy. It is the engine that runs modern India. Understanding one element of the alloy and not the other doesn't help. Caste is not color-coded. If it were, if it were visible to the untrained eye, India would look very much like a country that practices apartheid. Another "update" that we ought to think about is that new technology could ensure that the world no longer needs a vast working class. What will then emerge is a restive population of people who play no part in economic activity—a surplus population if you like, one that will need to be managed and controlled. Our digital coordinates will ensure that controlling us is easy. Our movements, friendships, relationships, bank accounts, access to money, food, education, healthcare, information (fake, as well as real), even our desires and feelings—all of it is increasingly surveilled and policed by forces we are hardly aware of. How long will it be before the elite of the world feel that almost all the world's problems could be solved if only they could get rid of that surplus population? If only they could delicately annihilate specific populations in specific ways—using humane and democratic methods, of course. Preferably in the name of justice and liberty. Nothing on an industrial scale, like gas chambers or Fat Men and Little Boys. What else are smart nukes and germ warfare for? [Read More]
 
Would the Draft Help End America's Endless Wars?
By Nan Levinson, The Nation [March 11, 2020]
---- As much as Americans love their military—it's consistently the part of the government in which they have the most confidence, according to multiple polls—the majority of them don't want to join it or be made to join it. Active-duty personnel currently account for a mere 0.4% of the population and only about 7% of us have ever been in uniform (more than half of those are over 60 years old). If we consider a tour in the armed forces a burden—as we must, despite all that thankful hand-shaking of people in uniform and their celebration everywhere—shouldn't we also consider the effects on the country of relying on an all-volunteer force (AVF) to carry that burden? One of those effects is surely that so many of the rest of us are allowed to ignore the endless wars and other conflicts "our" military has sparked and is still involved in around the world in our name. And what to make of the often-repeated claim that if only we did have a draft, this country might be far less eager to march into war? Is that, in fact, true? [Read More]
 
Chile: Notes from a Revolt
By Ariel Dorfman, New York Review of Books [March 13, 2020]
[FB – Ariel Dorman, a Chilean novelist and playwright, was an associate of President Salvador Allende when Allende was killed (or committed suicide) in the US-backed military coup of September 11, 1973.  Dorfman writes here about his memories of the coup as they mix with the youth-led uprising in today's Chile.]
---- At the very moment when, on October 6, 2019, high school students were igniting the first sparks of the rebellion by joyously jumping the turnstiles of a number of subway stations to protest a fare hike, Chile's right-wing president, Sebastián Piñera, was boasting on a television program that the country was "an oasis" in a turbulent and convulsed Latin America. The clueless leader, like most of Chile's elite, did not realize what was already erupting from the depths of a country he did not understand. Instead of acknowledging the anger behind this peaceful and playful defiance of norms—the students chanted that they had the right to "evade" the tariff just as the corrupt owners of Chile's economy were incessantly "evading" any form of reckoning—Piñera's government responded with a ferocious repression, further alienating large swaths of the citizenry. … The combination of such belligerent rhetoric, which recalled the justifications used by Pinochet to persecute dissidents, with actual tanks on the streets once again, further outraged the people of Chile, many of whom had struggled so hard, and at such a steep cost in suffering, to get the military out of their lives. On October 25, millions of men, women, and children serenely flooded cities and towns all over the country, spontaneously repudiating the repression and calling for its perpetrators to be punished. Such a nationwide assembly, the largest in our history, was unique in several ways. In contrast to every other march in living memory, this one was not organized by political parties, all of which, right, center and left, had fallen into utter disrepute with an increasingly disaffected and skeptical electorate and an underclass of primarily young people who were constantly promised paradise tomorrow while they lived a version of hell today. [Read More]
 

Sunday, March 8, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Lessons of the Coronavirus

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
March 8, 2020
 
Hello All – It looks like COVID 19 (the coronavirus) may be with us for months, perhaps for years.  It is already starting to be the wallpaper of our lives.  We ask ourselves: Will I get sick?  Will the schools close?  Will my job last? Will our cities and towns stay strong or break down?  The virus is forcing us to think about how we live, and how we live with each other, in new and difficult ways.
 
An early lesson is that the "public" in public health means everybody.  It matters to me if my neighbor gets sick, whether he or she is rich or poor, whether they came over on The Mayflower or are refugees from Central America.  COVID 19 teaches us that we all have a stake in healthcare for all. If my neighbor gets sick, my children may get sick too.
 
The virus is also teaching us that it is not enough to have a good doctor and great hospitals; we also need a public health infrastructure that supports basic research, training and preparation for disease outbreaks, and a manufacturing capacity for needed drugs and medical supplies.  This infrastructure will not be built by "the free market," by profit-making corporations.  Only a government can afford to invest in a public health infrastructure and adequate long-range planning, research, and development.
 
So COVID 19 teaches us that we need healthcare for all and a strong public health system.  What else?
 
In the last week news reporting and discussion about a new vaccine (some day) and a medicine that has a high success rate in curing someone with the virus has focused on Who will pay? and Who can pay? Much of the research on new medicines is supported in whole or in part by federal funding. When a vaccine for the virus is developed, or a drug that is effective in curing the disease is made, should private corporations be allowed to use this research to produce medicine that is very expensive? Would denying medicine to those who can't pay, or who don't have health insurance, be immoral?  Shouldn't medicine be affordable to all?
 
Also, treatment for the virus goes beyond medicine and opens up another area of inequality in the face of the disease. Even if good treatment and prevention programs are developed, many people may not be able to take advantage of them.  For example, many people cannot take time off to be sick or to "self-quarantine."  They may have limited sick days or none at all, and must keep working, even when sick, to make ends meet, thus endangering others as well as harming themselves. We must find a way to spread the costs of the virus so everyone receives equal protection and support.
 
And there will be more lessons from COVID 19 in the months ahead. In sum, they point towards a reorientation of our federal and state government towards building "human security," and curtailing excessive support for profit-making and war
 
To read more about the coronavirus and "human security" in the USA
The total failure of the Trump Team to understand the coronavirus and to act to combat it produced lots of responses this week. For a sampling, I recommend a roundtable discussion from Thursday's Democracy Now! program, "Coronavirus Is Best Case for Medicare for All"; a New York Times editorial,  "With Coronavirus, 'Health Care for Some' Is a Recipe for Disaster"; and a good article from The Intercept, "Coronavirus Matters, the Stock Market Doesn't, and Thinking It Does May Literally Kill Us." More on the medical side, CFOW's Betsy Todd has a useful post in her blog for the American Journal of Nursing on "to mask or not to mask"; today The New Yorker put up an informative article on "How Long Will It Take to Develop a Coronavirus Vaccine?" [Link]; and funnyman John Oliver has a wonderful takedown of the Trump Keystone Medical Corp and their misunderstandings of the coronavirus [Link].
 
Politics
Understanding what happened on Super Tuesday is important but difficult.  Will the results propel Joe Biden into a Convention victory, or does the progressive side still have a good chance?  The New Yorker has a useful article about the consolidation of the "moderates" around Biden. Much was made of his support from African-Americans in the South Carolina primary and then on Super Tuesday; and this Democracy Now! roundtable by African-American activists and scholars addresses why this happened and whether African-American support for Biden will continue as the primaries leave the South; and I found the post-election assessments from activists connected with the Organizing Upgrade group helpful. I also recommend "Sexism Sand Elizabeth Warren" from The Nation's Elie Mystal [Link] and "Does the Democratic Establishment Really Fear That Bernie CAN Win in November?" by Jeff Cohen, ZNet [March 4, 2020] [Link].
 
News Notes
It will come as no great surprise to stalwart Newsletter readers to learn that, in all 2019, of the tens of thousands of news stories broadcast by the three major television networks, less than one percent addressed climate change.  While this has been true in the past, that fact that 2019 saw California and Australia on fire and the Green New Deal emerge as a major focus for progressive politics in the USA, the avoidance of this subject by news media that are most influential in how people see the world is scandalous.  For a good analysis of what might lie ahead, read "Network News's Climate Disappearing Act—Will 2020 Be Different?" by Mark Hertsgaard, The Nation [March 4, 2020] [Link].
 
As an oldster still in the Dark Ages re: social media, I have been mystified by how influential it seems to be.  I learned a lot about how it works from this in-depth article, "The Billion-Dollar Disinformation Campaign to Reelect the President" by McKay Coppins, The Atlantic [March 2020] [Link]. The author concludes his essay: "The political theorist Hannah Arendt once wrote that the most successful totalitarian leaders of the 20th century instilled in their followers "a mixture of gullibility and cynicism." Over time, Arendt wrote, the onslaught of propaganda conditioned people to "believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true."… Should it prevail in 2020, the election's legacy will be clear—not a choice between parties or candidates or policy platforms, but a referendum on reality itself.
 
It looks like Israel may have to have a fourth national election in order to form a government.  Or something else may happen.  For a user-friendly explanation of Israel's political gridlock and the forces behind it, read "Netanyahu, failing to get a majority for the third time, Lashes out at Foes as "Arab Terrorists" and Jewish Terrorist-Lovers" b[Link].
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
Let's start this week's Rewards for stalwart readers with Hell You Talmbout," from Janelle Monae (h/t AW).  And 20 years ago Leonard Cohen wrote "Everybody Knows" for just this American Moment (h/t FA).  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THIS WEEK'S FEATURED ESSAYS
 
After I Lived in Norway, America Felt Backward. Here's Why. A crash course in social democracy.
By Ann Jones, Tom Dispatch [January 28, 2016]
[FB – Ann Jones wrote this article four years ago (and it was in the newsletter back then, too), but it was back up on-line today and I realized how appropriate it's message is to our current moment, when "democratic socialism" is actually being debated and (as indicated in the posting just below) when much of our country is on the ropes and nearing collapse.  Ann Jones is the author of the excellent book Kabul in Winter: Life Without Peace in Afghanistan. (2007)]
---- Some years ago, I faced up to the futility of reporting truths about America's disastrous wars, and so I left Afghanistan for another mountainous country far away. It was the polar opposite of Afghanistan: a peaceful, prosperous land where nearly everybody seemed to enjoy a good life, on the job and in the family. It's true that they didn't work much–not by American standards, anyway. In the United States, full-time salaried workers supposedly laboring 40 hours a week actually average 49, with almost 20 percent clocking more than 60. These people, on the other hand, worked only about 37 hours a week, when they weren't away on long paid vacations. At the end of the workday, about four in the afternoon (perhaps three during the summer), they had time to enjoy a hike in the forest, a swim with the kids, or a beer with friends—which helps explain why, unlike so many Americans, they are pleased with their jobs. Often I was invited to go along. I found it refreshing to hike and ski in a country with no land mines, and to hang out in cafés unlikely to be bombed. Gradually, my war-zone jitters subsided and I settled into the slow, calm, pleasantly uneventful stream of life there. Four years on, thinking I should settle down, I returned to the United States. It felt quite a lot like stepping back into that other violent, impoverished world, where anxiety runs high and people are quarrelsome. I had, in fact, come back to the flip side of Afghanistan and Iraq: to what America's wars have done to America. [Read More]
 
How Working-Class Life Is Killing Americans, in Charts
By David Leonhardt and March 6, 2020]
---- When the economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton first published their research on "deaths of despair" five years ago, they focused on middle-aged whites. So many white working-class Americans in their 40s and 50s were dying of suicide, alcoholism and drug abuse that the overall mortality rate for the age group was no longer falling – a rare and shocking pattern in a modern society. But as Case and Deaton continued digging into the data, it became clear that the grim trends didn't apply only to middle-aged whites. Up and down the age spectrum, deaths of despair have been surging for people without a four-year college degree. … Case and Deaton — a married couple who are both economists at Princeton — try to explain the causes in a new book, "Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism." Their basic answer is that working-class life in the United States is more difficult than it is in any other high-income country. "European countries have faced the same kind of technological change we have, and they're not seeing the people killing themselves with guns or drugs or alcohol," Case says. "There is something unique about the way the U.S. is handling this." [Read More] For some excellent companion reading on the same topic, recommended is "Left Behind," a review of the Case and Deaton book and also of "We're Still Here: Pain and Politics in the Heart of America," by Jennifer Silva, from the current New York Review of Books.
 
'Ruin Our Territory—for What?'
By Jillian Kestler-D'Amours, The Nation [March 5, 2020]
[FB – The stand-off between the native peoples of British Columbia, Canada and the corporate and government powers attempting to force an oil pipeline through their lands has attracted lots of attention, including here in the Newsletter.  This remarkable article traces and analyzes the complete arc of the struggle and illuminates by implication the myriad struggles going on by indigenous people (and their allies) around the world to protect civilized society against the depredations of corporate barbarism.]
---- For years, Na'Moks (who also goes by John Ridsdale) and the rest of the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs have been embroiled in conflict with a company called TC Energy and the BC government over the construction of a multibillion-dollar natural gas pipeline called Coastal GasLink that would cut through the heart of traditional Wet'suwet'en territory. Wet'suwet'en band councils, who are elected via rules set up by the Canadian government, supported TC Energy's project. But the hereditary chiefs, who hold a more traditional form of authority, oppose it. In late January, as the hereditary chiefs fought to block pipeline construction, their showdown with TC Energy, the BC government, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police exploded into a nationwide solidarity movement in support of Indigenous rights. Long-simmering tensions began to boil over at the end of 2019, after a BC court cleared the way for the pipeline construction and the Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs delivered an eviction notice to Coastal GasLink in response. The RCMP raided encampments that the Wet'suwet'en had set up on their land to block construction—and solidarity actions spread across the country. [Read More]
 
A New Pentagon Papers or the Same old Almost Endless War?
By Howard Machtinger, ZNet [March 6, 2020]
---- The Washington Post's exposure of the failure of this war – in its publication of selections from interviews  by the government-instituted Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) as part of its "Lessons Learned" project, as well as confidential emails from former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld — has attracted amazingly little notice in the reality show that characterizes contemporary American politics.  This not only demonstrates the short attention span of the news media, its failure to distinguish what is important from trivial entertainments in its infatuation with the horse race of electoral politics, but the lack of an antiwar movement to ensure public awareness. Despite important similarities, the release of these documents has not constituted a Pentagon Papers moment, but merely another episode in the normalization of war. … The Afghanistan Papers reveal an insider perspective on a failed war that has dragged on for 18 years.  Like the Pentagon Papers, these interviews and emails expose a long-term duplicitous policy that kept the truth from the American people and derailed any real accountability for the futility of the warmakers' efforts.  The futility of the war is amply demonstrated.  Like the Pentagon Papers, the Washington Post series also fails to understand the war in the context of an American imperial trajectory.  This, of course, is not to be expected of government operatives or mainstream media, but is the work of an authentic antiwar movement. [Read More]
 
The Real Modi: Do the Killings of Muslims Represent India's Kristallnacht?
---- On 9 to 10 November 1938 the German government encouraged its supporters to burn down synagogues and smash up Jewish homes, shops, businesses, schools. At least 91 Jews – and probably many more – were killed by Nazi supporters egged on by Joseph Goebbels, the minister for public enlightenment and propaganda, in what became known as Kristallnacht – "the Night of Broken Glass". It was a decisive staging post on the road to mass genocide. On 23 February 2020 in Delhi, Hindu nationalist mobs roamed the streets burning and looting mosques together with Muslim homes, shops and businesses. They killed or burned alive Muslims who could not escape and the victims were largely unprotected by the police. At least 37 people, almost all Muslims, were killed and many others beaten half to death: a two-year-old baby was stripped by a gang to see if he was circumcised – as Muslims usually are, but Hindus are not. Some Muslim women pretended to be Hindus in order to escape. Government complicity was not as direct as in Germany 82 years earlier, but activists of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, were reported as being in the forefront of the attacks on Muslims. [Read More]  For an excellent and in-depth article that explains the background to India's current crisis, read "India under the BJP's rule: The long fight against Modi's Hindu nationalist agenda" by Achin Vanaik, Solidarity [March 4, 2020] [Link]
 
Our History
How Did International Women's Day Start?
[FB – This brief history includes a fine video of International Women's Day celebrations around the world. Like so many Days we celebrate (May Day, Mother's Day), International Women's Day was begun by radicals in the USA.  A secret well-kept by our high school textbooks.]
---- The impetus for establishing an International Women's Day can be traced back to New York City in February 1908, when thousands of women who were garment workers went on strike and marched through the city to protest against their working conditions. "Like today, these women were in less organized workplaces [than their male counterparts], were in the lower echelons of the garment industry, and were working at low wages and experiencing sexual harassment," says Eileen Boris, Professor of Feminist Studies at the University of California Santa Barbara. [Read More]

Sunday, March 1, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Coronavirus and "Human Security"

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
March 1, 2020
 
Hello All – No nation on Earth spends more money and effort on military equipment and preparedness than the United States. But the worldwide coronavirus outbreak shows that there is more to "security" than guns and bombs. Money isn't everything, but where our government puts the taxpayers' dollars shows its priorities.  In the case of the coronavirus, what's relevant is how much money is spent on public health, on medical research, and on international programs to combat infectious diseases.
 
The Trump administration just released its proposed budget for the fiscal year that will begin next October.  It shows that our government plans to cut – drastically – many of the programs and agencies that would protect us from the corona virus.  For example:
 
  • The Centers for Disease Control would be cut by 16 percent;
  • Global Health Programs run by the State Department would be cut by $3 billion; and
  • Funding for the UN's World Health Organization would be cut by 53 percent.
 
The reduction of our country's "preparedness" to fight the coronavirus and other threats to the public's health illustrates the difference between "military security" and "human security."  Human security is a relatively new concert developed in and around the United Nations over the last several decades.  It prioritizes the 'security" of humans – of individuals – rather than nation states.  Its focus is on food security, shelter, education, health, environment, and human dignity.  Usually, human life and well being are in greater danger because of failures to safeguard "human security" rather than the weakness of "military security."  A good example is our healthcare system, where tens of thousands of people die prematurely each year because they lack adequate medical insurance, and thus access to good healthcare.
 
The trade-off between what we need to protect ourselves from the coronavirus and President Trump's priorities is evident in this week's debate about how to upgrade our public health system to deal with the virus.  Trump wants $2.5 billion for the coronavirus; medical experts say $8.5 billion is the minimum needed.  This sum is far less than the $11.5 billion asked for in Trump's latest budget for the border wall, family separation, and ICE deportations.  Priorities rule. [Read more on science & medical/military trade-offs here.)
 
Because the coronavirus is new, there are many things we do not know that we will know in a few months. But one thing we do know – from past experience – is the importance of prioritizing the science, not politics. Thus it is very dangerous that Trump is in full denial about the dangers of the coronavirus, that he is blaming media and the Democrats for this "hoax," and that he is attempting to make Vice President Pence the gate-keeper for information about the virus.  This is a recipe for disaster, and must be stopped.
 
Some useful reading on the coronavirus and "human security" - A short statement on "Why Human Security?" by Nobel-prize winner Amaratya Sen, one of the founders of the UN's work on this subject, can be read here. On the science of the coronavirus, CFOW's Betsy Todd posted a useful short advisory on her blog at the American Journal of Nursing. And this week Donald McNeil, Jr., the New York Times' reporter on epidemics, wrote "When an Epidemic Looms, Gagging Scientists is a Terrible Idea." [Link]. Trump's appointment of Vice President Pence to head his taskforce on the virus has prompted outrage and opposition, such as this Democracy Now! interview with author (of several books on epidemics) Laurie Garrett ("Pence is Not a Medical Expert") [Link]. Also useful is an article by Sharon Lerner at The Intercept, "Cronyism and Conflicts of Interest in Trump's Coronavirus Task Force" [Link].
 
Politics
As we head into Super Tuesday, Joe Biden's decisive win in South Carolina gives "moderates" and the Democratic Party leadership new hope that Bernie Sanders can be stopped from getting a majority of convention delegates via the primaries, thus allowing the  700+ "super delegates" – party leaders, etc. – to weigh in on a second round of this summer's convention voting.  How this stop-Sanders strategy would work was detailed this week in the New York Times ("Democratic Leaders Willing to Risk Party Damage to Stop Bernie Sanders") [Link] and in the social-democratic publication Jacobin ("Democratic Party Elites Are Ready to Steal the Nomination From Bernie Sanders. We Need a Plan to Stop Them") [Link]..The tensions in the looming showdown between the Sanders supporters and the Democratic Party leadership are captured in an article I like from Common Dreams, "Class War, the DNC, and the Fight for Our Lives" [Link].  According to this wonkish article from The New York Times, if Sanders can get the nomination, he will beat Trump: ""Here's the Math."
 
News Notes
Is the Afghanistan War finally nearing its end?  This week the USA and the Taliban signed an
agreement that would end the fighting; the US would withdraw its 14,000 troops within 14 months, 8,600 of them within 135 days. NATO's 17,000 noncombat troops would also withdraw within 14 months. Whether this agreement and subsequent negotiations between the Taliban and the Afghan government will actually bring peace is discussed in this good article from The Intercept.
 
In immigrations/refugee news, this week begins the implementation of the Trump administration's "public charge" rule, which requires that people seeking to immigrate to the United States show that they have money and are not likely to use social services like Medicaid or other government programs.  An article from the National Immigration Law Center calls this "a radical and grotesque attack on immigrant communities and US democracy" [Link]. Once here, however, migrants are no longer secure.  This week the Justice Department said they were taking a new look at a seldom-used law that would allow the government to "strip the citizenship" from naturalized citizens, though providing few details [Link].
 
On Monday, Israeli citizens go to the polls for the third time this year to see if they can elect a new government.  The first two elections resulted in neither of the leading parties able to assemble enough coalition partners to form a majority of the 120-seat Knesset; and a stalemate is also highly likely in Monday's balloting.  The inability to form a majority coalition is determined in part by the refusal of the "Jewish" parties to work with the Arab List, a coalition of formerly divided Arab-based parties that is now the third-largest party (15 seats) in the Knesset, and likely to win more on Monday.  Arab-Israeli citizens constitute about 20 percent of Israel's eligible  voting population, but are seldom included in US/media discussions of Israel's politics. Thus an interesting article from the Mondoweiss website this week, "'NY Times' ends its blackout, and recognizes Palestinian citizens are voting in Israel's election" [Link].
 
Things to Do/Coming Attractions
Sunday, March 1st – Westchester People for Bernie will hold an "informational rally" at the Mike Bloomberg for President headquarters, 140 Mamaroneck Ave. in White Plains, from 12 noon to 2:30 pm.  They write: "A peaceful, informational rally to educate Westchester voters. Let's have personal conversations about Bloomberg's track record, informing voters and electeds about what a Bloomberg candidacy means."  For more information, go here.
 
Saturday, March 6th – The next CFOW monthly meeting will be at the Hastings Community Center, 54 Main St, from 1:15 to 3 pm (following our weekly vigil).  At these meetings we review our work for the past month, make plans for the next month, and have general discussions.  Everyone is welcome at these meetings.  For more info, email fbrodhead@aol.com.
 
Thursday, March 12th – CFOW and CVI Voter will show the documentary film "Suppressed: The Fight to Vote" at the Hastings Community Center, 44 Main St. in Hastings, starting at 7 pm.  "Suppressed" is about Stacey Abrams' fight to be governor of Georgia, and how nefarious voter suppression tactics by the white party leadership led to her defeat.  For info about the film, go here.
 
Sunday, March 29th – The annual Westchester Social Forum will take place at the Eastview Middle School, 350 Main St. in White Plains, from 12 to 6 pm.  For more information (about workshops, etc.) and to register, go here.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
Let's start this week's Rewards off with a fabulous music video from The Killers, "Land of the Free." And I think you will also like some music from The Penguin Cafe Orchestra. For both, thanks to AW.
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THIS WEEK'S FEATURED ESSAYS
 
(Video) Catastrophic Humanitarian Crisis in Idlib as Syrian Troops Advance & Children Freeze to Death
From Democracy Now! [February 28, 2020]
---- In Syria, 33 Turkish soldiers were killed in an airstrike by Russia-backed Syrian forces in rebel-held Idlib in a major escalation on Thursday. Turkey has vowed to respond in kind, as U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres calls for an immediate ceasefire, saying "the risk of even greater escalation grows by the hour." Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan reportedly spoke by phone on Friday to discuss the crisis, as NATO urged rapid deescalation. The all-out offensive by the Syrian government is the single largest displacement in a nine-year war that has forced 13 million to flee and left hundreds of thousands dead. Since December alone, some 900,000 people, at least half of them children, have been displaced from northwestern Syria. As the humanitarian catastrophe deepens, aid workers are describing scenes of chaos and devastation on the ground, with families scrambling for shelter as temperatures fall below freezing. We speak with Avril Benoît, the executive director of MSF USA, or Doctors Without Borders USA. [See the Program]
 
How Democracy Ends: Not With a Bang But With a Whimper
By Karen J. Greenberg, TomDispatch [February 28, 2020]
---- In this fast-paced century, rife with technological innovation, we've grown accustomed to the impermanence of things. Whatever is here now will likely someday vanish, possibly sooner than we imagine. Movies and music that once played on our VCRs and stereos have given way to infinite choices in the cloud. Cash currency is fast becoming a thing of the past. Cars will soon enough be self-driving. Stores where you could touch and feel your purchases now lie empty as online shopping sucks up our retail attention. The ever-more-fleeting nature of our physical world has been propelled in the name of efficiency, access to ever more information, and improvement in the quality of life. Lately, however, a new form of impermanence has entered our American world, this time in the political realm, and it has arrived not gift-wrapped as progress but unpackaged as a profound setback for all to see. Longstanding democratic institutions, processes, and ideals are falling by the wayside at a daunting rate and what's happening is often barely noticed or disparaged as nothing but a set of passing problems. Viewed as a whole, however, such changes suggest that we're watching democracy disappear, bit by bit. [Read More]
 
Delhi Is On Fire, and My Kashmiri Parents Are in Prison
By Ahmed bin Qasim, The Nation [February 27, 2020]
---- I've been watching the images of bloodshed and targeted attacks against Indian Muslims breaking out on the streets of Delhi. The role of the police in precipitating violence in Delhi and the detention spree in Kashmir since August 5, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi revoked the region's nominal autonomous status, has laid bare a glaring truth: The Indian government is willing to use any means to crack down on dissent. For as long as I can remember, my father has suffered under the Indian state. I've seen him in the guise of a prisoner all my life. It's hard for me to even conjure him as a free man. On February 5, he completed his 27th year of imprisonment. I'm 20 years old. In his absence, my mother raised me. But I haven't seen her for two years. Both my parents are in solitary confinement, in two different jails. … Violence is the natural state of the Indian government's rule in Kashmir. The individual liberty of every Kashmiri comes into conflict with the national integrity of India. The Indian state's plan of action in Kashmir is simple: crush every form of dissent and increase the cost of resistance. By compelling the people to choose between survival and resistance, the Indian government thinks it can subdue Kashmiri political aspirations. What it does not realize is that for many Kashmiris, resistance is survival. [Read More]  For more on India's chaos, read "Who Will Douse Delhi's Flames?" by [Link]
 
Free Julian Assange!
By Charles Glass, The Nation [February 25, 2020]
---- If WikiLeaks did not exist, the public would know much less than it does about what government and politicians are doing in its name. When a 35-year-old Australian named Julian Assange launched WikiLeaks with a few like-minded friends in 2006, he little knew what exposing malfeasance would cost him. The WikiLeaks model was simple: provide a safe repository for documents showing state and corporate wrongdoing while guaranteeing anonymity for the leaker. … The criminals who perpetrated war crimes revealed in their own communications documented and made public by WikiLeaks did not want you to know about them. Nor do they want you to know about those they commit in the future. To conceal the truth, they will put the truth-teller in an oubliette where he will never again discover and reveal anything. By depriving Julian Assange of his freedom and thus intimidating his journalistic colleagues, US and UK prosecutors are abetting criminality by spies, secret policemen, torturers, and kleptocrats everywhere. [Read More] For some information about Assange's extradition hearing last week, read "Assange's Extradition Hearing Reveals Trump's War on Free Press Is Targeting WikiLeaks Publisher" by Nozomi Hayase, Common Dreams [Link] and from the notes of Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola, who was also at the hearing [Link].
 
 
 
Our History
Making the [Vietnam] Memorial
By Maya Lin, New York Review of Books [November 2, 2000]
[FB – 40 years ago, the USA decided to build a memorial for the US soldiers who had died in the Vietnam War.  Choosing a design, of course, was controversial: What was there to be said about the war, if anything, beyond the fact that more than 50,000 Americans had died?  The winning design was that of Maya Lin, an undergraduate at Yale University.  Her Asian background and her youth were enfolded into the larger debate over the design itself.  Twenty years ago, Maya Lin spoke/wrote for the first time about her experience in designing the memorial and the controversy that ensued.  She wrote: "It's taken me years to be able to discuss the making of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, partly because I needed to move past it and partly because I had forgotten the process of getting it built. I would not discuss the controversy surrounding its construction and it wasn't until I saw the documentary "Maya Lin: A Strong Clear Vision" [Link] that I was able to remember that time in my life. But I wrote the body of this essay just as the memorial was being completed—in the fall of 1982. Then I put it away…until now."]
---- On a personal level, I wanted to focus on the nature of accepting and coming to terms with a loved one's death. Simple as it may seem, I remember feeling that accepting a person's death is the first step in being able to overcome that loss…. What then would bring back the memory of a person? A specific object or image would be limiting. A realistic sculpture would be only one interpretation of that time. I wanted something that all people could relate to on a personal level. At this time I had as yet no form, no specific artistic image. The use of names was a way to bring back everything someone could remember about a person. The strength in a name is something that has always made me wonder at the "abstraction" of the design; the ability of a name to bring back every single memory you have of that per-son is far more realistic and specific and much more comprehensive than a still photograph, which captures a specific moment in time or a single event or a generalized image that may or may not be moving for all who have connections to that time. [Read More]