Monday, October 12, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on War and the Threat of War

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
October 12, 2020
 
Hello All – Just three weeks before Election Day, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has a commanding lead over President Trump. While there are credible fears that Trump will somehow steal the election, his ability to do so will be weakened if it appears that he has lost the popular vote in a landslide.  What can he do to save himself? None of the themes that Trump has tried to use to rally his base seem to gain him much traction: "law and order" and the "Marxist threat" are weak counters to the Covid-19 pandemic and economic chaos, and the Republicans in Congress appear unwilling to toss voters a stimulus bone or a $1,200 check in the mail.
 
As Michael Klare describes in his Nation magazine article linked below, a timely war may be Trump's last straw to clutch. Klare states that "it would be surprisingly easy for Trump to ignite a war" with China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, because "the Pentagon has adopted an offensive stance toward all four of those putative adversaries."  Indeed, we have been lucky so far that an "accident" has not already sparked a conflict with these countries, as Pentagon forces conduct intimidating military exercises on their doorsteps.  If Trump were seeking a wag-the-dog conflict to divert attention from his many policy failures and rally the voters around the flag, he could raise the odds that this would happen by pressing the Pentagon to be still more aggressive in one or more of these regions.
 
Needless to say, defeating Trump next month will not end the threat of (more) war.  Vice President Biden has surrounded himself with a hawkish foreign policy team largely inherited from the aggressive militarism of Clinton and Obama.  (See here and here.)   But this is a fight that we will begin on January 21, 2021; right now our goal is to remove Trump.
 
News Notes
While many towns, cities, and states are celebrating Indigenous Peoples' Day today, almost all of Westchester and New York continues to honor Columbus Day.  It's an interesting question why "progressive" New York lags behind so much of the country, especially as we have a rich and relatively well-known indigenous history and continuing Native American presence to draw on.  The Zinn Education Project has assembled a teaching package for Indigenous Peoples' Day; check it out. For some background on how we ended up with Columbus Day in the first place, check out "The Invention of Christopher Columbus, American Hero" [Link] and "It's Time for Italian Americans to Give Up on Columbus" [Link].
 
Last weekend in Denver a Trump supporter was shot and killed by a newspaper reporter's bodyguard when the Trump supporter attacked him.  This tragedy is being framed on-line as the responsibility of an Antifa member, which is not true.  The Intercept has a useful article today.
 
Arundhati Roy is one of our bravest and best writer/reporters.  What we read of hers in "the West" is usually big-picture, framed for our limited understanding of India.  For that reason, I found especially interesting her article in an Indian publication, Scroll, about "two conspiracies and a creation."  It dramatizes in some detail the chaos now engulfing India
 
Not least of the sins of the Trump administration has been its attack on basic science and medicine.  In the 21st century, in a so-called Advanced Country, this is simply frightening.  Last  week the leading science and medical journals wrote eloquent pleas that we vote out the Trump administration.  Check out powerful statements from The New England Journal of Medicine and Scientific American.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 6 to 6:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
WAR AND THE THREAT OF WAR
An October Surprise of a Military Kind
By Michael T. Klare, The Nation [October 12, 2020]
---- With Joe Biden leading in the polls and President Trump's attempts to avoid addressing the Covid danger now undermined by his own encounter with the virus, the White House is scrambling for a new line of attack on his opponent. Trump's attempt to use "law and order" as a wedge in suburban areas has clearly failed, and his drive to shoehorn the Supreme Court appointment of Amy Coney Barrett is at risk because of Covid infections among key Senate Republicans. What remains, then, as a last-minute game-changer? Knowing Trump's impulsive nature, we cannot rule out war as a possible option. … The fact is, it would be surprisingly easy for Trump to ignite a war. That's because the Pentagon has adopted an offensive stance toward all four of those putative adversaries. At this very moment, American aircraft carriers with their accompanying cruisers and destroyers are patrolling in the vicinity of Iran, China, and North Korea, while other US warships are deployed in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic. It would not be difficult, in those highly contested areas, to provoke a deadly incident, allowing Trump to order retaliatory strikes and commence the process of escalation. There are many locales on the borders of Eurasia where such a confrontation might occur. Here is a brief survey of the five most likely sites. [Read More]
 
How the United States Could End the War in Yemen
By Edward Hunt, The Progressive [September 15, 2020]
---- [On September 11th], former U.S. official Bruce Riedel told the House Intelligence Committee that the United States could take immediate action to end Saudi Arabia's brutal war in Yemen, where an estimated 100,000 people have died since the war began in 2015. Riedel, a senior fellow and director at the Brookings Institution, formerly spent thirty years working for the Central Intelligence Agency. He has served as a senior adviser to the last four U.S. Presidents. President Donald Trump vetoed resolutions passed by Congress in 2019 to end U.S. involvement in the war and block U.S. arms sales to Gulf nations, continuing U.S. support for the Saudi-led military operation. In his September 11, 2020, appearance before Congress, Riedel said that "only the United States of America and to a lesser extent the United Kingdom continue to provide the kind of support that allows this war to go on." … If the United States and United Kingdom cut off logistics support, he said, the Royal Saudi Air Force would be grounded and unable to operate. "That's how much influence we have over them," Riedel said. "That's how much responsibility we have." [Read More]
 
How can Americans support peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?
By Nicolas J.S. Davies, ZNet [October 11, 2020]
---- With so much of the world afflicted by 20 years of U.S.-led wars and the resulting political, humanitarian and refugee crises, we can't afford not to pay attention to the dangerous new outbreak of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenia and Azerbaijan fought a bloody war over Nagorno-Karabakh from 1988 to 1994, by the end of which at least 30,000 people had been killed and a million or more had fled or been driven out of their homes. By 1994, Armenian forces had occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding districts, all internationally recognized as parts of Azerbaijan. But now the war has flared up again, hundreds of people have been killed, and both sides are shelling civilian targets and terrorizing each other's civilian populations. … The greatest danger is that either Turkey, Russia, the U.S. or Iran should see some geopolitical advantage in escalating or becoming more involved in this conflict. [Read More].  For more on this new and dangerous conflict, read "War has broken out on the edge of Europe. What's behind it?" b[Link] and "Captive of the Caucasus: The Long War Over Nagorno-Karabakh" by Viken Berberian, The Nation [October 8, 2020] [Link].
 
With Crushing sanctions on 18 Iranian Banks, is Trump trying to leave a War behind for Biden?
---- As the dying Trump administration, literally on a sickbed, contemplates losing power, its hawks are lashing out at Iran in an attempt to ensure that the 2015 international nuclear deal is dead and buried, and that the US and Iran remain on a war footing. Trump's two main allies in the Middle East, Binyamin Netanyahu of Israel and Mohammed Bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, want at the least a rollback of Iranian influence in the region and at best regime change. They are small countries and have no hope of accomplishing the latter. Only a US war on Iran, repeating the 2003 invasion of Iraq could reliably change the regime and end the country's civilian nuclear energy program. The US Treasury Department has blocked financial transactions of 18 Iranian banks, and threatened anyone who does business with them with third party sanctions. This means that if a small French firm wanted to sell toasters to Iran, it can't use these banks to do so. There really aren't any banks left in Iran that aren't sanctioned by the Trump administration. So the message is to Europe, don't trade with Iran. This policy is unilateral and is ordered by one man, Trump. Congress has passed no such law. The United Nations Security Council is against these sanctions. [Read More] Also useful is "The undeniable cruelty of Trump's 'maximum pressure' on Iran" by Tyler Cullis, Responsible Statecraft [October 8, 2020] [Link].
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Getting to Freedom City [Los Angeles in the 1960s]
By Robin D. G. Kelley, Boston Review [October 7, 2020]
---- My mother had fled to LA in search of peace, but instead she found a war zone. Six years after the Watts rebellion, the police patrolled the streets of South LA like a victorious occupying army. But as Mike Davis and Jon Wiener make clear in their monumental new book, Set the Night on Fire: LA in the Sixties, the police under Mayor Sam Yorty treated the entire city like it was under siege. "No other major city outside of the Deep South," they write, "was subjected to such a fanatic and all-encompassing campaign to police space and control the night. Along with minorities, many young whites were also routinely victimized, leading hatred of the LAPD to grow into a common culture of resistance." When cops terrorized middle-class white kids for roaming Sunset Strip at night, their cries of "Free the Strip" quickly evolved into "All Power to the People" and "No More Murder of Black People." The image that lured my mother and millions like her to the City of Angels was painted by racial segregation, patriarchy, sexual norms, classism, and an iron fist used to crush dissent. And yet, the pervasiveness of state violence is not the whole story—it may not even be the main one. Set the Night on Fire is, above all, a historical account of how a rainbow of insurgent social movements tried to peel back the glitter, dismantle the police state, and replace elite white rule and its regimes of segregation, militarism, patriarchy, and conformity with a society oriented toward "serving the people." These social movements imagined a revolutionary culture of care, one that met all basic needs, that eliminated racism, patriarchy, and poverty, and that democratized knowledge and power. Diverse and complex, these movements entangled with one another as allies, affiliates, and adversaries. [Read More]
 
The Unprecedented and Illegal Campaign to Eliminate Julian Assange
By Charles Glass, The Intercept [October 6, 2020]
---- Over the 17 days of Julian Assange's extradition hearing in London, prosecutors succeeded in proving both crimes and conspiracy. The culprit, however, was not Assange. Instead, the lawbreakers and conspirators turned out to be the British and American governments. Witness after witness detailed illegal measures to violate Assange's right to a fair trial, destroy his health, assassinate his character, and imprison him in solitary confinement for the rest of his life. Courtroom evidence exposed illegality on an unprecedented scale by America's and Britain's intelligence, military, police, and judicial agencies to eliminate Assange. … Barristers for the prosecution and defense have one month to submit closing arguments in writing to Baraitser, the magistrate, who will render her verdict on January 4. An impartial tribunal would have no option but to exonerate Assange — but fairness has not thus far featured in proceedings with the prosecution's 10-year head start on the defense; the inability of Assange's solicitor, Jennifer Robinson, to confer with him for six months; and the prosecution's possession of his confidential lawyer-client documents and transcripts of his conversations with his advocates in heavy-handed violation of the law. [Read More] Also interesting/useful is "Julian Assange's Prosecution for Publishing Leaked Government Documents Is an Extremely Dangerous Precedent," an interview with Kevin Gosztola, Jacobin Magazine [October 2020] [Link].  Gosztola reported daily during the 17 days of the trial.
 
A Reckoning Inside the Domestic-Violence Movement
By Zoƫ Carpenter, The Nation [October 7, 2020]
[FB – This is why "defund the police" is such an important issue.  An excellent analysis, imo.]
---- Domestic abuse presents a deadly threat to millions of people across America. But as concerns about police misconduct grow, feminists are reconsidering the costs of criminalization. For the past four decades, a dominant project for American feminists has been getting the police and the legal system to respond seriously to the crisis of domestic violence. More than 10 million people in the US are abused by their partners each year. One in four women will be pushed, slapped, beaten, burned, strangled, or otherwise harmed by an intimate partner during her lifetime. Nearly half of the women who are murdered in the US each year are killed by a romantic partner. Until the 1970s, police and the legal system largely treated this kind of violence as a family issue best resolved quietly at home. As feminists worked to bring the problem into the public sphere, many advocates focused on toughening penalties for abusers and standardizing the way law enforcement responded to complaints. Jurisdictions around the country now have laws intended to ensure an aggressive law enforcement response, including laws that require police to make an arrest in response to a credible allegation and no-drop policies that force prosecutors to continue a case even without cooperation from witnesses.  Today the anti-violence movement is in the midst of a painful reckoning with the collateral damage of this approach. Stricter criminal penalties have protected some survivors, but they've also led to the arrest and prosecution of others and contributed to a ballooning prison population that is disproportionately made up of men and women of color. [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
Trump's Overhaul of Immigration Is Worse Than You Think
Editorial, New York Times [October 10, 2020]
---- Through administrative orders, strict enforcement and mere threat, the White House has attacked virtually every aspect of immigration, legal and illegal. This transformation of the American immigration system has been perhaps the administration's boldest accomplishment, overseen with single-minded focus by Stephen Miller, a top adviser to President Trump with an affinity for white nationalism. A report this summer from the Migration Policy Institute outlined over 400 actions on immigration that had been enacted by a sprawling array of federal departments in the Trump era. The effects are clear. Between 2016 and 2019, annual net immigration into the United States fell by almost half, to about 600,000 people per year — a level not seen since the 1980s. …  But rolling back other measures will be difficult. "There's so much change that has happened in the last four years, there's no way a new administration could reverse things in four or even eight years," said Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute who was a co-author of the group's July report. [Read More]
 
Trump Needs Accomplices at Every Level of Government to Pull Off a Coup
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [October 4, 2020]
---- For months, Donald Trump has been mounting a preemptive strike against the democratic election process. He signals his intent to manipulate — indeed, steal — the presidential election in the event that Joe Biden wins. With no evidence to support him, Trump repeats the mantra "voter fraud" to lay the groundwork for political, legal and extra-legal challenges to a Biden victory. … The prospects for a peaceful transition to a Biden administration if Trump is in charge are dubious. Ian Bassin, executive director of Protect Democracy, is optimistic, however. "For those worried that Donald Trump could single-handedly defy the election results and hold on to power, fear not — he cannot do that," Bassin wrote in an email to Truthout. "In order to do that, he'd need accomplices at every level, throughout the country — in the executive branch, in the Congress, in the courts, in state legislatures, in the media." But a landslide in favor of Biden could make potential accomplices feel less confident in supporting Trump if he were to claim that the results are ambiguous or fraudulent. Voting is absolutely critical for democracy. But at the end of the day, stopping a coup attempt will depend on far more than the ballot, and will require creative and courageous acts of civic and political engagement from all of us. Let's get to it! [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Despite ambiguity in international law, Palestinians are winning the 'legitimacy war' [An interview with former UN Rapporteur Richard Falk]
---- 'International law' remains one of the most discussed terms in the context of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. It is almost always present, whether the discussion pertains to the Israeli wars and siege on Gaza, the expansion of illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank or the encroaching apartheid throughout Israel and the Occupied Territories. Despite the importance and relevance of the term, however, it rarely translates into anything tangible. The Israeli siege on Gaza, for example, has continued, unabated, for nearly 14 years, without international law serving as a protector of Palestinian civilians against Israeli violations of human rights. More recently, on September 13, the Israeli government approved 1,000 illegal settlement units in the West Bank, in stark violation of international law. It is likely that Israel will go ahead with it, anyway. With regard to violating international law, Israel is in a unique category of its own, for Israel's behavior is always governed by its military strength and the backing of its Western allies. To gain more insight into the relationship between international law, conflict resolution and accountability, I spoke with Professor Richard Falk, one of the world's leading experts on international law and former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights. [Read More] Also of interest is "Israel to massively expand settlements after UAE normalization" by Tamara Nassar, Electronic Intifada [October 9, 2020] [Link].
 
OUR HISTORY
The Day Nuclear War Almost Broke Out
By Elizabeth Kolbert, The New Yorker [October 5, 2020]
[FB – This is a review of Gambling with Armageddon: Nuclear Roulette from Hiroshima to the Cuban Missile Crisis, by Martin Sherwin, and a meditation on the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962.  At that time I was a sophomore at Wesleyan, and the tiny antiwar demo of our peace group was overwhelmed by a mob of students supporting war.  They almost got their wish, and war was avoided by luck and the brave actions of a Soviet submarine crew, as this story tells.]
----In the nearly sixty years since the Cuban missile crisis, the story of near-catastrophe has only grown more complicated. What lessons can we draw from such a close call? Sherwin summarizes the "official" narrative of the "thirteen days" as follows. Members of ExComm, through "their careful consideration of the challenge, their firmness in the face of terrifying danger, and their wise counsel," steered the world to a peaceful resolution of a potentially civilization-ending conflict. Nothing, he writes, "could be further from the truth." The guidance J.F.K. received was, for the most part, lousy. Some of it was loony. Had he heeded ExComm's "wise counsel," chances are I would not be writing this, or you reading it. As the President told a friend not long after the crisis ended, "You have no idea how much bad advice I had in those days." [Read More]
 
What activists who fought the AIDS crisis can teach us about organizing during a pandemic
By Loretta Graceffo, Waging Nonviolence [October 10, 2020]
---- For Avram Finklestein, a 68-year-old artist and activist who lives in Brooklyn, witnessing the U.S. government stand by as the death toll climbs to over 200,000 is especially painful. As a survivor of the AIDS crisis, the current pandemic has been what he calls "a revisitation of suffering that can only be triggered by America at its most cruel." At the height of the AIDS epidemic, Finklestein was galvanized into action by the death of his partner, Don. In 1987, Finklestein helped found the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, or ACT UP, a grassroots direct action group advocating for AIDS research, treatment and policy change. "We were fighting for our lives first," he said. "It was a moment that was enraging, terrifying, solidifying." … Lawyer Terry McGovern, who has spent much of her life providing legal advocacy for low-income HIV positive individuals, describes the U.S. government's catastrophic response to COVID-19 as "completely predictable." "So many times throughout this whole experience, I thought about those early days of AIDS," she said. [Read More]

Monday, October 5, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on Election 2020 and Election Protection

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
October 5, 2020
 
Hello All – We have been warned.  Repeatedly. For months, President Trump has stated that whether or not he leaves office depends on his view of the legitimacy of the November 3 election, and a "legitimate" election is one that he wins.  And if an illegitimate election produces an apparent victory for Joe Biden, President Trump has vowed to fight this, both through the courts and, if necessary, by circling the wagons and refusing to leave office. What to do?
 
Newsletter articles linked below walk us through the first two steps in preventing a Trump election coup d'Ć©tat.  The first reminds us that a decisive win of the popular vote, as well as the electoral vote, is key.  Wracking up a strong lead in the popular vote by late night on November 3rd will narrow Trump's options in declaring the election illegitimate.  That means that voting early, as well as voting in person on November 3rd, has an extra importance.  And that also means that a huge turnout in Blue states, way beyond what is necessary to win that state's electoral votes, carries significance in legitimizing a Biden win.
 
A second newsletter article reminds us that, given the significance of mailed-in ballots in this election, the late-night scoreboard on November 3rd is not the end of the story.  In fact, Nation writer Joan Walsh urges us to think about "Election Month," not "Election Day."  A common scenario for the November 3rd election is that Trump will show a lead in the popular vote and electoral votes at midnight on November 3rd, because polls show that far more Democrats than Republicans plan to vote by mail.  And, given polling showing Biden is now ahead, a reasonable expectation is that, even if Trump is ahead in the popular vote and electoral votes on election night, this result will be turned around once the mail-in votes are counted.
 
If Trump's plan is to claim the mailed-in ballots are illegitimate, he may find support from the Courts and from many Republican-controlled state legislatures.  Several scenarios suggest that states could send a Republican slate of presidential electors to Congress despite the apparent capture of the popular vote by Biden. In addition to following the guidance of steps 1 and 2 above, therefore, we must expect a sustained struggle that will ensue in the Courts and in the streets between November 3rd and January 20th.  Useful guides to how this struggle might develop include those of Frances Fox Piven and Deepak Bhargave, Sasha Abramsky, and (video) George Lakey.
 
In addition to working for a huge voter turnout and counseling patience/reminding ourselves and others that "Election Month" means a month of vigilance and action, what else we might do is a work-in-progress.  One idea is to organize supporters of Biden to gather at any polling places that might be threatened by Trump supporters/White Supremacists who plan to intimidate voters, esp. people of color. The president of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law speaks about this here. A few weeks ago a band of Trump supporters attempted to intimidate early voters in Virginia. While this seems unlikely in the Rivertowns, we have had several Trump truck/car caravans, and so we are not immune from White Supremacist manifestations.
 
Finally, a group called The Election Defenders is offering several on-line trainings for useful things to do on November 3rd; learn more and if interested sign-up here. And several of us in CFOW are interested in the group Protect the Results, which is holding a two-session direct-action training (Zoom) starting Wednesday, October 7th [register here]. Let's get ready to get ready!
 
News Notes
Last week Columbia College undergraduates voted overwhelmingly to divest from companies that profit from or engage in the State of Israel's acts towards Palestinians under "apartheid" law. The university's president Lee Bollinger promptly repudiated the vote saying it was a "complex" issue on which no campus consensus exists. A similar vote was conducted recently at University of Illinois [Urbana Champaign].  Mondoweiss's Philiip Weiss interviewed Columbia's Rashid Khalidi, the Edward Said Professor of Modern Arab Studies, who explains what was going on and its significance. [Link].
 
As reported by our military affairs expert Phyllis Bennis, the Trump Pentagon diverted $1 billion in stimulus funds that were supposed to go towards making masks and other protective equipment for the pandemic — and gave most of it to weapons manufacturers.  Read more here.
 
This week marks the two-year anniversary of Saudi journalist (and Washington Post writer) Jamal Khashoggi.  Despite an avalanche of denials, it is clear that the order to murder Khashoggi came from the top of the Saudi government.  This Democracy Now! report introduces a new documentary (and its director) that explores the background to Khashoggi, and casts light on why he was killed.
 
Last June a Black Lives Matter demonstration in the Mott Haven neighborhood of the Bronx resulted in the arrest of 236 people, with at least 61 people injured at the hands of the police.  This week the police riot was illuminated by a report from Human Rights Watch.  The report makes it clear that the police action was both unjust/illegal and stupid/sadistic. "The police response to the peaceful Mott Haven protest was intentional, planned, and unjustified," the report concluded. "The protest was peaceful until the police responded with violence."
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 6 to 6:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
We need some happy music this week. We haven't heard from Stephanie Trick in quite a while, so here she is with her husband, Paolo Alderighi, in "The World is Waiting for the Sunrise." And here she plays Scott Joplin's 'The Entertainer" in stride-style.  And finally, here she plays James P. Johnson's "Carolina Shout."  There's lots more of her on-line; enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
ELECTION 2020
Stop Trump from Stealing the Election: An Activist's Checklist for Winning the Election
By John W. Lawrence, ZNet [October 4, 2020]
---- Beating Trump in 2020 is going to take a massive organizing effort. This is not an ordinary election. According to reporter Greg Palast, Republicans are trying to steal the election. They are implementing a slew of voter suppression strategies. That is, they are trying to prevent people likely to vote for Biden, people of color and young people, from voting. In addition, they are working to make sure Democratic votes are undercounted. For example, in a recent court ruling, a federal judge stated Postmaster General Louis DeJoy was engaging in "an intentional effort on the part of the current Administration to disrupt and challenge the legitimacy of upcoming local, state, and federal elections." In the swing states, the Republicans only need to suppress a small percentage of votes to win the election. Below are the steps progressive activists need to take to beat Trump and the Republicans. [Read More]
 
Get Ready for Election Month 2020: We won't know on November 3 who won the White House.
By Joan Walsh, The Nation [October 1, 2020]
---- Get ready for much, much worse in November. If the networks and the mainstream newspapers cling to the outdated model of trying to call races on election night, we are headed for a presidential legitimacy crisis—regardless of who wins, but especially if Trump loses. The Covid-19 pandemic has inspired dozens of states to expand vote-by-mail options, with many others offering a choice of early voting, voting by mail, or absentee ballots, along with traditional Election Day voting. Some experts estimate that the number of ballots cast by mail could be double what it was in 2016. Meanwhile, polls say many races are currently dead heats. There could be many more tight races, protracted recounts, and more emphasis on slower-to-count absentee or mail-in ballots than ever before. … While there are many groups working overtime to ensure ballot access at the federal and local levels, some are also working to persuade the media to take a longer view in its election coverage. [Read More]
 
Trump's Turn From Immigration to the Enemy Within
By Ryan Devereaux, The Intercept [October 3, 2020]
---- Listening to Donald Trump describe the U.S. in 2016 was to hear a story of a nation in peril of losing its identity to waves of brown-skinned invaders. Immigration and the border, particularly the urgent need to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico, dominated Trump's campaign rhetoric. Once in office, the president's top immigration adviser, Stephen Miller, rammed through one punishing initiative after another, banning travelers from Muslim-majority countries, separating immigrant children from their parents to deter others from making the journey north, forcing tens of thousands of asylum-seekers to wait out their cases in the border's most dangerous cities, and plowing through protected lands to stand up towering new sections of border wall. Today, asylum at the border is effectively dead, and Trump's Department of Homeland Security is using the coronavirus as a pretext to boot immigrants out of the country — including families, children, and babies — as swiftly as possible. So it may have come as a surprise to some that immigration hardly came up at all in the first presidential debate of 2020. …But with those efforts simultaneously in motion, the Trump administration has increasingly and prominently centered purported threats posed by leftists, anarchists, and anti-fascists in its bid to hold onto power.  [Read More]
 
Trump's Praetorian Guard [The military and the militias]
By Jonathan Stevenson, New York Review of Books [October 22, 2020 Issue]
---- President Trump is attempting to turn "law and order versus anarchy" into an election issue that will distract voters from the White House's incompetence in dealing with Covid-19 and the economic consequences of the pandemic, and provide cover for its perpetuation of systemic racial injustice. He has sent armed federal agents into majority-Democratic cities on the pretext of quelling unrest stemming from Black Lives Matter protests. At the same time, he appears to be encouraging his supporters to sow chaos in Democratic cities in order to create an excuse for redeploying federal forces and to reinforce fears of disorder. Trump's first martial response to the protests, which have been overwhelmingly though not exclusively peaceful, was to use the active-duty military. … After the Lafayette Square incident, senior US military officers, both retired and active, made it clear that they do not believe the military should intervene against protesters and that present conditions do not warrant military involvement to ensure public safety and order. … However, with the help of Barr—a leading proponent of the crypto-monarchist "unitary executive" theory of presidential power—Trump has forged a detour around the military's principled disengagement through the Department of Homeland Security's statutory mandate to "protect the buildings, grounds, and property that are owned, occupied, or secured by the Federal Government…. Trump has not only made "law and order" the centerpiece of his reelection campaign and the DHS its vanguard. He has also tried to muster a kind of praetorian guard for himself, composed mainly of government loyalists rounded out, it seems, by sympathetic mercenaries. Its evident purpose is not to maintain order and the rule of law through conventional policing but rather to support his presidency with the use of extralegal paramilitary tactics in American cities. [Read More]
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
(Video) A Message from the Future II: The Years of Repair
By Naomi Klein, The Intercept [October 1 2020]
---- Do we even have a right to be hopeful? With political and ecological fires raging all around, is it irresponsible to imagine a future world radically better than our own? A world without prisons? Of beautiful, green public housing? Of buried border walls? Of healed ecosystems? A world where governments fear the people instead of the other way around? These are questions we wrestled with as we conceived of a sequel to last year's Emmy-nominated short, "A Message From the Future with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez." The first film, co-written by the congresswoman and illustrated by Molly Crabapple, was set in a can-do, cli-fi future: one in which bold, progressive politicians joined with grassroots movements to launch the "Decade of the Green New Deal," battling poverty, injustice, and climate disruption all at the same time. The film touched a nerve and ended up being viewed more than 12 million times, convincing our little team of the need for more art that departs from well-worn apocalyptic scripts. Then Covid-19 hit. [Read more and see the 8-minute video]
 
here.  IMO, the journalists raise many interesting points about things there were NOT said as well as what was said. Also of interest is an Intercept podcast ("Deconstructed") with Ryan Grim and Kevin Gosztola, in which they assess the dangers to press freedom threatened by a successful prosecution of Assange. 
Why We're on a Long Road to COVID-19 Immunity Even With Vaccines
By Prabir Purkayastha, ZNet [October 3, 2020]
---- As the pandemic continues to spread throughout the world, many countries seem to have given up the fight against COVID-19 and are now waiting for a vaccine to protect against the virus. With cases exceeding 32 million, and more than a million dead, the world economy has taken a bigger hit than at any other time since the end of the Great Depression of 1929-39. … Normally, vaccine development and testing take from five to ten years, so it would be a significant achievement if we succeed in making effective vaccines available by the end of 2020 or early 2021. The progress so far also shows that we have the scientific capacity to develop a large number of vaccines for infectious diseases. The reason we have not done so for diseases other than COVID-19 is that such infectious diseases were thought to be the diseases of poor countries, and do not provide enough profits for global big pharma to invest in vaccines against infectious diseases. It required a public health emergency in the rich countries for vaccine development to take a front seat in medical science again. [Read More]
 
For some perspectives on Trump & Covid - (Video) "After Recklessness, a Coronavirus Outbreak at the White House; Will Admin Cover Up or Contract Trace?" from Democracy Now! [October 5, 2020] [Link]; and (Video) "Naomi Klein: I Fear Trump Will Exploit His COVID Infection to Further Destabilize the Election," from Democracy Now! [October 2, 2020] [Link].
 
By Robert Klemko and Greg Jaffe, Washington Post [October 3, 2020] 
[FB – I was fascinated by this story.  It presents a totally different picture from what I thought was going on the night of the murders in Kenosha. More like an Errol Morris film than a mere newspaper report. Check it out.]
---- Anti-police-brutality demonstrators were converging on Kenosha from all over Wisconsin for a second night of marches. An armed right-wing group had put out a call for "patriots willing to take up arms and defend [our] City tonight from the evil thugs." Joseph Rosenbaum — depressed, homeless and alone — didn't belong to either side. He had spent most of his adult life in prison for sexual conduct with children when he was 18 and struggled with bipolar disorder. That day, Aug. 25, Rosenbaum was discharged from a Milwaukee hospital following his second suicide attempt in as many months and dumped on the streets of Kenosha. His confrontation hours later with Kyle Rittenhouse, a heavily armed teenager who had answered the call for "patriots," kicked off a chain of violence — the deadliest of the summer — that left Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, dead. … The real story of the Kenosha shootings offers a different view of the sometimes-chaotic protests and counterprotests that have shaken American cities this summer. The confrontation between Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum, and the bloodshed that followed, was more accidental than political — the product of anger, alienation and a tragic, chance encounter between a mentally ill man and a heavily armed teenager. [Read More]
 
THE CLIMATE CRISIS
Top US Scientist: A Second Trump Term Would be 'Game Over' for the Climate
By Mark Hertsgaard, The Guardian [UK] [October 2, 2020]
---- Michael Mann, one of the most eminent climate scientists in the world, believes averting climate catastrophe on a global scale would be "essentially impossible" if Donald Trump is re-elected. … "If we are going to avert ever more catastrophic climate change impacts, we need to limit warming below a degree and a half Celsius, a little less than three degrees Fahrenheit," Mann said. "Another four years of what we've seen under Trump, which is to outsource environmental and energy policy to the polluters and dismantle protections put in place by the previous administration … would make that essentially impossible." … "The future of this planet is now in the hands of American citizens," he says. "It's up to us. The way we end this national and global nightmare is by coming out and voting for optimism over pessimism, for hope and justice and progress over fear and malice and superstition. This is a Tolkienesque battle between good and evil, and Sauron needs to be defeated on election day here in the United States." [Read More]
 
Also useful/interesting about the crisis  - (Video) "Kate Aronoff: The Climate Crisis Can't Take 4 More Years of Trump. We Must Push Biden from the Left," from Democracy Now! [September 30, 2020] [See the Program]; and "Climate Disasters Are Leaving Families With Nowhere to Go" by ZoĆ« Carpenter, The Nation [September 25, 2020] [Link].
 
OUR HISTORY
Antifa and America's Revamped Red Scare [Red Scares then and now]
By Patrick Strickland, Aljazeera [September 29, 2020]
---- Throughout the 2016 presidential election campaign and since Donald Trump came to office in January 2017, a resurgent far-right has sparked in response a revived anti-fascist movement. On August 12, 2017, thousands of white nationalists and neo-Nazis descended on Charlottesville, Virginia, where they protested against the city's decision to remove a Confederate statue. Throughout the day, the far-right protesters attacked locals and counterdemonstrators and clashed with anti-fascists. By the end of the day, a far-right marcher named James Alex Fields Jr had rammed his car into a crowd of anti-racist counter-demonstrators, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer and injuring dozens. … Although the rhetoric over anti-fascists has turned increasingly fiery, research consistently suggests that far-right violence remains the most dominant domestic "terror" threat in the country. … Neither an organisation nor a group, Antifa is both an ideology and a decentralised movement that includes people from across the left – anarchists, communists, and socialists, among others – fighting back against the rise of the far right. Anti-fascists engage in a wide range of activism – public education, protests, and monitoring the far right, for instance – but it is the movement's willingness to use direct confrontation and to damage property that has captured much of the public's attention. [Read More]
 
Twenty Years After the Second Intifada, the Israeli Victory Is Nearly Complete
By Amira Hass, Haaretz [Israel[ [October 2, 2020]
---- The second intifada erupted because Israel exploited the negotiations with the Palestinians to advance its land grab project. The hypocrisy cried out to the heavens – talk of peace on one hand while continuing to take over Palestinian expanse for the benefit of the Jews. The hypocrisy cried out, but the Israelis didn't listen. The anger and disgust at Israeli underhandedness built up over years of disappointment and sobriety following the Oslo Accords, erupting on September 29, 2000 (the day after the provocation by Ariel Sharon, with the approval of then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak). But the second intifada was not an intifada in the standard sense of the word: Aside from its first days, it was not a popular civil event and a majority of the public did not participate in it, unlike the uprising that erupted in 1987. [Read More]

Monday, September 28, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Supreme Court and Election 2020

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
September 27, 2020
 
Hello All – Military commanders describe war as taking place in "theaters."  There is the Middle East theater, the Pacific theater, and so on.  The civil war ravaging the USA over the past few decades has taken place in the theaters of Men v. Women, White v. Black, Bosses v. Workers, Fossil Fools v. The Climate, Rich v. Poor, My Country v. Everyone Else, and so on.  One thing these theaters have in common is that all roads soon lead to the Supreme Court.  Thus the appointment of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court will impact almost all areas of my/your life for years to come.  And if Trump is re-elected and gets to appoint yet another Justice, giving the Court a 7-2 reactionary majority, our children will reap the whirlwind.
 
Dozens of good articles have been published in the last days, and many more will appear in the days to come, explaining how Judge Barrett and a 6-3 Supreme Court will do great damage.  For example:
 
Is Amy Coney Barrett Joining a Supreme Court Built for the Wealthy?
By
---- With a 6-3 conservative court, the country is at risk of having the few remaining tools that permit some limits on the power of business — like labor unions and environmental legislation — weakened still further. The court's future decisions could give corporations even more weight and workers less, by blocking potential legislation that might mitigate the impact of unfettered capitalism and staggering inequality. [Read More]
 
Amy Coney Barrett Is an Extremist—Just Not the Kind You Think
By Elie Mystal, The Nation [September 25, 2020]
---- The problem with Trump's Supreme Court nominee has nothing to do with her strongly held religious beliefs and everything to do with her right-wing Republican ones. [Read More]
 
(Video) Planned Parenthood CEO: Trump's SCOTUS Pick Could Overturn Roe v. Wade & Kill Obamacare
From Democracy Now! [September 28, 2020] [See the Program]
 
Can the appointment of Judge Barrett be stopped?  It seems unlikely, given Republican control   of the Senate.  But Black Swans abound in this election season (witness The Times' report today on Trump's taxes), and so nothing is certain. – Circulating now is a "Memo" that lays out obstruction tactics to delay and perhaps derail Barrett's nomination. It is not a sure-fire formula, but suggests that there is a lot of hell that can be raised, and we should demand that Sen. Schumer and the Democrats fight hard.  To read about The Memo, check out  "Trump Taps Amy Coney Barrett — Memo Lays Out Tactics for Opposition" by Ryan Grim, The Intercept [September 24 2020] [Link].
 
NEWS NOTES
Today the New York Times published a lengthy article, "Long-Concealed Records Show Trump's Chronic Losses and Years of Tax Avoidance."  As many now know, Trump made hundreds of millions of dollars, lost even more, and paid virtually no taxes over the last 15 years.  The Times promises detailed revelations in the coming days.  What impact this will have on the election remains to be seen, but what is published so far suggests that Trump could face jail and/or heavy fines in the years ahead – if he is no longer President of the USA. The Nation magazine's Justice reporter Elie Mystal gave us a good overview on this morning's Democracy Now!
 
This week a Louisville, KY grand jury returned a verdict on the killing of Breonna Taylor.  In essence, no one was responsible for her death, though one officer (already fired) was indicted for shooting into a neighboring home!   Protests against this verdict immediately erupted in Louisville and around the country, and Sidiqa Reynolds, the head of Louisville's Urban League, gave a powerful presentation on Democracy Now!  This morning's edition of Democracy Now! featured a writer for Vice News who just broke the story that there was, contrary to police reports, body camera footage that raises questions about the basic police story. ("A Police Cover-Up? New Bodycam Video from Night of Breonna Taylor's Killing Undermines State Account.")  Finally, trying to keep some focus on the person whose life was snuffed out, reposted here is "The Life Breonna Taylor Lived, in the Words of Her Mother," based on interviews with Ta-Nehisi Coates, Vanity Fair [August 24, 2020] [Link].
 
Lydia Sargent died this week.  With her partner Michael Albert, Lydia initiated and guided ZMagazine, ZNet, and the Z Media Institute over several decades.  In a tender memorial essay, Mike writes about Lydia's long imprisonment in dementia, and about the many things she accomplished in her life before that. She was an educator par excellence, helping thousands to learn the nuts and bolts of living a meaningful, radical life. Lydia Sargent, Live Like Her!
 
CFOW NUTS & BOLTS
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 6 to 6:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
REWARDS!
This week's Rewards test the hypothesis that the best political offensive is parody.  As Truth seems to have little impact on our political system, let's consider some alternatives.  First up is one of CFOW's favorite funnymen, Roy Zimmerman, with "The Liar Tweets Tonight."  We follow up with Randy Rainbow and "I Won't Vote Trump." Finally, a faux Frank Sinatra returns to Stephen Colbert's "Late Show" to say good-bye to the Orange One.  And for those who aren't sure where this is leading, Wreckless Eric and Amy Rigby break it down.  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
ELECTION 2020
[FB – The likely confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court doubles down on the dangers posed by the possibility that President Trump will not recognize an election outcome that appears to end his presidency.  Trending this week in the media are explanations of our archaic method of translating the popular vote into a choice for president.  Also trending are proposals for Resistance if Trump mounts a protracted legal defense or simply refuses to pack his bags.  And, of course, there is the vote….  Below are some useful essays addressing these and other problems.]
 
The Election
Our Most Vulnerable Election
By Pamela Karlan, New York Review of Books [October 8, 2020 Issue]
[FB – This is a review of Will He Go?: Trump and the Looming Election Meltdown in 2020, by Lawrence Douglas]
---- The central argument of Will He Go? is that Trump's pathologies intersect with some distinctive features of the US electoral system in a particularly dangerous way. So before we can think about the scenarios Douglas sketches to suggest just how he might not go, we need to understand the architecture of our presidential election system. … Will He Go? is focused "less [on] the possibility that Trump will steal victory than that he will reject defeat," perhaps because Douglas is particularly interested in describing the design defects in the architecture of the Twelfth Amendment and the Electoral Count Act. So the second half of Douglas's book offers three scenarios designed to show the kinds of electoral meltdowns that may occur this fall. Each of his scenarios begins on or after Election Day and involves electoral uncertainty. But we should not ignore the possibility that Douglas skips past: that Trump will create a crisis of democratic legitimacy by manipulating the election system to prevent his defeat. [Read More]
 
(Video) "The Election That Could Break America": Inside How Trump & GOP Could Steal the Vote
From Democracy Now! [September 25, 2020]
---- As President Trump refuses to commit to accepting the results of the upcoming election, we speak to Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Barton Gellman, whose latest piece in The Atlantic looks at how Trump could subvert the election results and stay in power even if he loses to Joe Biden. "Trump's strategy is never to concede. He may win, he may lose, but under no circumstances will he concede this election," says Gellman. "That's a big problem, because we don't actually have a mechanism for forcing a candidate to concede, and concession is the way we have ended elections." [See the Program] For Gellman's article in The Atlantic [highly recommended], "The Election That Could Break America," go here.
 
Also of interest – "Why is the nationalist right hallucinating a 'communist enemy'?" b, The Guardian [UK] [September 26, 2020] [Link]; "With Chamber of Commerce Defections, a GOP Mainstay Finds Allies Among Democrats" by Ryan Grim, The Intercept [September 24 2020] [Link]; and "What's the Plan if Trump Tweets That He's Won Re-election?" Editorial, New York Times [September 27, 2020] [Link].
 
Resisting a Coup
(Video) Bernie Sanders on How to Block Trump from Stealing Election & Preserve American Democracy
From Democracy Now! [September 25, 2020]
----- In an address to the country, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has issued a stark warning about the threat posed by President Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the November election. Trump, who has made spurious claims of voter fraud and election-rigging against Democrats for months, recently ramped up his efforts to discredit the election results by suggesting he will refuse to concede if he loses. "This is an election between Donald Trump and democracy. And democracy must win," Sanders said. We air excerpts from his speech.  [See the Program]  For some analysis, read "Bernie Sanders Has Given Us a Tool Kit for Defending Against Trump's Threat to Democracy" by John Nichols, The Nation [September 25, 2020] [Link].
 
(Video) What to do if there is a coup.  A useful and user-friendly 90-minute lecture/seminar by long-time peace activist George Lakey.  Recommended! [See the Video].
 
10 Things You Need to Know to Stop a Coup
From Choose Democracy [September 2020].  This site also advertises upcoming Zoom seminars with George Lakey on October 1st and 6th.  Many other resources linked. [Link].
 
(Video) The Paradox of Civil Resistance in the 21st Century
By Erica Chenoweth, Professor in Human Rights and International Affairs at Harvard [January 29, 2020]
---- Erica Chenoweth shares data and research on the effectiveness of non-violent movements to effect significant changes at the national level. Diligent collection and analysis of data spanning the period 1900-2006 changed her own views and examines factors for success along with pros and cons of the digital age as a component of non-violent movements. [See the Video]
 
And looking ahead
The GOP Reshaped America to Hold Onto Power, Can the Dems Do the Same Thing to Save It? [Court Packing]
---- Both demographics and popular political opinion are moving against the Republican Party, and Republican politicians know it. Democrats should use this moment—if we can succeed in fighting back the GOP fascist tide—to use historical precedent to reconfigure our government so it represents the will of a majority of Americans. No more Mx. Nice Guy. [Read More]
 
It's Not Just the Supreme Court That's at Stake
By Robert L. Borosage, The Nation [September 25, 2020]
---- There can be no illusions. This is who they are. A minority party, grounded in small, predominately white states and the South, championing a failed ideology, and committed to doing what it takes to retain power, or at least to thwart the will of the majority. … The question is much broader than that. Democrats—and particularly Joe Biden—must discard any illusions that once Trump is ousted, Republicans will have, in Biden's words, an "epiphany" and cooperate in bipartisan efforts to address the crises we face. [Read More]
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Stephen F. Cohen, 1938–2020 - Мой Cтив (My Steve): A personal recollection
By Katrina vanden Heuvel, Editor, The Nation [September 21, 2020]
[FB – It was a coincidence that when Stephen Cohen died I was reading his magnum opus about the Russian revolutionary leader Nikolai Bukharin.  In this book and many to follow, Cohen illuminated the paths open to revolutionary Russia that Stalinism (and its aftermath) foreclosed.  In the 1980s, in Gorbachev, Cohen saw an alternative path re-emerging; but it too was cut short.  In his last years Cohen was one of the few/only Russian scholars who tried to open America's eyes to the dangers of Russia-phobia and the essentially defensive nature of Russian foreign policy, essays recently collected in his War with Russia? This memorial essay, by Cohen's wife and editor of The Nation Katrina vanden Heuvel, reveals what a scholar can do on behalf of peace and justice.]
---- While Steve liked to say it's healthy to rethink, to have more questions than answers, there was a wise consistency to his political analysis. For example, as is clear from his many articles in The Nation in these last decades, he unwaveringly opposed American Cold War thinking both during the Cold War and since the end of the Soviet Union. He was consistent in his refusal to sermonize, lecture, or moralize about what Russia should do. He preferred to listen rather than preach, to analyze rather than demonize. This stance was no recipe for popularity, which Steve professed to care little about. He was courageous and fearless in continuing to question the increasingly rigid orthodoxies about the Soviet Union and Russia. But in the last months, such criticism did take its toll on him. Along with others who sought to avert a new and more dangerous Cold War, Steve despaired that the public debate so desperately needed had become increasingly impossible in mainstream politics or media. [Read More]  Also of interest: "He Taught Gorbachev" by Nadezhda Azhgikhina, The Nation [September 25, 2020] [Link].
 
Trump's Nuclear Threats reveal the long arm of the Enola Gay and Hiroshima
---- Whether you're reading this with your morning coffee, just after lunch, or on the late shift in the wee small hours of the morning, it's 100 seconds to midnight. That's just over a minute and a half. And that should be completely unnerving. It's the closest to that witching hour we've ever been. Since 1947, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has adjusted its Doomsday Clock to provide humanity with an expert estimate of just how close all of us are to an apocalyptic "midnight" — that is, nuclear annihilation. … We know about what happened at Hiroshima largely thanks to one man, John Hersey. … And we now know just how Hersey got the story of Hiroshima — a 30,000-word reportorial masterpiece that appeared in the August 1946 issue of the New Yorker magazine, describing the experiences of six survivors of that atomic blast — thanks to a meticulously researched and elegantly written new book by Lesley Blume, Fallout: The Hiroshima Cover-Up and the Reporter Who Revealed It to the World…. It's been 74 years since Hiroshima hit the newsstands. A Cold War and nuclear arms race followed as those weapons spread across the planet. And this January, as a devastating pandemic was beginning to follow suit, all of us found ourselves just 100 seconds away from total annihilation….   [Read More]
 
The Second Intifada, 20 Years On: Thousands Died in a Struggle That Failed
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz [Israel] [September 26, 2020]
---- Yom Kippur this year will mark the anniversaries of the outbreak of two of the most violent events in Israel's history, events that shaped its character for years. It will be 47 years since the start of the Yom Kippur War and 20 years since the second intifada erupted. Both took Israel by surprise – but neither should have surprised anyone. On September 28, 2000, Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount in Jerusalem's Old City and the powder keg exploded. A day later, an Israel Defense Forces soldier and seven Palestinians were killed. …The demon of violent resistance to the occupation and its violent suppression exploded forcefully from the bottle. Over four lethal years would pass before the fierce uprising would be quelled, with the use of massive force, and perhaps only temporarily, until the next insurgence, although no signs of it are visible at present on the horizon. For Israel, the second intifada morphed into the nightmare of exploding buses and suicide bombers, years of unremitting horror and dread for the country's citizens. For the Palestinians, these were years of brutal suppression, extensive bloodshed, sieges, closures, lockdowns, checkpoints, mass arrests, and also combat and sacrifices that got them nowhere. Twenty years later, their situation is worse, more desperate than it was before the eruption of the Al-Aqsa Intifada and grimmer than ever: Only in the Nakba, the calamity of 1948, was their situation even harsher and more hopeless. [Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
U.S. War Crimes in Yemen: Stop Looking the Other Way
By Andrea Prasow, Foreign Policy in Focus [September 21, 2020]
---- The longstanding involvement of the United States in the conflict in Yemen is facing renewed scrutiny. On September 16, State Department officials testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee about whether the State Department misled Congress — and the American people — by circumventing controls designed to limit arms sales and ensure congressional oversight. The crimes occurring in Yemen are serious — and the responsible parties demonstrably unwilling or unable to address them. The most recent report by the United Nations Group of Eminent and International Regional Experts on Yemen described "an acute accountability gap" and recommended that the UN Security Council refer the situation in Yemen to the International Criminal Court. … Media reports have detailed the suppression of an internal State Department analysis that U.S. personnel could be legally liable for war crimes in Yemen because of continued U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia. Some members of Congress raised this during the hearing. The State Department's acting legal adviser acknowledged civilian casualties were a concern, but refused to say whether he believed U.S. personnel could be held culpable for war crimes in Yemen. [Read More]  For more on these war crimes, recommended is "U.S. Rationale for Military Aid to Saudis in Yemen War Is Fraying" by Edward Wong, New York Times [September 23, 2020] [Link].
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Israel Isn't Signing 'Peace' Deals
By Gregory Shupak, FAIR [Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting] [September 26, 2020]
---- Corporate media outlets such as Forbes, Bloomberg, CNN, and the Washington Post have described recent accords that normalize Israeli relations with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain as "peace" deals. This is a misleading label to apply to agreements that help cement a belligerent military alliance against Iran, and allow violence against Palestinians, Libyans and Yemenis to continue. … The Trump administration "do[es] not dispute that after years of American refusals to sell F-35s to the Emiratis, the change in position is linked to the diplomatic initiative," reported the New York Times. … Contrary to corporate media assertions, these US-managed agreements between three of its vassal states have little to do with "peace" and everything to do with enabling the smooth execution of despotism, war and a ruthless colonial enterprise. [Read More]