Tuesday, January 8, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - Troop withdrawals canceled? What will the Democrats do NOW?

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
January 8, 2019
 
Hello All – When President Trump announced last month that US troops would be leaving Syria, and that half of the 14,000 soldiers in Afghanistan would also be withdrawn, we celebrated this as good news.  While supported by about half of the US population, however, these moves by the president drew heavy fire from most of Congress and the mainstream media, and his Secretary of Defense resigned in protest.  In the ensuing weeks, it appears that President Trump has been both out-maneuvered and simply disobeyed, and the troop withdrawal now appears unlikely in the near term.
 
While this is not surprising, given the chaos of the Trump team's decision making, I think the important thing to notice is that the justification given by National Security Adviser John Bolten and other administration deep thinkers is that one of the purposes of US troops in Syria is to combat Iran's presence and influence in Syria.  While ISIS no remains much of a combat force, and the wish to overthrow Syria's President Assad seems more and more to be just a fantasy, the presence of Iran in Syria gives a semi-justification for remaining in Iran that has the support of Trump and the Republicans, and many congressional Democrats.
 
Because Iranian forces, being allied with President Assad, have some legitimacy for remaining in Syria, and because they are given some protection by Russian forces there, the efforts of the United States – or Israel, for that matter – to dislodge the Iranians risks a major war.  And needless to say, many in both the United States and Israel would welcome that … if it were not for the danger of conflict with Russia and perhaps nuclear war.
 
The chaos of the Trump administration – with the loss of the House to the Democrats, the schism with the Pentagon, the fragility of the financial system, and now the government shutdown – makes this a moment in which a Wag-the-Dog war seems possible.  With little anti-war opposition in Congress and virtually none in the mainstream media, the Good Ship USA may soon be taking on water.  Those working for peace and justice may have full employment very soon.
 
The Senate's anti-BDS Legislation
The legislation is called "S-1," Senate business numero uno as the new legislative session starts. And it is somewhat amazing, and certainly attention-getting, that the first thing the Republican-run Senate wants to do is to pass a law to fight the growing movement called "Boycott, Divest, and Sanction," or "BDS."
 
As I understand it, the goal of the anti-BDS supporters in the Senate was to include the proposed law in a much larger package, such as December's congressional spending bill that failed to pass and thus shut down the government.  And so now the proposed law is in the dazzling sunlight, giving Congress their first opportunity/occasion to debate why they think that Americans should be penalized for expressing opposition to Israel and urging a boycott of products (made in the Occupied Territories or not), or of corporations whose products facilitate the Occupation, or (for some) of travel to Israel, boycotting of conferences and concerts, etc.
 
"The Right to Boycott" is generally conceded to be well established in US law. The ACLU and similar legal organizations, as well as B. Sanders and others in Congress, have said that, whatever you think of Israel or BDS agitation, it's protected by the Constitution as "free speech." Legal arguments, and the state of play in the 26 states that already have laws or executive orders penalizing BDS activities (including New York), are helpfully explained at the website of Palestine Legal. A useful round-up of opinion from many organizations and writers was published yesterday by Mondoweiss. A good analysis of S-1 was published a few days ago on The Intercept. [Link]. As of this evening, at least 17 Democratic Senators say they will not vote for the Bill as long as the government is shut-down; and this includes Schumer and some others who are supportive of the anti-BDS legislation.
 
It is almost surreal that legislation clearly intended to stop "free speech" on behalf of the interests of another country should insert itself into the middle of a serious crisis of government and legitimacy.  But that's the state of the USA today.
 
News Notes
This afternoon in Cortlandt the town judge found three pipeline opponents "guilty" of trespass for their attempts to stop the construction of the Spectra pipeline (next to Indian Point) in October 2016.  However, the defendants were given an "unconditional discharge," as the judge rejected the demands of the town prosecutor that they be given a heavy fine and mandated to perform 300 hours of community service.  The case was notable because the judge allowed the defendants to present the "necessity" defense, meaning that their action was not a crime because they acted to prevent a greater harm, i.e. a potential explosion damaging Indian Point nuclear plant and the harm caused by global warming and by the release of gases (methane, etc.) from the pipeline.  In the end, the judge rejected the necessity defense on what seemed to me technical and basically bogus grounds.  To see if you agree, read the excellent article (with pictures) by Erik McGregor here.
 
The mainstream media has not given enough attention to the efforts of the Trump administration to destroy Veterans' healthcare.  Using the deadly combo of reduction of services and privatization of care (a Koch Brothers' plan), this basically very good system is on the ropes.  For a good overview, read  "Five Myths about VA Health Care." (h/t GMac).
 
In entertainment news this week, at the top of the charts is "'Sonic attack' on US embassy in Havana could have been crickets, say scientists."  When our spies in the US Embassy in Cuba got headaches and worse, the obvious culprits were the Cubans (and maybe the Russians) using cutting-edge microwave techniques. An analysis of the sound patterns, however, pointed to the "song" of the Indies short-tailed cricket as the source of the problem. (An in-depth article by Glenn Greenwald is linked below,)  The emergence of weaponized crickets reminded me of a story I wrote about in the early 1980s, when the United States blamed the Soviets for using chemical weapons in the jungles of Southeast Asia.  This deadly poison, dubbed "Yellow Rain," turned out to be naturally occurring bee shit.  Until this was discovered, books were written about Yellow Rain, and Congress held hearings.
 
For a news bright spot, I recommend "A Historic Day in Congress" by James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute. "I spent Thursday morning," he writes, "at the offices of two new Members of Congress, Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. The scenes at both were just delightful. Throngs of Palestinian Americans jammed into Tlaib's offices, spilling out into the hall. It was much the same at Omar's, but there the crowds were largely Somali Americans and Yemeni Americans. Many had traveled hundreds and even thousands of miles to witness history being made. You could feel their excitement. It was a day of celebration, validation, and empowerment."
 
As many newsletter readers know, right-wing researchers dug up a video of socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez actually dancing while a college student, and they posted it on line to discredit her before her supporters.  Needless to say, it's/she's fabulous, and the video only adds to her credibility as an actual person.  AOC was also in the news this week to explain to 11 million viewers of the CBS program "60 Minutes" how socialism was the way to go, and that if she didn't have all the answers, that's OK, no one else does either.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.
 
Please Support CFOW
CFOW's expenditures are small, but if you would like to support our work financially, please send a check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  In addition to the excellent Featured Essays, I especially recommend the article by Stephen Zunes on why we should move our troops out of Syria; the set of articles that outline and analysis parts of the Democrats' legislative program for this congressional session; Gideon Levy's review of Israel/Palestine in 2018; and an interesting essay ("Our History") on the 50th anniversary of "Liberation Theology" in Latin America.  Read on!
 
Rewards!
As President Trump rolls out a new chapter in his hateful war against immigrants and refugees at our southern border, here is Annie DiFranco with a beautiful version of Woody Guthrie's 1948 (I think) classic song, "Deportees."  And a few years earlier, in the time of "Grapes of Wrath," Woody recorded another migrant classic, "Pastures of Plenty."  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Is Donald Trump an Asteroid? Honestly, This Could Get a Lot Uglier
By Tom Engelhardt, Tom Dispatch [January 7, 2019]
---- Sixty-six million years ago, so the scientists tell us, an asteroid slammed into this planet. Landing on what's now Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula, it gouged out a crater 150 kilometers wide and put so much soot and sulfur into the atmosphere that it created what was essentially a prolonged "nuclear winter." During that time, among so many other species, large and small, the dinosaurs went down for the count. It took approximately 66 million years for humanity to evolve from lowly surviving mammals and, over the course of a recent century or two, teach itself how to replicate the remarkable destructive power of that long-gone asteroid in two different ways: via nuclear power and the burning of fossil fuels. And if that isn't an accomplishment for the species that likes to bill itself as the most intelligent ever to inhabit this planet, what is? [Read More]
 
Forgotten France Rises Up
---- December 15, place de l'Opéra, Paris. Three yellow vests read out an address 'to the French people and the president of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron' saying: 'This movement belongs to no one and to everyone. It gives voice to a people who for 40 years have been dispossessed of everything that enabled them to believe in their future and their greatness.' The anger provoked by a fuel tax produced, within a month, a wider diagnosis of what ails society and democracy. Mass movements that bring together people with minimal organisation encourage rapid politicisation, which explains why 'the people' have discovered that they are 'dispossessed of their future' a year after electing as president a man who boasts he swept aside the two parties that alternated in power for 40 years. Macron has come unstuck. [Read More]
 
Why are Leftists cheering potential demise of Rojava's socialist experiment?
By Pete Dolack, ZNet [January 4, 2019]
---- Lost in the discussions of Donald Trump's abrupt announcement of the withdrawal of United States troops from Rojava is the possible fate of the democratic and cooperative experiment of the Syrian Kurds. Threatened with annihilation at the hands of Turkish invaders, should we simply wipe our hands and think nothing of an interesting experiment in socialism being crushed on the orders of a far right de facto dictator? … What do the Kurds want? The Syrian Kurds, surrounded by hostile forces waiting for the opportunity to crush their socialist experiment, made a realpolitik decision in accepting the presence of U.S. troops, and a limited number of French and British troops. The dominant party in Syrian Kurdistan, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), is strongly affiliated with the leading party of Turkey's Kurds, the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). The PKK has been locked in a decades-long struggle with successive Turkish governments. … To ignore what the Kurdish people, in attempting to build a socialist, egalitarian society, have to say are acts of Western chauvinism. It is hardly reasonable to see the Syrian Kurds as "naïve" or "puppets" of the U.S. as if they are incapable of understanding their own experiences. And Turkey's invasion of Rojava's Afrin district, which was disconnected from the rest of Rojava, resulting in massive ethnic cleansing, should make clear the dangers of further Turkish invasions. [Read More]
 
(Mainstream) Media Tutorial
Veteran NBC/MSNBC Journalist Blasts the Network for Being Captive to the National Security State and Reflexively Pro-War to Stop Trump
By Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept [January 3 2019]
---- A veteran national security journalist with NBC News and MSNBC blasted the networks in a Monday email for becoming captive and subservient to the national security state, reflexively pro-war in the name of stopping President Donald Trump, and now the prime propaganda instrument of the War Machine's promotion of militarism and imperialism. As a result of NBC/MSNBC's all-consuming militarism, he said, "the national security establishment not only hasn't missed a beat but indeed has gained dangerous strength" and "is ever more autonomous and practically impervious to criticism." [Read More].  As an example of the Cold War framework of the mainstream media, read Greenwald's most recent piece, "NBC and MSNBC Blamed Russia for Using 'Sophisticated Microwaves' to Cause 'Brain Injuries' in U.S. 'Diplomats' in Cuba. The Culprits Were Likely Crickets," The Intercept [January 7, 2019] [Link].
 
THE NEW CONGRESS: THE DEMOCRATS' PLANS
Democrats Unveil Ambitious Plan to Fix Election System
By Steven Rosenfeld, ZNet [January 6, 2019]
---- On the second day of the 116th Congress, the new House Democratic majority will introduce H.R. 1, the most comprehensive democracy reform legislation seen this century. It addresses voting rights and electoral procedures, campaign finance rules and loopholes, and seeks to institute higher ethical standards for federal officeholders and more. One can look at the For The People Act as a wish list of inclusive, transparent and publicly accountable solutions and best practices that seek to come to grips with today's world of voting, election advocacy and voter engagement—or suppression. … The bill's overall framing is to counter systemic corruption that blocks some citizens—but not others—from voting; or allows large donors to hide their identity while funding attacks they wouldn't publicly want to be associated with; or enables current and recent officeholders to personally profit from serving in the highest levels of the federal government. [Read More].  For more insights, watch election expert Ari Berman on (Video) Democracy Now! "Dems Introduce Sweeping Voting Rights Bill to Combat Rampant Voter Suppression' [January 7, 2019] [Link].
 
'A Giant Step' Toward Humane Healthcare as Democrats Announce First-Ever Hearings on Medicare for All
By
---- In an essential and historic step toward developing a humane, effective, and universal solution to America's for-profit healthcare crisis, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) has reportedly won approval from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to hold the first-ever hearings on Medicare for All in two of the most powerful committees in Congress. "It's a huge step forward to have the Speaker's support," Jayapal said in an interview with the Washington Post on Thursday. "We have to push on the inside while continuing to build support for this on the outside." According to the Post, Medicare for All legislation is set to receive hearings in the Rules and Budget committees, both of which are chaired by Medicare for All supporters—Reps. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) and John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), respectively. While dates for the hearings have not been officially announced, Jayapal said House Medicare for All supporters expect to release legislation in "the next couple of weeks." "This will ensure that Medicare for All is part of the 2020 Democratic presidential platforms," said Jayapal, who will sponsor the House bill. [Read More]
 
(Video) Sunrise Movement: Pelosi's Actions on Climate Fall Woefully & Inexcusably Short of What We Need
From Democracy Now! [January 7, 2019]
---- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is facing criticism from some climate activists for failing to back a Green New Deal. Last week Pelosi announced the formation of a new Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, headed by long-standing Florida Congressmember Kathy Castor. But the committee is far weaker than what backers of a Green New Deal had envisioned. The committee will not have subpoena power or the power to draft legislation. We speak with Varshini Prakash, founder of the Sunrise Movement, a youth-led climate group that has occupied and lobbied at congressional offices, risking arrest to demand adoption of the Green New Deal and bold climate leadership. [See the Program]
 
For more on the Democrats' debate about how to approach the climate crisis – "New Congress Members See Climate Solutions and Jobs in a Green New Deal," by Marianne Lavelle, Inside Climate News [January 3, 2019] [Link]; "Democrats might have put a roadblock on the path to a Green New Deal," b [Link]; and House Dems formalize climate committee plans without Green New Deal language," by Timothy Cama, The Hill [January 2, 2019] [Link].
 
Pay-Go: What's the controversy about, and is it important?
FB – "Pay-Go" is the framing used traditionally by Democrats to mean that funding for new or expanded programs must be found by cutting or diminishing other programs, or by raising taxes. "Debt" cannot be increased.  The Republicans' version is the same, except that they add "no new taxes."  In both cases, this framing makes it difficult to launch big new federal programs.  And this seemed to be what the Democrats were doing when they inserted "Pay-Go" language into the "Rules" that will direct the legislative traffic in the House of Representatives.  Needless to say, this would make large state investment programs such as "Medicare for All" and "The Green New Deal" impossible.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and two other progressive Democrats voted against this Rule on these grounds; read "Nancy Pelosi Rams Austerity Provision Into House Rules Package Over Objections of Progressives," from The Intercept [January 2, 2019] [Link]. But other progressive Democrats, including the Progressive Caucus, say that this is a misunderstanding of what "Pay-Go" will/can do under the new House rules.  Read "Behind the Pay-go Battle Is a Central Contradiction That Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Her Allies Will Need to Resolve," from The Intercept [January 4, 2019] [Link] and "Congressional Staffing for Dummies: The Pay Go Dispute," by [Link]. So it may be that the Pay-Go rule will not prevent passing the legislation we care about. Maybe.
 
WAR & PEACE
Despite Everything, U.S. Troops Should Leave Syria
By Stephen Zunes, Foreign Policy in Focus [January 3, 2019]
---- Donald Trump's sudden decision to remove U.S. forces from Syria appears to have been impetuous and ill-considered — apparently a result of a conversation with Turkey's autocratic president Recep Erdoğan. That doesn't mean, however, that the United States should remain in that country. It's quite reasonable to question how and why Trump made his choice. This doesn't mean it wasn't the right one, however. … Though falling well short of the kind of egalitarian anarchist utopia that some Western leftists have claimed, Syrian Kurds have nevertheless organized one of the most democratic, popular, and well-functioning governing structures in the Middle East. During the past couple of years, they were able to make accommodations with the Syrian regime in several areas where government forces did move in — without violence and without any U.S. support that would have enabled them to keep control. The most legitimate concern is in regard to Turkey moving its forces into northern Syria to attack the SDF and slaughtering many thousands of Kurdish civilians in the process. … More pertinently, how are 2,000 U.S. troops in such a vast area an effective deterrent for Turkish intervention? They did nothing to halt the Turkish offensive that seized the SDF-controlled Afrin region back in March, for example. Given the small number of U.S. troops in an area more three times the size of Lebanon, it would be easy for Turkish forces to avoid confronting U.S. troops while slaughtering Kurds, and it would be hard to imagine Trump moving U.S. troops into position to stop it. A more effective deterrent than simply keeping U.S. troops in Syria would be for Washington to make clear to the Turks that the United States will suspend all arms transfers and strategic cooperation with Turkey if it moves any more troops into Syrian territory. [Read More]
       
The War in Yemen
Is the End of the Brutal War in Yemen Finally at Hand?
From Truth Dig [December 31, 2018]
---- When the new Congress convenes Jan. 3, it is expected to pass a House resolution upholding congressional war powers and ending all direct U.S. involvement in the Saudi coalition's war in Yemen. But hopes remain high that H. Con. Res. 138 will help to end the Yemen war itself. Congressional strategists and activists who have been working on the issue believe passage of the war powers measure will force Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to the negotiating table. Together, they are challenging the position of some former Obama administration officials who have warned the war powers resolution alone cannot bring the conflict to a close. Those former officials, led by Brookings Institution fellow Bruce Riedel, say that cutting off the Saudi pipeline of spare parts is the only way to prevent further airstrikes, which have been central to the Saudi war strategy. Proponents of the war powers resolution, sponsored by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, argue the Saudis will not be able to continue the war without the political-diplomatic support of the United States, and the Yemen resolution will make dramatically clear the Saudis can no longer count on U.S. support. … The war's swift conclusion appears all but inevitable. While Crown Prince Mohammed may be committed to final victory, the Saudi regime remains heavily dependent on U.S. political-diplomatic cover, as it has since the beginning of the bombing campaign in Yemen. Ironically, that political reality could now tip the balance toward peace. [Read More]  The Pentagon says its involvement in Yemen is helping to reduce civilian casualties.  Check out "See No Evil: Pentagon Issues Blanket Denial That It Knows Anything About Detainee Abuse in Yemen," by Alex Emmons, The Intercept [January 7 2019] [Read More].
 
GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE COLLAPSE
A Surge of Climate Lawsuits Targets Human Rights, Damage from Fossil Fuels
By Nicholas Kusnetz, Inside Climate News [January 4, 2019]
---- The past year saw a surge in new lawsuits filed against fossil fuel companies, and major developments in cases pressing governments for action in the United States and abroad. And while the plaintiffs haven't secured any substantial victories in U.S. courts, they may be scoring a different victory by drawing attention to the inaction of Congress and the Executive Branch. … What began with a handful of California cities and counties in 2017 spread across the country this past year, as New York City, Baltimore, Rhode Island and local governments in Colorado and Washington State sued fossil fuel companies. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation to help pay the costs of protecting residents from rising seas, worsening wildfires, extreme heat and other effects of climate change. Two law firms are arguing most of these cases. They allege that energy companies knew about the dangers associated with their products, but lobbied against capping emissions anyway while sowing doubt about climate science. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
In 2018, Israel's mask finally came off
By Gideon Levy, Middle East Eye [December 31, 2018]
---- 2018 wasn't a good year for Israel. It was even worse for Palestinians, of course. On the surface, it wasn't an especially dramatic year - just a lot more of the same, without major new wars, and without much bloodshed if you compare it to most previous years. Things appeared frozen in place. The occupation continued without impediment, likewise the settlement enterprise. Gaza tried to resist forcefully from inside its wretched cage, using its paltry and limited powers. The world averted its eyes from the occupation, as it has customarily done in recent years, and focused on other things entirely.  … The laws passed this year must not be viewed solely as anti-democratic laws that endanger Israel's democracy, as the situation is usually described by liberal circles in Israel. They are intended to do something much more dangerous. They aren't intended just to undermine the bogus democracy, to impose yet more discrimination on Palestinian citizens of Israel and turn them into second-class citizens by law. Their real intention is to provide legislative cover for the act of formally annexing the territories beyond the recognised sovereign boundaries of the state of Israel. In 2018, Israel moved closer to realising these objectives. The relative quiet that has prevailed in the country is deceptive. The apartheid state de jure, not just de facto, is coming. [Read More]
 
Exporting the Technology of Occupation
By Antony Loewenstein, New York Review of Books [January 4, 2019]
---- Besides spyware and cyber tools, Israel has developed a growing industry based around surveillance including espionage, psychological operations, and disinformation. … Over more than half a century of occupation, Israel has mastered the arts of monitoring and surveilling millions of Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza, and Israel itself. Israel is now packaging and selling this knowledge to governments that admire the country's ability to suppress and manage resistance. Israel's occupation has thus gone global. The country's defense exports reached a record $9.2 billion in 2017, 40 percent higher than in 2016 (in a global arms market that recorded its highest ever sales in 2017 at $398.2 billion). The majority of these sales were in Asia and the Pacific region. … he occupation has thus fueled Israel's industrial and defense policy-making through an economic boom that has benefited companies that build, operate, and manage the settlement enterprise. … Today, growing numbers of American Jews are distancing themselves from Israel, rejecting its government's embrace of ethno-nationalism and supporting instead a one-state solution. For the time being, Israel looks set to remain a major global player in the manufacture and sales of weapons systems and surveillance equipment and expertise—that is now one of the main ways the country defines itself internationally. But international opposition is growing, thanks largely to calls by the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement for a military embargo on Israel and its defense industry. [Read More]
 
OUR HISTORY
The Left Side of the Church
By Hugh McDonnell, Jacobin Magazine [December 2018]
---- The fiftieth anniversary of 1968 has occasioned much reflection on that pivotal moment in the twentieth century. If the quintessential image of that year of upheaval is students assembling barricades in the Paris streets, or protests at Berkeley against the Vietnam War, it was also marked by challenges to political and social power throughout the world. Curiously overlooked, however, is the gathering in Colombia of the Medellín Conference of Latin American Bishops — a pivotal event in the development of liberation theology throughout Latin America. The declarations of the conference broke new ground in expanding the notion of theological "liberation" to imply a positive humanizing process, and attacking the political, social, and economic structures that kept millions of Latin Americans poor and oppressed.
Recalling liberation theology's rejection of the church's traditional role as a bulwark of reaction and insistence instead on a "preferential option for the poor" takes on added importance [today.] [Read More]
 
 
 
 

Monday, December 31, 2018

CFOW Newsletter - Prospects for War & Peace in 2019

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
December 31, 2018
 
Hello All – The year 2018 was a tough one for peace & justice stalwarts, and we say good-bye to it without much regret. The threat of nuclear war (e.g. between the US and Russia) continued to grow, and the world made little progress (and some regress) in addressing the global disaster benignly described as "climate change."  Newsletter readers are familiar with the significant role played in these developments by our own government, though it had many supporting players throughout the world.
 
The last few months, however, have seen some rays of light that warrant hopes for a better New Year.  The outcome of the congressional elections in November is/was a bright spot; and whether or not the resulting shift in the balance of power in Congress produces much good, the elections showed that the Trump Agenda could be handily defeated with a strong mobilization around (often) progressive ideas.  Similarly, one of the "black swans" that seem to dominate our landscape these days – the gratuitous murder of journalist Jemal Khasshogi by underlings of the Saudi ruling family – has changed the way that the Saudi war in Yemen – and more generally the wars in the Middle East – are seen.  It is as if the United States and the lands of its allies were suddenly awakened from collective slumber and, rubbing their eyes, ask "What is going on?!!"  Thus, despite the pushback by US political and media elites against President Trump's order to remove troops from Syria and Afghanistan, US public opinion generally supports the idea that it is time for these wars to end.  And the promise of congressional action to end US support for the Saudi war in Yemen also has broad support.  There is, at last, some hope.
 
For these reasons, I think that there is even more reason than usual to call on our reserves of energy to protest those forces and actions that will attempt to keep the US war machine active in the Middle East.  Republicans in Congress have been meeting with Trump and claiming that he doesn't "really" mean what he said about withdrawing troops from Syria and Afghanistan, and US military commanders on the ground state that withdrawal of troops from Syria could take several months.  Democrat leadership in Congress may well conclude that Trump's failure to pursue the wars in the Middle East may be something to investigate, and/or perhaps to include in Articles of Impeachment.  As was shown several times during the Obama presidency, the Pentagon's commanders are capable of "dissuading" the Commander-in-Chief when he is neglecting his Imperial Duties.  Despite some auspicious signs at the end of 2018, therefore, peace activists in 2019 will have our work cut out for us.
 
News Notes
To start the New Year off right, show up on New Year's Day for the demonstration in White Plains, at the Federal Courthouse, called In Solidarity with Children's who die and suffer cruelty.  It is sponsored by the Hudson Valley Community Coalition and its allies. For more information, go here.
 
The admirable Project Censored publishes an annual report listing the most important stories suppressed or misreported by the mainstream media. The "missing" stories are generally written by students, and they make for impressive reading/reporting.  Here are the top 25 censored stories of 2017-2018.
 
A news report featuring our congressional representative Eliot Engel proclaims that "Democrats vow new scrub of post-9/11 war powers."  Indeed, launching or justifying wars based on the Authorization to Use Military Force passed by Congress days after 9/11 doesn't make sense anymore.  So the House of Representatives, led by among others Engel, is planning to draft a new one.  This sounds good for about a nanosecond; and then we say, "Why do we need to give the President a new blank check at all?"  Why not require Congress to declare war – or not – as described in the Constitution, or use the War Powers Act to require the President to get congressional approval for military action lasting longer than 60 days?
 
For several years Israel has offered US police departments to participate in training (in Israel) on how to fight terrorism.  Two years ago, Jewish Voice for Peace began the Deadly Exchange campaign, protesting the practice of US police "learning" at the feet of military forces who inflict daily terror on Palestinians.  The campaign has had some successes, with police forces cancelling their training; and this useful article from The Electronic Intifada asks (and answers), "How did activists accomplish this?"
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.
 
Please Support CFOW
CFOW's expenditures are small, but if you would like to support our work financially, please send a check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  In addition to the excellent Featured Essays, I especially recommend the set of articles that review the debate on, and merits of, Trump's decision to withdraw troops from Syria; the explosive expose ("War & Peace") of the use by Saudi Arabia of child soldiers/slaves from Darfur in its war in Yemen; an in-depth article by Korea expert Leon Sigal that reviews the US-North Korea negotiations since the 1990s; a set of good articles on The Green New Deal, and what the Democrats will/won't do to support this vital program; good articles on the repression of Julian Assange, the weakness of the latest "revelations" about "Russiagate," and some more support for the benefits of "Medicare for All"; and, finally, today's New York Times investigative report on the killing of a Palestinian medic in Gaza a few months ago.  Read on!
 
Rewards
To close out the old year and Welcome the New, here are CFOW favorites, Hudson Valley Sally, with a new (to me) song, "We Need Each Other Now."   And to illuminate yet another corner of our neglected history, here is True Story of "Yip Harburg: The Man Who Put the Rainbow in The Wizard of Oz," an old favorite rebroadcast by Democracy Now! last week.  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Seasons Greetings from France's Yellow Vests: "We are not tired"
By Richard Greeman, ZNet [December 30, 2018]
---- Is the Yellow Vest rebellion, now in its seventh week, "petering out?" Such was the near-unanimous pronouncement of the mainstream media, when I returned home to Montpellier, France, eager to participate and to observe first-hand this popular insurrection which I had been afraid of missing. I needn't have worried. … Then all hell broke loose and continued all day, with marches, countermarches and gas in the air. … So apparently the Yellow Vest movement is not exactly "petering out." After six weeks of daily roadblocks and disruptions in every corner of France, and after six (now seven) successive mass demonstrations of hundreds of thousands in Paris and the provinces, violently repressed, this spontaneous, self-organized rebellion, coordinated via social media, is still seriously challenging the political and economic order in France. Not only has this rebellion persisted despite unprecedented police brutality, media misrepresentation, and rejection by labor union officials, it has retained its grass-roots popularity and deepened its goals – from an initial rejection of a tax increase on Diesel fuel to explicit rejection of the established political/economic system and to near-unanimous call for the resignation of Macron and the creation of a new kind of democracy via referendum or constitutional convention. [Read More}
 
We Have Entered A Dangerous Moral Universe: What futures can we imagine when we no longer trust our senses?
By Patricia J. Williams, The Nation [December 19, 2018]
---- My inner 10-year-old does not want to get "used to losses." Indeed, the refusal to do so is the very claim that has been made, under "public trust" doctrine, in the pending federal-court case of Juliana v. the United States. The plaintiffs are 21 children ranging from 11 to 22 years old, and they have alleged that the destruction of the earth's atmosphere is a violation of substantive due process and equal protection, because it threatens their very future. The rest of us, meanwhile, seem to have forgotten that government should inspire public trust. Surely this determined sense of a right to exist is the same commitment that Jakelin's father felt as he fled the legacy of a civil war specifically targeting Mayan populations in Guatemala. Surely this insistence on the right to be is what also drives the stateless millions around the globe fleeing displacement by war, toxins, climate change, flood, famine, and drought. [Read More]
 
Isolationism or Imperialism?
By David Swanson, World Beyond War [December 28, 2018]
---- Five years ago, there was a debate over whether to bomb Syria flat, and those opposed to doing so were accused of "isolationism." Now the idea of pulling troops out of Syria or Afghanistan or ceasing to help bomb and starve the people of Yemen is subjected to the same rhetorical assault. That Trump promises to keep the occupation of Iraq going is understood as reassuring "engagement with the world" by people who demanded an end to the occupation of Iraq when George W. Bush was president, and who pretended to celebrate its ending when Barack Obama pretended to end it. This is simple-minded thinking in the extreme, notwithstanding its claims to be just the opposite. "I'm against war but we can't be simplistic about it and just end one of them willy-nilly, abandoning our allies." This is the type of language used to support imperialism in the great debate between isolationism and imperialism, a debate wholly dependent on the ridiculous pretense that these two choices constitute the full range of possible human behaviors. [Read More]
 
An Appeal to Jewish Women to Support the 2019 Women's March and Its Leaders
By Rosalind P. Petchesky, Solidarity – US [December 25, 2018]
---- For the past nine months, controversy and obfuscation concerning allegations of anti-Semitism and complicity with Louis Farrakhan have surrounded the 2019 Women's March and its Women of Color leaders, especially Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour. The complaints rage on, leaving a trail of divisiveness and malice in their wake. This is an appeal to the white Jewish women who have participated in this barrage, or stood idly by while it happened, to step back, hit pause, and think more clearly about what fears lie behind your anger, or your silence. … In a climate of fear, violence, intimidation and rising fascism, the only way forward for a truly transformative Women's March and movement is to unite the struggles to end violence, racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny, settler colonialism everywhere, including in Palestine, and the white nationalism that undergirds them all. And this means holding out our hands to the courageous leaders who propel this vision, like Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory, saying we stand with you, we have your back. [Read More]
 
TRUMP'S TROOP WITHDRAWAL FROM SYRIA – DISCUSSION
We Know How Trump's War Game Ends
By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone [December 2018]
---- Trump dumped on basically every segment of the political establishment en route to Washington, running on a classic authoritarian strategy — bash the elites, pose as a populist. However fake he was, there were portions of the political establishment that deserved abuse, the Pentagon most of all. The Department of Defense has been a money pit for decades. It has trillions in expenditures it can't account for, refused an audit for nearly 30 years and then failed this year (as in failed completely, zero-point-zero, not producing any coherent numbers) when one was finally funded. We have brave and able soldiers, but their leaders are utter tools who've left a legacy of massacres and botched interventions around the world. NATO? That's an organization whose mission stopped making sense the moment the Soviet Union collapsed. We should long ago have repurposed our defense plan to focus on terrorism, cyber-crime and cyber-attacks, commercial espionage, financial security, and other threats. Instead, we continued after the Soviet collapse to maintain a global military alliance fattened with increasingly useless carriers and fighter jets, designed to fight archaic forms of war. [Read More]
 
Trump Scores, Breaks Generals' 50-Year War Record
By Gareth Porter, The American Conservative [December 28, 2018]
---- The mainstream media has attacked President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria as impulsive, blindsiding his own national security team. But detailed, published accounts of the policy process over the course of the year tell a very different story. They show that senior national security officials and self-interested institutions have been playing a complicated political game for months aimed at keeping Trump from wavering on our indefinite presence on the ground in Syria. The entire episode thus represents a new variant of a familiar pattern dating back to Vietnam in which national security advisors put pressure on reluctant presidents to go along with existing or proposed military deployments in a war zone. The difference here is that Trump, by publicly choosing a different policy, has blown up their transparent schemes and offered the country a new course, one that does not involve a permanent war state. [Read More]
 
Ignore the howls of protest – Trump's Syria withdrawal is a simple reflection of foreign policy realities
By Patrick Cockburn, The Independent [UK] [December 26, 2018]
---- President Trump's decision to withdraw US troops from Syria is being denounced by an impressive range of critics claiming that it is a surrender to Turkey, Russia, Syria and Iran – as well as a betrayal of the Kurds and a victory for Isis. The pullout may be one or all of these things, but above all it is a recognition of what is really happening on the ground in Syria and the Middle East in general. This point has not come across clearly enough because of the undiluted loathing for Trump among most of the American and British media. They act as a conduit for the views of diverse figures who condemn the withdrawal and include members of the imperially-minded foreign policy establishment in Washington and terrified Kurds living in north-east Syria who fear ethnic cleansing by an invading Turkish army. … It is worth spelling out the state of play in Syria because this is being masked by anti-Trump rhetoric, recommending policies that may sound benign but are far detached from political reality. This reality may be very nasty: it is right to be appalled by the prospects for the Syrian Kurds who are terrified of a Turkish army that is already massing to the north of the Turkish-Syrian frontier. [Read More]
 
Also useful/insightful on the Syria withdrawal – "Bring the Troops Home, But Also Stop the Bombing," by Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies, Code Pink [December 26, 2018] [Link]; "Democrats and Neocons Are the Biggest Losers of Trump's Syria Withdrawal," by Daniel Lazare, TruthDig [December 28, 2018] [Link]; and "Trump vs Mattis: Watch out when men of war come to the rescue," by Robert Fisk, The Independent [UK] [December 27, 2018] [Link]. This article from 2014, by "Occupy's" David Graeber, is a useful reminder of the significance of the Kurd's self-governing project at Rojava, in Syria, now threatened by a Turkish attack: "Why is the world ignoring the revolutionary Kurds in Syria?" [Link].
 
WAR & PEACE
The United States is First in War, But Trailing in Crucial Aspects of Modern Civilization
---- Maybe those delirious crowds chanting "USA, USA" have got something. When it comes to military power, the United States reigns supreme. Newsweek reported in March 2018: "The United States has the strongest military in the world," with more than two million military personnel and vast numbers of the most advanced nuclear missiles, military aircraft, warships, tanks, and other modern weapons of war. Furthermore, as the New York Times noted, "the United States also has a global presence unlike any other nation, with about 200,000 active duty troops deployed in more than 170 countries." This presence includes some 800 overseas U.S. military bases. … Maintaining the U.S. status as "No. 1" in war and war preparations comes at a very high price. That price is not only paid in dollars—plus massive death and suffering in warfare ― but in the impoverishment of other key sectors of American life. After all, this lavish outlay on the military now constitutes about two-thirds of the U.S. government's discretionary spending. And these other sectors of American life are in big trouble. [Read More]
 
Our Poor, Defenseless Military Industrial Complex
By Alan MacLeod, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting [December 20, 2018]
---- Even these figures do not include military pensions and veterans' healthcare, or nuclear weapons, and therefore the true total is possibly greater than all other countries combined. Military spending is approaching the highest in recorded history of any country, and the increase in military spending Trump approved last year alone would be enough to make public colleges and universities across the US free to all. Considering the problems of unemployment, poverty, climate change and infrastructure in the US, perhaps tooling up for an intercontinental war against two nuclear-armed superpowers is not the most effective use of trillions of dollars. That reducing a $716 billion war budget can be presented as a threat to the nation, and that "defense" can refer to wars in Taiwan or the Baltic, illustrates the depth of the media's imperial mindset, and goes to show President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the power of the military industrial complex went unheeded. [Read More]
 
The War in Yemen
A Top 2018 Story: Sudan's Mercenary child-soldiers in Yemen (NYT)
---- David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times caused an international stir by estimating that 20 percent of Sudanese fighters in Yemen may be 13-17, i.e. child soldiers. The percentage may be as high as 40%. That these child soldiers appear to have been paid for by Saudi Arabia at a time when, because of the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Saudi Arabia is in bad odor anyway, contributed to the sensation. Virtually every Arabic newspaper and news site is leading with the Times story. … Sudan, a country of 40 million with a GDP of only $110 bn., is said to have 10,000 fighters in Yemen, with the first contingent entering at Aden in October of 2015, about six months after the Saudis launched their air war on Yemen.  The vast majority of these fighters are not regular army troops but Janjawid mercenaries from Dar Fur ("Rapid Support Forces") whose salaries are paid by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Sudan leader Omar al-Bashir is said to have demanded from these Gulf countries $2 billion for every 1,000 Sudanese troops deployed in Yemen. [Read More]  And please read the original article by David D. Kirkpatrick, "On the Front Line of the Saudi War in Yemen: Child Soldiers From Darfur," New York Times [December 28, 2018] [Link]. Many pictures and maps accompany this useful New York Times article, "Saudi Strikes, American Bombs, Yemeni Suffering" [December 27, 2018] [Link].
 
The War in Afghanistan
C.I.A.'s Afghan Forces Leave a Trail of Abuse and Anger
By Mujib Mashal, New York Times [December 31, 2018]
---- At a time when the conventional Afghan military and police forces are being killed in record numbers across the country, the regional forces overseen by the C.I.A. have managed to hold the line against the most brutal militant groups, including the Haqqani wing of the Taliban and also Islamic State loyalists. But the units have also operated unconstrained by battlefield rules designed to protect civilians, conducting night raids, torture and killings with near impunity, in a covert campaign that some Afghan and American officials say is undermining the wider American effort to strengthen Afghan institutions. Those abuses are actively pushing people toward the Taliban, the officials say. And with only a relatively small American troop contingent left — and that perhaps set to drop further on President Trump's orders — the strike forces are increasingly the way that a large number of rural Afghans experience the American presence. … For months, The New York Times has investigated the human toll of the C.I.A.-sponsored forces on communities. Times journalists researched frequent complaints — at times almost weekly — that these units had raided and killed civilians, and The Times went to the sites of half a dozen of their raids, often less than 24 hours after the force had left. The investigation found details of a C.I.A. mission with tactical successes that have come at the cost of alienating the Afghan population. One former senior Afghan security official bluntly accused the strike forces of war crimes. [Read More].
 
War With Iran?
Fear, Hate And Violence: The Human Cost Of US Sanctions On Iran
By Alan Knight and Shahrzad Khayatian, Worldbeyondwar.org [December 24, 2018]
---- In the US, however, this suffering in Iran will be invisible. You won't see it on the screens of the 24/7 mass-market corporate broadcasts. You won't find it on the pages of the newspapers of record. It won't be debated in Congress. And if something does make it onto YouTube, it will be ignored, downplayed, denied or buried in a lifeless statistic. The importance of giving a name and face to suffering cannot be exaggerated. We respond to human experience; we ignore statistics. In this series of articles we will follow the lives of middle class Iranians, that middle class Americans can easily identify with, as they live through US imposed sanctions. The stories begin with the implementation of the first tranche of sanctions in August 2018, but first some context. [Read More]
 
War With North Korea?
For North Korea, Verifying Requires Reconciling: The Lesson from A Troubled Past
By Leon V. Sigal, 38North [December 14, 2018]
[FB – Leon Sigal is the author of several books and articles on the US-North Korea negotiations of the 1990s.  This is a major essay, a useful background study for the evolving Trump negotiations with North Korea.]
---- The usual story going around Washington is that North Korea has no intention to denuclearize or to provide a complete and accurate declaration of all its nuclear facilities and inventory and allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access to verify that declaration. According to this story, North Korea reneged on promises to take these steps in the past, and instead, temporarily suspended production of plutonium, impeded unfettered access for IAEA inspectors, secretly sought the means to enrich uranium, expelled the inspectors, and resumed plutonium production when its enrichment activity was challenged. This narrative is incomplete and misleading, because it ignores the crucial link between Pyongyang's willingness to accept US requests for verification and Washington's willingness to take steps to end enmity with North Korea. There is, in short, another way to interpret the troubled history of US-North Korean negotiations on verification. … If there is one takeaway from this history of verification in North Korea, it is that cooperation begets cooperation. The test of that proposition will come prior to a North Korean declaration of its fissile material and nuclear weapons stocks when the United States seeks access to the North's nuclear test sites, uranium mines, facilities to refine the ore into metal and turn it into a gas to run through centrifuges, and enrichment plants and reactors, to determine how much fissile material it could have produced. Any attempt to secure access to its nuclear facilities, not to mention its nuclear materials and weapons, will require a sustained US effort to end enmity with North Korea. The message from Pyongyang seems clear: no verification without reconciliation. [Read More].  And for Part II of this article, go here.
 
GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHAOS
The Green New Deal Is Good for the Planet—and the Democratic Party
By Mike Konczal, The Nation [December 19, 2018]
---- We don't have much time to tackle climate change. A new report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finds that we need to reduce carbon emissions by 45 percent in the next 12 years to keep the earth from heating up "only" 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. This isn't a problem for future generations; this is an emergency now. Into this crisis comes a demand for a Green New Deal, a call to mobilize the federal government to tackle this threat. Led by the young organizers of the Sunrise Movement, the campaign received a signal boost when Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined its members during a sit-in at Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi's office. The fact that the earth is rapidly warming is reason enough to pay attention. But there are three additional reasons why the Green New Deal should excite Democrats and progressives. First, it proves that the grass roots can drive the Democratic agenda. … Second, a Green New Deal helps solve the Democrats' ideas problem. … Finally, we are not prepared for the next recession. With low interest rates, corporate balance sheets bloated with cash that companies won't spend, and workers without the power to demand higher wages, the next recession will be just as devastating as the previous one and will require an even bigger response. [Read More] The import of the Green New Deal, and the strategic thinking behind it, is explained in this article by Naomi Klein that was in the CFOW newsletter last month, "The Game-Changing Promise of a Green New Deal," The Intercept [November 27 2018] [Link]. The Democratic Party leadership, however, has set off in the wrong direction; read "Climate Crisis is "Existential Threat," House Democrats Say — but Protecting Turf Comes First," by Kate Aronoff, The Intercept [December 30 2018] [Link].
 
The Infiltrator: How an Undercover Oil Industry Mercenary Tricked Pipeline Opponents Into Believing He Was One of Them
By Alleen Brown, The Intercept [December 30, 2018]
---- For months, a man calling himself Joel Edwards had posed as a pipeline opponent, attending protests, befriending water protectors, and paying for hotel rooms, supplies, and booze. He told some people he had a job with a hotel that allowed him to travel, others that he was a freelance journalist reporting on the pipeline resistance. But five former contractors for TigerSwan, the secretive security firm hired by Energy Transfer to guard the pipeline, confirmed to The Intercept that Joel was an undercover intelligence operative. His real name was Joel Edward McCollough, and he had been sent to collect information on the protesters, [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES/"THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR"
Justice for Julian Assange, Test of Western Democracy
By Nozomi Hayase, Antiwar.com [December 29, 2018]
---- This has been the 7th year that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange spent Christmas in confinement inside Ecuador's London embassy. … In December 2015, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded that Assange was being "arbitrarily deprived of his freedom and demanded that he be released". Yet the UK government's refusal to comply with the UN finding has allowed this unlawful detention to continue. This cruel persecution of Assange represents a deep crisis of Western democracy. As injustice against this Western journalist prevails, the legitimacy of traditional institutions has weakened. The benevolent Democracy that many were taught to believe in has been shown to be an illusion. It has been revealed as a system of control, lacking enforcement mechanisms in law to deal with real offenders of human rights violations, who for example illegally invade countries under the pretext of fighting terrorism.  [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics
By Aaron Maté, The Nation [December 27, 2018]
---- The release of two Senate-commissioned reports has sparked a new round of panic about Russia manipulating a vulnerable American public on social media. Headlines warn that Russian trolls have tried to suppress the African-American vote, promote Green Party candidate Jill Stein, recruit "assets," and "sow discord" or "hack the 2016 election" via sex-toy ads and Pokémon Go.  The reports, from the University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Research Project and the firm New Knowledge, do provide the most thorough look at Russian social-media activity to date. … There is no indication that the disinformation spread by employees of a St. Petersburg troll farm has had a discernible impact on the US electorate. The barrage of claims to the contrary is but one element of an infinitely larger chorus from failed political elites, sketchy private firms, shadowy intelligence officials, and credulous media outlets that inculcates the Western public with fears of a Kremlin "sowing discord." Given how divorced the prevailing alarm is from the actual facts—and the influence of those fueling it—we might ask ourselves whose disinformation is most worthy of concern. [Read More]
 
25 Ways The Canadian Health Care System Is Better Than Obamacare
By Ralph Nader, Nader.org [December 27, 2018]
---- Dear America: Costly complexity is baked into Obamacare. No health insurance system is without problems but Canadian-style single-payer— full Medicare for all— is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal. In the early 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson enrolled 20 million elderly Americans into Medicare in six months. There were no websites. They did it with index cards! Below please find 25 ways the Canadian health care system is better than the chaotic U.S. system. Replace it with the much more efficient Medicare-for-all: everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital. It will produce far less anxiety, dread, and fear. Love, Canada. [Read More] For some discussion of the proposed USA single-payer healthcare ideas, read "Medicare Will Be Good for Everyone — Except CEOs," an interview with Robert Pollin, in Jacobin Magazine [December 2018] [Link]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Biggest Stories of 2018: Israel announced Apartheid, Shot Thousands of Civilians
---- 2018 was in many ways a turning point for the position of Israel in the system of Western, liberal, capitalist democracies. It had long sat uneasily among France, Britain, and the United States, inasmuch as it was founded on a formal racial supremacist principle that Jews must rule the state. Racism is important in the other democracies, as well, but it is not typically enshrined in the constitution. The French Rights of Man mentioned nothing about race. … Somewhat astonishingly, the assemblage of far-right Israeli parties that rules Israel has managed to worsen its wretched human rights record in 2018 and to depart from liberal capitalist democracy almost entirely. Not only is Israel not the only democracy in the Middle East (that distinction now belongs to Tunisia), it isn't a democracy at all in the sense of a state of equal citizens able to vote for the government that rules them. [Read More] For more on the state of Israel's democracy and the forthcoming election, read Ariel Gold (Code Pink), "Elections Don't Make Israel a Democracy" [December 29, 2018]  [Link]
 
Nearly 300 Palestinians killed, 29,000 injured in 2018
By Maureen Clare Murphy, Electronic Intifada [December 27, 2018]
---- Israeli occupation forces and settlers have killed 295 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza since the beginning of the year, according to a UN monitoring group. Fourteen Israelis were killed by Palestinians during the same period, in addition to a baby who died days after his premature birth following the shooting and critical injury of his mother. More than 29,000 Palestinians were injured during 2018 – the highest number of injuries in a single year since the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs began collecting data in 2005. Nearly 60 of those Palestinians killed and 7,000 of those injured were children. Twenty-eight members of armed groups were among the fatalities, as were 15 perpetrators or alleged perpetrators of attacks against Israelis in the West Bank, according to OCHA. More than 60 percent of the fatalities and nearly 80 percent of the injuries took place in the context of the Great March of Return – mass protests held regularly along Gaza's eastern and northern perimeter since 30 March. [Read More]
 
A Day, a Life: When a Medic Was Killed in Gaza, Was It an Accident?
By David M. Halbfinger, New York Times [December 30, 2018]
---- A young medic in a head scarf runs into danger, her only protection a white lab coat. Through a haze of tear gas and black smoke, she tries to reach a man sprawled on the ground along the Gaza border. Israeli soldiers, their weapons leveled, watch warily from the other side. Minutes later, a rifle shot rips through the din, and the Israeli-Palestinian drama has its newest tragic figure. For a few days in June, the world took notice of the death of 20-year-old Rouzan al-Najjar, killed while treating the wounded at protests against Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip. Even as she was buried, she became a symbol of the conflict, with both sides staking out competing and mutually exclusive narratives. To the Palestinians, she was an innocent martyr killed in cold blood, an example of Israel's disregard for Palestinian life. To the Israelis, she was part of a violent protest aimed at destroying their country, to which lethal force is a legitimate response as a last resort. Read More]