Sunday, January 12, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on "Killer Drones" and Assassination

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
January 12, 2020
 
Hello All – A week ago, President Trump brought the USA to the edge of war with Iran by assassinating their General Suleimani. The murder weapon of choice was a missile fired by an MQ-9 Reaper Drone, flying high in the sky. In just over a decade, weaponized Drones have become the go-to tool in the Imperial Toolbox.  Drones come in many shapes and sizes. Some are large and some are small.  Some Drones are for surveillance: hovering over a village or tracking or searching for an individual who has been designated as a target. Others, like the Reaper, are outfitted with missiles to strike at the "enemy."
 
Beginning with the Obama administration, Drones have racked up an impressive record as a killing machine.  Drones have been used to kill people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria, Somalia, Yemen, Niger, Libya and the Philippines. The numbers are imprecise, hard to come by, and largely secret, but Drones have killed at least 12,200 people in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen alone.  The total number of drone dead is much higher, particularly because of more intense use of killer drones in Afghanistan in the last three years.  The government refuses to release figures on the numbers of these attacks.
 
The government says drone killing is "precise".  But the killing is done by Hellfire missiles and 500-pound bombs, which means that usually, many more than those targeted are killed.  And there is enduring terror from drone attacks for people who know that their lives can be snuffed out at any minute by an unseen and unheard missile.  We must understand that all those killed are being killed without due process, violating international law and U.S. law prohibiting assassination. Politicians are acting as judge, jury and executioner, as happened in the case of General Suleimani. Killer drones enable government vigilante actions that not only violate human rights but national sovereignty and respect for the rights of all governments to protect their citizens.  General Suleimani was killed in Iraq, whether the Iraqi government liked it or not.
 
Killer drones are bringing a new level of lawlessness to the world that is totally unacceptable. The world needs to ban weaponized Drones.  If their use and development continue, we will soon be in a world of war by "artificial intelligence," a world too frightening to contemplate.  A useful first step would be a negotiated moratorium on Drone killings, something Congress could legislate and presidential candidates could promise.  Please call Eliot Engel (202-225-2464); Chuck Schumer (202-224-6542); Nita Lowey (202-225-6506); and Kirsten Gillibrand (202-224-4451). Ask them to support legislation to stop weaponized Drones.
 
To learn more about the uses and dangers of weaponized Drones, the place to start is the website www.KnowDrones.com.  It is run by Nick Mottern, a resident of Hastings and a member of CFOW. His "Drone Organizer's Bulletin" includes analyses of drone warfare and reports from anti-drone organizers across the USA.  A useful overview of how Killer Drones serve as a weapon of terrorism, even when they are not firing their missiles, was published last month; read "Merry Christmas, America! Let's Remember the Children Who Live in Fear of Our Killer Drones," by Elise Swain and Jon Schwarz, [Read More] And on the same day that General Suleimani was killed in Iraq, a attempted assassination-by-drone failed to hit the right "bad guy" in Yemen, illustrating a glitch in our precision murder weapon. [Link] For an interesting overview of the role that drones play in the USA's great economic and military campaign in the Middle East, read Michael Hudson's "America Escalates Its "Democratic" Oil War in the Near East," [Link].
 
News Notes
On Thursday, January 9th, CFOW held a No War on Iran rally in Hastings.  More than 100 people attended.  (See pictures and video on our Facebook page.) Our event was one of more than 370 events organized by MoveOn across the country (see pictures here.)
 
In talking about the dangers of US/NATO military exercises on Russia's border, or other close encounters between US and Russian troops (e.g. Syria), we often say that this could lead to an accidental nuclear war.  Never! reply some of our critics.  Well, here are some semi-famous examples of how close we have com  to accidental nuclear war in the past decades – from the Union of Concerned Scientists.
 
It is usually said as a half-joke, half-truth: "The American people couldn't find [fill in whatever country we were bombing at the moment] on a map.  Well, now this question has been studied, and it turns out that 23 percent of Americans were able to locate Iran on a map, though an earlier survey found that 36 percent were able to find North Korea on a map. [Link]. Should the War Powers Act include a map test?
 
Finally, our Things to Do/Calendar (below) includes two rallies in Albany to relieve some of the horrors of Incarceration Nation.  Steve Siebert writes: "As we know, some important first steps toward criminal justice reform – the elimination of cash bail for misdemeanors and some non-violent felonies, and new discovery rules that give the accused the right to hear the evidence against them in a timely fashion – took effect in NY state on January first. But much more needs to be done to address the on-going injustices in the country's mass-incarceration system. There are two opportunities to continue this movement of reform that may be of interest, both involving lobbying days in Albany."
 
Things to Do/Coming Attractions
Tuesday, January 14th - Extinction Rebellion is an international movement that uses non-violent, direct action to raise awareness about the climate and ecological crisis. Extinction Rebellion Westchester will present a program called "Climate Change: Heading for Extinction (and What to Do About It.)"  XR says: "In this public talk, climate speakers from Extinction Rebellion will share the latest climate science on where our planet is heading, discuss some of the current psychology around climate change, and offer solutions through the study of social movements." At the JV Harmon Community Center, 44 Main St. in Hastings, from 7 to 9 pm.  Free.
 
Tuesday, January 14th – In Albany, there will be a rally to support Fair and Timely Parole (S.497A) and Elder Parole (S.2144). Almost 500 people are signed up to attend.  For details on the issue and the event, go here.
 
Thursday, January 16th & Saturday, January 18thThe Legal Aid Society of Westchester will present two "Know Your Rights" forums, both covering the new criminal justice legislation, immigration reform, and voter registration.  There will also be Legal Aid attorneys available for one-on-one discussions.  The forum on the 16th is at the Yonkers Riverfront Library from 5 to 7 pm; the forum on the 18th is at the Field Library in Peekskill, from 1 to 3 pm.
 
Tuesday, January 21st – Again in Albany, there will be a rally to limit solitary confinement to 15 days.  To learn more about the event and the reasons why the action is important, go here. The organizers are aiming for 1,000 participants; please join them!
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
SOME INTERESTING/ILLUMINATNG FEATURED ESSAYS
 
10 Ways Trump's Actions Against Iran Hurt the US, the Region, and the World
By Medea  Benjamin and Nicholas Davies, Common Dreams January 10, 2020]
---- The U.S. assassination of General Qassem Soleimani has not yet plunged us into a full-scale war with Iran thanks to the Iranian government's measured response, which demonstrated its capabilities without actually harming U.S. troops or escalating the conflict. But the danger of a full-blown war still exists, and Donald Trump's actions are already wreaking havoc. The tragic crash of the Ukranian passenger jet that left 176 dead may well be the first example of this, if indeed it was shot down by a jittery Iranian anti-aircraft crew who mistook the airliner for a U.S. warplane. "If we fail to haul our deluded leaders back from the brink, an American war on Iran may mark the ignominious end of our country's imperial moment and seal our country's place among the ranks of failed aggressors whom the world remembers primarily as the villains of human history." Trump's actions make the region, and the American people, less safe in at least ten important ways. [Read More]
 
What if Australia Were Its Own Planet?
By Bill McKibben, The Nation [January 9, 2020]
---- The idea of Australia as a planet of its own only goes so far, of course—even if it stopped exporting coal tomorrow and resolved to power its own economy with abundant wind and sun, Australia's temperature would continue to rise. The country cannot, by itself, solve global warming. But if the shock of these hideous firestorms is what's required to decisively change Australia's politics, technology, and relations with the continent's original inhabitants, that example would demonstrate to the rest of the world that real change is not impossible. Imagine an Australia that stopped building new coal mines and started installing more giant solar farms and batteries; imagine an Australia where people retreated enough to give the natural world the margin it clearly requires. What we're going to see, over the next year or two, is whether modern societies are capable of responding to this kind of horror with the speed and courage that science demands. Planet Australia may be the best experiment we ever get. [Read More]
 
Also useful/illuminating – Famous climate scientist Michael Mann is interviewed (video) on The Real News (15 minutes).  For some good reading: "Australia is built on lies, so why would we be surprised about lies about climate change?" by Luke Pearson for IndigenousX [January 9, 2020] [Link];  and "Australia's Decade of Burning Environmental Apathy," by Edward Cavanough, The Nation [January 10, 2020] [Link].  And in case you are wondering, read "2019 Was Second Hottest Year on Record," by [Link].
 
Tear-Gas Gelato, Foulmouthed Mooncakes and Other Foods Fit for a Revolution
By Laurie Wen, New York Times [January 9, 2020]
[FB – Laurie Wen, a filmmaker and writer, was recently the staff person for Physicians for a National Health Program in NYC, but is now in Hong Kong, writing a book about the democracy movement.]
---- If the current protests in Hong Kong have lasted seven months despite minimal concessions from the government and the rising costs — economic, social, psychological — of all the disruption and violence, that's partly because sympathetic citizens like Ah Wa have mobilized to organize parallel support systems for the demonstrators. Various shadow networks of caterers, lawyers, health care providers or car-poolers have emerged. There are apps that tell you which restaurants and shops are "yellow" (pro-democracy) and which are "blue" (pro-police and pro-government). … One dessert place invites front liners who are low on cash to "come be food testers." A steamed-rice crepe shop offers a free meal to anyone who hands in a yellow Post-it that says, "I love Hong Kong"; at one burger joint, you're comped a meal if you whisper to a staffer: "Hong Kong, ga yau!" — "add oil," a term of encouragement among protesters. Employees of an e-commerce platform prepay for restaurant meals and groceries, then give out the order numbers to demonstrators so they can claim the food. … Mooncakes, round pastries often filled with a pristine, salted egg yolk, can be eaten at any time, but they're most common around Mid-Autumn Festival, an annual harvest ritual held during a full moon. Legend has it that on the occasion of the holiday in 1368, Han Chinese rebels wanting to overthrow Mongol oppressors slipped into the cakes pieces of paper calling for a revolt. The people got the message, rose up and overthrew the Mongol Yuan dynasty. Today, Kristina Sze, the owner of Wah Yee Tang Bakery, doesn't bother hiding her messages inside the cakes; she stamps them on top. [Read More]
 
The War on the War on Cancer
By Sharon Lerner, The Interceept [January 12, 2020]
---- Virtually no sector of the EPA's work has escaped reversals that will cause disease and death among the U.S. population. The agency scrapped the Clean Power Plan and a rule to improve fuel efficiency standards for cars, depriving the public of not just the climate benefits but also the improvements to air quality and health both would have brought. The EPA rejected its own science in deciding not to ban chlorpyrifos, a pesticide linked to autism and other neurodevelopmental problems in children. Dozens of other EPA rollbacks — including the gutting of the Clean Water Act, the undermining of guidelines on emissions of methane from landfills, the loosening of restrictions on toxic air pollution from industrial facilities, the disbanding of a panel on air pollution — will have dire health consequences, as will the dramatic reduction in the enforcement of environmental laws. The erosion of these protections may leave Americans at greater risk of all kinds of health effects, including fertility issues, birth defects, and neurodevelopmental problems — all of which have been linked to chemical exposure. But among the most devastating of Trump's legacies will be an increase in cancers. [Read More]
Our History
Project 1619 and Its Detractors
By Louis Proyect, Counterpunch [January 10, 2020]
---- Last August, the New York Times Sunday Magazine devoted an entire issue to Project 1619, an attempt to root today's racism in the institution of slavery dating back to the seventeenth century. In 1619, British colonists in Point Comfort, Virginia bought twenty African slaves from Portuguese traders who had landed there, fresh from a body-snatching expedition. Times reporter Nikole Hannah-Jones wrote the introduction to ten articles in the magazine that focused on different aspects of Black oppression, such as Traymaine Lee's on the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Four months later, five prominent historians of the Civil War signed a letter demanding that the newspaper correct "errors" and "distortions" in Project 1619. … As an example of what irked the five historians, the letter complains about the project asserting that colonists declared independence from Britain "in order to ensure slavery would continue." It was clear that they were singling out Ms. Hannah-Jones who did write: "Conveniently left out of our founding mythology is the fact that one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery." [Read More]
 
 
 

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

CFOW anti-Iran War protest in Hastings - Thursday, 5 p.m. at VFW Plaza

Hi All - On Thursday, Concerned Families of Westchester will have a protest re Trump's war against Iran. We will assemble at the VFW Plaza in Hastings from 5 to 6 p.m. We'll have a banner and signs, some speakers and an open mic. This is part of the nationwide effort organized by MoveOn, Indivisible, etc. PLEASE JOIN US!

Frank Brodhead
For CFOW

Monday, January 6, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the US War on Iran

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
January 6, 2020
 
Hello All – This has been an extraordinary, terrifying week. After the assassination of Iran's General Qassem Soleimani, the world waits for the next shoe to drop. Iran is expected to respond to the assassination (at some time, at some place) in the near future, and Trump has announced/tweeted threats to obliterate Iran if it does. 
 
For some help in clarifying these fast-changing events, I recommend "A New Year and a New Trump Foreign Policy Blunder in Iraq" by Kata'ib Hezbollah) Democracy Now! program with Narges Bajoghli, a professor of Middle East studies at Johns Hopkins University.  (Also recommended is Prof. Bajoghli's op-ed in The New York Times, "Suleimani's Death Changes Nothing for Iran.")
 
Whether this war is long or short, whether it kills thousands or hundreds of thousands, depends partly on us, the American people. We can make Trump pay a price for this war – in the streets, in the media, in Congress, and in the voting booth.  If we fail to do this, if we stand by and let war engulf the Middle East, our children will reap the whirlwind. We have no choice: we must become an unstoppable force against war. Yesterday, CFOW held a well-attended rally in Hastings against Trump's war.  According to Popular Resistance, one of the organizers, there were rallies in at least 82 cities in 38 states. This is a good start.
 
Our first order of business is to make Congress Act. It is Congress, not the President, who can declare war. A war against Iran is not covered by existing authorizations to use military force.  The War Powers Act requires Trump to get the support of Congress if fighting goes beyond 30 days.  Other legislation in Congress demands that Trump get congressional approval before attacking Iran. The Democrats have focused on Trump's failure to consult Congress.  Our New York/Rivertowns representatives in Congress have a lot of power and can make a difference.  Please call them and let them know that we want them to stop war with Iran: Eliot Engel (202) 225-2464; Nita Lowey 202-225-6506; Sen. Chuck Schumer (202) 224-6542; and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (202) 224-4451.
 
This war will be a "war of choice," not of "self-defense." The Trump people say that Soleimani was a "legitimate target" because he was travelling to Baghdad to plan attacks on Americans.  Tragically, it appears that – according to the President of Iraq – Gen. Suli
has taken stepsa foreign policy debate among the Democratic presidential candidates.
Unless we stop this war it may escalate out of control. For the foreseeable future, negotiations between the US and Iran will not be possible. The Iran nuclear deal is totally dead. The US bombing of Iran will cause thousands of casualties. Iran and its allies will reply by attacking US people and institutions in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Pakistan, and many other places.  Israel and Saudi Arabia may be drawn into the war; and oil supplies from the Persian Gulf may be stopped, spiking the price of oil and contributing to worldwide economic difficulties.  Unless We the People – and our allies in Congress and voters in the 2020 election – can stop Trump and this war, it could last for years. We must do all we can!
 
Some useful reading on the US & Iran
The Assassination of Suleimani Escalates the Threat of War
By Phyllis Bennis The Nation [January 4, 2020]
How we understand history—the past as well as how the present will become the past—is determined by when we start the clock. The skyrocketing crisis between the United States and Iran didn't start a few days ago when rockets fired at an Iraqi military base killed a US military contractor. … This crisis began almost two years before, when Trump abandoned the internationally endorsed nuclear deal with Iran. Tehran was complying with the agreement, and the diplomacy had succeeded in preventing Iran from moving toward production of a nuclear weapon and was allowing the Iranian people at least a modicum of relief from crippling economic sanctions. Trump's decision to walk away from the deal, launch an economic war in the form of new devastating sanctions, and announce a policy of "maximum pressure" against Iran set the stage for the dangerous escalation we are seeing right now. [Read More]
 
Killing Qassim Suleimani Was Illegal. And Predictable.
By
---- After the attacks of Sept. 11, "targeted killings" became the new rubric employed to bypass the ban on assassinations — a term which had conveniently escaped definition either by the Church Committee or subsequent presidential authorizations. Under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, executive authority to carry out these targeted killings expanded. Mr. Bush authorized some 50 strikes, but the policy came into its own under Mr. Obama. His administration's lawyers reasoned that despite the ban on assassinations, "targeted killings" against nonstate actors outside the zone of active hostilities and in cases of imminent threat were lawful as act of self-defense in the context of the war on terror, thus authorizing a program that resulted in hundreds of strikes, causing the deaths of thousands of suspected terrorists and an untold number of civilians. The program has taken on renewed energy under President Trump. … The United States and Iran are now in a state of war by any other name. The belief that authorities aimed at nonstate actors would not eventually creep into activity against state actors has proved hollow. The expectation that backlash could be limited by decree has shown itself to be wishful thinking. And the trust that good men would be in office to oversee its legacy was all-too shortsighted. We have come perilously far, it seems, from the call of John Adams for "a government of laws not men." [Read More]
 
News Notes
Governor Cuomo has called for legislation establishing automatic hand recounts in close elections in New York State. Election-protection activists ask that we call the Guv to thank him for this initiative (518-474-8390). They also ask that we call our state senator (Andrea Stewart-Cousins - 518-455-2585) and our state assembly member (in the Rivertowns, Tom Abinanti - 518-455-5753) and ask them to support the governor's proposal for automatic hand recounts
 
The New York Times had an article yesterday reporting that young people are concerned about a return of the military draft. It is unlikely that the Pentagon would want this, and Congress would have to pass new legislation to bring back the draft, but it's possible that this is something that Trump would propose, he is so crazy.  But even the unfounded rumor may be enough to awaken young people to the fact that there's a war on.
 
On New Year's Day, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer released a letter from late last year accusing the United States of submitting Chelsea Manning to treatment that is tantamount to torture. Manning has not be accused of a crime, but of simply refusing to testify against Julian Assange. For a good explanation of her situation, and for five things that you can do to support Chelsea Manning, go here.
 
The US Border Patrol didn't miss a beat before it began its crackdown on Iranian-Americans and people of Iranian descent.  For a picture of things to come, read "U.S. Border Agency Says It's Not Singling Out Iranians. This Family Waited 11 Hours and Was Asked About Iranian Heritage" [Link]
 
Things to Do/Coming Attractions
Tuesday, January 14th - Extinction Rebellion is an international movement that uses non-violent, direct action to raise awareness about the climate and ecological crisis. Extinction Rebellion Westchester will present a program called "Climate Change: Heading for Extinction (and What to Do About It.)"  XR says: "In this public talk, climate speakers from Extinction Rebellion will share the latest climate science on where our planet is heading, discuss some of the current psychology around climate change, and offer solutions through the study of social movements." At the JV Harmon Community Center, 44 Main St. in Hastings, from 7 to 9 pm.  Free.
 
Thursday, January 16th & Saturday, January 18thThe Legal Aid Society of Westchester will present two "Know Your Rights" forums, both covering the new criminal justice legislation, immigration reform, and voter registration.  There will also be Legal Aid attorneys available for one-on-one discussions.  The forum on the 16th is at the Yonkers Riverfront Library from 5 to 7 pm; the forum on the 18th is at the Field Library in Peekskill, from 1 to 3 pm.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
SOME USEFUL/ILLUMINATING FEATURED ESSAYS
 
Happy New Year, Gaza
By Gideon Levy, Haaretz [Israel] [January 2, 2020
---- Eight years ago, in 2012, the United Nations issued a report entitled "Gaza in 2020: A livable place?" The answer was contained in the body of the report – no. Not unless steps are taken to save it. No real steps have been taken but the projections in this severe report were also not borne out: The situation is much worse than it predicted. On January 1, 2020, the year of the end for Gaza began. As of January 1, 2 million human beings are living in a place that is not livable. There's a Chernobyl in Gaza, an hour from Tel Aviv. And Tel Aviv is not bothered by that. Nor is the rest of the world. News reviews of the past decade included everything else, just not the humanitarian disaster in Israel's backyard for which Israel, first and foremost, is to blame, is responsible. Instead of taking responsibility for expelling and driving them to Gaza in 1948 and attempting to compensate and atone for what was done, through rehabilitation and assistance, Israel is continuing to pursue the policies of 1948 in a different way: a cage instead of expulsion, jail instead of ethnic cleansing, siege instead of dispossession. [Read More]
 
For more insights on the situation in Gaza, read – "Is 2020 the Year Gaza under Israeli Occupation Becomes Unlivable?" by Motasem A Dalloul, [December 29, 2019] [Link]; and "The U.N. once predicted Gaza would be 'uninhabitable' by 2020. Two million people still live there," by Miriam Berger and Hazem Balousha, Washington Post [January 2, 2020] [Link]. For some recent developments in Israel, read "Report: In 2019 Israel arrested over 5,500 Palestinians, including 889 children," by Kate, Mondoweiss [Link]; and "The ICC will likely throw out Palestine's case for war crimes, Norman Finkelstein says," by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss [December 31, 2019 [Link].
 
Afghan Papers Propagate Colonial Narrative of Noble Intentions Gone Awry
By Joshua Cho, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting [FAIR] [December 26, 2019]
---- The Afghanistan Papers should be considered an excellent case study of contemporary colonial propaganda, and yet another example of corporate media criticizing US wars without opposing US imperialism. Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky's famous analysis of media coverage of the Vietnam War, in Manufacturing Consent, found that questions of the invasion's "tactics and costs"—to the US—dominated the debate, because the media absorbed the framework of government propaganda regarding the "necessity" of military intervention, the "righteousness of the American cause" and the US's "nobility of intent." Decades later, Herman and Chomsky's propaganda model of corporate media is still a useful tool in understanding the Post's Afghanistan Papers. The Post advanced the centuries-old colonial narrative of the empire's good intentions gone awry when it argued that the US "inadvertently built a corrupt, dysfunctional Afghan government," and that this illustrated that "even some of the most well-intentioned projects could boomerang." … The Post is so eager to push this colonial narrative of noble incompetence that a later report on "key takeaways" from the Afghanistan Papers claimed that US officials "failed to align policy solutions with the challenges they confronted," having "strategic drift" in place of "coherent US policy for Afghanistan." As noted earlier, one method of discerning whether US officials are being dishonest, not incompetent, is to check whether the pretexts for invading and occupying another country are constantly changing. [Read More]  In 1971 the Pentagon Papers [Vietnam War] made a big media splash; the Afghanistan Papers….? The "Papers" were published on December 9th; neither ABC nor NBC news mentioned the story.  CBS had a story on December 9th, but no network news covered it on December 10th. [Link]
 
Americans Want Jobs, Not War
By Guy T. Saperstein and Joe Cirincione, The Nation [January 6, 2020]
--- The full polling results allow us to draw a number of interrelated conclusions about the mood of the electorate in this presidential election year. First, American voters are tired of endless wars. At a time when median real incomes have stagnated for more than a generation, people want more investment at home. This is not a call for isolationism; voters still want to be globally engaged. They just want policy-makers to prioritize funding the social, medical, and environmental changes needed in this country. Our results suggest that policy-makers would be rewarded—not punished—for pursuing diplomatic solutions to conflicts. Second, American voters are uncomfortable with the role of nuclear weapons in our defense policy. With the messaging we suggest, the public strongly supports fewer weapons, more negotiated restraints, and policies that will avoid nuclear war. Third, the American people believe the Pentagon budget is out of control. As former vice president Biden is fond of saying, "Show me your budget and I'll tell you what you value." By that yardstick, our values need some adjustment. There is a real hunger for plans, like those of Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, to lower defense spending and reduce corporate influence at the Pentagon.  Indeed, our polling suggests that the majority of voters will still call for cuts in Pentagon spending even if it affects their local communities, both because they believe their communities will recover and the money could be spent in more productive ways in the long run. [Read More] For a useful corrective to the Trump claim that he has brought us economic prosperity, read "Trump Will Claim Credit for a Robust Economy. This Is How We Fight Back," by Sasha Abramsky, The Nation [January 3, 2020] [Link].
 
Our History
First Lady of the World: Eleanor Roosevelt's Impact on New Deal to U.N. Declaration of Human Rights
From Democracy Now! [January 1, 2020]
---- This year, 2020, marks the hundredth anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which guaranteed women the right to vote. We begin this new decade with an hour-long special about one of the most influential women in U.S. politics, Eleanor Roosevelt, who served as the first lady of the United States from 1933, when her husband Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office, until his death during his fourth term in office in 1945. That wasn't the end of the story for Eleanor Roosevelt, though. She went on to serve as United States delegate to the United Nations General Assembly and spearheaded the U.N. Convention on Human Rights. President Harry Truman later called her the "First Lady of the World." I recently sat down with Blanche Wiesen Cook, distinguished professor of history and women's studies at John Jay College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. She's the author of the definitive three-part biography of the former first lady… I began by asking her how she came to write this trilogy on Eleanor Roosevelt. [See the Program]

Monday, December 30, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on Ending the Afghanistan War

CFOW Newsletter
December 30, 2019
 
Hello All – Eighteen years after the US invasion of Afghanistan, there may be hope for an end to the fighting.  On Sunday the Taliban Council agreed to a 10-day nationwide ceasefire, raising that possibility that a peace agreement with the United States could be signed. Progress in the peace negotiations comes just weeks after the publication in the Washington Post of thousands of pages of secret US government reports on the war revealed that for many years US military officials have known that the US was losing the war, information that was kept from Congress and the public. Widely compared to the Pentagon Papers of the Vietnam War, the "Afghanistan Papers" utterly discredit the 18-year US project in Afghanistan. Together, these two factors – the Papers and the peace negotiations – may be the breakthrough to peace that we have been waiting/working for.
 
Shortly after the Washington Post published the Afghanistan Papers, US Rep. and our congressman Eliot Engel announced that his Foreign Affairs Committee would hold hearings on the Afghanistan Papers in January. These hearings could be comparable to the historic Vietnam War hearings held by Senator William Fulbright in 1966; or they could be a superficial rehash of what we already know all too well.  There is much about the war we do not know, and which the government officials responsible for the Afghanistan Papers do know and have not told us.  Simply in terms of basic information, the Trump people have been refusing to report on battlefield casualties or missions, civilian casualties, desertions of Afghan soldiers, and similar basics in war reporting.  Of particular interest would be information on US bombing and drone strikes, which appear to be increasing; and to know how many civilians have been killed in the process.  The Afghanistan Papers' main revelations were the interviews the Inspector's staff held with high-ranking military officials, most of whom reported the war was going badly.  Rep. Engel could invite these and other officials to testify about whether their views were expressed up the military chain of command, and who kept this information secret from Congress and the public.  And much more.  And so now and in the coming weeks CFOW will encourage Rep. Engel's constituents to demand that he hold extensive and in-depth hearings on the Afghanistan War, focusing on how the war was prolonged and how peace can be achieved. To start off, please call Rep. Engel at 202-225-2464 to inquire when the Afghanistan Papers hearing will be held, and to express your concern that hearings cover the full extent of the war – from President Bush through President Obama and now to President Trump.  Thanks!
 
Some useful/illuminating reading about the Afghanistan Papers
We Have Just Been Handed the Pentagon Papers of Our Generation
By Danny Sjursen, The Nation [December 13, 2019]
---- Earlier this week, we learned that our leaders also knew the war was a fiasco, doomed to fail. But, unlike many of us, they chose not to speak out. Instead, as The Washington Post revealed in a series of stunning articles based on what it has labeled the Afghanistan Papers—a trove of previously classified documents that it is calling a "secret history of the war"—dozens of consecutive generals and senior US officials had repeatedly lied about, omitted, and obfuscated the facts to give an illusion of progress in that war. … The Afghanistan Papers don't try to answer these bigger questions, and perhaps they can't, but their significance is nonetheless profound. At 2,000 pages, they are nothing less than the Pentagon Papers of my generation. … In a real republic, these papers would be explosive, triggering investigations, denunciations, and serious policy conversations. The Senate would hold a lengthy inquest, such as the Fulbright hearings on Vietnam or the Church Committee on CIA abuses, in addition to producing substantive reports similar to the 9/11 commission or the McCain/Feinstein CIA torture report. But I'm skeptical. If this Afghan disclosure doesn't generate thorough investigation and accountability, can the concerned citizenry ever again count on Congress? Probably not. [Read More]
 
News Notes
Yesterday's CFOW holiday party was, as always, lots of fun and a happy reunion.  To see some pictures of the stalwarts in song, go here and here.
 
The new issue of the socialist magazine Jacobin has a nice interview with CFOW friend, Peekskill City Council member, and DSA activist Vanessa Agudelo: "We're Creating a Society That's Better for All of Us Together." [Link]
 
The United States of Incarceration.  Read a New York Times story about the 5 million children who have a parent in prison.  And this Twitter video about jailed immigrants was posted on our Facebook page yesterday; horrible. The Intercept has an interesting review about the history of "illegal" immigration – "Immigration Detention Is Part of Mass Incarceration: The Case for Abolishing ICE and Everything Else" [Link].
 
One of the forces distorting our democracy is the inability of millions of people to vote.  Part of this is due to the purging of voter rolls.  While dead people and people who have left town should be removed from voter lists, in too many places the process is used to remove thousands of actual voters – especially low-income people – from the registration lists. The New York Times recently reported  on the purges on Georgia, and CNN recently reported on the purge in Wisconsin.  The Brennan Center for Justice released a study Thursday showing that 17 million Americans were dropped from voter rolls between 2016 and 2018—almost four million more than the number purged between 2006 and 2008. [Link].
 
Senator Bernie Sanders (Vermont) and Rep. Rashida Tlaib (Minn) published a hard-hitting holiday statement last week, "Trump's holiday menu: handouts for billionaires, hunger for the poor."  Noting that 100 of the Fortune 500 companies pay no taxes, the statement focuses Trump's cuts in food stamps, housing and childcare cuts, and other attacks on the supposed "safety-net" for low-income people in Vermont and Minneapolis. Billions are taken from the poor, while the rich get tax cuts for Christmas.  Read more here. For some shocking (really?) details about the tax cuts, go here.
 
Continuing with the same theme, income inequality increased substantially in 2019, as "the world's 500 richest people gained $1.2 trillion in wealth in 2019," and "In the U.S., the richest 0.1% control a bigger share of the pie than at any time since 1929." [Link] According to an analysis in Bloomberg, the net worth of the world's richest 500 people increased by 25 percent last year, and the S&P stock market average gained 29 percent. (Thus, a stock portfolio of $1 million would increase in value by $290,000 over the last year.)  This does not happen by blind luck:  An illuminating article in today's New York Times shows "How Big Companies Won New Tax Breaks From the Trump Administration" following the tax law revisions of 2017. To keep up with this topic, I recommend https://inequality.org/, a project of The Institute for Policy Studies.
 
Finally, Democracy Now! spent the hour last Thursday with Michael Moore, talking about impeachment and prospects (not good, say Michael) for the future.  See the program here.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. Also, we (usually) have a general meeting on the first Saturday afternoon of each month. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
Yesterday's CFOW holiday party featured some group singing, led by Jenny Murphy and Joe Kaminsky.  As a Bostonian, my favorite tune of the afternoon was "Charlie on the MTA," written to support a leftish mayoral campaign in 1949, but made famous by the Kingston Trio in 1959. As with so much of mainstream Americana, the slightest inquiry reveals the hidden hand of peaceniks and progressives, in this case, the authors of the song, Jacqueline Steiner and Bess Lomax Hawes, true stalwarts. Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
SOME INTERESTING/ILLUMINATING FEATURED ESSAYS
 
At Christmas, Let's Remember the Children Who Live in Fear of Our Killer Drones.
By Elise Swain and Jon Schwartz, The Intercept [December 25, 2019]
---- The movie "Love Actually" has some good advice: At Christmas, you tell the truth. It's the perfect day to be honest about what you've done in the past year, what that says about who you are, and what it means about where you're heading. So, let's tell the truth about America. The truth is that, through a worldwide drone war we commenced two decades ago, we've invented a new form of terror for millions of people across the world. The truth is that we continued to escalate this war in 2019, yet there's no way to say exactly how much, because the U.S. government refuses to tell its citizens the basic facts about it. The truth is that the best sources of information on this war are two underfunded outfits — the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Airwars — that aren't even based in the United States. The truth is that these journalists can't be sure which airstrikes are being carried out by drones and which by conventional manned aircraft. The truth is that our drone war is like some undersea leviathan, the nature and size of which we can only guess at when parts of it briefly surface. The truth that is our fleet of killer drones is likely aloft on Christmas Day, right now, circling endlessly as intelligence analysts decide whether to pronounce a death sentence on people thousands of miles away. The truth is that, as we open presents, these death machines might as well — for all the space they occupy in our consciousness — not exist at all. The truth is that there have been six Democratic presidential debates this year, and during these six debates, the number of times our worldwide drone war was debated is zero. [Read More]
 
Bernie Is the Candidate Who Can Beat Trump. Here's Why.
By Meagan Day and Matt Karp, Jacobin Magazine [December 2019]
---- In the race for the Democratic nomination, one figure towers above the field: the large, misshapen form of President Donald Trump. … Across the primary campaign, Bernie Sanders and many of his supporters have argued that it is not enough to defeat Trump: we need to organize to transform the abysmal economic conditions that produced Trump, too. This is all very true. But in the meantime, there are elections to win. America simply cannot afford another Trump victory at the polls, or another four years of rapacious right-wing government. To prevent this nightmare, we must convince anxious voters that Sanders can and will throttle Trump in a general election. … The truth is that Democrats genuinely like Bernie: he has the highest favorability rating in the primary field, and among Democratic voters who prioritize "issues" — that is, what a president might actually try to do in office — Sanders leads the pack. Yet among the Democrats most concerned with beating Trump, Sanders currently trails. A hostile party establishment and an unfriendly media appear to have convinced many voters that Sanders is "too extreme" or "too far left" to win a general election. … But this primary season, anxious Democrats should trust their guts. It turns out that the candidate they like best, Bernie Sanders, is also the candidate with the best chance to knock Trump out of the White House. [Read More]  For another optimistic analysis of the Sanders polling data, go here.
 
The Climate Crisis Escalated in 2019. So Did the Climate Justice Movement.
By Sharon Zhang, Truthout [December 29, 2019]
---- 2019 is slated to be the second-warmest year on record, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This means that, come year's end, all of the top 10 warmest recorded years will have happened in the last two decades. The climate is worsening as we speak, and the years we have left to prevent even more catastrophic change are flying by. But there is something that sets this year apart, and it's not just because of the ever-worsening climate disasters. 2019 marked a renaissance for the climate movement. For the first time, the climate crisis became a top issue for registered Democrats, likely in part due to the newly widespread discussion of the Green New Deal (which every major news outlet covered in some way), and the hard work of climate activists. … As we approach a vital election year, this list is a reminder of how far we came on climate in 2019 — and how far we have to go. [Read More] Also very interesting imo is this article from Waging Nonviolence put up last April: "Why desperation could be the key to tackling climate change" by Cam Fenton [Link].
 
A Year in Review: Will 2020 Be a Game Changer in Palestine?
By Ramzy Beroud, Middle East Monitor [December 27, 2019]
---- This has been a defining year for Palestine and Israel. Despite the usual political stagnation of the Palestinian leadership, two factors contributed to making 2019 particularly eventful and, looking ahead, consequential as well: The unprecedented political power struggle in Israel, and the total US retreat from its own self-proclaimed role as an "honest peace broker". Since his first day in office, US President Donald Trump has made no secret of his desire to embrace fully the right-wing agenda of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Although the process started earlier, 2019 has witnessed the complete collapse of traditional US foreign policy which was, for nearly three decades, predicated on the principle of a negotiated political solution. … In some ways, 2019 did indeed prove to be a game-changer in Palestine and Israel. It is the year when the Israeli government managed to achieve total and unconditional US support, while the Palestinian leadership was left largely isolated and incapable of formulating an alternative agenda. However, while Israel persists in its prolonged political crisis and as the international community is still unable or, perhaps, unwilling, to play a more fundamental role in ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine, 2020 promises to be equally tumultuous and challenging. [Read More]
 
Americans are ready for a different approach to nuclear weapons
By Lawrence Wittner December 23, 2019
---- Although today's public protests against nuclear weapons can't compare to the major antinuclear upheavals of past decades, there are clear indications that most Americans reject the Trump administration's nuclear weapons policies. Since entering office in 2017, the Trump administration has withdrawn the United States from the nuclear agreement with Iran, scrapped the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with Russia, and apparently abandoned plans to renew the New START Treaty with Russia.  After an overwhelming majority of the world's nations agreed on a landmark UN Treaty on the Prohibitions of Nuclear Weapons in July 2017, the Trump administration quickly announced that it would never sign the treaty.  The only nuclear arms control measure that the Trump administration has pursued ― an agreement by North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program ― appears to have collapsed, at least in part because the Trump administration badly mishandled the negotiations. Moreover, the Trump administration has not only failed to follow the nuclear arms control and disarmament policies of its Democratic and Republican predecessors, but has plunged into a renewed nuclear arms race with other nations by championing a $1.7 trillion program to refurbish the entire U.S. nuclear weapons complex.  Perhaps most alarming, it has again and again publicly threatened to initiate a nuclear war. These policies are quite out of line with U.S. public opinion. [Read More]
 
Our History
The Confederation as the Commune of Communes
By Debbie Bookchin and Sixtine van Outryve, Roar Magazine [December 2019]
---- In 1936, at the apex of the Spanish Revolution, hundreds of Spanish villages, towns, neighborhoods and factories had organized themselves into collectives in which local residents made decisions about labor and the distribution of resources. For a splendid few months, these workers' and peasant assemblies and their committees took charge of nearly one third of Spain. They help to organize every aspect of political and social life: agricultural production, local administration, munitions and how to feed their people. While each community had a great degree of autonomy, they also cooperated informally, sometimes holding general assemblies that covered more than 1,000 families across 15,000 square kilometers. Like the French revolutionaries of the sectional assemblies of 1793 and the Paris Commune of 1871, which called for a nationwide Commune of Communes, the fiercely democratic anarchists of Spain understood that to maintain their autonomy, any decision-making body had to be directly accountable to the communities from which they derived their power. These popular assemblies and their empowerment of ordinary people were coordinated through an important process: confederation, also known as confederalism. By coordinating collective will through a confederal council, the confederation allows for the organization of political life over a large territory and a large population in a directly democratic way. [Read More]