Sunday, September 15, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on Friday's Global Climate Strike

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
September 15, 2019
 
Hello All – The focus of this week's CFOW newsletter is on our climate crisis and next Friday's "Global Climate Strike," which will take place in 117 countries, with more than 2,500 events, including some in Westchester and a big rally and march starting in NYC's Foley Square (near City Hall) at noon. (Find events near you here.) CFOW stalwarts and friends will be heading down to the event on the Metro North train leaving Dobbs Ferry at 10:48 and Hastings at 10:50; (at GCS we will meet the train leaving Greystone at 10:37). Please join us!
 
Why a climate strike?
Yesterday, in front of the White House, Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg and dozens of other young people held an 11-minute "die-in" to dramatize the rule-of-thumb timeline that we have only 11 years to turn around our climate crisis before it may be too late. While "how long do we have?" before it is too late to head off extreme disaster is somewhat uncertain, over the past decade the proposed timelines have been getting shorter and shorter, and now the year 2030 seems to be the most hopeful deadline.  (It could well be much shorter, including "yesterday.") – What this means is that, as greenhouse gases (mostly carbon dioxide and methane) accumulate in our atmosphere), our climate will warm at a predictable rate, and that before too long the Earth's temperature will have risen more than 2.7 degrees (Fahrenheit) over pre-industrial times, and we will reach a tipping point of extreme danger and possibly runaway warming.
 
And so this is The Emergency, and it confronts us all.  But what has changed in recent years is that young people have reframed The Emergency, pointing out that the Leaders of the Free World, and not incidentally their own parents, will be dead and gone before the worst impacts of the climate crisis arrive, and that it is they – those today under 30, for example – who will bear the brunt of this existential crisis, a crisis that they had no personal role in creating.  This is obviously unfair; and the anger of young people is compounded by the universally acknowledged truism that their parents' generation has done virtually nothing to address the crisis.  And if righteous anger needed any other fuel, the election of climate-vandal Donald Trump takes the cake. And so first in Europe, and now all over the world, young people are acting to try to save themselves from a horrible fate.  In the USA, we have the Sunrise Movement, the Green New Deal, and now a Global Climate Strike.  This is a desperate moment, and all of us need to do as much as we can to support our children and grandchildren.
 
But isn't The Green New Deal too expensive?
Whenever someone proposes ways to deal with our climate crisis, the mainstream media highlight the cost of the proposal and ask, "How could we possibly pay for this?" To which Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg replies, "If we can save the banks, then we can save the World."  And so yes, it's expensive, but it's not like we haven't done something big before.  Another answer is that the cost of doing not enough is greater than the cost of being serious about the climate crisis. Recently, in The Nation, Joshua Holland wrote, "The Green New Deal is Cheaper Than Climate Change."  "Even if we set aside the human and biospheric costs of climate change," he writes, "the economic cost of allowing temperatures to rise even a couple of degrees above that target is simply staggering." Scientists working at the Environmental Protection Agency, for example, estimated that "a fraction of the potential risks and damages" to the USA economy in 2090 will be costing $224 billion per year if global warming is not effectively slowed and stopped.  Examples of the economic losses of our climate crisis are all around us; for example, a report cited in The New York Times this week claimed that "extreme weather displaced a record 7 million in first half of 2019."  Another article in The Times – about the Great Flood [USA] of 2019 – reported "this year's flooding across the Midwest and the South affected nearly 14 million people. … The causes of flooding are complicated, but climate change is increasingly an exacerbating factor. Warmer air can hold more moisture, and that moisture can fall back out of the sky, whether as rain or snow, in greater amounts." (And this excellent article includes maps and pictures that show how extensive and disastrous were the Midwestern floods in the first half of this year.)
 
The Global Climate Strike is not just on Friday
What can we do?  How can I help?  These are the questions we need to be asking (and answering) in the months and years ahead.  We are up against the fossil fuel companies, who are investing billions of dollars in exploration and new drilling, when we will certainly bring ourselves to doom if we even burn the fossil fuels now ready for market.  We are up against a political system that refuses to consider the Green New Deal or similar proposals; and we are up against a media system that continues to ignore our climate crisis (for example, only one climate question during the last presidential candidates' debate). So it won't be easy; but when our grandchildren ask us, "What did you do in the great war to save our climate?" what will we answer?  "A lot," I hope.
 
Read more about the Global Climate Strike
 
(Video) Greta Thunberg on the Climate Fight: "If We Can Save the Banks, Then We Can Save the World"
An interview with Naomi Klein, The Intercept [September 13 2019]
---- We are living through some scary times. As Greta has told us so often: "Our house is on fire." And I firmly believe that there are three things that have to align if we are going to douse the flames. First, we need the courage to dream of a different kind of future. To shake off the sense of inevitable apocalypse that has pervaded our culture. To give us a destination, a common goal, a picture of the world we are working towards. But those dreams are useless unless we are willing to embrace the other two forces. One is the need to confront the truth of our moment in history — the truth of how much we have already lost and of how much more we are on the brink of losing if we do not embrace revolutionary levels of change. The other thing we have to do is this: We have to find our fight. We have to come together across differences and build credible, unshakable power. In the face of the fires roiling our world, we have to find our own fire. Truth and fire. [Read More]
 
(Video) "We Are Striking to Disrupt the System": An Hour with 16-Year-Old Climate Activist Greta Thunberg
From Democracy Now! [September 11, 2019]
---- In her first extended broadcast interview in the United States, we spend the hour with Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old Swedish climate activist who has inspired millions across the globe. Last year she launched a school strike for the climate, skipping school every Friday to stand in front of the Swedish parliament, demanding action to prevent catastrophic climate change. Her protest spread, quickly going global. Hundreds of thousands of schoolchildren around the globe have participated in their own local school strikes for the climate. Since her strike began in 2018, Greta has become a leading figure in the climate justice movement. [See the Program]
 
There's Only One Antidote for Climate Despair—Climate Revolt
By Ben Ehrenreich, The Nation [September 9, 2019]
---- What could it mean to "act now," when we have so little time? How to find the will to fight when everything seems doomed? It's hard even to move when temperatures break 100, and harder still when you know that the sweat soaking your shirt means the Gulf Stream is failing, the permafrost melting, that Alaska's sea ice is already gone, that we're running out of arable land, out of water, out of time.  The left has rarely been comfortable talking about despair, much less about faith—of the religious sort or any other. But who ever expected to have to mourn a planet, to watch the shadow of extinction fall on so many living things? Our demise is not yet fated, but even without Bolsonaro and Trump, we are running headlong towards it. Carbon emissions continue to climb. Despair hangs heavy, stifling, grey as meltwater rushing off a Greenland glacier. Sometimes it feels more frantically debilitating, a roaring orange, like the Arctic and the Amazon in flames. It has its own feedback loops, too: If we don't act, we know that all will certainly be lost; but all action feels inadequate, so we muddle on as the ground collapses in front of us. From the beginning, Extinction Rebellion—"XR" in movement shorthand—has sought a way out of this bind. [Read More]
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
That's it for this week.
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
This Week's Featured Essays
 
Observe 9/11 Anniversary by Calling for an End to the Afghan War
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [September 10, 2019]
---- The U.S. military invasion of Afghanistan violated the United Nations Charter, which mandates that countries settle their disputes peacefully. The Charter forbids the use of military force except in self-defense or with Security Council authorization. The invasion was not lawful self-defense, as it did not respond to an armed attack by Afghanistan. The 9/11 attacks were not carried out by the Afghan government. And although the Council passed Resolutions 1368 and 1373 in response to the 9/11 attacks, neither resolution authorized the United States to use military force against Afghanistan. Instead, the resolutions condemned the 9/11 attacks; ordered the freezing of assets and criminalization of terrorist activity; urged steps to prevent terrorist activity, including sharing of information; and advocated ratification and enforcement of international conventions against terrorism. … The 18-year U.S. war in Afghanistan has claimed the lives of 139,000 Afghan civilians and combatants, and more than 6,300 U.S. soldiers and mercenaries. And the carnage in Afghanistan is only getting worse. July 2019 was the deadliest month of the past two years, with 1,500 civilians killed or wounded. During the first half of 2019, nearly 4,000 civilians were killed in Afghanistan, and it was primarily the United States that caused most of the civilian deaths in that time period. [Read More] For an interesting appraisal of the deeper background behind the Afghanistan war, read "A century after the Anglo-Afghan peace treaty, the Fourth Afghan War is about to escalate," by Robert Fisk, The Independent [UK] [August 2019] [Link].
 
(Video) Noura Erakat: Netanyahu's Proposed West Bank Annexation Is Logical End to Israel's Apartheid Policy
From Democracy Now [September 12, 2019]
---- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing worldwide condemnation for vowing to annex nearly a third of the occupied West Bank if he wins next week's snap election. The United Nations, the Arab League, the European Union and Russia have all criticized Netanyahu's plan, which he unveiled Tuesday. Netanyahu's pledge comes just a week before Israeli voters return to the polls on Tuesday for new elections after Netanyahu failed to form a coalition government following Israel's April 9 election. Netanyahu's annexation plan would crush hopes of an eventual Palestinian state. We speak with Noura Erakat, Palestinian human rights attorney and an assistant professor at Rutgers University. [See the Program]
 
For more insights on the Israeli annexation plan – "Netanyahu Openly Boasts About Stealing vast Swathes of Palestine, but US Pols Won't Acknowledge It," by Juan Cole, Informed Comment [Link]; "A declaration of war on the two-state solution," by Gershon Baskin, Jerusalem Post [September 12, 2019] [Link]; and "Why Bibi Fears Arab Voters," by Yardena Schwartz, New York Review of Books [September 10, 2019] [Link]. You can also listen to Noura Erakat on a podcast from +972 Magazine, "Has international law failed Palestinians?" [August 30, 2019]  [Link] - 48 minutes.
 
The Question That Never Gets Asked About Kashmir
By Charles Glass, Stratfor [September 9, 2019]
---- In 1998, the CIA subjected India to strict surveillance to ensure it was complying with its commitment not to test nuclear weapons. The agency used satellites, communications intercepts and agents to watch the nuclear facility at Pokhran in Rajasthan state. India could not detonate warheads, which would inevitably lead Pakistan to follow suit, without the United States knowing in advance. Or so the United States thought. Washington went into shock on May 11, 1998, when Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee announced that his country had just detonated not one, but five nuclear warheads at Pokhran. "India is now a nuclear power state," Vajpayee declared. … If the CIA is watching India and Pakistan now, it will have to do better than it did in 1998. In 2019, with passions high over India's abrogation of Kashmir's legal, if fictitious, autonomy, the outcome would not be waking up to discover one side or the other had tested weapons. It would be the sight of nuclear war taking millions of lives. Although the stakes in Kashmir could not be higher, the United States and much of the international community call the dispute India's "internal affair" or a "bilateral" issue between India and Pakistan. It isn't. A potential nuclear conflagration cannot be anything other than a matter of international peace and security. The Indian and Pakistani armed forces possess both strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, which local commanders could use on the battlefield in populated areas. This would be the first use in war of atomic weapons since the U.S. destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.  [Read More]  India's fascist government is not neglecting the rest of India: read "'Everywhere is Kashmir': Unraveling Weaponized, Corporatized Hindustan in India's Northeast," b [Link].
 
Latest Russian spy story looks like another elaborate media deception
By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone [September 13, 2019]
---- The story was broken by CNN Monday, September 9th, under the headline, "Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017": "In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN." … If the mole was even that important, it seems more than possible we lost this "asset" because our intelligence chiefs felt it necessary to spend late 2016 and early 2017 spilling details about our capabilities in the news media. This story wasn't leaked to tell the public an important story about a lost source in the Kremlin, but more likely as damage control, to work the refs as investigators examine the origins of the election interference tale [Read More]
 
Our History
Salvador Allende's Last Speech
[FB – Chilean President Salvador Allende died 46 years ago (September 11, 1973) in a US-backed coup. As a socialist, he moved his country in a progressive direction.  With his overthrow, the country plunged into a nightmare of fascist violence.  Here's his final address, broadcast over the radio while he was barricaded in the presidential palace.]
---- My friends, surely this will be the last opportunity for me to address you. The Air Force has bombed the towers of Radio Portales and Radio Corporación. My words do not have bitterness but disappointment. May they be a moral punishment for those who have betrayed their oath: soldiers of Chile, titular commanders in chief, Admiral Merino, who has designated himself commander of the Navy, and Mr Mendoza, the despicable general who only yesterday pledged his fidelity and loyalty to the government, and who also has appointed himself chief of the Carabineros [national police]. Given these facts, the only thing left for me is to say to workers: I am not going to resign! Placed in a historic transition, I will pay for loyalty to the people with my life. And I say to them that I am certain that the seed which we have planted in the good conscience of thousands and thousands of Chileans will not be shriveled forever. They have strength and will be able to dominate us, but social processes can be arrested neither by crime nor force. History is ours, and people make history. [Read More]

Sunday, September 8, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Global Climate Strike - September 20th

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
September 8, 2019
 
Hello All - Last week, as Hurricane Dorian barreled toward the Bahamas, 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg - "Hurricane Greta" - landed in New York.  Known widely as the inspiration for "student climate strike," Greta stepped off an emission-free sailboat to be greeted by a crowd of several hundred people. She will soon be attending a UN climate summit, but before that she will be part of a worldwide "Global Climate Strike" on Friday, September 20th.
 
Why a Climate Strike? Since 1988 we have known that human activity, especially burning gas, coal, and oil, has caused the Earth to get warmer, thus changing our climate and our weather. Since 1988, global warming has continued, but the governments of the world have done little to protect us.  We are approaching a time when global warming may be unstoppable.  This is our emergency
 
Let's stay with Hurricane Dorian for a moment, a Category 5 storm that more or less destroyed an entire island nation, and brought fear and trembling to other islands and the USA coastal states. Climate scientist tell us that warmer water and warmer air make such storms more frequent and more intense, and that such storms move more slowly than in years gone by, giving them more time to dump rain on wherever they are.  Despite the obvious connections between global warming and the especially damaging effects of Hurricane Dorian, two useful/illuminating media studies (here and here) show that corporate media – print and television – made a connection between our climate crisis and Hurricane Dorian in only a few out of hundreds of reports.  Is it any wonder that people of the USA, of all the industrialized nations in the world, are the least knowledgeable about, and the least concerned with, our climate crisis?
 
So here comes the Global Climate Strike  – the week of September 16 -20.  The energy behind the Climate Strike comes from young people.  While the leaders of the world's nations will be dead and gone long before the full impact of climate chaos strikes us, young people will still be here to bear the brunt of disaster.  And they are angry and they are rebelling. They say the obvious: it is not fair that their lives will be ruined and our civilization traumatized because the elites of their parents' generation were unwilling or unable to tackle the power of the fossil-fuel giants and pay attention to climate science, not Fox News.
 
While the youth uprising and protests against the fossil fools are everywhere, the most active groups now leading the fight for our climate are the "Extinction Rebellion" and the "Sunrise Movement."  Extinction Rebellion has its roots in Europe, especially the UK, using nonviolent civil disobedience to protest their government's inaction. The Extinction Rebellion's obvious point is that We the People should not go quietly to our graves, doing nothing while the fossil fools and their governments destroy us.  Fight back!
 
The Sunrise Movement is based in the USA.  It is composed of young people, and is similar to the student strikes in Europe, where, partly inspired by Greta Thunberg, students have been striking, marching, and protesting each Friday, disrupting business-as-usual.  In the USA, the Sunrise Movement held a sit-in in Nancy Pelosi's office last fall, demanding that Congress take action for a Green New Deal.  And it was the Sunrise Movement that led the demand that the Democratic Party hold a presidential candidates' debate on the climate crisis.
 
This week's CNN forum on the climate crisis, where the Democratic presidential candidates talked at length about their plans to fix our climate crisis, was a response to this grassroots rebellion. While there were differences among the candidates, almost all favored ending carbon emissions by 2050, ending federal subsidies of the fossil fuel industry, and restricting oil and gas leasing on public lands. But the forum also exposed differences about how to do all this, and how aggressively to fight Big Energy. Among Democratic Party activists, a debate focuses on Joe Biden and whether his climate proposals are strong enough to gain the support (or assent) of liberals.  And once again, if and when the mainstream media allow "climate" to be discussed, they ignore the urgency of the crisis and the short-term timetable that Nature has given us, rejecting – for example – Bernie Sanders' proposals as too extreme.
 
So far climate strikes are planned in 117 countries, with over 2,500 events planned.  In NYC, the main rally will be on Friday, September 20th, in Foley Square (near City Hall) starting at noon.  In Westchester, there will be rallies in Croton (121 Maple St.) at 11:30 AM, and at Chuck Schumer's office in Peekskill (1 Park Place) at 9 AM.  And on Monday, September 9th, the Climate Strike week will be kicked off by Naomi Klein and Greta Thunberg speaking at a town hall in NYC.  Though the event is sold out, you can watch a live stream broadcast starting at 7 pm.  If we learn of additional events, they will be posted on the CFOW Facebook page.
 
Some Useful Reading on the Climate Crisis
Why the Democratic National Committee Must Change the Rules and Hold a Climate Debate
By Naomi Klein, The Intercept [August 21, 2019]
---- Here is why setting an emergency tone at this crossroads is so important. Imagine that the party does absolutely everything right between now and November 2020. It elects a beloved candidate to lead the party with a bold and positive platform; that candidate goes on to defeat Trump in the general election; other galvanizing candidates succeed in taking the Senate and keeping the House for your party. Even in that long-shot, best-case scenario, a new administration would come to power with the climate clock so close to midnight that it will need to have earned an overwhelming democratic mandate to leap into transformative action on day one. The timeline we face is nonnegotiable. [Read More]
 
The Rise of a New Climate Activism
By Sophie Yeo, The Ecologist [September 5, 2019]
---- I saw Greta Thunberg for the first time in Poland at the end of last year. It was during the early days of the Katowice (Poland) UN climate negotiations. … What I didn't realise was that she would catalyse a shift in how climate activism works altogether. … The viral nature of the movement, where young people can broadcast their concerns to millions, highlights the potency of a concoction both timeless and modern: the anger of youth and the organising power of social media. … When Greta told the UN that "real power belongs to the people", she couldn't have known the extent to which that sentiment would define the next year of climate activism. What we don't know yet is whether it's enough. Enough power. Enough people. [Read More]
 
We Will See Roots Reaching Out for Each Other
By Vijay Prashad, Tricontinental [September 8, 2019]
---- Last week, Agence France-Presse got its hands on a draft UN report called Special Report on the Ocean and Cyrosphere in a Changing Climate. This 900-page document is study of the oceans for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN body which won the Nobel Prize for Peace in 2007. What extracts have become available make for chilling reading. 'The same oceans that nourished human evolution', the draft says, 'are poised to unleash misery on a global scale unless the carbon pollution destabilising Earth's marine environment is brought to heel'. … Unless there are deep cuts to the carbon emissions created by humans, at least 30% of the northern hemisphere's surface permafrost could melt within the next eight decades. This would mean that by 2050 the oceans will rise, and the 'extreme sea level events' will wipe out islands and low-lying megacities. Few scientists are convinced that warming can be controlled at the threshold of 1.5˚C; they hope for 2˚C. At this increase of temperature, the oceans will rise sufficiently to displace more than a quarter of a billion people; these displaced people – at 250 million – would collectively form the fifth largest country in the world after China, India, the United States of America, and Indonesia. [Read More]
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
The CFOW Newsletter is changing.  This edition is a first-draft of how the changed newsletter will look.  Until now, the Newsletter has tried to have useful information/links for the issues that CFOW is engaged with; but as time went on, and the number of issues has grown, things got out of hand.  And the editor is not getting any younger.  Going forward, we are thinking of a topical focus for each newsletter – in today's case, the climate crisis – supported by some useful articles; and an additional selection of a half-dozen articles of general interest – what used to be called "Featured Essays."  The result will be about 5 pages instead of ten, perhaps more readable and with more focus.  Your comments are appreciated.
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
GOOD READING
 
"There Are Reasons for Optimism" [An interview with Noam Chomsky]
Interview by John Nichols, Catalyst [September 2019]
---- When you were ten years old, you wrote a short essay on your concerns about the rise of fascism. You were writing after the fall of Barcelona to Francisco Franco's fascist forces in the closing days of the Spanish Civil War. The Americans who fought in that war, as members of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, were disparaged as "premature anti-fascists," as they dared to raise arms against the allies of Hitler and Mussolini before the US entered World War II on December 8, 1941. At ten, you aligned yourself with the antifascists. Do you recall the article?
Chomsky: The article was for the fourth-grade newspaper. I was the editor and the only reader as far as I recall, aside from maybe my mother. Luckily for me, she didn't save anything. I'm sure it would be quite embarrassing. All I remember about it is the first sentence, which described what I was thinking at the time. The first sentence was: Austria falls, Czechoslovakia falls, Toledo falls and now Barcelona falls. I was writing after the fall of Barcelona, February 1939. And it just seemed at the time that the spread of fascism was inexorable. Nothing was going to stop it. The article was concerned with what was going on in the world, which was frightening. I was old enough to listen to Hitler's speeches at the Nuremberg Rallies — not understanding the words, but it was easy enough to pick up the tone. You could just see what was happening as this plague spread all over Europe and seemed to have no end. [Read More]
 
(Video) Shut It Down: Veteran Organizer Lisa Fithian Offers a Guide to Resistance in Era of Climate Crisis
From Democrcy Now! [September 6, 2019]
---- Lisa Fithian is a longtime organizer and nonviolent direct action trainer since the 1970s. She has shut down the CIA. She has occupied Wall Street, disrupted the World Trade Organization and stood her ground in Tahrir Square. She has walked in solidarity with the tribal leaders at Standing Rock and defended communities in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. She joined us at the Democracy Now! studio to talk about her new book, which was published this week, titled "Shut It Down: Stories from a Fierce, Loving Resistance." Fithian is currently on a book tour and doing a new workshop called "Escalating Resistance: Mass Rebellion Training." [See the Program]  And you can see Part Two of this interview, "'Shut It Down: Stories from a Fierce, Loving Resistance': Lisa Fithian Reflects on Decades of Protest"
[Link]  For additional analysis and inspiration about why and how to take action, highly recommended is "Strike! - Unbreakable human solidarity is what we need, and mass strikes are the strategy to get it," by veteran organizer Jane McAlevey, The Nation [September 2, 2019] [Link]
 
Why is the Far-Right Rising Globally?
An interview with Walden Bello, The Real News [August 25, 2019]
---- Walden Bello, author of "Counterrevolution: The Global Rise of the Far-Right," argues that the far-right is in ascendancy at the moment not only in reaction to the failures of neoliberalism, but also because of the failures of liberal democracy. Not since the pre-World War II period of the early 20th century have there been as many far-right governments in office as today. It almost seems that with every new election, another one joins the ranks of governments that can be described as authoritarian, anti-immigrant, xenophobic, homophobic, racist, or even sexist. Governments that fall into this far-right categorization include Jair Bolsonaro's government in Brazil, Rodrigo Duterte's in the Philippines, Narendra Modi's of India, Tayyip Erdogan's of Turkey, Viktor Orban's of Hungary, Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, and last but not least, Donald Trump's government in the United States. They all came into power in the last five years, more or less. Why is it though that there is this fairly sudden rise of the far-right? There are a number of political scientists and sociologists who have tried to explain this phenomenon, but it receives relatively little attention in the general public. Joining me now to discuss the global rise of the far right is Walden Bello. He is a sociologist who has given this topic a lot of attention. He actually recently published a book on this topic with the title, Counterrevolution: The Global Rise of the Far Right. [Read More]  Also highly recommended is Part Two of the interview, "How to Confront the Global Rise of the Right? [August 26, 2019] [Link]
 
Our History
From mind control to murder? How a deadly fall revealed the CIA's darkest secrets
By Stephen Kinzer, The Guardian [UK] [September 6, 2019]
---- Glass shattered high above Seventh Avenue in Manhattan before dawn on a cold November morning in 1953. Seconds later, a body hit the sidewalk. Jimmy, the doorman at the Statler hotel, was momentarily stunned. Then he turned and ran into the hotel lobby. "We got a jumper!" he shouted. "We got a jumper!" The night manager peered up through the darkness at his hulking hotel. After a few moments, he picked out a curtain flapping through an open window. It turned out to be room 1018A. Two names were on the registration card: Frank Olson and Robert Lashbrook. … Decades later, however, spectacular revelations cast Olson's death in a completely new light. First, the CIA admitted that, shortly before he died, Olson's colleagues had lured him to a retreat and fed him LSD without his knowledge. Then it turned out that Olson had talked about leaving the CIA – and told his wife that he had made "a terrible mistake". Slowly, a counter-narrative emerged: Olson was disturbed about his work and wanted to quit, leading his comrades to consider him a security risk. All of this led him to room 1018A. [Read More]
 
At the Movies
Film 'Official Secrets' is the Tip of a Mammoth Iceberg
By Sam Husseini, Consortium News [August 29, 2019]
---- Katharine Gun worked as an analyst for Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), the British equivalent of the secretive U.S. National Security Agency. She tried to stop the impending invasion of Iraq in early 2003 by exposing the deceit of George W. Bush and Tony Blair in their claims about that country. For doing that she was prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act — a juiced up version of the U.S. Espionage Act, which in recent years has been used repeatedly by the Obama administration against whistleblowers and now by the Trump administration against WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange. Gun was charged for exposing— around the time of Colin Powell's infamous testimony to the UN about Iraq's alleged WMDs – a top secret U.S. government memo showing it was mounting an illegal spying "surge" against other U.N. Security Council delegations in an effort to manipulate them into voting for an Iraq invasion resolution. The U.S. and Britain had successfully forced through a trumped up resolution, 1441 in November 2002. In early 2003, they were poised to threaten, bribe or blackmail their way to get formal United Nations authorization for the invasion. [Read More] For another good review/perspective, read "The Best Movie Ever Made About the Truth Behind the Iraq War Is "Official Secrets," by Jon Schwarz, The Intercept [August 31, 2019] [Link]
 

Sunday, August 25, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - Climate Crisis and Climate Denial

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
August 25, 2019
 
Hello All – This week the Amazon basin, the home to 20 percent of our oxygen and a critical "carbon sink" for keeping CO2 out of the atmosphere, was also the home to more than 70,000 fires, many caused by lightening but many more set by ranchers, loggers, and miners to "clear the land." This is not new: over the past fifty years, one-fifth of the Amazon has been "cleared" for cattle ranching and extractive industries.
 
While the world watched in horror as the Amazon burned, the Democratic National Committee met in California.  One of its acts was to defeat two attempts to persuade the Committee to allow a presidential candidates' debate focused solely on the climate crisis, something that the candidates themselves endorsed and was supported by thousands of grassroots climate activists.  In its wisdom, the Committee maintained that the climate crisis was but one important issue of many – guns, vote rigging, infrastructure, etc. – and should not be given special privilege.
 
And this is where we are now.  While the "moderates" in control of the Party hope to manipulate "moderate" Joe Biden into the presidential nomination, the more liberal or radical wing of the party centers itself around the Green New Deal and issues that would resonate with lower-income Democrats.  This liberal opposition says that maintaining a livable climate is a pre-requisite to all our other aspirations.  Additionally, the liberal opposition takes seriously the consensus among climate scientists that we have only a decade or so to solve this problem before the window of opportunity closes forever.  Thus the job will be accomplished under the President elected in 2020, or it won't be done at all. So Trump must be defeated; but ALSO the victorious Democratic candidate must come into office with a mandate to take the revolutionary measures if we are to save ourselves. Winning is good, but not enough; the victory must represent a strong national consensus to transform what much be changed to greatly diminish the threats that face us.  As Naomi Klein explained in an "Open Letter" to the DNC:
 
"Here is why setting an emergency tone at this crossroads is so important. Imagine that the party does absolutely everything right between now and November 2020. It elects a beloved candidate to lead the party with a bold and positive platform; that candidate goes on to defeat Trump in the general election. … Even in that long-shot, best-case scenario, a new administration would come to power with the climate clock so close to midnight that it will need to have earned an overwhelming democratic mandate to leap into transformative action on day one.  The timeline we face is nonnegotiable. … Global emissions need to be slashed in half in the decade that follows a new U.S. administration taking office. Not 10 years to agree on a plan or 10 years to get started on the plan. It will have 10 years to get the job done."
 
We have never done this before; even the economic conversion from peace to a war economy in 1941 is dwarfed by the changes that we have to make.  At the moment, the idea of a "Green New Deal" and the detailed program put forward this week by Sen. Bernie Sanders (linked below) look like the most useful set of ideas on the table. But here we are, trying to persuade the Democratic Party leadership that the climate crisis is more than "a single issue." We have only six months or so to change this.
 
Last week activists and politicians in Iceland gathered to memorialize the loss of a massive glacier, the first such loss in the current crisis.  The assembly heard speeches and poems about the death of the glacier, and erected a memorial plaque.  The message it left for future generations reads: ""In the next 200 years all our glaciers are expected to follow the same path. This monument is to acknowledge that we know what is happening and what needs to be done. Only you know if we did it." Is this our future?
 
News Notes
David Koch died this week.  One half of the "Koch Brothers" team, the billionaire racist and climate denier caused immense damage in his lifetime.  For a review, here is a 2016 Democracy Now! interview with Jane Mayer, author of a book about the Kochs and other rightwing billionaires. For more background, check out "How the Koch Brothers and Other Family Capitalists Are Ruining America" by Steve Fraser, The Nation [September 11, 2014] [Link].
 
The anti-government protests in Hong Kong continue, and the government refuses to negotiate or make concessions. For a useful review of the struggle, read "Why There's No End in Sight to the Hong Kong Protests," by Ilaria Maria Sala, The Nation [August 21, 2019] [Link].
 
This Newsletter has linked many articles about the weaknesses in the Russia-gate conspiracy theory.  One of the entertaining facets of Russia-gate is the corrupt and colorful Trump associates and hangers-on who seem at home in both Ukraine and the CIA. One such minor character is Felix Sater, who is frequently mentioned in the Mueller Report, mainly in connection with the Trump organization's wish/plan to build a high-rise in Moscow.  But there's much more to Felix; read "Unsealed Filings Detail Felix Sater's Work as an Intelligence Asset, With Significant Gaps" [Link] and "Did Felix Sater's 20 Years as an Informant Help Land Him at the Center of the Trump-Russia Story?" [Link]. And for some previews of things to come, read "10 declassified Russia collusion revelations that could rock Washington this fall," by John Solomon, The Hill [August 20, 2019] [Link].
 
Finally, yesterday was the birthday of Howard Zinn, the American historian and author of A People's History of the United States.  Zinn's work, popularizing the radical struggles and government repression that are normally buried in school history curricula, is now carried on by the Zinn Project, where you can read more about his life and legacy.  One of Zinn's books was You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train, a call for commitment and participation in making history.  And this also became the title of a very good documentary film about his life and times, which you can see here.
 
Things to Do/Coming Attractions
Thursday, September 5th – "Climate Emergency and the Green New Deal: Centering the Voices of Movements" is the title of a forum sponsored by Bronx Climate Justice North and other organizations., The panel discussion will feature several of the leaders in the NY-area fight for a Green New Deal.  The event will be at the Riverside Church, 490 Riverside Drive (125th St.), from 7 to 9:30 PM  More information.
 
Sunday, September 8th – The next CFOW monthly meeting will be held at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, 12 Elm St. in Dobbs, from 7 to 9 PM. At these meetings we review our work & the events of the past month, and make plans going forward.  Everyone is welcome at these meetings.
 
Week of September 20-27 – Global Climate Strike.  Local info tbd.  For the action's website, go here.
 
September 21st – "We the People" is the name for a March on Washington. So far the content or "demands" of the March are wide open; but this is likely to take shape over the next month. Check out https://wethepeoplemarch.org and their Facebook page for further developments.  WESPAC will have a bus leaving North White Plains at 6 AM; for tickets ($50) and info, go here.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or the climate crisis, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  As always, we have some excellent "Featured Essays," I also highly recommend the set of articles on the crisis in Kashmir ("War & Peace"), Conn Hallinan's essay on the future of (no) water ("Climate Crisis"); journalist Dave Lindorff memoir of being at an airport and on the terrorist watch list ("Civil Libertiesi"); and an essay about shooting a documentary film in Jerusalem, with two short videos from the project ("Israel/Palestine"). And of course there's lots more.  Enjoy!
 
Rewards!
The Newsletter's "Rewards" offer a brief moment of cultural sanity before plunging into a review and analysis of the week's news.  This week's Rewards are taken from the song bag of the popular television series "Weeds." As the program centered on unorthodox entrepreneurship, their music was similarly nouveau for the time.  First up, the program's theme song, "Little Boxes," by Malvina Reynolds.  I hope you also like "Terrible Things" by April Smith, and "Celia" by Toots and the Maytalls.  And there's lots more on-line!
 
Best Wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Chomsky: By Focusing on Russia, We Ignore Trump's Existential Threat to Climate
Interviewed by David Barsamian, Truthout [August 21, 2019]
---- In this continuation of an extensive interview, world-renowned public intellectual Noam Chomsky discusses the growing extremism of the Republican Party, Trump's ongoing trade war with China, Democrats' abandonment of the working class and impending threat of the climate crisis. Read Part 1 of this interview here, and Part 2 here. [7/18 and 7/28]
David Barsamian: Talk about the present occupant of the White House. In some ways, his boorish and grotesque behavior is a pretty easy target. People can feel very virtuous about denouncing Trump. But Public Citizen warns, "Every day we witness a further slide toward authoritarianism under Trump." Are you concerned about that?
Noam Chomsky: I'm less concerned than they are. I think the system is resilient enough to withstand a figure who is defying subpoenas, defying congressional orders and so on. I think Trump is in many ways underestimated. He's a highly skilled politician who is very successful in what he's doing. Bottom of Form
He's got two major constituencies. One is the actual, standard constituency, the Republican Party — both parties, but much more the Republicans — private wealth, corporate power. You've got to keep them satisfied. Then there is the voting base. Here, what's happened to the Republicans over the years is pretty interesting. [Read More]
 
The Significance of the "1619 Project"
By Jesse Jackson, Counterpunch [August 23, 2019]
---- On Sunday, the New York Times unveiled "The 1619 Project," a journalistic series in the Sunday magazine that seeks to tell the "unvarnished truth" about slavery and its impact on America's history.
In 1619, just 12 years after the founding of the first permanent English settlement in the Americas, the Jamestown colonists bought the first slaves, 20 to 30 enslaved Africans, from English pirates.
The Declaration of Independence, penned by Thomas Jefferson, a slave owner, issued America's founding creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, … endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, … among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." As Nikole Hannah-Jones writes in her stunning introduction in the New York Times Magazine, at 43, she is part of the first generation of black Americans in the history of this country to be born into a society in which blacks had equal rights of citizenship. [Read More]
 
How the US Exported Its Border Around the World
By Aaron Bady, The Nation [August 20, 2019]
[FB – This is a review of Empire of Borders, by Todd Miller.]
---- Trump didn't make the heinous immigration enforcement apparatus we've had for so many years. He's a manifestation of it. But an interesting thing Trump has done is denormalize what had been normalized in previous administrations. Many people are seeing the utter brutality of the border and immigration apparatus for the first time, when it has been going on for so many years. Certainly, Trump is ratcheting part of it up, like forcing families apart right on the border. And he's doing it in front of TV cameras, like a performance for his constituency. But there is a danger of treating Trump like an anomaly, which is what much of the media seems to be doing. Erasing the long history also erases how this bipartisan system of exclusion was created, the countless billions invested in it since Bill Clinton took office in the early 1990s, how the Border Patrol went from 4,000 to 21,000, how 650 miles of walls and barriers have already been constructed, how more than 30,000 people have been incarcerated on any given day in an assortment of prison camps, and 400,000 people expelled and banished from the country per year, not to mention the 23 CBP attachƩs around the world. That long predates Trump. If you think this border immigration apparatus only came when Trump took power, the solution then seems to be as simple as voting Trump out. It's not that simple. [Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
The World Is Uniting For International Law, Against US Empire
By Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, Popular Resistance [August 11, 2019]
---- "We oppose the extraterritorial application of unilateral measures." That is not Cuba, Nicaragua, Iran, Russia, or China talking about the most recent unilateral coercive measures imposed by the United States against Venezuela, i.e. economic sanctions that have become an economic blockade, but the European Union. Even allies who have embarrassed themselves by recognizing the phony "interim president" Juan Guaido are saying the US has gone too far. All of the countries listed above and many more have stated their opposition to the escalation of the US economic war against Venezuela. Venezuela, along with Iran, has become a prime target of US regime change, and both are uniting the world in opposition to US bullying behavior, which is hastening the demise of US domination. Popular social movements are growing against US unilateralism and violations of international law. [Read Morfe]
 
Peace in Afghanistan?
Terrorist 'safe havens' are a myth — and no reason for continuing the war in Afghanistan
John Glaser and John Mueller, Los Angeles Times [August 19, 2019]
---- America's longest war may be coming to an end. Although major obstacles remain, the Trump administration's negotiations with the Taliban, led by U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, have made progress toward an agreement that would include a U.S. military withdrawal. In July, President Trump said "it's ridiculous" that we're still in Afghanistan after almost two decades of stalemate. His 2020 Democratic challengers seem to agree — most have called for an end to the war — and fewer and fewer Republicans are willing to defend it. But one persistent myth continues to frustrate the political momentum to end the war and may inhibit the impending debate over withdrawal. It is by far the most common justification for remaining in Afghanistan: the fear that, if the Taliban takes over the country, the group will let Al Qaeda reestablish a presence there, leaving the terrorist organization to once again plot attacks on the United States. … Trump reflected this thinking as well when he authorized an increase of troops to Afghanistan in his first year in office. His "original instinct," he noted, was "to pull out," but his advisers had persuaded him to believe that "a hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum that terrorists … would instantly fill, just as happened before" the Sept. 11 attacks. This key justification for staying in Afghanistan has gone almost entirely unexamined. It fails in several ways. [Read More]
 
The War Against Iran
Trump's Persian-Gulf Car Crash
By Daniel Lazare, Consortium News [August 19, 2019]
---- Traffic accidents normally take just a second or two.  But the coming collision in the Persian Gulf, the equivalent of a hundred-vehicle pile-up on a fog-bound interstate, has been in the works for years.  Much of it is President Donald Trump's fault, but not all.  His contribution has been to take an insane policy and make it even crazier. The situation is explosive for two reasons. First, the Iranian economy is in a free fall with oil exports down as much as 90 percent from mid-2018 levels.  As far as Iran is concerned, this means that it's already at war with the United States and has less and less to lose the longer the U.S. embargo goes on. Second, after Trump denounced the 2015 Iranian nuclear accord from the moment he began his presidential run, it's all but impossible at this point for him to back down.  The result is a classic collision between the immovable and the unstoppable with no apparent way out. How did the world bring itself to the brink of war?  The answer, ironically, is by bidding for peace. The process began in early 2015 just as the nuclear talks were entering their final stages.  Despite last-minute hand-wringing, it was clear that success was in sight simply because the participants – China, France, Russia, Germany, Britain, the European Union, Iran and the U.S. – all wanted it. But other regional players felt differently, Saudi Arabia first and foremost.  [Read More] A possible flashpoint for military escalation is the Iranian oil tanker, now off the coast of Greece; for background, read "Why the World Is Watching the Fate of an Iranian Tanker in the Mediterranean," by Vijay Prashad, Common Dreams [August 20, 2019] [Link]
 
India and Pakistan: War for Kashmir?
Why Kashmir Is Suddenly a Potential Global Point of Conflict
By Vijay Prashad, Common Dreams [August 14, 2019]
---- On August 5, India's Home Minister Amit Shah introduced the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Bill in the Indian Parliament. The bill divides the Indian State into two parts: the Union Territory of Ladakh and the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The Legislative Assembly in the state has been suspended. Its elected officials have been placed under house arrest. The press has been gagged, protests have been violently disbanded, and social media has been shut down. A bill in parliament suggests the normal function of democracy; the actual situation on the ground in Jammu and Kashmir is undemocratic. T.K. Rangarajan, a Communist Party of India (Marxist) member of parliament, condemned the government's decision. "You are creating another Palestine," he warned. Despite the gag on the press, news began to filter out. Before Shah introduced this bill, his government sent tens of thousands of Indian troops into Kashmir. There is no official number, but it is often said that there are nearly 600,000 Indian troops in the state. That a population of 12 million people needs this kind of armed action suggests that they are an occupied people. Rangarajan's parallel with Palestine is credible. As each day passes, Kashmir resembles the West Bank. [Read More] For more background, read "What's behind the protests in Kashmir?" by Sumit Ganguly, The Conversation [August 20, 2019] [Link]; and "'Kashmir Has Been Turned Invisible'," by Samreen Mushtaq and Mudasir Amin, Jacobin [August 2019] [Link].
 
The War in Yemen
The Deeper Meaning in a Lost War
By Alastair Crooke, Antiwar.com [August 21, 2019]
---- It's pretty clear. Saudi Arabia has lost, and, notes Bruce Riedel, "the Houthis and Iran are the strategic winners." Saudi proxies in Aden – the seat of Riyadh's Yemeni proto-"government" – have been turfed out by secular, former Marxist, southern secessionists. What can Saudi Arabia do? It cannot go forward. Even tougher would be retreat. Saudi will have to contend with an Houthi war being waged inside the kingdom's south; and a second – quite different – war in Yemen's south. MbS is stuck. The Houthi military leadership are on a roll, and disinterested – for now – in a political settlement. They wish to accumulate more "cards." The UAE, which armed and trained the southern secessionists has opted out. MbS is alone, "carrying the can." It will be messy.  So, what is the meaning in this? It is that MbS cannot "deliver" what Trump and Kushner needed, and demanded from him: He cannot any more deliver the Gulf "world" for their grand projects – let alone garner together the collective Sunni "world" to enlist in a confrontation with Iran, or for hustling the Palestinians into abject subordination, posing as "solution." [Read More]
 
OUR HUMAN-CAUSED CLIMATE CRISIS
Rivers of Dust: The Future of Water and the Middle East
By Conn Hallinan, Foreign Policy in Focus [August 1, 2019]
---- … But while the instruments of war have changed, the issue is much the same: whoever controls the rivers controls the land. And those rivers are drying up, partly because of overuse and wastage, and partly because climate change has pounded the region with punishing multi-year droughts. Syria and Iraq are at odds with Turkey over the Tigris-Euphrates. Egypt's relations with Sudan and Ethiopia over the Nile are tense. Jordan and the Palestinians accuse Israel of plundering river water to irrigate the Negev Desert and hogging most of the three aquifers that underlie the occupied West Bank. According to satellites that monitor climate, the Tigris-Euphrates basin, embracing Turkey, Syria, Iraq and western Iran, is losing water faster than any other area in the world, with the exception of Northern India. … Whether nations will come together to confront the planet wide crisis is an open question. Otherwise, the Middle East will run out of water — and it will hardly be alone. By 2030, according to the UN, four out of 10 people will not have access to water. [Read More]
 
THE DEMOCRATS AND THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
Why Democratic Presidential Candidates Need to Listen to American Muslims
By Linda Sarsour, The Nation [August 23, 2019]
---- Since childhood, I have never been the quiet one in a room. But on the night Donald Trump was elected president, I sat in my living room speechless. Perhaps it was that I had no words to console my children—three beautiful souls who were already struggling to navigate what it meant to be unapologetically Muslim and Palestinian-American in a country that wasn't built for them. Or perhaps I was silenced by the weight of the community I had been organizing for 18 years—mothers, fathers, and children in Brooklyn who were now questioning whether they would be safe to pray at their local mosque or wear a hijab in public. For Muslim Americans, the election of Donald Trump was more than just an unprecedented expression of hate and fascism in our country. It was a threat to our very existence.
We had a choice: We could try to blend in and protect our families from the violence and hate around us, or we could rise up, organize, and call for an America that embodied the values of democracy my children read about in their textbooks.  We chose the latter.  [Read More]
 
Bernie Sanders's Climate Plan Is More Radical Than His Opponents' — And More Likely to Succeed
By Kate Aronoff, The Intercept [August 22 2019]
---- If you tried to design a program with the aim of offending the top brass of the world's most powerful corporations and the politicians whose careers they bankroll, you'd get something like what Bernie Sanders unveiled today in his $16.3 trillion Green New Deal platform. That's part of the point. "We need a president who has the courage, the vision, and the record to face down the greed of fossil fuel executives and the billionaire class who stand in the way of climate action," the plan's opening salvo states, going on to echo a famous line from Franklin Delano Roosevelt. "We need a president who welcomes their hatred." Sanders outlines an expansive system, building on the resolution introduced by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey in April, that would generate publicly owned clean energy and 20 million new jobs, end fossil fuels imports and exports, revivify the social safety net, redress historical injustices like environmental racism, and make prolific investments toward decarbonization at home and abroad — among many, many other things. It would not only transition American society away from fossil fuels but renegotiate decades-old nostrums, championed by the right, about the respective roles of the government and the economy. [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES/"THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR"
Are Terrorism Watch Lists Expanding Under Trump?
By Dave Lindorff, The Nation [August 20, 2019]
---- My wife, Joyce, and I recently traveled to Vienna for a week, where she had been invited to perform on Austrian state radio. Passing through Heathrow on our way home, we were separated by an automated security gate. The gate, which required you to scan your boarding pass, allowed Joyce through, but when I ran my pass it flashed "Invalid." A security attendant pointed me to a transit desk where I could get a new boarding pass printed. An agent there ran a new card and then pressed a rubber stamp on it before handing it to me. Spotting, in fresh red ink, the words "ICE Security," I asked, "Why's a stamp from the US Immigration and Customs service being put on my boarding pass here in the UK? I'm not an immigrant." The ticketing agent replied, "That's being done at the request of your Homeland Security Department, sir. You are on their list." …Sixteen years after it was created in the post 9-11 hysteria of the Patriot Act, the Homeland Security Terrorist Watch List is alive and, apparently, going off the rails, with increasing numbers being kept from boarding, while others are simply harassed, seemingly for political activism of one kind or another. [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
Immigration Is for Rich People
By Atossa Araxia Abrahamian, The Nation [August 15, 2019]
---- Starting in October, the Trump administration's new definition of who constitutes a "public charge" will likely thwart thousands of low-income immigrants from obtaining legal permanent resident status in the United States. The rule, which in the past has only affected applicants who leaned heavily on cash aid to get by, will make it harder for recipients of Medicaid, housing vouchers, food stamps, or other basic subsidies to obtain green cards—even if they have no criminal records, pay their taxes, and reside in this country legally. When immigrants are denied permanent residence and their prior legal status expires, they're supposed to leave, often abandoning families, jobs, and communities. This new measure, then, effectively criminalizes poverty. Lawyers and advocates reported a drop in immigrants' willingness to rely on life-saving state benefits even before the rule was made official, and they now worry that the policy will push more and more families into the shadows: They won't get the help they need to feed their families, stay healthy, and feel safe. The public charge rule has been criticized as unfair, undemocratic, and above all, un-American. It is all of those things—but it's also unsurprising. [Read More]
 
Puerto Rican People's Assemblies Shift from Protest to Proposal
By Jacqueline Villarrubia-Mendoza and Roberto VƩlez-VƩlez, NACLA [August 20, 2019]
---- A microphone sat in the center of a crowd under some trees in Plaza Las Delicias in Ponce, the largest city on the southern coast of Puerto Rico. Some of the people present occupied the concrete benches in the outer perimeter of the circle around the microphone. Others had brought beach chairs or sat on the ground, and some stood along the edges, arms crossed, looking in. It was a little past six in the evening. Veronica, a young woman from the University of Puerto Rico at Ponce, called the assembly to order and welcomed the crowd of some 80 people, noting that many had crossed paths during recent protests. This was the first of many people's assemblies, called by diverse groups across the island to discuss the next stage in Puerto Rico's newly acquired experience in popular democracy. The exercises of direct democracy that sprouted in the streets through massive protests—taking  from dance to motorcycle demonstrations, among others—led to the resignation on July 25th of governor Ricardo Rosselló and crystallized for Puerto Ricans a consummation of popular power. The outcome confirmed that an organized group of citizens can exert enough pressure to force a detente on the state. Following Rosselló's resignation, however, many have expressed concerns about possible demobilization. Some fear that as people return to the routines of life, the fiery resistance struggles of July will gradually fade from our collective memory. Were the protests and marches the beginning and end of this political awakening? How far can this newly acquired power be taken?  [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
The Trip Rashida Tlaib Didn't Get to Take
By Gideon Levy and Alex Levac, Haaretz [Israel] [August 22, 2019]
---- The tens of thousands of Israelis who whizz by here every day in their cars on their way to Jerusalem, or, if they're traveling in the other direction, to Tel Aviv, probably don't notice the small, old stone house that stands a few dozens of meters away from Highway 443, on the other side of the security barrier. A little house in the West Bank, with a covered verandah, a few plastic chairs and fruit trees in the yard; a solitary house set between two villages, east of the city of Modi'in: Beit Ur al-Fauqa (Upper Beit Ur) and Beit Ur al-Tahta (Lower Beit Ur).  It's to this house that U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib (Democrat, Michigan) was planning to come, to visit her grandmother, possibly for the last time. It's to this house that she didn't come, as Israel initially prohibited her from entering the country, and afterward set humiliating conditions for a visit that she could not abide. In this house we find Tlaib's grandmother, Muftiya Tlaib, who is 90, and her uncle, Bassem Tlaib, disappointed and angry.  If Israel blocked this roots journey of the promising and courageous congresswoman solely because of her political views, and Tlaib wasn't able to get to the village, we will bring the sights of the village to her. [The original article, with lots of pictures, may be blocked by a pay wall; in that case, read the here.]
 
For some background – "Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar's support for Palestinians is like the Anti-Colonialism of George Washington," by Juan Cole, Informed Comment [August 20, 2019] [Link]; "GOP's Biggest Donors Laid Groundwork for Trump and Netanyahu's Targeting of Muslim Congresswomen," by Eli Clifton, LobeLog [August 21, 2019] [Link]; and "To please Trump, Netanyahu turned Omar, Tlaib and BDS into prime time news," by Amir Tibon, Haaretz [Israel] August 20, 2019] [Link].
 
Shooting Jerusalem: A glimpse into life in a segregated city
By Awad Joumaa, Aljazeera [August 18, 2019]
---- US President Donald Trump's policies on Palestine have sharpened the existing divisions stemming from the world's longest modern occupation. His controversial recognition of Jerusalem as Israel's capital in 2017 and the relocation of the US embassy there were met with protests. Jerusalem, which hosts sites holy to all three monotheistic faiths, is at the heart of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. While Palestinians aspire to make it the capital of their future state, Israel says it wants total sovereignty over the city. The film A Rock and A Hard Place was born out of that historical development back in 2017. I wanted to explore why so many people worldwide are so attached to the city of Jerusalem. More importantly, I wanted to find out what the people who live there have to say about the challenges facing their city. What does it mean to live in and identify with the city of Jerusalem? What I found was a deeply segregated city. There is one set of rules that applies to Jews and another that applies to Palestinians. Jerusalemites who have been living there for decades told me ancient Jerusalem as people know it is disappearing. [Read More] Check out this fascinating video, "Jerusalem: A Rock and a Hard Place."  Here is Part One, ("There Israel, Trump & future of Jerusalem"), and Part Two, ("Jerusalem: Can Jews, Christians, Muslims live together?").
 
OUR HISTORY
We Have Been Here Before: Japanese American incarceration is the blueprint for today's migrant detention camps.
By Brandon Shimoda, The Nation [August 20, 2019]
---- On Saturday, June 22, a group of Japanese Americans gathered in front of Bentley Gate, on the edge of Fort Sill, an army base outside Lawton, Oklahoma, to protest the Trump administration's plan to use the base to incarcerate approximately 1,600 asylum-seeking migrant children from Central America. Among the Japanese Americans were several elders in their 70s and 80s, for whom the site possessed a harrowing correspondence to their own childhoods. The first to speak was Satsuki Ina, a writer, filmmaker, therapist, and activist. "I am a former child incarceree," she began. Seventy-seven years ago, "120,000 of us were removed from our homes and forcefully incarcerated in prison camps across the country." Ina was born in one of the prison camps: … Concentration camps are basic units of space the United States has devised for the populations it sees as inassimilable, incongruous with—and threatening to—its self-image. Concentration camps can be, and have been, invented, at will, from sites—military bases to empty box stores—retained for use in the event of a crisis, sometimes real, though more often manufactured. They are outposts of the border wall, therefore materializations of the white settler hatred and rage by which the border wall, and its innumerable chimeras, are motivated. And we are, right now, watching the United States resurrect, with frightening ease, its system of concentration camps, and all the crimes against humanity such a system entails. [Read More]