Monday, January 25, 2021

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on Prospects for the Biden Administration

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
January 25, 2021
 
Hello All – The first week of the Biden administration saw a flurry of executive orders intended to overturn some of the cruel and misguided decisions of the Trump Agenda.  Many of these are of great significance, such as rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization. The sheer number of executive-order injustices – several hundred in the area of immigration alone – could be used to illustrate what Inaugural poet Amanda Gorman meant by "The Hill We Climb." This is a welcome return to a semblance of sanity in Washington.
 
By all means, let us pick the low-hanging fruit of executive orders.  But very soon (right now) we will encounter contested terrain, where there is disagreement within the Biden coalition over the path to take.  And it is obvious – from Biden's campaign, his Cabinet appointments, etc. – that the framing of the Administration's program is well to the right of a progressive agenda.  In face this is what we foresaw, as soon as Biden became the Democratic Party nominee:  by however many light years he was preferable to Donald Trump, to bring about what the country needs will require a strong and relentless push from progress forces.  We can't settle for a Restoration; we want and need a New Reconstruction.
 
This is immediately evident in the debate about Trump's impeachment.  Will we get a housecleaning of the congressional people and administration underlings who conspired to subvert the presidential election?  Or will the Democratic leadership focus the investigation as narrowly possible, to "do something" about Trump and move on quickly to their legislative agenda?  And will the white supremacy terror network, so dramatically on display on January 6th, be investigated and suppressed, or will a few dozen high-profile cases be deemed enough to "send a lesson"?  A clamor in the country for justice may make a difference.
 
There are also many tensions in the Biden legislative agenda.  Can/will the Trump depredations be rolled back completely? Will our many wars and threats of war be rolled back or continued?  Can the insights and demands of the Black Lives Matter movement be translated into policy and law? Again, these questions (any many others) depend on how strongly progressive forces can mobilize.  Some of these issues and tensions are discussed in a set of readings linked below.
 
News Notes
When the next installment of the Economic Impact Payment checks are issued, the Westchester chapter of SURJ (Showing Up for Racial Justice) proposes that those who can afford it donate their check to grassroots organizations via Redistribute Funds for Racial Justice. For more info, go here.
 
On Saturday, January 28th, the New York State Board of Elections will decide whether to certify the ExpressVote XL, a voting machine that would undermine the security of our elections.  Smart Elections, the main organization working to stop certification, asks that we email the Board to ask them NOT to do this.  For sample letters and more information, go here..
 
As Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms ban ex-president Trump and other rightists, fears have been expressed that leftist groups would be caught up in the purge. This appears to have happened to two (non-terrorist) groups in the UK.  Check out the stories of the Socialist Workers Party and the Socialist Equality Party here.  Is this just the beginning?
 
The Caledonian Record, reporting the news from northern Vermont and New Hampshire, has published 50 pictures to go along with their selection of the 50 top civil rights speeches.  Check it out here. [h/t SR]
 
Finally, Tom Tomorrow explains how the Republicans plan to go about "healing" and restoring unity to our nation.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally on Saturday in Hastings, at 12 noon at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on the first Monday of the month (February 1st, etc.), from 5 to 5:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 4 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  If you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
Among the groups performing at the Biden Inaugural Ceremony last week was the Black Pumas, from Austin Texas.  I did not know about them until their video/song, "Colors," was played on Democracy Now!  There's lots more good stuff out there; here is another favorite --
"Fire."  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THE CAPITOL ASSAULT AND THE ATTEMPTED COUP
Among the Insurrectionists
By Luke Mogelson, The New Yorker [January 15, 2021]
---- The attack on the Capitol was a predictable apotheosis of a months-long ferment. Throughout the pandemic, right-wing protesters had been gathering at statehouses, demanding entry. In April, an armed mob had filled the Michigan state capitol, chanting "Treason!" and "Let us in!" In December, conservatives had broken the glass doors of the Oregon state capitol, overrunning officers and spraying them with chemical agents. The occupation of restricted government sanctums was an affirmation of dominance so emotionally satisfying that it was an end in itself—proof to elected officials, to Biden voters, and also to the occupiers themselves that they were still in charge. [Read More]
 
What's Next for the Militias?
By Mike Giglio, The Intercept [January 20 2021]
---- The pride with which he recounted these details speaks to the dilemma many militant groups are now facing: They might be pro-Trump. But often they are also pro-cop and dream of being seen as community protection forces, a sort of law enforcement auxiliary. Storming government buildings and trying to overturn an election flies in the face of that. At the end of the day, it's also illegal. It's the same contradiction conveyed by the plastic cuffs: Taking the law into your own hands also means breaking it. These militant groups have arrived at a moment of truth. In meetings and conversations over the last week, I found members struggling with it. Behind all the rhetoric and threats and Trumpian claims about the election is a choice about what side of law and order they really want to be on. Where they land will say a lot about whether the political violence we saw on January 6 remains relatively isolated or metastasizes into a wider uprising. [Read More]
 
Also useful/interesting – "How Democrats Planned for Doomsday" b[Link]; "Capitol Riot Puts Spotlight on 'Apocalyptically Minded' Global Far Right" bKatrin Bennhold and [Link]; and "How the Israeli flag became a symbol for white nationalists" by Ben Lorber, +972 Magazine [Israel] [January 22, 2021] [Link].
 
PROSPECTS FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION
(Video) The Way Forward: Can the Left Push Biden to Be a Transformative President Like LBJ, FDR & Lincoln?
From Democracy Now! [January 20, 2021]
---- We look at the path forward for the Biden-Harris administration and the role of social movements with political strategist Waleed Shahid and author and analyst Michael Eric Dyson. Shahid, spokesperson for the progressive political action committee Justice Democrats, says Biden could be "one of the most transformative presidents" in U.S. history if he acts boldly. "But it will take an immense amount of pressure on Joe Biden, on the political system, on the political class for him to get there," says Shahid. [See the Program].
 
War & Peace
What Our Forever Wars Will Look Like Under Biden
By Danny Sjursen, The Nation [January 24, 2021]
---- Hard as it is to believe in this time of record pandemic deaths, insurrection, and an unprecedented encore impeachment, Joe Biden is now officially at the helm of the US war machine. He is, in other words, the fourth president to oversee America's unending and unsuccessful post-9/11 military campaigns. … Biden inherits a global war—and burgeoning new Cold War —spanning four continents and a military mired in active operations in dozens of countries, combat in some 14 of them, and bombing in at least seven. That sort of scope has been standard fare for American presidents for almost two decades now. Still, while this country's post-9/11 war presidents have more in common than their partisan divisions might suggest, distinctions do matter, especially at a time when the White House almost unilaterally drives foreign policy. So, what can we expect from Commander in Chief Biden? [Read More]
 
The Climate Crisis
Climate Groups Begin Vying for Power in the Biden Era as Pressure for Unity Fades
By Rachel M. Cohen, The Interept [January 21 2021]
---- While BlueGreen's focus on public investment, good jobs, and justice shares much in common with the federal Green New Deal resolution introduced in February 2019, their "Solidarity for Climate Action" report is in tension with those in the environmental movement who call for a more rapid transition away from oil, coal, and natural gas. … The alliance — which includes large national green groups like the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council and labor unions like the Service Employees International Union, the American Federation of Teachers, and the United Steelworkers — also calls for measures like restoring forests and wildlands, cracking down on employee misclassification, making it easier to unionize, winning universal high-speed internet, and investing in deindustrialized areas. … For now, some left-wing climate groups concede that even if the Biden team has close relations with the BlueGreen Alliance and the alliance plans to flex its power more in the coming months, the Biden team has also shown its willingness to be more aggressive against fossil fuel companies in ways that BlueGreen would not. [Read More]
 
Immigration
Immigration Activists Prepare to Fight a "Timid" Biden After He Walks Back Key Promise
By Maurizio Guerrero, The Intercept [January 19, 2021]
---- One initiative stood out as especially (and cruelly) effective in President Donald Trump's often inept White House: his administration's monomaniacal attack on immigrants. Starting with an unconstitutional Muslim ban his first week in office, Trump signed more than 400 executive actions against migrants in a single term — curtailing legal immigration, casting out tens of thousands of refugees and asylum seekers, separating undocumented families and sowing terror in immigrant communities. Trump's caging of migrant children at the border sparked nationwide protests in 2018 under the banner "Keep Families Together." But despite mass outrage among liberals, the enormous bipartisan machine built to surveil, catch and imprison migrants predates Trump. … Biden has declared a moratorium on deportations during his first 100 days in office. He also promises to send an immigration reform bill to Congress. But neither of these measures, advocates say, would necessarily effect a meaningful change; the moratorium is a temporary measure, and a bill could be delayed in Congress and might expand immigration enforcement as a trade-off for pro-migrant measures. [Read More]
 
Also good articles on immigration and reform – "The Republican Dam on Immigration Is Cracking, and Now They Will Pay for Their Racism" by Sonali Kolhatkar, ZNet [January 24, 2021] [Link]; "Why Biden's 'Virtual' Border Could Be Worse Than Trump's Wall" by Felipe de la Hoz, The Nation [January 22, 2021] [Link]; and "Biden Must Reckon With Obama-Era Immigration Mistakes" by Jean Guerrero, New York Times [January 23, 2021] [Link].
 
Civil Liberties
Biden Should End Espionage Act Prosecutions: It's time to stop the war on journalism.
By Jeremy Scahill, The Intercept [January 21 2021]
---- We have just seen the end of a dangerous administration that openly waged war against journalism. For four years, the president of the United States used the Justice Department as his personal law firm and a political cudgel against his perceived enemies, including the press. Even if Biden doesn't agree with the principles I am advocating, he could declare these Espionage Act indictments to be the toxic fruit of the poisonous and discredited Trump Justice Department. And media outlets should remember the next time a whistleblower is arrested that the most important task for journalists is to hold those in power to account rather than allow themselves to be used in a government distraction campaign. [Read More]
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
The Scale of Loss: 400,000 Dead
By Rivera Sun, ZNet [January 24, 2021]
---- Four hundred lights stretch along the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall. Each represents one thousand people in America who have died of COVID-19. It is only in their absence that we have space to acknowledge the dead–there is not enough space beside the pool for that many people to stand. It is only by symbols that we can understand the enormity of what we've lost.
If the living marched on DC in equal numbers, the sea of people would be as large as the DC Women's March in 2017 or twice the size of the crowd in the iconic photos of Dr. King's "I Have A Dream" speech during the March On Washington in 1963. It is difficult to comprehend the silence around these 400,000 deaths. When 2,977 people died in the 9/11 attacks, the nation mourned and grieved, took off their shoes at airports, invaded two countries, formed new departments of security and surveillance, tossed out half our civil liberties, and posted flags commemorating the lives lost on 9/11 in airports around the nation. There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of our failure to limit the spread of COVID-19. … Why is death by pandemic less worthy of our collective grief than death by terrorism? [Read More] And Noam Chomsky and Vijay Prashad make a reasonable proposal: "Why Neoliberal Leaders Who Failed to Protect Their Countries From COVID-19 Must Be Investigated" Counterpunch [January 22, 2021] [Link].
 
'We're witnessing a fundamental political realignment: the crisis in the United States"
An interview with Mike David, Solidarity – Against the Current  [January 22, 2021]
[FB – This wide-ranging interview/essay comes from one of our most thoughtful intellectuals.  Please check it out.]
Q. Thinking more broadly about the situation in the US in 2021, what do you think are the most consequential "known knowns" and "known unknowns"? What do you think are the most important issues facing the US left?
---- The conditions in this country are extreme for low-wage workers in general and the working class as a whole. They're living under depression conditions. And it's doubtful that the Biden administration will be able to do anything dramatic about that, at least in the short term. The great priority must be struggles to organise workplaces and defend workers, to organise in the communities around life and death issues like rent control and medical coverage and to build effective national protest movements after the bitter experience of last year — of seeing the pandemic response annexed by the Trumpites, allowing the far right to mount the only effective protest movement that occurred, rather than a broad progressive coalition fighting for workplace safety and supporting the healthcare and essential workers. Never has the progressive camp, or more explicitly the American left, had greater tasks and responsibilities placed on it than it has for the forthcoming year. … But in this country, the most astonishing thing, I think, is not so much the rise of Trump and far-right populism. It's that among people under 30, every poll shows that a majority looks more favourably on socialism, whatever that means to them, than on capitalism. And it's that so many of them, hundreds of thousands of them, have been active in campaigns from the Occupy movement to Black Lives Matter and so on. One of the principal concerns of progressives right now is how to sustain that activism, how to prevent it from being demobilised. … After Sanders' concession, you faced the possibility that tens of thousands of young people who had been active in his campaign would just become pessimistic and disorganised, when instead their activism was recycled by BLM. We must conserve and nurture activism above all. [Read More]  Mike Davis will speak about "The Crisis After Trump" in a webinar on February 1st at 8 pm.  For more information and to register, go here.
 
The Meaning of the Mittens: Five Possibilities
By Naomi Klein, The Intercept [January 21 2021]
---- Pity the art directors, the stylists, and the stage managers. So much effort, taste, strategy, and money went into planning the semiotics of Joe Biden's inauguration. And yet it was all for naught. Because in a sea of exquisitely matching face masks, Bernie Sanders's ratty old mittens upstaged them all, instantly becoming the most discussed, delighted-in, and deranged visual message of the historic occasion. What should we make of this? Why did so many millions connect to whatever language the mittens were speaking? Was it pandemic delirium — all of us projecting our social isolation onto the most isolated person in the crowd? Was it sexism and racism, the Bernie Bros once again failing to acknowledge the subversive messages expressed in the fashion choices of glass-ceiling shattering women? Was it, as a friend just texted as I typed these words, "the world's secret wish that Bernie was our president"? What is the meaning, the mittenology of it all? [Read More]
 
THE IRAN NUCLEAR AGREEMENT
Iran Wants the Nuclear Deal It Made
By Mohammad Javad Zarif, Foreign Affairs [January 22, 2021]
[FB – Mr. Zarif is Iran's Foreign Minister.]
---- As a candidate for president in 2016, Donald Trump pledged to stop wasting American blood and treasure on wars in West Asia. During his time in office, Trump instead further trapped the United States in the region and inflamed divisions to the point where a minor incident might quickly spiral out of control and lead to a major war. The new administration in Washington has a fundamental choice to make. It can embrace the failed policies of the Trump administration and continue down the path of disdain for international cooperation and international law… Or the new administration can shed the failed assumptions of the past and seek to promote peace and comity in the region. U.S. President Joe Biden can choose a better path by ending Trump's failed policy of "maximum pressure" and returning to the deal his predecessor abandoned. If he does, Iran will likewise return to full implementation of our commitments under the nuclear deal. But if Washington instead insists on extracting concessions, then this opportunity will be lost. [Read More]
 
Nine hurdles to reviving the Iran nuclear deal
By Seyed Hossein Mousavian, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists [January 19, 2021]
[FB – Mr. Mousavian was a leading Iranian negotiator during the early stages of what became the Iran Nuclear Agreement.  He is the author of The Iranian Nuclear Crisis.]
---- Five years ago, after years of intensive negotiations, six world powers managed to sign the world's most comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran. While the agreement was a political one, it was also ratified by the UN Security Council in Resolution 2231. And, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the organization tasked with verifying the agreement's technical aspects, Iran was fully complying with the deal for about three years, until President Trump withdrew from it in May 2018. In response to the US violations of the nuclear agreement, Iran too reduced some of its commitments. Most recently, on January 4, Iran announced that it had increased its uranium enrichment levels to 20 percent. Although reviving the agreement is certainly still possible, it won't be easy. The two sides will need to overcome nine hurdles to make it happen. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Israel is an apartheid state, says B'Tselem; time to ditch the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism?
By Nasim Ahmed, Middle East Monitor [January 21, 2021]
---- When B'Tselem [FB – an Israeli human rights organization] described Israel as an apartheid state in a position paper last week, it did more than just dispel long held delusions about the Zionist state. In saying that Israel "promotes and perpetuates Jewish supremacy between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River," the country's largest human rights group may have rescued the possibility of open and honest discussion from those who seek to stifle free speech under the cloak of combating anti-Semitism. … The dispute centres around seven of the eleven illustrative examples that conflate anti-Semitism with criticism of the state of Israel. Claiming, for instance, that the existence of a state of Israel is a "racist endeavour" can get you branded as an anti-Semite. As ridiculous as this sounds, B'Tselem is thus, according to the IHRA, an anti-Semitic organisation. Though the definition has no legal standing, its adoption by political parties, civil society organisations and academic institutions will still have a chilling effect on free speech, which is why British government coercion to get universities to adopt the IHRA document has been condemned. [Read More].
 
OUR HISTORY
Failures of Democracy in America and the Arab Spring [10th anniversary]
By Juan Cole, Informed Comment [January 25, 2021]
---- Today is ten years since Egyptian youth gathered in Tahrir Square in downtown Cairo demanding the resignation of Egypt's brutal and corrupt Interior Minister, Habib Adly. Even those who called for the rally were surprised by the thousands of youth and workers that showed up, on Egypt's Police Day, and by their determination to camp out in the square until not only Adly was gone was also the president for life, former Air Force general Hosni Mubarak. The determination of the youth and other disadvantaged groups provoked the Egyptian officer corps to put Mubarak on a helicopter in mid-February, making a coup and appointing a provisional government.  The U.S. and Egypt are very different places, but perhaps Americans can sympathize better with what Egypt has been through if we consider some similarities related to political movements. Egypt suffered from some of the same deep social problems as the United States.  [Read More]
 
The 1970s: Decade of the Rank and File
By Cal Winslow, Jacobin Magazine [January 2021]
---- The 1970s were a high-water mark for the US labor movement, with work stoppages, wildcat strikes, and sit-downs spreading up and down the country, involving workers in all industries.
The year 1970 saw strikes in almost every employment category. ...This was just the beginning. In the decade that followed — or the "long seventies," lasting from 1965 to 1981 — the United States experienced a strike wave like few others. Uniquely, the '70s strikes were often led by "restless" young workers whose grievances went far beyond the bread-and-butter disputes typical of the postwar decades. These disputes included the entire range of strikes: wildcats and sit-downs, grievance strikes, as well as contract rejections and contested local union elections, often initiated by a rank and file. The strikes, taken together, were reflective of the rebellious movements of the era. … With their demand for democracy in their unions, workers sought to make these institutions their own, recalling the students' demand for self-government, or "participatory democracy." [Read More]
 

Monday, January 18, 2021

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on honoring the real Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
January 18, 2021
 
Hello All – What do we remember, who do we honor today?  After a long and bitter struggle, the birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was made a national holiday.  Even in death, Dr. King's life and message were denounced by a substantial portion of the American people, with white supremacists decrying any reverence or even recognition given to a black man who fought for civil rights and justice, against war and poverty.  Yet his cause prevailed, and today the nation honors Dr. King.
 
And yet official America, illustrated by the speeches and commemorations on this day, still refuses to look Dr. King in the eye and to recognize, or even comprehend, his message for his time and ours. Our official celebrations today cling closely to Dr. King as an apostle of nonviolence, and focus on his early years as a leader of desegregation movements in the American South.  Consistently glossed over are his later years when, after Selma, Dr. King brought his struggle for justice to the North, to Chicago and other great cities.  Also forgotten is Dr. King's incisive criticism of the US War in Vietnam, and his efforts in his last year to lift up the struggles of the poor, culminating in his support of the Memphis sanitation workers' strike and his "I have been to the mountain top" speech on the evening before he was assassinated in 1968.
 
Like so much of American history, the meaning of Dr. King's life has to be reclaimed.  This morning I listed to Dr. King's speech given exactly one year before his murder.  It was called "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break the Silence".  Unlike virtually all of the other civil rights leaders, and deviating 100 percent from the consensus of even liberal elites at that time, Dr. King called for an immediate end to the war:
 
Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor of America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours.
 
A few paragraphs later, Dr. King took even this radical critique of the war further, maintaining that the war was not just skin-deep in America, but was rooted in the very heart of our national culture:
 
There is something seductively tempting about stopping there and sending us all off on what in some circles has become a popular crusade against the war in Vietnam. I say we must enter the struggle, but I wish to go on now to say something even more disturbing. The war in Vietnam is but a symptom of a far deeper malady within the American spirit,
 
And so today, if we want to truly honor Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I think it is incumbent on us to do him the simple courtesy of recognizing the man as he truly lived, and to acknowledge his message as he truly lived it.  A man of peace; a prophet of justice; a fighter for human equality; a leader in struggle.
 
News Notes
Last week many of the major progressive organizations in New York City, including the Working Families Party, the Democratic Socialists of America, and Make the Road New York launched the Invest in Our New York campaign, a coalition of more than 100 groups that aims to persuade lawmakers to pass laws raising $50 billion in new revenue in 2021.  A "tax the rich" campaign is necessary and long overdue; read about it here.
 
On Friday Democracy Now! interviewed Dr. Peter Salk, an infectious disease specialist, but also the son of Dr. Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine.  At a time when patent rights and "who will pay?" is central to the question of immunizing the world against the ravages of the Covid-19 virus, we are reminded that Dr. Jonas Salk refused to patent his work on the polio vaccine: "Would you patent the sun?" he famously asked an interviewer.
 
Almost every day the CFOW Facebook page carries a post from Heather Cox Richardson, an historian at Boston College whose comments on the day news has attracted a large following.  Of equal interest to me is her weekly presentation on her area of specialty as an historian, Reconstruction (1863-77), a period of history so relevant to our current engagement with white supremacy.  A recent offering that I enjoyed is called "Recontruction: Communism and Cowboys" ["How the quest for equality after the Civil War shaped today's politics."].  Check it out
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally on Saturday in Hastings, at 12 noon at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on the first Monday of the month (February 1st, etc.), from 5 to 5:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 4 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  If you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
This week's Rewards for stalwart readers-down-to-here come, first, from CFOW cultural advisor Alison W, who sent along this collection of songs packaged by David Byrne, "A Change is Gonna Come."  My other offering for this week started out with liking a song composed by Elizabeth Cotton and sung buy Rhiannon Giddens, "Shake Sugaree.  I had no idea what a sugaree was, let alone why one would shake it.  Investigation led to a host of explanations; the one that worked for me is that "sugaree" was a traditional southern dancing thing with sugar shaken on the dance floor and adding to percussion.  Thus the song is a lament from an old person about how they lost everything they had ("gone to pawn"), but had a party while doing it.  However, even further investigation revealed (according to Elizabeth) that the song was a nonsense song composed as bedtime singing with her grandchildren.  And so here is her great-granddaughter Brenda Evans (12), accompanied by Elizabeth Cotton, singing "Shake, Sugaree."  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THE ATTEMPED COUP OF JANUARY 6TH
'Be Ready to Fight' [January 6th, in DC]
By Mark Danner, New York Review of Books [February 11, 2021 issue]
---- As I advanced toward the White House and the booming, reverberating electronic voices, the crowd began to thicken and finally to coalesce. Before I knew it I had been pressed into a mass of bodies straining toward a faintly gesticulating figure hundreds of yards away, echoed by the crudely pixelated image of an amped-up Eric Trump, magnified a hundred times on the jumbotron, just glimpsable through the MAGA hats and flags. … If it all seems too fantastical, you might consider: How do you know the election wasn't stolen? In part it is because you trust institutions: the governors who preside over the elections, the secretaries of state who administer them, the courts that adjudicate the claims of fraud. When you see the news that the courts threw out the suits brought by Trump's lawyers you believe it proves the election was fair. But what if you hated and distrusted those institutions and believed instead what your duly elected president told you? That he had won in a great landslide, that corrupt elected officials were trying to steal it from him, that it was all happening in plain sight? … And I thought of watching the tumult and the flags and the savage fighting at the wounded Capitol that day and the words that had several times come unbidden into my mind there—that unctuous phrase that has come to describe America and our era: "This is not who we are." And yet, I thought, it is what we do. [Read More] For some fascinating (to me) "live action" of the assault on the Capitol, assembled by ProPublica from hundreds of short videos that were posted on the rightwing site Parler, go here.
 
The Bitter Fruits of Trump's White-Power Presidency
By Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, The New Yorker  [January 12, 2021]
---- The spectacular violence in the Capitol on January 6th was the outcome of Donald Trump's years-long dalliance with the white-supremacist right. Trump all but promised an attack of some kind as he called for his followers to descend on Washington, D.C., for a "wild" protest to stop the certification of Joe Biden's Electoral College victory… The white right-wing assault on the Capitol, with a Confederate flag in the building and gallows on the lawn, was alarming yet wholly predictable as Trump's frantic efforts to hold on to power faltered. Not only did Trump clearly incite violence with his speech, but his Administration also paved the way for the violence through its deliberate neglect of the rising threat of white extremism. … Democrats now have the votes to demonstrate the power of government to repair and provide in a time of crisis. If they bungle this effort with continued overtures to the disgraced Republican Party, even as its leaders persist in appealing to the worst of right-wing extremists, not only will the galvanizing efforts of Black activists in Georgia have been wasted, but an even-grimmer future will wait on the horizon. A failure of the Democratic Party to deliver during a time of unprecedented need would further validate the sense that electoral participation does not matter. Grassroots activists and other ordinary people will have to continue to push and cajole the Party establishment to think big and act boldly. We have to seize the time. [Read More]
 
For more on next steps and deep causes – "There Can Be No 'Unity' With Seditious Republicans by Elie Mystal, The Nation [January 14, 2021] [Link]; and "We need to prepare for ongoing insurrectionary violence and address its root causes" by Maria J. Stephan, Waging Nonviolence [January 14, 2021] [Link] And if you haven't already heard AOC's riveting analysis of the events of January 6th and her call for a struggle against white supremacy, please check it out..
 
Who were the rioters who joined in the attempted coup? 
(Video) From Charlottesville to the Capitol: Trump Fueled Right-Wing Violence. It May Soon Get Even Worse
From Democracy Now! [January 15, 2021]
---- As security is ramped up in Washington, D.C., and state capitols across the U.S., the FBI is warning of more potential violence in the lead-up to Joe Biden's inauguration on January 20. Federal authorities have arrested over 100 people who took part in last week's deadly insurrection at the Capitol, and The Washington Post reports that dozens of people on a terrorist watch list — including many white supremacists — were in Washington on the day of the insurrection. "This was something that had been coming for a long time," ProPublica reporter A.C. Thompson, who covers right-wing extremism, says of the January 6 riot. "If you looked at the rhetoric online … it was all about revolution, it was all about death to tyrants, it was all about civil war." [See the Program] Also useful are these capsule profiles of some of the rightwing groups: "What is the 'boogaloo' and who are the rioters who stormed the Capitol? Five essential reads," from The Conversation [January 15, 2021] [Link].
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
The Things You Are Getting Wrong About White Supremacists Is What Allows Them To Grow
By Gwen Frisbie-Fulton [January 10, 2021]
---- Twelve years ago, I packed up a Uhaul and left the home my son was born in. I drove across the country with him in a car seat, singing hours of nursery rhymes to keep him entertained. … There were ten thousand personal reasons why I packed up that house and sold it, but there was also one troublesome thing that had been on my mind. A few years earlier the Vinlanders — a white power hate group — had set up a clubhouse only a few blocks away. They were disruptive, violent, and scary and they were recruiting the neighborhood's poor white kids who they hoped had no other offers or chances in life. As a young, poor single mom of a white son, I knew he could eventually be a target. I'll take a lot of risks, but not that one. …Only days ago, a white mob marched from the White House to the Capitol building in order to break in and disrupt the Electoral College count. Some of the mob had zip ties to, apparently, take hostages. Some had guns and other weapons. Some chanted that they were going to kill the Vice President. Someone erected a platform with a noose. Five people died. The nation remains shocked. How did we get here? We each have asked. This is not us, we each have hoped. Then, the day after the attack on the Capitol, the Indianapolis Star — the reputable, award-winning paper — ran a run-of-the-mill story including an interview with a man named Brien James. It was reported that James had joined about one hundred other Trump supporters and Proud Boys at the Indiana statehouse to oppose the Electoral College count and he spoke to the Star as the assault was occurring in Washington. The Star then also quoted James again the next day, documenting him as just another voice in this moment in history. It read like a benign human interest story: Some men, who you may or may not agree with politically, holding a protest at the statehouse — as we do and will continue to do in our American democracy. But I know plenty about Brien James. He was my old neighbor. [Read More]
 
How to Fight Climate Change and Fascists at the Same Time [Democracy Reform]
By Kate Aronoff, The New Republic [January 14, 2021]
---- Politicians in the United States have long had a single, instinctive response to crises both real and imagined: make new kinds of cops. After 9/11, the Bush administration created the Department of Homeland Security. Amid a ginned-up border crisis two years later, it created the Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Now, after last week's raid on the Capitol, President-elect Joe Biden is being pushed to create a Cabinet-level appointee tasked with fighting domestic terrorism, bolstered by the bold new statutes criminalizing it that he's promised. That's despite the fact that there's a much better way to defang the violent far right and countless other crises boiling in our teetering republic. The best way to contain the militant GOP, while helping the U.S. face global warming and more, is to expand democracy—not the national security state.  The people who stormed the Capitol last week and the politicians who incited them should be held accountable, a process begun by yesterday's impeachment vote. But we already have laws for dealing with domestic terrorism. The relevant agencies just haven't wanted to enforce them, preferring almost always to target either whole categories of people—predominantly, nonwhite people—and forms of small-d democratic dissent like nonviolent protests. Anti-pipeline protesters, for instance, have found themselves on the losing end of a rash of new legislation making sit-ins and other peaceful disruptions to "critical infrastructure" a felony. New counterterrorism measures may be framed as protecting democracy, but more often they constrain it. [Read More]
 
(Video) America Has Entered the Weimar Era: Walden Bello on How Neoliberalism Fueled Trump & Violent Right
From Democracy Now! [January 12, 2021]
---- Democrats in Congress are pushing ahead with impeachment following the violent insurrection that killed five people at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. The single article of impeachment against President Trump cites his incitement of insurrection and accuses him of subverting and obstructing the certification of the 2020 election. This comes as authorities are warning of more right-wing violence around Joe Biden's inauguration on January 20, with possible armed far-right protests planned at all 50 state capitols as well as the U.S. Capitol. We speak with Walden Bello, an acclaimed sociologist, academic, environmentalist and activist, whose latest column argues the United States has entered a "Weimar Era," in which democratic elections are increasingly delegitimized as street violence becomes the norm. "This is not something that's unusual that has happened in the Capitol. Right-wing groups, when they begin to lose electorally resort to the streets and to violence in order to stop that process," says Bello. [See the Program]
 
What Price Wholeness? [Reparations for Slavery]
By Shennette Garrett-Scott, New York Review of Books [February 11, 2021]
[FB – This is a review of From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century, by William A. Darity Jr. and A. Kirsten Mullen.]
---- Darity and Mullen lay out a history of America's failures to live up to its democratic ideals and its long record of state-sanctioned violence against and exploitation of African Americans. The early section of their book outlines a history of the reparations movement and tentative precedents to recompense African Americans for racist violence and exclusion after emancipation. Its lengthy midsection outlines a self-described political history of the United States, beginning with the institutionalization of chattel slavery, which turned people into property and stripped Black people of their humanity. Racial inequities have endured long after the formal end of slavery; its legacies persist to the present day. Finally, in the last two chapters, Darity and Mullen present a blueprint for "a just and fair America": a detailed plan for calculating and administering reparations. The most basic definition of "reparations" is payment to make up for a past wrong. When invoked as a mechanism of redress for American slavery, the word ignites passionate responses from advocates and critics alike. Darity and Mullen propose a "portfolio of reparations" that includes a mix of monetary payments, public services, and education. [Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
Joe Biden Can Reverse Trump's Warpath With China
By Michael T. Klare, The Nation [January 15, 2021]
---- Soon-to-be President Joe Biden will instantly face a set of extraordinary domestic crises—a runaway pandemic, a stalled economy, and raw political wounds, especially from the recent Trumpian assault on the Capitol—but few challenges are likely to prove more severe than managing US relations with China. While generally viewed as a distant foreign-policy concern, that relationship actually looms over nearly everything, including the economy, the coronavirus, climate change, science and technology, popular culture, and cyberspace. If the new administration follows the course set by the preceding one, you can count on one thing: The United States will be drawn into an insidious new Cold War with that country, impeding progress in almost every significant field. To achieve any true breakthroughs in the present global mess, the Biden team must, above all else, avert that future conflict and find ways to collaborate with its powerful challenger. Count on one thing: Discovering a way to navigate this already mine-laden path will prove demanding beyond words for the most experienced policymakers in Biden's leadership ensemble. … As in so many other areas he will have to deal with after January 20, to make progress on any issue, Biden will first have to overcome the destabilizing legacies of his predecessor. This will mean, above all, scaling back punitive and self-defeating tariffs and technological barriers, slowing the arms race with China, and abandoning efforts to encircle the mainland with a hostile ring of military alliances. Short of that, progress of any sort is likely to prove next to impossible and the 21st-century world could find itself drawn into a Cold War even more intractable than the one that dominated the second half of the last century. If so, god save us all, we could end up facing nuclear hot war or the climate-change version of the same on a failing planet.  [Read More]
 
In Shadows, SecState Mike Pompeo passed 'Death Sentence' for Millions in Yemen and poisoned Biden's well in Cuba, China, Iran
By Juan Cole, Informed Comment [January 15, 2021
---- Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who styles himself a Christian gentleman, has according to United Nations officials just passed a death sentence on hundreds of thousands or millions of Yemenis by designating the ruling Helpers of God government of North Yemen a "Foreign Terrorist Organization." The Saudi-UAE War on little Yemen that began in 2015 has left one of the poorest countries in the world a complete basket case. Its 29 million people have seen their infrastructure destroyed from the air by US-made F-16s. Bridges that are needed to transport food have been destroyed. Hospitals have been bombed. Port facilities have been struck, even though they allow the importation of food to the country. The US has been an active participant in the war, providing in-air refueling to the Saudi-led coalition and offering other logistical help and strategic counsel on targeting. Both houses of Congress invoked the War Powers Act to force Trump out of the war, but he vetoed it and not enough Republicans cared to override the veto. … Yemenis are on the brink of mass starvation, and international aid agencies are trying to prevent it. They have to deal with the Helper of God government, to get the food to people. But if they deal with the Houthis, the humanitarian organizations and the companies, banks and governments that fund them will all be declared guilty of material support to terrorists by the United States government. [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES
The Last Thing We Need Is Another War on Terror
By Spencer Ackerman, The Daily Beast [January 13, 2021]
White terrorism—or, if you prefer, Radical White Terror—is the oldest and most fundamentally American terrorism there is. Distinct among forms of political violence, it feeds from the same innocence narratives of the American Founding on display in textbooks and airport bookstores across the country. … Accordingly, there is no confronting Radical White Terror without the difficult political and social challenge of confronting its powerful apologists and enablers, from President Donald Trump to the 100-plus Republican members of Congress who helped fan the January 6 Insurrection through embracing Trump's election lies, to the state legislators who actually joined the mob at the Capitol. There is also no confronting Radical White Terror without arresting, prosecuting, and convicting those who executed the riot and expelling them from Congress or, in Trump's case, impeaching, and prosecuting those who provoked them to do it. [Read More] For more cautionary remarks on additional "domestic terrorism" legislation, I suggest "We Should Be Very Worried About Joe Biden's "Domestic Terrorism" Bill" by Luke Savage, Jacobin Magazine [January 2021] [Link]; and "Schumer's Insurrectionist No-Fly List Is a Civil Liberties Nightmare" by Murtaza Hussain, The Intercept [January 13 2021] [Link].
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
How the United States Chose to Become a Country of Homelessness
By Dale Maharidge, The Nation [January 14, 2021]
---- The end date for the federal moratorium looms in a matter of weeks, while various state moratoriums are also slated to sunset. And the $25 billion in rent relief provided by Congress, while critical, falls far short of what advocates believe is necessary. But perhaps the most intractable problem is that a moratorium is not the same as rent forgiveness. This means that, even if the moratoriums are extended again (and then again), tenants will at some point have to pay their landlords all of the accrued back rent. Already, nearly 12 million households owe an average of $5,850 in overdue rent and utilities, according to Moody's Analytics. That's $70 billion. How will people be able to repay those sums if they remain jobless? How will they be able to repay them even if they do land a job?  Many advocates believe that only a sustained, robust, and far-reaching intervention by the US government can prevent a full-scale catastrophe. Biden's victory, along with Democrats' newly cemented control of the Senate, have given them some hope that aid might be forthcoming. But with Republicans still holding significant power in Congress and Democrats hemmed in by their own party dynamics, they are hardly breathing sighs of relief. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
President Biden, you Need to Hear this: Respected Israeli Rights Group B'Tselem declares Israel an Apartheid State
By Juan Cole, Informed Comment [January 17, 2021]
----The respected Israeli human rights organization, B'Tselem, has declared Israel an Apartheid state. … B'Tselem points out the sleight of hand in much international discourse in which the area between the Mediterranean and the Jordan is typically seen as two administrative units, the state of Israel on the one hand and the Palestinian territories on the other. The latter are often thought of as a state in waiting, hence the "two-state solution." They are not. Unfortunately, the incoming Biden administration is still wedded to the 'two-state' rhetoric, which is completely detached from reality. Worse, it serves as a fig leaf for military occupation and Apartheid, with vague future hopes of a Palestinian state that increasingly doesn't have any plausible territory, since it is being eaten away at by Israel. [Read More] The Israeli magazine +972 just published two interesting essays about the report: one by a member of the B'Tselem executive committee [Link] and another pointing out that, while the Apartheid Report got some coverage in the Israeli English-language media, it was blacked out by the Hebrew media [Link]
 
OUR HISTORY
[FB – Many thoughtful essays, both in this Newsletter and elsewhere, debate whether Trump and his followers are "fascists," or whether there are such differences between the USA today and Mussolini's Italy or Hitler's Germany that the comparison is useless. But often some of the basics of the German or Italian story, necessary for comparison between then and now, are glossed over.  For example, who actually supported Hitler, who went to the rallies, who voted for him … and why? – This review essay addresses these questions based on a reading of Richard Hamilton's 1982 book, Who Voted for Hitler? – I knew Hamilton when I was a student and admired him very much. – By dissecting "Who supported Hitler?" and suggesting some reasons, I think the story helps to illuminate our own times. And for some additional thoughts on the obstacles placed before us in addressing these questions, just out is "A (Not-So-New) Profile of the American Right: On the Authoritarian-Fascist Crisis" by Anthony DiMaggio, Counterpunch [January 15, 2021] [Link].
 
Who Voted for Hitler?
By Dan Simon, The Nation [January 15, 2021]
---- Three-quarters of a century have passed now since Hitler came to power in Germany, leaving in place two enduring myths about how it happened. One claims that Hitler's rise was born of the frustrations of the middle class in post-WWI Germany. The other holds that Hitler's support came from the disenfranchised and uneducated working and out-of-work poor. But neither myth is accurate, and both are based on hearsay—half-truths people are comfortable with, rather than hard truths that emerge from the data. … What followed with almost blinding speed was the consolidation of power by Hitler, the building of a war machine, and then the start of Second World War itself. Within just a few months, the Nazis had asserted complete control over industrial output, finance, labor, the military, and politics in Germany. But, to be clear, and as Hamilton states emphatically, the key election was the one that took place on July 31, 1932, when Hitler's Nazi party secured only 37.3 percent of the national vote. As Hamilton writes, "Since only three out of eight voters supported Hitler at that point, one must ask, which Germans voted for Hitler?" He doesn't stop there: "But that is only part of the problem and in many respects the less interesting part. It is much more difficult to provide an answer to the why question—why did they support Hitler?"  [Read More]