Sunday, October 25, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on Election 2020 and Protecting/Restoring Democracy

The Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
October 25, 2020
 
Hello All – Do we, in the USA, have a Democracy?  Do we have "rule of the People"?  This election season, with its concerns about the Electoral College, voter suppression, Citizens United, and highly fallible voting machinery has been a sustained lesson on how far the USA is from a democracy in which the People determine who governs in their name.  And because of this initial failure of democracy, it is not surprising that the resulting state and government favors the rich, and taxes and distributes resources in a way that benefits the well-to-do, not lower-income people.
 
This state of affairs long-preceded the Regime of Trump; but under his presidency the unequal distribution of power, of "rights," of resources, and of income has become obscene, rivaling the Gilded Ages of aristocracies of old.  This is unacceptable not only as a matter of ethics, but it has engendered a State that is simply incompetent, that poisons its citizens, houses and educates them abominably, and can't heal them when they are sick. Our Military-Industrial Complex is simply grotesque, bringing misery to millions of poor people around the world. The avariciousness of our fossil-fuel industries is wrecking our civilization.  Nuclear war threatens. It is tragic that humans, who could be so great, have come to this.
 
The defeat of President Trump and his Republican Gang won't end this mess, but without their (sound) defeat we don't have a chance to restore all that has gone wrong. The chances of victory are looking good, but we can't be sure, and Trump has blathered about not leaving office if the election is so unfair that he loses.  If he tries this, we must fight like Hell to stop him.  Our slogan will be "Count Every Vote!"  In hundreds of cities and towns, organizations, unions, and regular people are getting ready to protest and do civil disobedience in case Trump and his lawyers try something funny.
 
To join this Election Protection effort, an excellent source of information on what can be done is the training seminars presented by Choose Democracy, featuring veteran non-violence activist George Lakey.  For protecting the election on Election Day, and especially to learn about preventing voter intimidation, I think the place to go the Election Defenders Training Series. And for what to do if Trump et al. try to stop the vote count or dispute the vote-count, the major effort (national) is directed by Protect the Results.  Please check them out and join in the Common Effort to protect whatever of our democracy remains.
 
News Notes
News outlets report that "The Trump administration is considering declaring that several prominent international NGOs — including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Oxfam — are anti-Semitic and that governments should not support them." [Link]. This is in line with the rightwing rendering of all criticism of Israel or its government as "anti-Semitic."  Leading this push is Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, even though this action is strongly opposed by State Department lawyers.  Human Rights Watched responds to Pompeo's accusations here.
 
For most people, the Covid Economy has been rough, but a recent report from Americans for Tax Fairness and the Institute for Policy Studies finds that US billionaires have increased their wealth by $931 billion since the beginning of the pandemic.  That is, their wealth has increased by almost one-third.  Read more here.
 
Environmental groups sued the Department of Homeland Security and its acting secretary, Chad Wolf, in federal district court today over their use of what the suit called "a vast arsenal of weapons" on Black Lives Matter protesters in Portland.  According to a report in The Intercept, "among the weapons mentioned in the complaint are rubber bullets; CS tear gas; OC spray, also known as pepper spray; and hexachloroethane smoke grenades.  … Along with a thick smoke, the grenades release chemicals associated with short- and long-term human health effects, including nausea, vomiting, central nervous system depression, kidney and liver damage, and cancer."
 
Finally, between now and November 3rd, The New York Review of Books is taking down its pay wall and making articles in the archives available free.  Lots of good stuff, back to 1963.  Check it out here.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 5:30 to 6 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
This week's Rewards for stalwart readers celebrate the work of folksinger Malvina Reynolds.   You may know her for her 1963 musical critique of suburbia, "Little Boxes," which was later featured on the TV series "Weeds."   Here is a short documentary film about her life & songs, "Love Like A Fool."  And in the early 1960s, when we were endangered by fallout from nuclear testing, she gave us "What Have They Done to the Rain?"  Malvina Reynolds, get to know her!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION …
The Real Reason the GOP Suppresses the Vote
By Yochai Benkler, Boston Review [October 2020]
---- Last month Donald Trump ended the presidential debate falsely alleging that mail-in voting is subject to mass voter fraud and refusing to commit to accepting the results of the election should he lose.  A week later Mike Pence repeated the falsehood. These statements capped a months-long disinformation campaign by the Republican Party, led by Trump, designed to persuade Republicans and uncommitted voters that mail-in voting is unsafe and that Democrats are planning to use it to steal a "RIGGED!!!" election… The statements by both the president and vice president strongly suggest that part of the strategy is to develop ammunition for a rearguard battle over the outcome of the election, should the results be closer in battleground states than polls now suggest they may be. Close examination of the disinformation campaign makes clear that it is not the whim of an individual, but a sustained effort led by Republican Party elites. … The Republican assault on voter participation in 2020 reflects the deeper reality that the Republican strategy of the past fifty years has reached an electoral dead end. [Read More]
 
Swing County, USA [Pennsylvania & the Democrats]
By Akela Lacy and Ryan Grim, The Intercept [October 22 2020]
---- Pennsylvania could be closer than the polls suggest, making the state's eccentric politics all the more important. Ever since Obama's election, the political realignment in areas similar to the Lehigh Valley — a region with a significant minority population and sprawling suburbs — has favored Democrats, yet in 2016 the Lehigh Valley went in the opposite direction and, arguably, took Pennsylvania and the White House with it. … Overall, in 2008, Obama won the Lehigh Valley and nearby Carbon County by more than 40,000 votes. In 2016, Trump took the area by nearly 6,000 votes. Trump won the state by 44,292 votes. What happened? [Read More]
 
… AND THE DAY AFTER….
How Workers Can Help Defeat a Trump Coup
By Jeremy Brecher, Labor Network for Sustainability [October 22, 2020]
---- If President Trump loses the November election but refuses to concede defeat and leave office, whatever words are used to justify his action the result will be a coup d'etat–an illegal, unconstitutional takeover of government power. Here's how workers–whatever their degree and kind of previous organization – can play a crucial role in resisting usurpation and restoring democracy. While the US doesn't have a tradition of popular mobilization to overcome coups, around the world popular resistance has repeatedly helped defeat attempts to overthrow democratic governments. Two studies, The Anti-Coup by Gene Sharp and Bruce Jenkins and Civil Resistance Against Coups by Steven Zunes, examine civilian resistance to 15 coups. In 13 cases the resistance succeeded in overcoming the coups, primarily through nonviolent mass action. … How do we apply these principles to the specific situation of a Trump coup and the specific role of workers in defeating it? … Preparations to respond are already under way. A manual titled Hold the Line lays out how to form local "election protection" committees and start organizing for coup resistance. Numerous organizations and coalitions are actively preparing for responding if Trump and his supporters disrupt the election and attempt to nullify its results. They include Choose DemocracyNational Council On Election Integrity, Keep Our Republic , Stand Up America , and People's Strike!. Others are keeping a low public profile unless and until open resistance is necessary. Protect the Results, a joint project of Indivisible and Stand Up America, has already organized actions in 233 locations for 5:00 p.m. local time on November 4. [Read More]  For an update on what some labor unions are doing to Get Ready, read "Labor Prepares for Last-Minute General Strike If Trump Tries to Steal Election," [Link].
 
A Common Defense: Mobilizing Veterans in Labor
----- In blue collar communities in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin which suffered some of the highest post 9/11 combat-casualty rates, veterans and their neighbors helped Trump carry those decisive swing states four years ago. To repeat that regional sweep next month and give Trump a second term, the Republican Party has again targeted the nation's 20 million veterans as a key voting bloc. Among the groups trying to prevent the GOP from out-organizing the Democratic Party among veterans and military families are the Communications Workers of America (CWA) and Common Defense, a national organization of progressive veterans. CWA and Common Defense unveiled their joint initiative in the fall of 2019, when CWA President Chris Shelton, an Air Force veteran and former telephone worker, launched a "Veterans for Social Change Program." … CWA seeks to counter these Trump-era threats by encouraging veterans in its own ranks to engage in grassroots campaigns with community allies and increase awareness of veterans' issues within CWA, like the need for a strong fully funded veterans' healthcare system. [Read More]
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
"We're Not a Democracy"
By James Risen, The Intercept [October 21, 2020]
---- It is time to take stock of America. Heavily armed terrorists plot to kidnap the governor of Michigan while President Donald Trump, sick with Covid-19 and probably high on a cocktail of steroids and experimental drugs, tries to shift the blame to her. The president of the United States calls American soldiers who died in war "losers and suckers." An anti-abortion zealot who served as a "handmaid" in People of Praise, a splinter group of charismatic Christians, is nominated for the Supreme Court by a man accused of sexual misconduct by more than two dozen women. The nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, is the mask-less guest of honor at a Covid-19 superspreader event in the White House's Rose Garden and may only be a few Zoom calls away from overturning Roe v. Wade. This is who we are now. [Read More]
 
Angela Davis
---- There's a wall on Throop Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, that is painted with a mural of Black icons. It begins with Bob Marley and Haile Selassie before going on to include Martin Luther King Jr., Betty Shabazz (Betty X) and Nelson Mandela. The last portrait is of Angela Yvonne Davis — scholar, activist and the only surviving hero of the global African diaspora. … For the mural's context, we have to return to the fall of 1969, when Davis, then an assistant professor in the philosophy department at the University of California, Los Angeles, was fired at the beginning of the school year for her membership in the Communist Party, and then, after a court ruled the termination illegal, fired again nine months later for using "inflammatory rhetoric" in public speeches. She had recently become close to a trio of Black inmates nicknamed the Soledad Brothers (after the California prison in which they were held) who had been charged with the murder of a white prison guard in January 1970. One, George Jackson, was an activist and writer whom Davis befriended upon joining a committee challenging the charges. In August 1970 — after Jackson's younger brother, Jonathan, used firearms registered to Davis in a takeover of a Marin County courthouse that left four people dead — Davis immediately came under suspicion. In the aftermath of that bloody event, she was charged with three capital offenses, including murder. [Read More]
 
It's 'Court Reform,' Not Court Packing
By Marshall Auerback, The Nation [October 23, 2020]
---- With the likely imminent confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett, the Republicans will succeed in entrenching a solid 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court for many years to come. Already, questions have arisen as to how Democrats should respond. There has been much discussion of blunting the impact of this ideological coup through the expedient of court-packing. The term "court packing" itself evokes President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's controversial proposal to appoint up to six additional justices to the Supreme Court—one for every justice older than 70— after he was decisively reelected for a second term in 1936. … Despite FDR's ultimate legislative successes, "court packing" remains an emotive term suggesting something underhanded or even illegal, akin to stacking a deck of cards. Yet there is nothing in the Constitution that specifies the number of justices or justifies treating the current complement of nine as sacrosanct as the Holy Trinity. Still, the GOP thinks they are on to a winning issue, and Democrats remain defensive about the concept. They needn't be—if the message is framed as a broader issue of court reform and social justice, as well as one that is consonant with historic precedent. [Read More] And for some insights, watch (Video) "A Barrett Confirmation Is a Catastrophe," an interview with Zephyr Teachout, Democracy Now! [Link].
 
Bolivia: The people defeat the coup
By Federico Fuentes, Green Left [Australia] [October 22, 2020]
----- With almost 90% of the October 18 vote counted, MAS presidential candidate Luis Arce has won with 54.5%, thumping his nearest rival, Carlos Mesa (29.26%). Arce even managed to win more votes than former MAS president Evo Morales did in the October 2019 elections. While Morales won that election, opposition protests against supposed fraud culminated in a police-military coup that forced him into exile just weeks later. The vote for Arce, who was economy minister during most of Morales' 14 years in power, represents a clear rejection of those who sought to trample on Bolivia's democracy and the many achievements of the MAS government, in particular its empowerment of the country's indigenous majority. It also represents a defeat for those internationally, such as the Organization of American States (OAS) and the United States government, who backed the coup and subsequent illegitimate regime headed by right-wing senator Jeanine Áñez. [[Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
Danger in the South China Sea
By Ann Wright, former military officer [October 16, 2020]
---- Over the past two years, the United States has dramatically increased the number of U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and destroyers sent into the South China Sea as freedom-of-navigation show-of- force missions to remind the Chinese government that the U.S. considers the Western Pacific and the South China Sea as a part of the oceans of America and its allies.  Additionally, in 2020, the Trump administration ratcheted up tensions with China by sending to Taiwan the highest-ranking U.S. officials in over 40 years. The Chinese government has responded with the largest naval exercises in its history and sending flights of 18 aircraft to the edge of Taiwan's air defense zone. … Besides pressure on China through its actions with Taiwan, in the past six months, the confrontation and competition between the U.S. and Chinese navies has increased dramatically. In response to increased U.S. military operations in the Western Pacific, China has increased its pressure on issues in the South China Sea, the East China Sea, Hong Kong and Taiwan. [Read More]
 
Trump's quiet war against civilians in Iran continues amid the pandemic
By Niloofar Adnani, Responsible Statecraft [October 22, 2020]
---- With people in Iran already suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic and crippling U.S. sanctions, the Trump administration earlier this month unveiled yet another set of sanctions that could restrict Iranians' access to food and medicine even further. This move has gone largely unnoticed in the United States, with the first presidential debate passing without mention of Trump's disastrous "maximum pressure" policy on Iran. But for Iranians, it is impossible to ignore… In a recent publication, U.N. experts, along with many activists and scientists have stated that sanctions are silent weapons of mass destruction during the COVID-19 pandemic and that U.S. humanitarian exemptions are not working. In short, civilians in Iran have no room to breathe under the catastrophic and life-threatening economic blockade. [Read More]
 
THE COVID-19 CRISIS & THE STATE OF THE UNION
We're Never Going Back to Normal
By Gregg Gonsalves, The Nation [October 22, 2020]
---- Last Friday, the United States recorded 70,000 cases of SARS-CoV-2, the largest single-day tally since the end of July. Meanwhile, the president of the United States is trashing Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, saying, "People are tired of hearing Fauci and these idiots, all these idiots who got it wrong." … The winter is most likely to be grim. While it's hard to predict with any reliability months out from now, the upward trajectory of cases over the past couple of weeks (34 percent over the previous two-week average) is all but certain to be followed by an increase in deaths. We already have more deaths per day than we did in July. This time around, the upper Midwest and Great Plains states are being slammed by the virus, hitting new records for their local epidemics. … What will help us survive this long winter is not sinking into anger and resentment, looking behind us to make America great or "normal" again. And this isn't meant to be a moment of spiritual uplift but an invitation to work. Components of the public health response are there to use to help us through the pandemic, but they are only one set of tools we need right now. We have a lot of damage to repair and then we have to imagine and then create a world where we are all less vulnerable to new and unknown viruses, to the growing impact of climate change, to the next unforeseen challenge that will greet us when we least expect it. [Read More]
 
The Pandemic Sent Americans' Health Care Coverage Into Free Fall
By Bryce Covert, The Nation [October 21, 2020]
---- This is the first recession the country has faced with the ACA in place. And in the states that have established private health insurance exchanges and expanded Medicaid coverage, the crisis of losing a job has not necessarily precipitated the crisis of losing health insurance. But in the states that did not expand Medicaid, there is a gaping hole in the patchwork of health coverage, and as people face widespread job loss, unprecedented numbers of them are tumbling into it. Between February and May, 5.4 million people who lost their job in the United States also lost their health insurance coverage—the highest increase ever recorded. Losses have been heavy in many nonexpansion states like Texas, the Carolinas, Georgia, and Florida. [Read More]
 
Trump Sets Up Pharma Billionaires for Coronavirus Payday
By Sharon Lerner, The Intercept [October 23 2020]
[FB – Adding to the interest of this story is the fact that Regeneron, the company at the core of this story, is located in Tarrytown.]
---- The development of the antibody cocktail used to treat President Donald Trump for Covid-19 — which he heralded as a cure for the disease — was funded largely by the U.S. government, yet the Trump administration has apparently failed to set any guarantees that the treatment would be affordable. The biopharmaceutical company Regeneron, led by the two highest paid executives in the industry, received hundreds of millions in public funds during the research and development of the antibody therapy, and now stands to make a killing from its potentially lifesaving treatment. … While Regeneron initially estimated that it would have between 70,000 and 300,000 doses "as early as end of summer and completed this fall," Schleifer admitted on CBS News' "Face the Nation" that, as of October 11, it had only produced 50,000 doses, which is fewer than the number of coronavirus infections diagnosed on a single day in the U.S. last week. And although Regeneron has committed to selling some of the antibodies to the government, which in turn is obligated to distribute them "to the American people at no cost," according to the government's July 6 agreement, that deal applies only to "a fixed number of bulk lots." After that, the pricing is up to the company — a prospect that frightens some economists. [Read More]
 
OUR HISTORY
"The Trial of the Chicago 7"
By Frank Brodhead
---- Aaron Sorkin's film, "The Trial of the Chicago 7," now streaming on Netflix, is thought-provoking.  If there had been no Vietnam War, if the Democratic Convention of 1968 had not happened, if there had been no police riot in Chicago, if Nixon had not won the presidency … (and so on), "The Trial of the Chicago 7" would be entertaining, like a good Seinfeld episode. But Sorkin's film is premised on the claim that the courtroom drama actually happened; and it is implied that the conflicts and their resolution teach us something about our past.  But by stripping most of the context from the people and the events in the film, and misrepresenting much of what is depicted (compared, for example, to the trial transcript and witness testimonies, the basis for a film 30+ years ago, "Conspiracy.  The Trial of the Chicago 8"), one asks what Sorkin had in mind by fictionalizing a key moment in the protest against the Kennedy/Johnson/Nixon war against Vietnam that killed millions of people and so divided the USA.  (To help recall some of the context of the events leading up to the trial – mostly missing in Sorkin's story – check out this clip from Democracy Now! on the 50th anniversary of the Chicago demonstrations, which includes an interview with Bobby Seale.)  It's a tragedy that we have to fight so hard simply to keep our own story straight, a story that includes our movement's bravery, imagination, and stalwartism, so necessary today.  For additional views on Sorkin's interpretation of events, I recommend "I Was in the Room Where It Happened: One Woman's Perspective on "The Trial of the Chicago 7" by Nancy Kurshan, at that time married to Jerry Rubin [Link]; and "Chicago 7: Counter Cultural Learnings of America for Make Money Glorious Nation of Post-Truthvaluestan" b [Link].

Sunday, October 18, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on the Supreme Court and the Election

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
October 18, 2020
 
Hello All – There appears to be no chance that the confirmation of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court can be stopped. Predicted to be the the most right-wing judge on the Court, Barrett will give the Court a 5-4 or 6-3 conservative majority for the foreseeable future. On the chopping block are not only the Affordable Care Act, voting rights, regulations on business, Roe v. Wade, and much more, but perhaps the 2020 presidential election as well.
 
The capture of the Supreme Court by the right wing is only the tip of the iceberg, as over the past two decades Republicans have also succeeded in turning the federal appeals courts into a power base of conservatism and big business. Most recently, when Trump took office, there were 103 vacant court seats, in part because Sen. Mitch McConnell took little action on President Obama's nominees.  And so during his first three years in office, President Trump made 200 appointments to the federal courts, all of whom are conservative and most of whom will serve for decades..
 
Not surprisingly, the wave of conservative judges installed in the federal courts has had a significant impact on the outcome of cases.  For example, a study reported on by The New York Times last Friday found that, in cases affecting voting rights, "Republican appointees interpreted the law in a way that impeded ballot access 80 percent of the time, versus 37 percent for Democratic ones."  More generally, especially since (2005) the tenure of Chief Justice Roberts, in cases involving business interests the Supreme Court has sided with business in 70 percent of its decisions.  The appointment of Justice Barrett will consolidate this trend.
 
The Republicans have installed hundreds of right-wing, pro-business judges through a focused strategy of using whatever court appointment opportunities that came their way to nominate uniformly conservative candidates. Here Republican political strength, and the work of conservative legal groups such as the Federalist Society, has been bolstered by hundreds of billions of dollars of "dark money" from rightwing funders and conservative foundations, as the 30-minute testimony by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse last week so clearly laid out. "Dark" money also played a role in generating public support for Judge Barrett's nomination, with big investments coming from conservative groups like the Judicial Crisis Network, the Charles Koch network, and the US Chamber of Commerce.
 
If Trump wins re-election, of course, the judicial landscape will remain a nightmare and get worse.  But what if Biden wins, what can he do?  If the Democrats also control the Senate, now a serious possibility, the Democrats could add several/many judges to the Supreme Court, righting the imbalance that Republican appointments have created over the last 20 years.  Called "packing the court" by its critics, defenders of appointing more judges, such as Elie Mystal of The Nation, have described such a step as necessary if democracy is to survive. Of interest, Mystal proposes adding 20 or more judges to the court, so that epoch-making changes in constitutional law are less likely to be made by a one-vote majority.  But first, the election; indeed, we live in Interesting Times.
 
News Notes
This week a UN agency issued a report concluding that natural disasters caused by the human impact on Earth's climate have doubled in the last 20 years. Using a comprehensive database, the UN agency found that from 2000 through 2019 there have been 7,348 huge disasters. That's about one per day for 20 years.  [Link].
 
Last month the Trump administration took action to sanction leaders of the International Criminal Court – freeze their bank accounts, etc. – because the ICC dared to consider bringing war crimes cases involving military forces (including the USA) in Afghanistan and against Israeli forces in Gaza.  Neither the US nor Israel is a member of the court, but Afghanistan and the Palestinian Authority are, giving the ICC the authority to investigate war crimes and crimes against humanity and genocide in these states.  This New York Times story gives us insights into how the US has become such an outlier re: international law, and also the perniciousness of US sanctions that can seek to control alleged adversaries wherever they are. [Link].
 
On Tuesday, in Hastings, the Westchester UN Association and the Village of Hastings will honor the 75th anniversary of the United Nations by raising the UN flag in front of village hall.  The ceremony will take place at 10 AM, and Mayor Armacost will read a Village proclamation.  Let's have a good show of support for the UN!
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 5:30 to 6 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Rewards!
This week's Rewards for stalwart readers celebrate the music of Rhiannon Giddens.  Earlier this week Democracy Now! premiered her great rendering, with the Resistance Revival Chorus, of Woody Guthrie's "All You Fascists Bound to Lose," with some inspiring video.  (And here is some back story on the production.) Later I found this haunting song "Julie," capturing the moment when a slave and her "mistress" see the Union soldiers approaching the plantation.  And finally, I think you will like this amazing tribute/memorial to Breonna Taylor, "Cry No More." Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
ELECTION 2020
The Election That Could Break America
By Barton Gellman, The Atlantic [November 2020 Issue]
[FB – This is a lengthy and in-depth analysis of all the ways in which our presidential election could go off the rails, by one of the USA's leading journalists. Please read this.]
---- There is a cohort of close observers of our presidential elections, scholars and lawyers and political strategists, who find themselves in the uneasy position of intelligence analysts in the months before 9/11. As November 3 approaches, their screens are blinking red, alight with warnings that the political system does not know how to absorb. They see the obvious signs that we all see, but they also know subtle things that most of us do not. Something dangerous has hove into view, and the nation is lurching into its path. Something has to give, and many things will, when the time comes for casting, canvassing, and certifying the ballots. Anything is possible, including a landslide that leaves no doubt on Election Night. But even if one side takes a commanding early lead, tabulation and litigation of the "overtime count"—millions of mail-in and provisional ballots—could keep the outcome unsettled for days or weeks. … The worst case, however, is not that Trump rejects the election outcome. The worst case is that he uses his power to prevent a decisive outcome against him. If Trump sheds all restraint, and if his Republican allies play the parts he assigns them, he could obstruct the emergence of a legally unambiguous victory for Biden in the Electoral College and then in Congress. He could prevent the formation of consensus about whether there is any outcome at all. He could seize on that un­certainty to hold on to power. [Read More] Another good summary of what might happen and what we can do is "The Count: A practical guide to defending the Constitution in a contested 2020 election" [Link].
 
End Our National Crisis: The Case Against Donald Trump
By The Editorial Board, New York Times [October 16, 2020]
[FB – I can't remember when/if ever the "newspaper of record" published such a diatribe against an incumbent president.  The editorial illustrates the extent of the panic among much of the US elite at the prospect of another four years of Trump.]
---- Donald Trump's re-election campaign poses the greatest threat to American democracy since World War II.  … Nov. 3 can be a turning point. This is an election about the country's future, and what path its citizens wish to choose. The resilience of American democracy has been sorely tested by Mr. Trump's first term. Four more years, the damage may be irreversible. But even as Americans wait to vote in lines that stretch for blocks through their towns and cities, Mr. Trump is engaged in a full-throated assault on the integrity of that essential democratic process. Breaking with all of his modern predecessors, he has refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power, suggesting that his victory is the only legitimate outcome, and that if he does not win, he is ready to contest the judgment of the American people in the courts or even on the streets. [Read More]
 
Also of interest for the coming election – "These Are the States to Focus on to Flip the Senate," by Steve Phillips, The Nation [October 16, 2020] [Link]; "Election 2020 sees record $11 billion in campaign spending, mostly from a handful of super-rich donors," by Richard Briffault, The Conversation [October 14, 2020] [Link]; "5.2 million Americans with convictions can't vote this year, and Black people are disproportionately affected," New York Times [October 14, 2020] [Link]; "The Socialists and Progressives Working Outside of the Biden Campaign to Oust Trump," by Nuala Bishari, In These Times [October 13, 2020] [Link]; and "New York WFP Organizes to Thwart Existential Threat to Its Ballot Line," by Akela Lacy, The Intercept [October 15 2020] [Link].
 
Election Protection and "The Day After"
As indicated by the alarms raised by the Barton Gellman article above (and many other places), there are serious concerns about voter intimidation, disrupted vote-counting, and protracted legal and other challenges from the Trump people if it appears that Biden has won the election.  The latter prospect is likely in part because the Covid pandemic has created a scenario what the majority of votes by Democrats will be by mail, while the majority of Republican votes will be in-person.  Thus on election night Trump may appear to be ahead in an election that may result in a landslide for Biden, once the mail-in and absentee ballots are counted.  The legal and street conflicts that are predicted are likely to be in the swing states, where voting margins are close and the ability to stop counting or to disqualify mailed-in ballots could be significant.  Nevertheless, people in New York have been organizing to prevent voter intimidation and to take action if need be to make sure that all the votes are counted.  To learn more, an excellent source of information on what can be done are the training seminars presented by Choose Democracy, featuring veteran non-violence activist George Lakey.  The next presentation is on October 21st.   For protecting the election, and especially to learn about preventing voter intimidation, I think the place to go the Election Defenders Training Series. The next on-line presentation is Tuesday, October 20th, at 7:30 pm.  And for what to do if Trump et al. try to stop the vote count or dispute the vote-count, the major effort (nation) is directed by Protect the Results.  So far, they have scheduled 170 events starting on Wednesday, November 4th. The big one will be in New York City, starting in Times Square.  In Westchester, so far there are events only in Sleepy Hollow and in Pelham.  WESPAC has initiated a coalition of organizations in Westchester to plan more events here.  Some details should be available next week, and late news and updates will be reported in this Newsletter.
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
The President, the Pandemic & the Election [Noam Chomsky]
An interview by David Barsamian, Alternative Radio [October 17, 2020]
---- We are still in the grips of capitalist logic and savage neoliberalism. We are still in the hands of leadership of extreme malevolence. The three worst, perhaps, are those I mentioned, Trump in the lead; his clone, Bolsonaro, in Brazil,the second largest country in the hemisphere; the world's largest democracy, or perhaps I should say former democracy, India, in the hands of Modi, a monster who is trying to destroy the relics of Indian democracy, meanwhile killing huge numbers of Indians, turning India into a Hindu national religious ethnocracy and crushing the rights of Muslims, destroying Kashmir. These are the three leaders. No one is even close in cases and deaths. I should say this is slightly misleading, because I'm not counting deaths per capita. When you look at that, you get a slightly different picture. It's worth looking at. But these figures are very striking. And the malevolence is striking. We are now in a situation where further pandemics are very likely, with habitat destruction even more likely, with heating the atmosphere even more likely. They might be worse than this one, as I mentioned. We know what has to be done. We don't have a lot of time to do it. The same impediments to dealing with this one still exist. It's within our reach to overcome them, but if you we don't work in a dedicated, committed way on it, it will happen. This is the course we're on, just as we are on a course towards environmental destruction unless we sharply change direction. [Read More]
 
America is Complicit, as Yemen Spirals toward Mass Starvation
---- Mark Lowcock of the United Nations gave an impassioned and apocalyptic speech on Thursday warning that 4 million Yemenis who had been receiving aid no longer are, because of a shortfall in donor contributions, and the country could be on the cusp of mass starvation. There already is widespread malnutrition in Yemen, fueled by the war and more recently by the economic downturn of the coronavirus pandemic. The humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen largely stems from the war on that country launched in 2015 by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which is backed to the hilt by the Trump administration. This is an American war, and Americans have Yemeni blood on their hands. A third of Yemen's infrastructure has been destroyed, mostly by Saudi and UAE air strikes, and over 100,000 have been killed. The United Arab Emirates, led by Mohammed Bin Zayed, is giving nothing to aid Yemen this year, despite its invasion having caused many of the problems the country is facing. The Saudis and Kuwaitis were also called out by Lowcock, and they did proffer new donations, with Kuwait offering $20 million. But the aid effort has fallen from being funded at over 60% of requested contributions to only 42%. [Read More]
 
The Tenants Who Evicted Their Landlord
By Matthew Desmond, New York Times Magazine [October 14, 2020]
---- Today, in the pandemic economy, millions of renters are at risk of eviction. Even the expanded provisions supplied by the CARES Act — the $600-a-week supplements to states' stingy unemployment insurance — weren't doing enough to shield many renting families from homelessness. In May, Houston approved $15 million in rental assistance; it ran out in less than two hours. In June, cities like Cleveland and Milwaukee saw evictions spike well above average levels when local eviction moratoriums and other protections expired. The next month, the United States experienced the largest economic downturn on record and unemployment levels unseen since the Great Depression. Congress allowed federal moratoriums on eviction and unemployment benefits to lapse anyway. … Watching this looming eviction crisis take shape, I've often thought of those Minneapolis tenants, whom I followed over the last year and a half. I went to report on them — the security guards, store clerks and night-shift custodians — because I wanted to see what happened when a group of tenants organized against a pair of landlords who owned hundreds of apartments generating, as of 2016, a net operating income of approximately $300,000 a month (or $3.6 million annually). Over the course of my reporting, I saw the tenants reimagine — and then reinvent — what stable, affordable housing could look like in their community. I saw them fight, and I saw them win. [Read More]
 
THE CLIMATE CRISIS
Journalists Must Demystify the Green New Deal
By Mark Hertsgaard, The Nation [October 14, 2020]
---- In the first presidential debate, in September, Donald Trump was eager to attack his opponent's $2 trillion plan to address the climate crisis. "He's talking about a Green New Deal," the president said, talking over Joe Biden. In the vice presidential debate, Mike Pence likewise assailed the Green New Deal, invoking the term 11 times as a threat that "literally would crush American jobs."  While the Biden climate plan is indeed informed by Green New Deal principles—Biden calls it a "crucial framework"—its goals and methods are narrower in scope. Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris, have stated repeatedly that they do not support a Green New Deal. … Nevertheless, Republicans' efforts to demonize Biden's climate plan as a Green New Deal inadvertently highlight how superficially many mainstream news outlets have covered that foundational proposal to date. … Some post-debate commentary, for instance, focused on whether Trump and Pence's attacks on a Green New Deal could cost Biden votes in the battleground state of Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, the public has been left largely in the dark about the basic, underlying questions of what a Green New Deal actually is and what it would aim to achieve. … This moment—arguably America's last to get the climate issue right—demands that the press do a much better job of explaining these scientific and economic realities to their audiences. Trump, according to his own words and actions, has no plan on climate. Biden does have a plan, one that is informed by, but ultimately different from, the Green New Deal. Rather than contributing to an environment in which the words "Green New Deal" are treated as a political liability, good journalism should assess both candidates' plans on their merits and inform the public accordingly. That means also finally telling audiences the truth about the Green New Deal.  https://www.thenation.com/article/environment/green-new-deal-media/
 
OUR HISTORY
The United States of Paranoia — From the Salem Witch Hunt to Conspirator-in-Chief Donald Trump
By Steve Fraser, Tomdispatch [October 16, 2020]
---- Conspiracy thinking has always been an American pastime, incubating what the novelist Phillip Roth once called "the indigenous American berserk." Most of the time, it's cropped up on the margins of American life and stayed there. Under certain circumstances, however, it's gone mainstream. We're obviously now living in just such a moment. What might ordinarily seem utterly bizarre and nutty gains traction and is ever more widely embraced. It's customary and perhaps provides cold comfort for some to think of this warped way of looking at the world as the peculiar mental aberration of the sadly deluded, the uneducated, the left-behind, those losing their tenuous hold on social position and esteem, in a word (Hillary Clinton's, to be exact), the "deplorables." Actually, however, conspiracy mongering, as in the case of Trump, has often originated and been propagated by elites with fatal effect. Sometimes, this has been the work of true believers, however well educated and invested with social authority. At other times, those at the top have cynically retailed what they knew to be nonsense. At yet other moments, elites have themselves authored conspiracies that were all too real. But one thing is certain: whenever such a conspiratorial confection has been absorbed by multitudes, it's arisen as a by-product of some deeper misalignment and fracturing of the social and spiritual order. More often than not, those threatened by such upheavals have resorted to conspiracy mongering as a form of self-defense. [Read More]
 

Monday, October 12, 2020

CFOW Newsletter - Focus on War and the Threat of War

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
October 12, 2020
 
Hello All – Just three weeks before Election Day, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has a commanding lead over President Trump. While there are credible fears that Trump will somehow steal the election, his ability to do so will be weakened if it appears that he has lost the popular vote in a landslide.  What can he do to save himself? None of the themes that Trump has tried to use to rally his base seem to gain him much traction: "law and order" and the "Marxist threat" are weak counters to the Covid-19 pandemic and economic chaos, and the Republicans in Congress appear unwilling to toss voters a stimulus bone or a $1,200 check in the mail.
 
As Michael Klare describes in his Nation magazine article linked below, a timely war may be Trump's last straw to clutch. Klare states that "it would be surprisingly easy for Trump to ignite a war" with China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, because "the Pentagon has adopted an offensive stance toward all four of those putative adversaries."  Indeed, we have been lucky so far that an "accident" has not already sparked a conflict with these countries, as Pentagon forces conduct intimidating military exercises on their doorsteps.  If Trump were seeking a wag-the-dog conflict to divert attention from his many policy failures and rally the voters around the flag, he could raise the odds that this would happen by pressing the Pentagon to be still more aggressive in one or more of these regions.
 
Needless to say, defeating Trump next month will not end the threat of (more) war.  Vice President Biden has surrounded himself with a hawkish foreign policy team largely inherited from the aggressive militarism of Clinton and Obama.  (See here and here.)   But this is a fight that we will begin on January 21, 2021; right now our goal is to remove Trump.
 
News Notes
While many towns, cities, and states are celebrating Indigenous Peoples' Day today, almost all of Westchester and New York continues to honor Columbus Day.  It's an interesting question why "progressive" New York lags behind so much of the country, especially as we have a rich and relatively well-known indigenous history and continuing Native American presence to draw on.  The Zinn Education Project has assembled a teaching package for Indigenous Peoples' Day; check it out. For some background on how we ended up with Columbus Day in the first place, check out "The Invention of Christopher Columbus, American Hero" [Link] and "It's Time for Italian Americans to Give Up on Columbus" [Link].
 
Last weekend in Denver a Trump supporter was shot and killed by a newspaper reporter's bodyguard when the Trump supporter attacked him.  This tragedy is being framed on-line as the responsibility of an Antifa member, which is not true.  The Intercept has a useful article today.
 
Arundhati Roy is one of our bravest and best writer/reporters.  What we read of hers in "the West" is usually big-picture, framed for our limited understanding of India.  For that reason, I found especially interesting her article in an Indian publication, Scroll, about "two conspiracies and a creation."  It dramatizes in some detail the chaos now engulfing India
 
Not least of the sins of the Trump administration has been its attack on basic science and medicine.  In the 21st century, in a so-called Advanced Country, this is simply frightening.  Last  week the leading science and medical journals wrote eloquent pleas that we vote out the Trump administration.  Check out powerful statements from The New England Journal of Medicine and Scientific American.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  Taking the Covid Crisis into account, we meet (with safe distancing) for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 11 to 11:30 a.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Another vigil takes place on Mondays, from 6 to 6:30 pm, in Yonkers at the intersection of Warburton Ave. and Odell.  In this time of coronavirus, we are meeting by Zoom conference; if you would like to join one of our Zoom meetings, Tuesday and Thursday at noon and/or Saturday at 2 pm, please send a return email. Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.  And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
WAR AND THE THREAT OF WAR
An October Surprise of a Military Kind
By Michael T. Klare, The Nation [October 12, 2020]
---- With Joe Biden leading in the polls and President Trump's attempts to avoid addressing the Covid danger now undermined by his own encounter with the virus, the White House is scrambling for a new line of attack on his opponent. Trump's attempt to use "law and order" as a wedge in suburban areas has clearly failed, and his drive to shoehorn the Supreme Court appointment of Amy Coney Barrett is at risk because of Covid infections among key Senate Republicans. What remains, then, as a last-minute game-changer? Knowing Trump's impulsive nature, we cannot rule out war as a possible option. … The fact is, it would be surprisingly easy for Trump to ignite a war. That's because the Pentagon has adopted an offensive stance toward all four of those putative adversaries. At this very moment, American aircraft carriers with their accompanying cruisers and destroyers are patrolling in the vicinity of Iran, China, and North Korea, while other US warships are deployed in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic. It would not be difficult, in those highly contested areas, to provoke a deadly incident, allowing Trump to order retaliatory strikes and commence the process of escalation. There are many locales on the borders of Eurasia where such a confrontation might occur. Here is a brief survey of the five most likely sites. [Read More]
 
How the United States Could End the War in Yemen
By Edward Hunt, The Progressive [September 15, 2020]
---- [On September 11th], former U.S. official Bruce Riedel told the House Intelligence Committee that the United States could take immediate action to end Saudi Arabia's brutal war in Yemen, where an estimated 100,000 people have died since the war began in 2015. Riedel, a senior fellow and director at the Brookings Institution, formerly spent thirty years working for the Central Intelligence Agency. He has served as a senior adviser to the last four U.S. Presidents. President Donald Trump vetoed resolutions passed by Congress in 2019 to end U.S. involvement in the war and block U.S. arms sales to Gulf nations, continuing U.S. support for the Saudi-led military operation. In his September 11, 2020, appearance before Congress, Riedel said that "only the United States of America and to a lesser extent the United Kingdom continue to provide the kind of support that allows this war to go on." … If the United States and United Kingdom cut off logistics support, he said, the Royal Saudi Air Force would be grounded and unable to operate. "That's how much influence we have over them," Riedel said. "That's how much responsibility we have." [Read More]
 
How can Americans support peace in Nagorno-Karabakh?
By Nicolas J.S. Davies, ZNet [October 11, 2020]
---- With so much of the world afflicted by 20 years of U.S.-led wars and the resulting political, humanitarian and refugee crises, we can't afford not to pay attention to the dangerous new outbreak of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenia and Azerbaijan fought a bloody war over Nagorno-Karabakh from 1988 to 1994, by the end of which at least 30,000 people had been killed and a million or more had fled or been driven out of their homes. By 1994, Armenian forces had occupied Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding districts, all internationally recognized as parts of Azerbaijan. But now the war has flared up again, hundreds of people have been killed, and both sides are shelling civilian targets and terrorizing each other's civilian populations. … The greatest danger is that either Turkey, Russia, the U.S. or Iran should see some geopolitical advantage in escalating or becoming more involved in this conflict. [Read More].  For more on this new and dangerous conflict, read "War has broken out on the edge of Europe. What's behind it?" b[Link] and "Captive of the Caucasus: The Long War Over Nagorno-Karabakh" by Viken Berberian, The Nation [October 8, 2020] [Link].
 
With Crushing sanctions on 18 Iranian Banks, is Trump trying to leave a War behind for Biden?
---- As the dying Trump administration, literally on a sickbed, contemplates losing power, its hawks are lashing out at Iran in an attempt to ensure that the 2015 international nuclear deal is dead and buried, and that the US and Iran remain on a war footing. Trump's two main allies in the Middle East, Binyamin Netanyahu of Israel and Mohammed Bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, want at the least a rollback of Iranian influence in the region and at best regime change. They are small countries and have no hope of accomplishing the latter. Only a US war on Iran, repeating the 2003 invasion of Iraq could reliably change the regime and end the country's civilian nuclear energy program. The US Treasury Department has blocked financial transactions of 18 Iranian banks, and threatened anyone who does business with them with third party sanctions. This means that if a small French firm wanted to sell toasters to Iran, it can't use these banks to do so. There really aren't any banks left in Iran that aren't sanctioned by the Trump administration. So the message is to Europe, don't trade with Iran. This policy is unilateral and is ordered by one man, Trump. Congress has passed no such law. The United Nations Security Council is against these sanctions. [Read More] Also useful is "The undeniable cruelty of Trump's 'maximum pressure' on Iran" by Tyler Cullis, Responsible Statecraft [October 8, 2020] [Link].
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Getting to Freedom City [Los Angeles in the 1960s]
By Robin D. G. Kelley, Boston Review [October 7, 2020]
---- My mother had fled to LA in search of peace, but instead she found a war zone. Six years after the Watts rebellion, the police patrolled the streets of South LA like a victorious occupying army. But as Mike Davis and Jon Wiener make clear in their monumental new book, Set the Night on Fire: LA in the Sixties, the police under Mayor Sam Yorty treated the entire city like it was under siege. "No other major city outside of the Deep South," they write, "was subjected to such a fanatic and all-encompassing campaign to police space and control the night. Along with minorities, many young whites were also routinely victimized, leading hatred of the LAPD to grow into a common culture of resistance." When cops terrorized middle-class white kids for roaming Sunset Strip at night, their cries of "Free the Strip" quickly evolved into "All Power to the People" and "No More Murder of Black People." The image that lured my mother and millions like her to the City of Angels was painted by racial segregation, patriarchy, sexual norms, classism, and an iron fist used to crush dissent. And yet, the pervasiveness of state violence is not the whole story—it may not even be the main one. Set the Night on Fire is, above all, a historical account of how a rainbow of insurgent social movements tried to peel back the glitter, dismantle the police state, and replace elite white rule and its regimes of segregation, militarism, patriarchy, and conformity with a society oriented toward "serving the people." These social movements imagined a revolutionary culture of care, one that met all basic needs, that eliminated racism, patriarchy, and poverty, and that democratized knowledge and power. Diverse and complex, these movements entangled with one another as allies, affiliates, and adversaries. [Read More]
 
The Unprecedented and Illegal Campaign to Eliminate Julian Assange
By Charles Glass, The Intercept [October 6, 2020]
---- Over the 17 days of Julian Assange's extradition hearing in London, prosecutors succeeded in proving both crimes and conspiracy. The culprit, however, was not Assange. Instead, the lawbreakers and conspirators turned out to be the British and American governments. Witness after witness detailed illegal measures to violate Assange's right to a fair trial, destroy his health, assassinate his character, and imprison him in solitary confinement for the rest of his life. Courtroom evidence exposed illegality on an unprecedented scale by America's and Britain's intelligence, military, police, and judicial agencies to eliminate Assange. … Barristers for the prosecution and defense have one month to submit closing arguments in writing to Baraitser, the magistrate, who will render her verdict on January 4. An impartial tribunal would have no option but to exonerate Assange — but fairness has not thus far featured in proceedings with the prosecution's 10-year head start on the defense; the inability of Assange's solicitor, Jennifer Robinson, to confer with him for six months; and the prosecution's possession of his confidential lawyer-client documents and transcripts of his conversations with his advocates in heavy-handed violation of the law. [Read More] Also interesting/useful is "Julian Assange's Prosecution for Publishing Leaked Government Documents Is an Extremely Dangerous Precedent," an interview with Kevin Gosztola, Jacobin Magazine [October 2020] [Link].  Gosztola reported daily during the 17 days of the trial.
 
A Reckoning Inside the Domestic-Violence Movement
By Zoë Carpenter, The Nation [October 7, 2020]
[FB – This is why "defund the police" is such an important issue.  An excellent analysis, imo.]
---- Domestic abuse presents a deadly threat to millions of people across America. But as concerns about police misconduct grow, feminists are reconsidering the costs of criminalization. For the past four decades, a dominant project for American feminists has been getting the police and the legal system to respond seriously to the crisis of domestic violence. More than 10 million people in the US are abused by their partners each year. One in four women will be pushed, slapped, beaten, burned, strangled, or otherwise harmed by an intimate partner during her lifetime. Nearly half of the women who are murdered in the US each year are killed by a romantic partner. Until the 1970s, police and the legal system largely treated this kind of violence as a family issue best resolved quietly at home. As feminists worked to bring the problem into the public sphere, many advocates focused on toughening penalties for abusers and standardizing the way law enforcement responded to complaints. Jurisdictions around the country now have laws intended to ensure an aggressive law enforcement response, including laws that require police to make an arrest in response to a credible allegation and no-drop policies that force prosecutors to continue a case even without cooperation from witnesses.  Today the anti-violence movement is in the midst of a painful reckoning with the collateral damage of this approach. Stricter criminal penalties have protected some survivors, but they've also led to the arrest and prosecution of others and contributed to a ballooning prison population that is disproportionately made up of men and women of color. [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
Trump's Overhaul of Immigration Is Worse Than You Think
Editorial, New York Times [October 10, 2020]
---- Through administrative orders, strict enforcement and mere threat, the White House has attacked virtually every aspect of immigration, legal and illegal. This transformation of the American immigration system has been perhaps the administration's boldest accomplishment, overseen with single-minded focus by Stephen Miller, a top adviser to President Trump with an affinity for white nationalism. A report this summer from the Migration Policy Institute outlined over 400 actions on immigration that had been enacted by a sprawling array of federal departments in the Trump era. The effects are clear. Between 2016 and 2019, annual net immigration into the United States fell by almost half, to about 600,000 people per year — a level not seen since the 1980s. …  But rolling back other measures will be difficult. "There's so much change that has happened in the last four years, there's no way a new administration could reverse things in four or even eight years," said Sarah Pierce, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute who was a co-author of the group's July report. [Read More]
 
Trump Needs Accomplices at Every Level of Government to Pull Off a Coup
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [October 4, 2020]
---- For months, Donald Trump has been mounting a preemptive strike against the democratic election process. He signals his intent to manipulate — indeed, steal — the presidential election in the event that Joe Biden wins. With no evidence to support him, Trump repeats the mantra "voter fraud" to lay the groundwork for political, legal and extra-legal challenges to a Biden victory. … The prospects for a peaceful transition to a Biden administration if Trump is in charge are dubious. Ian Bassin, executive director of Protect Democracy, is optimistic, however. "For those worried that Donald Trump could single-handedly defy the election results and hold on to power, fear not — he cannot do that," Bassin wrote in an email to Truthout. "In order to do that, he'd need accomplices at every level, throughout the country — in the executive branch, in the Congress, in the courts, in state legislatures, in the media." But a landslide in favor of Biden could make potential accomplices feel less confident in supporting Trump if he were to claim that the results are ambiguous or fraudulent. Voting is absolutely critical for democracy. But at the end of the day, stopping a coup attempt will depend on far more than the ballot, and will require creative and courageous acts of civic and political engagement from all of us. Let's get to it! [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Despite ambiguity in international law, Palestinians are winning the 'legitimacy war' [An interview with former UN Rapporteur Richard Falk]
---- 'International law' remains one of the most discussed terms in the context of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. It is almost always present, whether the discussion pertains to the Israeli wars and siege on Gaza, the expansion of illegal Jewish settlements in the West Bank or the encroaching apartheid throughout Israel and the Occupied Territories. Despite the importance and relevance of the term, however, it rarely translates into anything tangible. The Israeli siege on Gaza, for example, has continued, unabated, for nearly 14 years, without international law serving as a protector of Palestinian civilians against Israeli violations of human rights. More recently, on September 13, the Israeli government approved 1,000 illegal settlement units in the West Bank, in stark violation of international law. It is likely that Israel will go ahead with it, anyway. With regard to violating international law, Israel is in a unique category of its own, for Israel's behavior is always governed by its military strength and the backing of its Western allies. To gain more insight into the relationship between international law, conflict resolution and accountability, I spoke with Professor Richard Falk, one of the world's leading experts on international law and former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian Human Rights. [Read More] Also of interest is "Israel to massively expand settlements after UAE normalization" by Tamara Nassar, Electronic Intifada [October 9, 2020] [Link].
 
OUR HISTORY
The Day Nuclear War Almost Broke Out
By Elizabeth Kolbert, The New Yorker [October 5, 2020]
[FB – This is a review of Gambling with Armageddon: Nuclear Roulette from Hiroshima to the Cuban Missile Crisis, by Martin Sherwin, and a meditation on the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962.  At that time I was a sophomore at Wesleyan, and the tiny antiwar demo of our peace group was overwhelmed by a mob of students supporting war.  They almost got their wish, and war was avoided by luck and the brave actions of a Soviet submarine crew, as this story tells.]
----In the nearly sixty years since the Cuban missile crisis, the story of near-catastrophe has only grown more complicated. What lessons can we draw from such a close call? Sherwin summarizes the "official" narrative of the "thirteen days" as follows. Members of ExComm, through "their careful consideration of the challenge, their firmness in the face of terrifying danger, and their wise counsel," steered the world to a peaceful resolution of a potentially civilization-ending conflict. Nothing, he writes, "could be further from the truth." The guidance J.F.K. received was, for the most part, lousy. Some of it was loony. Had he heeded ExComm's "wise counsel," chances are I would not be writing this, or you reading it. As the President told a friend not long after the crisis ended, "You have no idea how much bad advice I had in those days." [Read More]
 
What activists who fought the AIDS crisis can teach us about organizing during a pandemic
By Loretta Graceffo, Waging Nonviolence [October 10, 2020]
---- For Avram Finklestein, a 68-year-old artist and activist who lives in Brooklyn, witnessing the U.S. government stand by as the death toll climbs to over 200,000 is especially painful. As a survivor of the AIDS crisis, the current pandemic has been what he calls "a revisitation of suffering that can only be triggered by America at its most cruel." At the height of the AIDS epidemic, Finklestein was galvanized into action by the death of his partner, Don. In 1987, Finklestein helped found the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power, or ACT UP, a grassroots direct action group advocating for AIDS research, treatment and policy change. "We were fighting for our lives first," he said. "It was a moment that was enraging, terrifying, solidifying." … Lawyer Terry McGovern, who has spent much of her life providing legal advocacy for low-income HIV positive individuals, describes the U.S. government's catastrophic response to COVID-19 as "completely predictable." "So many times throughout this whole experience, I thought about those early days of AIDS," she said. [Read More]