Monday, June 24, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - War with Iran? Sadism at our Southern Border

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
June 24, 2019
 
Hello All –  The jury is still out on the question of whether President Trump's last-minute intervention saved us from going to war against Iran, or whether that was the plan all along and the whole thing was theater. But if the threat were only a head-fake to test the Iranian defenses and world opinion, it was also a test of the citizens of the USA.  How did we do?
 
While most of the mainstream media expressed anti-Iranian noises, but were hesitant or opposed to going to war in the present state of confusion about what actually happened in the Persian Gulf, two fault lines about war/peace were revealed that should cause us concern.  One, of course, was the continued Democratic Party (and some Republicans) demand that war should not happen until Congress gives its approval.  This in part grew out of Trump's efforts to by-pass Congress and sell weapons to Saudi Arabia.  Trump's "Iran Emergency" put the War Powers Act and the Constitutional role of Congress re: war on the front burner.  So at the moment, it is hard to tell whether or under what circumstances Democratic hawks would vote for war if Congress were asked its opinion.  It is important, therefore, to advocate for No War under ALL circumstances, and not just whether Congress is being ignored.
 
Over the weekend, another fault line appeared, this time on a Sunday news programs.  On "Face the Nation," Senator Bernie Sanders was criticized by the CBS host for objecting to a "limited strike" on Iran, stating that this was an act of war and thus unlawful without congressional approval. Very good; but immediately after the attack on Iran was called off, CNN's Jake Taper asked several questions of Congressman Engel, one of which related to the need to consult Congress before attacking Iran.  Engel told Tapper: I think the President needs to come to Congress if ... going to war with Iran. I meanindividual strike, we don't want to tie the President's hands. But in terms of going to war, we're a co-equal branch of government, it's very important that Congress have a say in it."  But with this president, under the circumstances prevailing, it is absolutely necessary to tie his hands! That Congressman Engel, Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, should give a rhetorical blank check to President Trump to strike Iran is madness. Under those circumstances, the question is whether Iran will declare war against the United States.  One small step we can take is to sign/support a petition calling on Congressman Engel to state that a "limited strike" on Iran would be an act of war requiring specific prior congressional authorization.  Thanks.
 
Government Sadism at Our Southern Border
The way that our government treats immigrants, and especially children, at our southern border is reminiscent of fascist governments' treatment of Jews in the 1930s.  It is simply intolerable, not only for those so treated, but for those forced to watch this cruelty being carried out in our name.  Today, Democracy Now! devoted a program segment to the crisis: "'Somebody Is Going to Die': Lawyer Describes Chaos, Illness & Danger at Migrant Child Jail in Texas."  Please watch it.  One of the places where the Trump team plans to put immigrant children (but not their parents) is Ft. Sill, in Oklahoma, where 700 Japanese-American men were imprisoned in 1942. Some of the survivors of this wartime imprisonment protested against the re-use of Ft. Sill for immigrants.  For those who have promised themselves, "Never Again!" – "Again" is now here.
 
News Notes
Almost 200 Turkish university teachers who signed an "Academics for Peace Petition" have been sentenced to prison.  While most of the sentences have been suspended, dozens of others have not.  One thing Americans concerned about this injustice might do is to email a protest to Mr. David Kaye, the UN's Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression.  His email is freedex@ohchr.org  This is a moment when public opinion might have some effect, as Turkey's President Erdogan has just suffered a massive electoral defeat in Istanbul.
 
The Story of Stuff Project produces great/smart educational videos on protecting our environment.  Things like too much plastic or stopping NestlĂ©'s raid on our water resources.  One of their new projects is about water privatization. Check it out.
 
Those interested in the deeper story of the alleged Russian hacking of the Democratic Party's emails in the 2016 election should check out the latest posting from Ray McGovern and the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).  This one is about the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, the analytics firm that was hired by the Democrats and put the finger on the Russians.
 
For those keeping score at home, here's the latest update re: how many nuclear warheads exist, and which countries own them.  Spoiler alert: this year's count of 13,865 warheads is a significant drop from 14,465 in 2018.  At this rate, we could be touching bottom in 25 years.
Climate Update/News
This week we have two items from climate stalwart Iris Hiskey Arno.  The first is a piece of good news; the second calls on us to take some action.
 
CLIMATE LEGISLATION PASSED IN NYS! - While it didn't include everything activists had hoped for, the Climate and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) hammered out by the legislature and governor is an excellent first step. Tireless work by environmental advocates definitely played a part in getting this legislation over the finish line and much more work will be needed to address the weaknesses of the bill.

THE WILLIAMS FRACKED GAS PIPELINE PROPOSED TO GO THROUGH NY HARBOR NEEDS TO BE STOPPED AGAIN! - This pipeline involves a 23-mile trench dug in the seabed of NY harbor to transport fracked gas from PA out past the Rockaways.  The project is disastrous for sea life, frontline communities that were hit hard by Sandy, lots of noise/lights from construction.  Also, it threatens various endangered forms of marine life, and we don't need the gas. The DEC has extended the public comment period until July 13, so please flood them with comments! Use this link.
 
If you would like to give Iris and her colleagues a hand, the next meeting of the NYCD16 Indivisible Environment Committee is Wednesday, June 26th, 7:30 p.m. at the James Harmon Community Center, Main St. in Hastings.
 
Thing to Do/Coming Attractions
Ongoing – Weather permitting, the CFOW stalwarts gather every Saturday from 12 to 1 PM at the VFW Plaza in Hastings (Warburton and Spring St.) to protest war and other evils.  Please join us!
 
Please sign a petition to Eliot Engel that urges him to take action of arms sales to Saudi Arabia. While Engel supports blocking these arms sales – and is attacking the fake "Iran Emergency" that Trump is using to circumvent the need for congressional approval – this petition supports the efforts of some DC-based peace groups to get "No Arms to Saudi Arabia" put into the National Defense Authorization Act, which can't easily be vetoed by Trump.  So please sign the petition and – for extra credit – give Engel's office a call at 202-225-2464 – Put No Arms to Saudi Arabia in the NDAA!  Thanks.
 
Friday, June 28th – For those outraged by the Trump-regime anti-immigrant sadism at our southern border, one way to help is via the New Sanctuary Coalition.  A training in Yonkers will get you started in the NSC's accompaniment program, which recruits and trains volunteers to accompany people facing deportation to their immigration hearings and ICE check-ins. The training takes place at The Power Lab, 35 Ludlow St. (Suite #310) in Yonkers from 6 to 8 p.m. For more information, go here, or email Ambien Mitchell – ambien@newsanctuarynyc.org.
 
Thursday, July 4th – Mark your calendars for the more-or-less annual CFOW 4th of July Picnic. All CFOW friends are invited to a picnic on the lawn/porch of the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, 12 Elm St. in Dobbs, from 1 to 5 p.m.  We'll have a grill and hot dogs and maybe a few other things.  Come see old friends and make new ones!
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page. And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  As always, we have some excellent "Featured Essays," I also highly recommend the sets of good/useful articles on the threat of war with Iran; AOC and the US concentration camps for immigrants; and excellent articles on the sadistic regimes of economic sanctions; the threat of immigrant round-ups and deportations; and a good essay on the implications of Israel's plan to annex more land from the Occupied West Bank.
 
Rewards!
The Newsletter's rewards offer a brief sanctuary of sanity before proceeding to the News of the Week.  Starting off on a positive foot, thanks to JG we have two pieces of fair-and-balanced reporting from Tom Tomorrow: "The Brain-Eating Zombie Party" and "Yet Another Week in Stupidverse."  And while printing leaflets for this week's vigil I listened to some more Dr. John, and I especially liked his versions of "Goodnight Irene" and "How come my dog don't bark when you come around?" Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Forget Bernie vs. Warren. Focus on Growing the Progressive Base and Defeating Biden.
By Naomi Klein, The Intercept [June 21, 2019]
---- Today's electoral dynamics are absolutely nothing like 2016. That was a two-way race between two candidates with radically different records and ideas, in which one candidate's gain really was the other's loss. A winner-takes-all race like that pretty much always turns into some kind of death match.
These primaries are another species entirely. There is a small army of candidates, with two of the leaders running on platforms so far to the left, they would have been unimaginable for anyone but a protest candidate as recently as 2014. The frontrunner, meanwhile, is eminently beatable (especially if Joe Biden keeps showing us exactly who he is, as he did about six times this week). All this means that for leftists and progressives, the name of the game is not canceling out each other's candidates. It's doing everything possible not to end up with a Wall Street-funded centrist running against a president with the power of incumbency. That means making the case against the idea that candidates positioning themselves as the "safe choice" are in any way safe, whether at the polls or once in office. And it means helping to bring more and more people to one of the genuinely progressive frontrunners. There's plenty of time to worry about vote-spitting down the road — the task now is to enlarge the number of votes available to be split (or combined). [Read More]
 
(Video) Writer Ta-Nehisi Coates Makes the Case for Reparations at Historic Congressional Hearing
From Democracy Now! [June 20, 2019]
---- On Wednesday, a subcommittee of the House Judiciary held a historic hearing on reparations for slavery—the first of its kind in over a decade. Wednesday's hearing coincided with Juneteenth, a day that commemorates June 19, 1865, when slaves in Galveston, Texas, finally learned that the Emancipation Proclamation had abolished slavery. This year marks the 400th anniversary of the transatlantic slave trade. Lawmakers are considering a bill titled the "Commission to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African-Americans Act." It was introduced by Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Houston, after former Congressmember John Conyers had championed the bill for decades without success. The bill carries the designation H.R. 40, a reference to "40 acres and a mule," one of the nation's first broken promises to newly freed slaves. Ahead of the hearing, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said, "I don't think reparations for something that happened 150 years ago, for whom none of us currently living are responsible, is a good idea." Award-winning author Ta-Nehisi Coates testified at the historic congressional hearing on reparations and took direct aim at McConnell. [Read More]
 
America's Suicide Epidemic
By Rajan Menon, Tom Dispatch [June 18, 2019]
---- We hear a lot about suicide when celebrities like Anthony Bourdain and Kate Spade die by their own hand. Otherwise, it seldom makes the headlines. That's odd given the magnitude of the problem. In 2017, 47,173 Americans killed themselves. In that single year, in other words, the suicide count was nearly seven times greater than the number of American soldiers killed in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars between 2001 and 2018.  A suicide occurs in the United States roughly once every 12 minutes. … One aspect of the suicide epidemic is puzzling.  Though whites have fared far better economically (and in many other ways) than African Americans, their suicide rate is significantly higher.  It increased from 11.3 per 100,000 in 2000 to 15.85 per 100,000 in 2017; for African Americans in those years the rates were 5.52 per 100,000 and 6.61 per 100,000. Black men are 10 times more likely to be homicide victims than white men, but the latter are two-and-half times more likely to kill themselves. The higher suicide rate among whites as well as among people with only a high school diploma highlights suicide's disproportionate effect on working-class whites. This segment of the population also accounts for a disproportionate share of what economists Anne Case and Angus Deaton have labeled "deaths of despair" — those caused by suicides plus opioid overdoses and liver diseases linked to alcohol abuse. [Read More]
 
WAR WITH IRAN?
We must stop the US from going to war with Iran
By Sen. Bernie Sanders, The Guardian [UK] [June 21, 2019]
---- The drums of war are beating in Washington again. Just today we learned that the US came very close to striking targets inside Iran in response to the downing of a US drone in the Persian Gulf. Last week the White House announced that 1,000 additional troops would be sent to the Middle East in response to an alleged Iranian attack on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman. Last month, the New York Times reported that the Pentagon had presented a plan to the White House that envisions sending as many as 120,000 troops to the region to fight Iran. We need to rethink our current approach. A war with Iran would be an absolute disaster. As former general Anthony Zinni has put it: "If you like Iraq and Afghanistan, you'll love Iran." If the US were to attack Iran, Iran could respond with attacks on US troops and on countries around the region. It would lead to the further destabilization of that region in a way that is unimaginable and would result in wars that would go on years and probably cost trillions of dollars. [Read More]
 
America's Confrontation With Iran Goes Deeper Than Trump
By Trita Parsi, The Nation [June 20,, 2019]
---- This is why the cards were stacked against the survival of the Iran nuclear deal even if Trump had not been elected. By striking a compromise with a defiant non-democracy like Iran, which for the past 40 years has defined itself as the foremost opponent of American hegemony (liberal or otherwise), while signaling a desire to slowly dismantle American hegemony in the Middle East (in order to pivot to Asia), Obama introduced an unsustainable contradiction to US foreign policy. This contradiction has been particularly visible among Democrats who oppose Trump's Iran policy but who still cannot bring themselves to break with our seemingly endless confrontation with Iran. As long as such Democrats allow the debate to be defined by the diktat of US primacy, they will always be on the defensive, and their long-term impact on US-Iran relations will be marginal. [Read More]
 
Also useful/illuminating on the war against Iran – "Iran Had the Legal Right to Shoot Down US Spy Drone," by Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [June 21, 2019] [Link]; and the blogsite Moon of Alabama has had a week (or more) of excellent reporting on the deeper goings on re: Iran and USA.
 
AOC AND CONCENTRATION CAMPS
Yes, Liz Cheney, AOC is right that US is Running Concentration Camps for Refugees
---- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has been under fire for an Instagram message she sent out in which she characterized the holding facilities for refugees and other undocumented entrants into the US run by ICE and by private companies (for which it is a $2 billion a year industry) as "concentration camps. "Human rights groups are speaking of a systematic violation of basic human rights of these immigrants. Note that it is perfectly legal for people to seek refugee status in the United States, and that the court system determines if they will be awarded that status. …For-profit prisons should be illegal, and government officials certainly shouldn't be allowed to own them! Cheney's line is that it is sacrilegious to apply the term "concentration camp" to these facilities because it diminishes the concentration camps into which Jews were put by the Nazis in preparation for the Holocaust. AOC and her critics fired back that the Nazi concentration camps were a prelude to death camps, an entirely different phenomenon. So being a historian I looked into this "concentration camp" term. [Read More]
 
AOC's Generation Doesn't Presume America's Innocence
By Peter Beinart, The Atlantic [June 21, 2019]
----On Monday night, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez declared in an Instagram video that "the United States is running concentration camps on our southern border." The following morning, Liz Cheney tweeted, "Please @AOC do us all a favor and spend just a few minutes learning some actual history. 6 million Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust. You demean their memory and disgrace yourself with comments like this." … But whether you believe Ocasio-Cortez's terminology was appropriate or offensive, the deeper question is why it provoked such a ferocious debate. The answer: Because for the first time in decades, the left is mounting a serious challenge to American exceptionalism. … American exceptionalism does not merely connote cultural and political uniqueness. It connotes moral superiority. Embedded in exceptionalist discourse is the belief that, because America has a special devotion to democracy and freedom, its sins are mostly incidental. [Read More]
 
Also useful/insightful on Concentration Camps USA – "A Brief History of US Concentration Camps," b [Link]; "Why Interning Refugee Children In Military Bases puts them at Risk in Age of Trump," by Jana Lipman, The Conversation [June 23, 2019] [Link]; "Concentration camps – at the US border and in Gaza," by Jonathan Ofir, Mondoweiss [June 24, 2019] [Link]; and "When the NY Times understood what the term concentration camp meant," by Louis Proyect, [June 20, 2019] [Link].
 
WAR & PEACE
The Antiwar Movement No One Can See
By Allegra Harpootlian, Tom Dispatch [June 24, 2019]
---- When Donald Trump entered the Oval Office in January 2017, Americans took to the streets all across the country to protest their instantly endangered rights. Conspicuously absent from the newfound civic engagement, despite more than a decade and a half of this country's fruitless, destructive wars across the Greater Middle East and northern Africa, was antiwar sentiment, much less an actual movement. Those like me working against America's seemingly endless wars wondered why the subject merited so little discussion, attention, or protest. … But here's what I've been wondering recently: What if there's an antiwar movement growing right under our noses and we just haven't noticed? What if we don't see it, in part, because it doesn't look like any antiwar movement we've even imagined? If a movement is only a movement when people fill the streets, then maybe the critics are right. It might also be fair to say, however, that protest marches do not always a movement make. Movements are defined by their ability to challenge the status quo and, right now, that's what might be beginning to happen when it comes to America's wars. [Read More]
 
US Sanctions: Economic Sabotage That Is Deadly, Illegal, and Ineffective
By Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies, Code Pink [June 17, 2019]
---- While the mystery of who is responsible for sabotaging the two tankers in the Gulf of Oman remains unsolved, it is clear that the Trump administration has been sabotaging Iranian oil shipments since May 2, when it announced its intention to "bring Iran's oil exports to zero, denying the regime its principal source of revenue." The move was aimed at China, India, Japan, South Korea and Turkey, all nations that purchase Iranian oil and now face US threats if they continue to do so. The US military might not have physically blown up tankers carrying Iranian crude, but its actions have the same effect and should be considered acts of economic terrorists. … Whether in Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea or one of the 20 countries under the boot of US sanctions, the Trump administration is using its economic weight to try to exact regime change or major policy changes in countries around the globe. [Read More] For more on the failures of "sanctions" as economic warfare, real "Risk of Shooting War with Iran Grows after Decades of Economic Warfare by the U.S.," by David Cortright, The Conversation [June 22, 2019] [Link]
 
HUMAN-CAUSED CLIMATE CHAOS
'Hardhats vs. Hippies': How the Media Misrepresents the Debate Over the Green New Deal
By
---- The Green New Deal resolution calls for an economy-wide mobilization to achieve a national transition to a zero-carbon future within a decade. The proposal has sparked a vibrant conversation in Congress and throughout the country, resonating with grassroots environmental groups and challenging lawmakers to start talking seriously about decarbonization. Yet despite massive public support, the resolution was predictably stymied in Congress, and has faced skepticism within the Democratic Party and labor movement. Nor has the resolution been greeted with universal praise by the Democratic Party or labor unions. But while some unions express reluctance to hop on the green bandwagon, there's more to the story than "environmentalists versus blue-collar workers." Organized labor does not speak with a single voice on climate policy, though the whole movement has deep stakes in the politics of decarbonization, as working-class people's lives and livelihoods are most vulnerable to climate change. … More importantly, though building-trades workers may fit Trump's image of working-class America, they are not representative of labor or the working class as a whole when it comes to green issues. The future of labor will be helmed by service workers, women, immigrants and people of color. Accordingly, the Green New Deal or other strong climate change policies have won endorsements from SEIU, Los Angeles County Federation of Labor and National Nurses United, along with various locals like New York State Nurses Association and American Federation of Teachers - Oregon. A survey released by Data for Progress this month found that "union membership is one of the factors most highly correlated with support for Green New Deal policies as well as the Green New Deal framework as a whole." [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES/"THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR"
(Video) Julian Assange Indictment "Criminalizes the News Gathering Process," Says Pentagon Papers Lawyer
From Democracy Now! [June 18, 2019]
---- A London judge has ordered WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to appear before a court in February 2020 to face a full extradition hearing. Prosecutors in the U.S. have indicted Assange on 18 counts, including 17 violations of the Espionage Act. This is the first-ever case of a journalist or publisher being indicted under the World War I-era law. Assange said that his life was "effectively at stake" if the U.K. honors a U.S. request for his extradition. Assange is currently serving a 50-week sentence in London's Belmarsh Prison for skipping bail in 2012. We speak with James Goodale, former general counsel of The New York Times. In 1971, he urged the paper to publish the Pentagon Papers, which had been leaked by whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg. [Read More]
 
I'm a Journalist but I Didn't Fully Realize the Terrible Power of U.S. Border Officials Until They Violated My Rights and Privacy
By Seth Harp, The Intercept [June 22 2019]
---- I should have kept my mouth shut about the guacamole; that made things worse for me. Otherwise, what I'm about to describe could happen to any American who travels internationally. It happened 33,295 times last year. My work as a journalist has taken me to many foreign countries, including frequent trips to Mexico. On May 13, I was returning to the U.S. from Mexico City when, passing through immigration at the Austin airport, I was pulled out of line for "secondary screening," a quasi-custodial law enforcement process that takes place in the Homeland Security zone of the airport. … In retrospect, I was naive about the kind of agency CBP has become in the Trump era. Though I've reported several magazine stories in Mexico, none have been about immigration. Of course, I knew these were the guys putting kids in cages, separating refugee children from their parents, and that Trump's whole shtick is vilifying immigrants, leading to many sad and ugly scenes at the border, including the farcical deployment of U.S. troops. But I complacently assumed that wouldn't affect me directly, least of all in Austin. [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
What You Need to Know About Trump's Mass Deportation Threat
By Maryam Saleh, The Intercept [June 18 2019]
---- In between tweets complaining about Fox News polling numbers and boasting about the size of future rallies, President Donald Trump took a moment on Monday to send shock waves through immigrant communities with a threat meant to rally his base — but one that is not actually logistically possible. "Next week ICE will begin the process of removing the millions of illegal aliens who have illicitly found their way into the United States," he tweeted. "They will be removed as fast as they come in." An administration official later told the Associated Press that the effort would target people who have received final orders of deportation. There are more than 1 million people living in the United States with final deportation orders, among an undocumented population of about 11 million.  "He obviously wants everyone to believe he's talking about some mass roundup, which is just not possible," immigration attorney Matt Cameron said of Trump, "both because of resources and because of due process." [Read More] And now Trump is "postponing" the deportations.  "Trump Says He'll Delay Deportation Operation Aimed at Undocumented Families," by Michael D. Shear, New York Times [June 22, 2019] [Link]
 
Supreme Court Ruling on Census Could Deal Grave Blow to Democracy
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [June 15, 2019]
---- The Supreme Court is poised to decide two cases that could prove devastating to the right to vote — the very foundation of a democracy. One case will review the Trump administration's attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The other will consider whether partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. They are related because the citizenship question would "allow Republicans to draft even more extreme gerrymandered maps to stymie Democrats," the New York Times reported. … The census is used to determine the number of representatives each state will have in the House, how electors are distributed in the Electoral College, and how $880 billion in federal funds will be allocated between the states. … Gerrymandering is "the intentional manipulation of district boundaries to discriminate against a group of voters on the basis of their political views or race." Although the Supreme Court has struck down racial gerrymandering, it has never agreed on a standard for assessing the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering. … The Supreme Court will decide two cases involving partisan gerrymandering by the end of June. One challenges gerrymandering by Republicans, the other by Democrats. [Read More]
 
Mobilizing the Poor People's Campaign
---- This week in Washington, the powers that be are hearing from a vital new democratic force in this country. For three days, the Poor People's Campaign will bring poor and low-wage Americans to the nation's capital to call for a moral renewal in this nation. They will question many of those who are seeking the Democratic nomination for president. Congressional hearings will showcase their Poor People's Moral Budget. Their actions should be above the fold of every newspaper in America; they should lead the news shows and fill the talk shows. A movement for common sense and social justice is building, putting every politician on notice: lead or get out of the way, a new moral majority is building and demanding change. … This week, the campaign releases their Poor People's Moral Budget. It details authoritatively that the cost of our current inequality, the cost of mass poverty is far greater than what it would cost to invest in people, put them to work at a living wage and guarantee basic economic and political rights. It costs society big time to not provide health care or quality education or clean water and air, to suppress voting rights and to keep wages low. The moral budget is detailed and authoritatively sourced. The numbers are clear, as is the conclusion. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Annexation: How Israel Already Controls More Than Half of the West Bank
By Jonathan Cook, Middle East Eye [June 24, 2019]
---- A state of de facto annexation already exists on the ground in most of the occupied West Bank.
Almost two-thirds of the Palestinian territory, including most of its most fertile and resource-rich land, is under full Israeli control. About 400,000 Jewish settlers living there enjoy the full rights and privileges of Israeli citizens. At least 60 pieces of legislation were drafted by right-wing members of the Knesset during the last parliament to move Israel from a state of de facto to de jure annexation, according to a database by Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights group. … Support in Israel for annexation is growing, with 42 percent backing one of several variants in a recent poll, as opposed to 34 percent who were behind a two-state solution. Only 28 percent of Israelis explicitly rejected annexation. Behind the scenes, debates about formally annexing the Palestinian territories have been rife in Israel since it occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza in 1967. [Read More]
 
World Refugee Day
By Ramzy Baroud, Editor, Palestine Chronicle [June 22, 2019]
---- The United Nations' World Refugee Day, observed annually on June 20, should not merely represent a reminder of "the courage, strength and determination of women, men and children who are forced to flee their homeland under threat of persecution, conflict and violence." It should also be an opportunity for the international community to truly understand and actively work towards finding a sustainable remedy to forced displacement, for no woman, man or child should be forced to endure such grueling, shattering and humiliating experience in the first place. Palestinians who have withstood the degradation of exile for over 70 years embody the harshness of this collective experience more than any other group. … Palestinian refugees may not top the political agenda of the Middle East at the moment, but it is their persistence, determination and undying hope that will keep their cause alive until international law is respected and human rights are truly honored. [Read More]
 
Trump, Kushner, and "The Deal of the Century"
Buying Palestine for peanuts
By Ali Abunimah, Electronic Intifada [June 24, 2019]
---- Over the weekend, the White House released "Peace to Prosperity," the economic component of its so-called Deal of the Century. It calls for $50 billion in "investments" spread over 179 projects. Half the money would be spent on Palestinian infrastructure over 10 years, with the rest spread between Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan. It will supposedly include a $5 billion transportation corridor between the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip and another $2 billion in the Palestinian tourism sector. The plan has zero chance of success, not least because no one knows where the money would come from – presumably it is to be pledged by America's client states in the Gulf – and there's no reason to believe Israel would ever remotely allow any major projects intended to benefit Palestinians. Jared Kushner, adviser and son-in-law to President Donald Trump, and US envoy Jason Greenblatt, are the brains behind the plan. They claim it will reduce Palestinian poverty by half and double Palestinian GDP over a decade. [Read More]  Ali Abunimah discusses this further on (Video) Aljazeera. Also useful is "Palestinians have every right to reject another Oslo," by Sam Bahour, +972 Magazine [Israel] [June 22, 2019] [Link].

Sunday, June 16, 2019

CFOW Newsletter - War against Iran? Time to Rise Up

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
June 16, 2019
 
Hello All – Is President Trump about to take us into a war with Iran? Without much evidence, Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are claiming Iran was responsible for the attack on two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman last Wednesday.  But was it? And will the Trump people use this incident as an excuse to attack Iran?  And what will happen if it does?
 
Despite Trump's bluster, we actually know little about what happened to the oil tankers. For example, were the ships struck by a torpedo, or a mine, or a missile? There is disagreement. And who did it? There are reasons to wonder, for example, why Iran would attack a Japanese tanker while the Japanese leader was visiting Iran. And analysts raise questions about a "false flag" attack that might be intended to lead to war.  Remembering the "weapons of mass destruction" falsehood that led to the war with Iraq, we should be cautious.
 
But if Iran were responsible for attacking the oil tankers, why would they do this?  Trump's withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Agreement – negotiated over several years – and the subsequent renewal of economic sanctions are seen by Iranians as a betrayal and an act of war. They see the failure of the United Nations and the European nations to stand up to Trump's sanctions as a further betrayal, leaving them on their own against the USA.  What does Iran's "peace faction" have to say against the argument that it's time to stand up and fight back?
 
There is widespread concern among the US political elite that the Trump people want to manipulate "facts" so as to justify continued support for Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen.  Trump recently proclaimed an "Iran National Emergency" that would give him legal cover to sell weapons to Saudi Arabia without congressional approval. Pending now in Congress are 22 weapons sales worth eight billion dollars.  This money will go to Raytheon and other "merchants of death."  Is this what the war-scare is about?
 
This is a critical moment if we are to avoid war.  The "Iran National Emergency" brings us closer to war.  We can do our part to stop it by telling our congressional representatives to stand up to Trump and his war talk. Please call Senator Charles Schumer (202) 224-6542; Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (202) 224-4451; Congresswoman Nita Lowey 202-225-6506; and Congressman Eliot Engel (202) 225-2464.  Let them know that you oppose war with Iran and selling weapons to Saudi Arabia
 
Incredible, But True
Yesterday the New York Times published an article titled "U.S. Escalates Online Attacks on Russia's Power Grid."  The article was co-authored by The Times' hawkish David Sanger, known as "Scoop" because of his availability to receive and write-up "secret" information from the Pentagon.  In yesterday's article, "Scoop" writes: "The United States is stepping up digital incursions into Russia's electric power grid in a warning to President Vladimir V. Putin and a demonstration of how the Trump administration is using new authorities to deploy cybertools more aggressively, current and former government officials said."  The article goes on to describe how the Pentagon's cyber squad has placed malware in Russia's national power grid that (supposedly) can be activated at will. Needless to say, the Pentagon claims this is a defensive measure, responding to earlier Kremlin attacks on the USA.  This seems to me to be reckless in the extreme, illustrating and amplifying the dangerous military encirclement – and now infiltration – of Russia by the USA and its NATO allies.  Note also that this aggression is justified by the hoodwinking of Congress.  "Scoop" writes: "The action inside the Russian electric grid appears to have been conducted under little-noticed new legal authorities, slipped into the military authorization bill passed by Congress last summer. The measure approved the routine conduct of "clandestine military activity" in cyberspace, to "deter, safeguard or defend against attacks or malicious cyberactivities against the United States." Under the law, those actions can now be authorized by the defense secretary without special presidential approval."  Unbelievable.
 
News Notes
The huge demonstrations in Hong Kong have (at least temporarily) defeated the government and its attempt to enact unpopular legislation at the behest the China.  Check out Sunday's demonstration.
 
The arrest and trial of humanitarian activist Scott Warren has been reported in previous newsletters.  His crime: leaving food and water in the Arizona desert to help "illegal" immigrants who are crossing into the USA.  On Tuesday, his case ended in a mistrial, as the majority of the jury refused to convict him.  For background on this significant victory, check out this Democracy Now! program.
 
New York renters/tenants gained a great victory in the state legislature this week, gaining the strongest-ever legal protections. The law is one of several similar efforts nationwide and is expected to give municipalities around the state more authority to regulate rents and ensure greater access to affordable housing. See this report from Democracy Now!'s Juan Gonzalez.
 
USA wealth-inequality got even more unequal in the last three decades, as the top one percent of Americans gained $21 trillion in wealth since 1989 while the bottom 50 percent lost $900 billion. Read the grisly details here.
 
Climate Action Needed
Fairly strong climate legislation is in the final stages of debate and discussion in Albany.  The Climate and Community Protection Act would (among other things) include a path to 100% renewables and a ban on new fossil fuel projects.  (For details, go here.)  As the legislative session is coming to an end, calls are needed between now and Wednesday to let political leaders know that climate legislation is important to people. Please call Governor Cuomo (press 2 to speak with a human): 518-474-8390; Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins: 518-455-2585; and Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie (pronounced "hasty"): 518-455-3791.  Thanks!
 
Thing to Do/Coming Attractions
Ongoing – Weather permitting, the CFOW stalwarts gather every Saturday from 12 to 1 PM at the VFW Plaza in Hastings (Warburton and Spring St.) to protest war and other evils.  Please join us!
 
Thursday, July 4th – Mark your calendars for the more-or-less annual CFOW 4th of July Picnic. All CFOW friends are invited to a picnic on the lawn/porch of the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, 12 Elm St. in Dobbs, from 1 to 5 p.m.  We'll have a grill and hot dogs and maybe a few other things.  Come see old friends and make new ones!
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page. And if you would like to support our work by making a contribution, please send your check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  As always, we have some excellent "Featured Essays," I also highly recommend the set of articles and videos about the dangerous confrontation underway between the USA and Iran; the set of articles about the Democrats and the 2020 election, with a focus on E. Warren and B. Sanders; an excellent article on the very sound reasons to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE); and a good article by Jonathan Cook on the reasons why the Trump/Kushner "Deal of the Century" for Israel/Palestine is a non-starter.
 
Rewards!
The Newsletter's rewards give stalwart readers a brief oasis before heading into the chaos of the week's news.  The rewards this week illustrate the amazing range/oeuvre of Ry Cooder.  First up is "Jesus on the Mainline."  Next is an instrumental from the film, "Paris, Texas."  And finally, with V. M. Bhatt he performs "Ganges Delta Blues." Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Two Iraqi Peace Activists Confront a Trumpian World
By Laura Gottesdiener, Tom Dispatch [June 12, 2019]
---- There's a dark joke going around Baghdad these days. Noof Assi, a 30-year-old Iraqi peace activist and humanitarian worker, told it to me by phone. Our conversation takes place in late May just after the Trump administration has announced that it would add 1,500 additional U.S. troops to its Middle Eastern garrisons. "Iran wants to fight to get the United States and Saudi Arabia out of Iraq," she began. "And the United States wants to fight to get Iran out of Iraq." She paused dramatically. "So how about all of us Iraqis just leave Iraq so they can fight here on their own?" Assi is among a generation of young Iraqis who lived most of their lives first under the U.S. occupation of their country and then through the disastrous violence it unleashed, including the rise of ISIS, and who are now warily eying Washington's saber-rattling towards Tehran. They couldn't be more aware that, should a conflict erupt, Iraqis will almost certainly find themselves once again caught in the devastating middle of it. … In late May, I spoke with Assi and Mohammed separately by telephone in English about the rising threat of another U.S. war in the Middle East and their collective two decades of peace work aimed at undoing the violence wrought by the last two U.S. wars in their country. Below, I've edited and melded the interviews of these two friends so that Americans can hear a couple of voices from Iraq, telling the story of their lives and their commitment to peace in the years after the invasion of their country in 2003. [Read More]
 
The Indian Subcontinent's Third Partition
[FB – The re-election campaign of India's ruling party focused Trump-like hatred on India's minority Muslim population and the alleged threats coming from neighboring Pakistan.  The result was the re-election of Prime Minister Modi and his Hindu fascist BJP party.  This article gives us a useful review of how "communitarianism" or religious hatred has fueled India's politics from Day One.]
The First partition (1947)
The Indian subcontinent got partitioned in 1947 when the British colonial rule came to an end. India was divided into two new independent states: India and Pakistan. The reason for the division was the Indian National Congress' (INC's) adamant refusal to share power with the Indian Muslim League (IML) headed by Muhammad Ali Jinnah who was himself a non-practicing Muslim with a secular vision. Muslims represented over 25% of the then total Indian population. The partition was gory and bloody; in excess of a million people were killed. Also, millions of Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan and Muslims in India, migrated to areas cohabited by their coreligionists.
The Second partition (1971)
Jinnah died within thirteen months after the formation of Pakistan. In the late 1950s, power in Pakistan was gradually usurped by its military, with strong encouragement from the United States and Britain. British trained and labeled "martial race" the West Pakistan based army mainly comprising Punjabis and some Pashtuns. The majority wing, East Pakistan with 54% of Pakistan's population, consisted mostly of Bengalis, the "non-martial race." The outright racism by the Punjabis (27 % of total population), the West Pakistan-based elite, and the economic exploitation of West Pakistan-based businesses resulted in a revolt by the Bengalis and culminated in a war in East Pakistan which then became Bangladesh in 1971.
Over a million people died and hundreds of thousands of Bengali women were raped by the Pakistani soldiers.
The Third partition (2019)
The third partition took place on May 23, 2019 when the Indian general election results were announced. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) won a decisive victory with 303 seats in a 543 national Assembly, the lower house. With coalition support, BJP now controls 353 seats.) One of the major reasons Modi won the election was by uniting as many Hindus as possible by instilling the fear of Pakistan. … The 2019 partition of India is not physical; it is a partition of people based on their religion: Hindus and Muslims. [Read More]
 
(Video) Glenn Greenwald Explains the Political Earthquake in Brazil Caused by Our Ongoing Exposés
From The Intercept [June 15 2019]
---- Last Sunday, the Intercept and the Intercept Brasil published a series of exposĂ©s that has created a major political earthquake in Brazil that has only grown and intensified throughout the week. In less than a week, the once-revered Justice Minister of President Bolsonaro's government, Sergio Moro, now faces widespread calls to resign from the same large Brazilian media outlets that spent years transforming him into an untouchable icon of integrity and uncritically applauding his every move. Even more grave, the improprieties revealed by our reporting have cast serious doubt on the validity of numerous guilty verdicts issued by Judge Moro and the anti-corruption task force, beginning – most importantly – with the conviction and imprisonment of former President Lula da Silva last year at exactly the time that he was the overwhelming front-runner to win the presidency in 2018….  Because of the importance but also complexity of these issues for those outside of Brazil, we created a video explaining what this archive is about, what these revelations mean, and why the consequences of our reporting are so significant not only for Brazil but for the entire democratic world. [Read More] Also interesting is Wednesday's program from Democracy Now! (Video) "Secret Files Show How Brazil's Elites Jailed Former President Lula and Cleared the Way for Bolsonaro" [Link]. The Intercept's revelations have helped fuel the massive demonstrations against Brazil's rightwing government; check out this short program from The Real News.
 
Department of Justice Bloodhounds on the Scent of John Brennan
By Ray McGovern, Consortium News [June 14, 2019]
---- The New York Times Thursday morning has bad news for one of its favorite anonymous sources, former CIA Director John Brennan.  The Times reports that the Justice Department plans to interview senior CIA officers to focus on the allegation that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian intelligence to intervene in the 2016 election to help Donald J. Trump. DoJ investigators will be looking for evidence to support that remarkable claim that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's final report failed to establish.  Despite the collusion conspiracy theory having been put to rest, many Americans, including members of Congress, right and left, continue to accept the evidence-impoverished, media-cum-"former-intelligence-officer" meme that the Kremlin interfered massively in the 2016 presidential election. One cannot escape the analogy with the fraudulent evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. As in 2002 and 2003, when the mania for the invasion of Iraq mounted, Establishment media have simply regurgitated what intelligence sources like Brennan told them about Russia-gate. No one batted an eye when Brennan told a House committee in May 2017, "I don't do evidence." [Read More]  Earlier statements by Ray McGovern for the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) can be read here and here.  Those still wedded to the "Russian hacking" story might want to check this out.
 
WAR WITH IRAN?
The mainstream media has generally maintained a high level of skepticism about Secretary of State Pompeo's assertions that Iran was "certainly" responsible for damaging two oil tankers last Thursday in the Gulf of Oman (between Oman and Iran).  This was illustrated by MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Thursday: (Video) "Mike Pompeo Constructs Iran Narrative Moving US Toward War Footing."  More in-depth reporting also underlined the many unknowns: 
 
(Video) U.S. Rushes to Blame Iran for Tanker Attacks as Much of World Pushes for Diplomacy
A Democracy Now! interview with Vijay Prashad [June 14, 2019] [Link]
 
Whatever Pompeo Says, there is no Certainty Iran mined the Tankers
By Juan Cole, Informed Comment [June 13, 2019] [Link]
 
(Video) Iran calls tanker explosions 'suspicious' as global concern grows
From Aljazeera [June 13, 2019] [Link]
 
For the New York Times version, read "Tankers Are Attacked in Mideast, and U.S. Says Video Shows Iran Was Involved," [June 13, 2019] [Link]
 
And here's another problem for the war hawks:
Mike Pompeo Said Congress Doesn't Need to Approve War With Iran. 2020 Democrats Aren't Having It.
By Akela Lacy and Jon Schwarz  [June 14 2019]
---- As the Trump administration ratchets up tensions with Iran, escalating fears that the United States is looking for a possible path to another war in the Middle East, several Democratic presidential contenders are standing firm in their rejection of the White House's attempts to create a legal rationale for war. They were responding to comments Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made in a May 21 classified briefing for members of Congress that suggested that the Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, passed by Congress three days after 9/11 could provide a legal basis for a war with Iran. In interviews with The Intercept, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., as well as spokespeople for Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., said it would be illegal for the U.S. government to rely on a 2001 law that authorized military force against perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks to go to war with Iran. [Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
Congress Can End the Yemen War This Summer, Despite Trump
By Hassan El-Tayyab, Truthout [June 8, 2019]
---- On April 16, President Trump vetoed one of the most historically significant pieces of legislation to emerge from Congress during his presidency: S.J.Res.7, the Yemen War Powers Resolution. This bill would end U.S. military involvement in Saudi Arabia's and the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) disastrous war on Yemen. A veto override vote in the Senate a few weeks later passed with a simple majority of 53-45, but did not achieve the 67-vote supermajority needed to overturn the veto. Though the effort failed, we learned something important in the process: We now know in unequivocal terms that a bipartisan majority in Congress wants to end the U.S. military role in a war that has already claimed the lives of 85,000 children under the age of five due to hunger and disease. Congress has another chance to end the war this summer during consideration of the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and defense appropriations bills. These annual military spending bills offer Congress one of the quickest and most straightforward ways to defund the war and condemn this military campaign. Through the NDAA and defense appropriations, Congress can prohibit intelligence-sharing and logistics support activities for the war in Yemen; suspend direct commercial sales licenses for the maintenance and sustainment of fighter aircraft used in Saudi-UAE offensive operations in Yemen; and even stop domestic training of Saudi and UAE fighter jet mechanics. Importantly, these bills could suspend the transfer and sale of weapons ― something many experts believe could be the best chance for creating the leverage needed for lasting peace in Yemen. [Read More]
 
HUMAN-CAUSED CLIMATE CHAOS
Climate Change Will Increase Risk of Violent Conflict, Researchers Warn
By Neela Banerjee, Inside Climate News [June 13, 2019]
---- Worsening climate change will increase the risk of future violent conflict within countries, a group of top researchers representing an array of viewpoints said Wednesday in the scientific journal Nature. The study, "Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict," tries to address some longstanding disagreements among climate scientists, political scientists, historians and other experts about what role, if any, climate change has played in internal conflicts over the last 100 years. Stanford researchers took the unusual step of convening 11 of the most experienced and cited experts on the topic to resolve their assessments of climate change's impact on global security. Working together, the experts concluded that climate change so far has not played a large role in stoking conflict, overshadowed instead by other factors such as poor governance and weak economic development. But they agreed that climate change will play a far greater role in destabilizing countries as the planet warms. [Read More]
 
THE DEMOCRATS AND 2020
Why Won't the Democratic Candidates Move to the Left on Foreign Policy?
An interview with Peter Beinart, The Intercept [June 13, 2019]
---- The Democratic candidates have introduced a raft of radical progressive proposals on the domestic policy front, from Medicare for All to free public college to universal basic income. Yet that appetite for radicalism has been sorely lacking on the foreign policy front, with the candidates mostly mouthing the same noncommittal platitudes we've come to expect from cautious presidential contenders. Why is it that the policy area in which American presidents have the most power and the most freedom to shape world events is so often overlooked in our political campaigns? Atlantic contributor and City University of New York professor Peter Beinart joins Mehdi Hasan to talk about why Democrats are so timid on foreign policy. [Read/Hear the Program]
 
Demand for Presidential Climate Debate Escalates after DNC Says No
By Marianne Lavelle, Inside Climate News [June 13, 2019]
---- Like Miami, the low-lying coastal city where Democrats will hold their first presidential debates of the 2020 race, the Democratic National Committee is at risk of being inundated. Fifteen of its presidential candidates, more than 50 of its member organizations in the states, and a slew of progressive organizations that make up its voting base, some armed with petitions bearing over 200,000 signatures, all are now calling for the DNC to hold a separate climate-focused debate. The executive committee of the Democratic party in Miami-Dade County—the U.S. metropolitan area considered most vulnerable to sea level rise and where the first debates will be held June 26 and 27—voted unanimously Monday to urge Democrats to devote one of the 12 Democratic presidential debates to the climate crisis. [Read More]
 
Elizabeth Warren Is Proving Her Doubters Wrong
By Katrina vanden Heuvel, The Nation [June 11, 2019]
---- Yet, to borrow a phrase, Warren persisted. And with the first debate quickly approaching, she has jumped in the polls and emerged as the clear leader in the Democratic "ideas primary."  Last week, Warren unveiled a sweeping new plan for what she calls "economic patriotism." Her proposal calls for $2 trillion investment in clean energy, which she says would create more than a million jobs and advance the goals of the Green New Deal. In a boost to workers, the plan would require federal contractors to pay a $15 minimum wage and offer 12 weeks of paid family leave. It would also convert the Commerce Department into a new Department of Economic Development, focused on job creation. By linking the causes of environmental and economic justice in one package, Warren is reimagining the American Dream for these times. … Warren is certainly not the only Democrat in the field running on innovative, important ideas. Sanders, in particular, has built on his transformative 2016 campaign, with bolder proposals for public education and Medicare-for-all. One also hopes that Warren will show the same audacity and vision in foreign policy as the campaign continues. But no matter what happens, it's now obvious that pundits who argued that Warren had missed her moment were wrong. The presidential race is better because she is in it. [Read More]
 
Bernie Sanders Proposes New Economic Bill of Rights
By Marjorie Cohn, Truthout [June 13, 2019]
---- Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders delivered a full-throated defense of democratic socialism in his June 12 speech at George Washington University. Sanders quoted FDR's 1944 State of the Union address: "We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence." Sanders, like FDR, proposed an Economic Bill of Rights, including the rights to health care, affordable housing, education, a living wage and retirement. "Economic rights are human rights," Sanders declared. "That is what I mean by democratic socialism." …The Universal Declaration of Human Rights sets forth two different categories of human rights: (1) civil and political rights, and (2) economic, social and cultural rights. Civil and political rights comprise the rights to life, a fair trial and self-determination; freedom of speech, expression, assembly and religion; and freedom from torture, cruel treatment and arbitrary detention. Economic, social and cultural rights include the rights to health care, education and social security; the right to form and join unions and to strike; and the right to equal pay for equal work, unemployment insurance, paid maternity leave, and the prevention, treatment and control of diseases. U.S. policy since Reagan has been to define human rights only as civil and political, excluding economic rights. [Read More] And Louis Proyect gives us an interesting article, "Bernie Sanders and the New Deal" [June 14, 2019] [Link]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
Abolish ICE! Fighting for Humanity over Profit in Immigration Policy
By Jennie Rose Nelson, NACLA [June 6, 201
---- In its less than 20 years of existence, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has amassed an extensive and shocking record of human rights violations. The current administration's anti-immigrant sentiment has radicalized the agency, emboldening it to employ increased violence, excessive force, and blatantly illegal methods of arrest with impunity. While families continue to be separated at our border, inadequate government efforts to reunite families in the wake of "zero tolerance" policy means it could take years for authorities to even identify thousands of children taken from their parents, raising concerns they could remain separated indefinitely. Meanwhile, the network of ICE-managed private detention facilities is rapidly expanding. It is behind these prison walls that ICE agents have committed their most egregious and unregulated acts of violence, including fatal medical neglect, rape, and sexual abuse of minors. In response to these abuses, activists have been calling for the agency's abolition. The Abolish ICE movement is rapidly gaining traction, despite frequently facing derision in the mainstream press. Constant news headlines revealing ICE's systematic violence make it increasingly difficult to claim such acts are isolated incidences within an otherwise functioning and necessary system. While few politicians deny that ICE's role and conduct in immigration enforcement must be subject to oversight, concrete plans of action seldom follow their calls for "comprehensive reforms."  [Read More]
 
Anyone who'd rather not be shot should read this book
By David Swanson [June 9, 2019]
---- Thom Hartmann has long written and spoken on the topic of guns in the United States, along with many other topics. Of those topics he's dealt with that I know anything about, I have not always agreed with him on every detail, but on most I've found him highly informative and persuasive. His new book, The Hidden History of Guns and the Second Amendment, is possibly the best book I've ever seen on its topic, both to read, and to pass along to anyone in the United States, whatever their current opinion on guns and gun laws may be, as well as to share with anyone else on earth who may be trying to understand why the United States seems to be allowing its own ongoing slaughter, with guns the second-leading cause of death among children in the United States. … Over 1,000 people have been killed in the United States in mass-shootings over the years. But this pales in comparison with non-mass shootings, which kill about 34,000 per year, two-thirds of those being suicides, a small percentage being accidents, and a smaller percentage being police killings. Roughly twice the number killed are non-fatally (but often horrifically) injured. The direct financial cost of just the deaths, plus the lost productivity, is some $300 billion per year, but there's no way to put a number on the cultural poison, the fear, the anxiety, the hatred, the bitterness, the distrust, or the shame. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Trump enjoys bipartisan support for his plan to eradicate the Palestinian cause
By Jonathan Cook, Middle East Eye [June 14, 2019]
---- The US seeks to engineer a suitable regional environment before it begins implementing the 'deal of the century.' The White House's prolonged financial bullying of the Palestinian Authority (PA), the Palestinians' government-in-waiting, has reached the point where there are now credible warnings that it is close to collapse. The crisis has offered critics further proof of the administration's seemingly chaotic, often self-sabotaging approach to foreign policy matters. …  There's nothing especially 'Trumpian' about the administration's emerging 'peace process.' Again, critics view the Trump administration's approach as a dangerous departure from the traditional US role of "honest broker". Such analyses, however common, are deeply misguided. Far from lacking a strategy, the White House has a precise and clear one for imposing a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – President Donald Trump's so-called "deal of the century". Even without publication so far of a formal document, the plan's contours are coming ever more sharply into relief, as its implementation becomes observable on the ground. …Further, the Trump administration's vision of the future for Israelis and Palestinians – however extreme and one-sided – has wide, bipartisan support in Washington. There's nothing especially "Trumpian" about the administration's emerging "peace process." [Read More]
 
(Video) "Advocate": Israeli Attorney Lea Tsemel Reflects on Defending Palestinians Who Resist Occupation
From Democracy Now! [June 14, 2019]
---- Attorney Lea Tsemel has defended Palestinian political prisoners in Israeli courts for nearly half a century, insisting on their humanity and their right to a fair trial. Her work has earned her the scorn and reprobation of many Israelis, as well as death threats. A staunch critic of the Israeli occupation of Palestine, Tsemel has long argued that Palestinians who carry out politically motivated violence are freedom fighters, not "terrorists." In 1999, Tsemel won a landmark case in the Israeli Supreme Court, making it illegal for Israeli officials to torture detained Palestinians during interrogations. The documentary "Advocate" narrates the remarkable life story of Tsemel. The film premiered at this year's Sundance Film Festival and screened in New York City for the first time Thursday night at the Human Rights Watch Film Festival. We speak with Lea Tsemel and the director of "Advocate," Rachel Leah Jones. [See the Program]  And you can see Part 2 of this interview here.
 
OUR HISTORY
A Complex Fate: Vasily Grossman in war and peace.
By Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Nation [June 12, 2019]
[FB – Vasily Grossman's Life and Fate is often – and justifiably, imo – compared to Tolstoy's War and Peace in its ability to capture a society at war.  The prequel to Life and Fate – originally "Stalingrad" but later edited down to "For the Right Cause" – is now published in English translation under its original title and with censored material restored. (My copy arrives tomorrow!) – Check out historian Sheila Fitzpatrick's interesting essay and get to know this great novelist.]
---- Vasily Grossman is hard to pigeonhole. A Jewish novelist and journalist and not a party member, he was one of the Soviet Union's leading war correspondents during World War II, first at Stalingrad, then with the Soviet Army moving westward. He wrote powerfully about the destruction of the Jews of the Ukraine and Poland. His big postwar novels, For the Right Cause and Life and Fate, drew on his wartime experiences, and at one point it seemed he might be a plausible contender for the role of the Soviet Tolstoy. But the novels, especially Life and Fate, had too strong a Jewish theme for the Soviet authorities. They also suggested a basic similarity between the Soviet and Nazi political systems, so he often had trouble with the censors, though his work was never under a total ban. Life and Fate was confiscated by the KGB in 1961 before publication, but his other writings stayed in print, and he remained at liberty and died of cancer a few years later. [Read More]