Monday, December 31, 2018

CFOW Newsletter - Prospects for War & Peace in 2019

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
December 31, 2018
 
Hello All – The year 2018 was a tough one for peace & justice stalwarts, and we say good-bye to it without much regret. The threat of nuclear war (e.g. between the US and Russia) continued to grow, and the world made little progress (and some regress) in addressing the global disaster benignly described as "climate change."  Newsletter readers are familiar with the significant role played in these developments by our own government, though it had many supporting players throughout the world.
 
The last few months, however, have seen some rays of light that warrant hopes for a better New Year.  The outcome of the congressional elections in November is/was a bright spot; and whether or not the resulting shift in the balance of power in Congress produces much good, the elections showed that the Trump Agenda could be handily defeated with a strong mobilization around (often) progressive ideas.  Similarly, one of the "black swans" that seem to dominate our landscape these days – the gratuitous murder of journalist Jemal Khasshogi by underlings of the Saudi ruling family – has changed the way that the Saudi war in Yemen – and more generally the wars in the Middle East – are seen.  It is as if the United States and the lands of its allies were suddenly awakened from collective slumber and, rubbing their eyes, ask "What is going on?!!"  Thus, despite the pushback by US political and media elites against President Trump's order to remove troops from Syria and Afghanistan, US public opinion generally supports the idea that it is time for these wars to end.  And the promise of congressional action to end US support for the Saudi war in Yemen also has broad support.  There is, at last, some hope.
 
For these reasons, I think that there is even more reason than usual to call on our reserves of energy to protest those forces and actions that will attempt to keep the US war machine active in the Middle East.  Republicans in Congress have been meeting with Trump and claiming that he doesn't "really" mean what he said about withdrawing troops from Syria and Afghanistan, and US military commanders on the ground state that withdrawal of troops from Syria could take several months.  Democrat leadership in Congress may well conclude that Trump's failure to pursue the wars in the Middle East may be something to investigate, and/or perhaps to include in Articles of Impeachment.  As was shown several times during the Obama presidency, the Pentagon's commanders are capable of "dissuading" the Commander-in-Chief when he is neglecting his Imperial Duties.  Despite some auspicious signs at the end of 2018, therefore, peace activists in 2019 will have our work cut out for us.
 
News Notes
To start the New Year off right, show up on New Year's Day for the demonstration in White Plains, at the Federal Courthouse, called In Solidarity with Children's who die and suffer cruelty.  It is sponsored by the Hudson Valley Community Coalition and its allies. For more information, go here.
 
The admirable Project Censored publishes an annual report listing the most important stories suppressed or misreported by the mainstream media. The "missing" stories are generally written by students, and they make for impressive reading/reporting.  Here are the top 25 censored stories of 2017-2018.
 
A news report featuring our congressional representative Eliot Engel proclaims that "Democrats vow new scrub of post-9/11 war powers."  Indeed, launching or justifying wars based on the Authorization to Use Military Force passed by Congress days after 9/11 doesn't make sense anymore.  So the House of Representatives, led by among others Engel, is planning to draft a new one.  This sounds good for about a nanosecond; and then we say, "Why do we need to give the President a new blank check at all?"  Why not require Congress to declare war – or not – as described in the Constitution, or use the War Powers Act to require the President to get congressional approval for military action lasting longer than 60 days?
 
For several years Israel has offered US police departments to participate in training (in Israel) on how to fight terrorism.  Two years ago, Jewish Voice for Peace began the Deadly Exchange campaign, protesting the practice of US police "learning" at the feet of military forces who inflict daily terror on Palestinians.  The campaign has had some successes, with police forces cancelling their training; and this useful article from The Electronic Intifada asks (and answers), "How did activists accomplish this?"
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.
 
Please Support CFOW
CFOW's expenditures are small, but if you would like to support our work financially, please send a check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  In addition to the excellent Featured Essays, I especially recommend the set of articles that review the debate on, and merits of, Trump's decision to withdraw troops from Syria; the explosive expose ("War & Peace") of the use by Saudi Arabia of child soldiers/slaves from Darfur in its war in Yemen; an in-depth article by Korea expert Leon Sigal that reviews the US-North Korea negotiations since the 1990s; a set of good articles on The Green New Deal, and what the Democrats will/won't do to support this vital program; good articles on the repression of Julian Assange, the weakness of the latest "revelations" about "Russiagate," and some more support for the benefits of "Medicare for All"; and, finally, today's New York Times investigative report on the killing of a Palestinian medic in Gaza a few months ago.  Read on!
 
Rewards
To close out the old year and Welcome the New, here are CFOW favorites, Hudson Valley Sally, with a new (to me) song, "We Need Each Other Now."   And to illuminate yet another corner of our neglected history, here is True Story of "Yip Harburg: The Man Who Put the Rainbow in The Wizard of Oz," an old favorite rebroadcast by Democracy Now! last week.  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
Seasons Greetings from France's Yellow Vests: "We are not tired"
By Richard Greeman, ZNet [December 30, 2018]
---- Is the Yellow Vest rebellion, now in its seventh week, "petering out?" Such was the near-unanimous pronouncement of the mainstream media, when I returned home to Montpellier, France, eager to participate and to observe first-hand this popular insurrection which I had been afraid of missing. I needn't have worried. … Then all hell broke loose and continued all day, with marches, countermarches and gas in the air. … So apparently the Yellow Vest movement is not exactly "petering out." After six weeks of daily roadblocks and disruptions in every corner of France, and after six (now seven) successive mass demonstrations of hundreds of thousands in Paris and the provinces, violently repressed, this spontaneous, self-organized rebellion, coordinated via social media, is still seriously challenging the political and economic order in France. Not only has this rebellion persisted despite unprecedented police brutality, media misrepresentation, and rejection by labor union officials, it has retained its grass-roots popularity and deepened its goals – from an initial rejection of a tax increase on Diesel fuel to explicit rejection of the established political/economic system and to near-unanimous call for the resignation of Macron and the creation of a new kind of democracy via referendum or constitutional convention. [Read More}
 
We Have Entered A Dangerous Moral Universe: What futures can we imagine when we no longer trust our senses?
By Patricia J. Williams, The Nation [December 19, 2018]
---- My inner 10-year-old does not want to get "used to losses." Indeed, the refusal to do so is the very claim that has been made, under "public trust" doctrine, in the pending federal-court case of Juliana v. the United States. The plaintiffs are 21 children ranging from 11 to 22 years old, and they have alleged that the destruction of the earth's atmosphere is a violation of substantive due process and equal protection, because it threatens their very future. The rest of us, meanwhile, seem to have forgotten that government should inspire public trust. Surely this determined sense of a right to exist is the same commitment that Jakelin's father felt as he fled the legacy of a civil war specifically targeting Mayan populations in Guatemala. Surely this insistence on the right to be is what also drives the stateless millions around the globe fleeing displacement by war, toxins, climate change, flood, famine, and drought. [Read More]
 
Isolationism or Imperialism?
By David Swanson, World Beyond War [December 28, 2018]
---- Five years ago, there was a debate over whether to bomb Syria flat, and those opposed to doing so were accused of "isolationism." Now the idea of pulling troops out of Syria or Afghanistan or ceasing to help bomb and starve the people of Yemen is subjected to the same rhetorical assault. That Trump promises to keep the occupation of Iraq going is understood as reassuring "engagement with the world" by people who demanded an end to the occupation of Iraq when George W. Bush was president, and who pretended to celebrate its ending when Barack Obama pretended to end it. This is simple-minded thinking in the extreme, notwithstanding its claims to be just the opposite. "I'm against war but we can't be simplistic about it and just end one of them willy-nilly, abandoning our allies." This is the type of language used to support imperialism in the great debate between isolationism and imperialism, a debate wholly dependent on the ridiculous pretense that these two choices constitute the full range of possible human behaviors. [Read More]
 
An Appeal to Jewish Women to Support the 2019 Women's March and Its Leaders
By Rosalind P. Petchesky, Solidarity – US [December 25, 2018]
---- For the past nine months, controversy and obfuscation concerning allegations of anti-Semitism and complicity with Louis Farrakhan have surrounded the 2019 Women's March and its Women of Color leaders, especially Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour. The complaints rage on, leaving a trail of divisiveness and malice in their wake. This is an appeal to the white Jewish women who have participated in this barrage, or stood idly by while it happened, to step back, hit pause, and think more clearly about what fears lie behind your anger, or your silence. … In a climate of fear, violence, intimidation and rising fascism, the only way forward for a truly transformative Women's March and movement is to unite the struggles to end violence, racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, misogyny, settler colonialism everywhere, including in Palestine, and the white nationalism that undergirds them all. And this means holding out our hands to the courageous leaders who propel this vision, like Linda Sarsour and Tamika Mallory, saying we stand with you, we have your back. [Read More]
 
TRUMP'S TROOP WITHDRAWAL FROM SYRIA – DISCUSSION
We Know How Trump's War Game Ends
By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone [December 2018]
---- Trump dumped on basically every segment of the political establishment en route to Washington, running on a classic authoritarian strategy — bash the elites, pose as a populist. However fake he was, there were portions of the political establishment that deserved abuse, the Pentagon most of all. The Department of Defense has been a money pit for decades. It has trillions in expenditures it can't account for, refused an audit for nearly 30 years and then failed this year (as in failed completely, zero-point-zero, not producing any coherent numbers) when one was finally funded. We have brave and able soldiers, but their leaders are utter tools who've left a legacy of massacres and botched interventions around the world. NATO? That's an organization whose mission stopped making sense the moment the Soviet Union collapsed. We should long ago have repurposed our defense plan to focus on terrorism, cyber-crime and cyber-attacks, commercial espionage, financial security, and other threats. Instead, we continued after the Soviet collapse to maintain a global military alliance fattened with increasingly useless carriers and fighter jets, designed to fight archaic forms of war. [Read More]
 
Trump Scores, Breaks Generals' 50-Year War Record
By Gareth Porter, The American Conservative [December 28, 2018]
---- The mainstream media has attacked President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Syria as impulsive, blindsiding his own national security team. But detailed, published accounts of the policy process over the course of the year tell a very different story. They show that senior national security officials and self-interested institutions have been playing a complicated political game for months aimed at keeping Trump from wavering on our indefinite presence on the ground in Syria. The entire episode thus represents a new variant of a familiar pattern dating back to Vietnam in which national security advisors put pressure on reluctant presidents to go along with existing or proposed military deployments in a war zone. The difference here is that Trump, by publicly choosing a different policy, has blown up their transparent schemes and offered the country a new course, one that does not involve a permanent war state. [Read More]
 
Ignore the howls of protest – Trump's Syria withdrawal is a simple reflection of foreign policy realities
By Patrick Cockburn, The Independent [UK] [December 26, 2018]
---- President Trump's decision to withdraw US troops from Syria is being denounced by an impressive range of critics claiming that it is a surrender to Turkey, Russia, Syria and Iran – as well as a betrayal of the Kurds and a victory for Isis. The pullout may be one or all of these things, but above all it is a recognition of what is really happening on the ground in Syria and the Middle East in general. This point has not come across clearly enough because of the undiluted loathing for Trump among most of the American and British media. They act as a conduit for the views of diverse figures who condemn the withdrawal and include members of the imperially-minded foreign policy establishment in Washington and terrified Kurds living in north-east Syria who fear ethnic cleansing by an invading Turkish army. … It is worth spelling out the state of play in Syria because this is being masked by anti-Trump rhetoric, recommending policies that may sound benign but are far detached from political reality. This reality may be very nasty: it is right to be appalled by the prospects for the Syrian Kurds who are terrified of a Turkish army that is already massing to the north of the Turkish-Syrian frontier. [Read More]
 
Also useful/insightful on the Syria withdrawal – "Bring the Troops Home, But Also Stop the Bombing," by Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies, Code Pink [December 26, 2018] [Link]; "Democrats and Neocons Are the Biggest Losers of Trump's Syria Withdrawal," by Daniel Lazare, TruthDig [December 28, 2018] [Link]; and "Trump vs Mattis: Watch out when men of war come to the rescue," by Robert Fisk, The Independent [UK] [December 27, 2018] [Link]. This article from 2014, by "Occupy's" David Graeber, is a useful reminder of the significance of the Kurd's self-governing project at Rojava, in Syria, now threatened by a Turkish attack: "Why is the world ignoring the revolutionary Kurds in Syria?" [Link].
 
WAR & PEACE
The United States is First in War, But Trailing in Crucial Aspects of Modern Civilization
---- Maybe those delirious crowds chanting "USA, USA" have got something. When it comes to military power, the United States reigns supreme. Newsweek reported in March 2018: "The United States has the strongest military in the world," with more than two million military personnel and vast numbers of the most advanced nuclear missiles, military aircraft, warships, tanks, and other modern weapons of war. Furthermore, as the New York Times noted, "the United States also has a global presence unlike any other nation, with about 200,000 active duty troops deployed in more than 170 countries." This presence includes some 800 overseas U.S. military bases. … Maintaining the U.S. status as "No. 1" in war and war preparations comes at a very high price. That price is not only paid in dollars—plus massive death and suffering in warfare ― but in the impoverishment of other key sectors of American life. After all, this lavish outlay on the military now constitutes about two-thirds of the U.S. government's discretionary spending. And these other sectors of American life are in big trouble. [Read More]
 
Our Poor, Defenseless Military Industrial Complex
By Alan MacLeod, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting [December 20, 2018]
---- Even these figures do not include military pensions and veterans' healthcare, or nuclear weapons, and therefore the true total is possibly greater than all other countries combined. Military spending is approaching the highest in recorded history of any country, and the increase in military spending Trump approved last year alone would be enough to make public colleges and universities across the US free to all. Considering the problems of unemployment, poverty, climate change and infrastructure in the US, perhaps tooling up for an intercontinental war against two nuclear-armed superpowers is not the most effective use of trillions of dollars. That reducing a $716 billion war budget can be presented as a threat to the nation, and that "defense" can refer to wars in Taiwan or the Baltic, illustrates the depth of the media's imperial mindset, and goes to show President Dwight Eisenhower's warning about the power of the military industrial complex went unheeded. [Read More]
 
The War in Yemen
A Top 2018 Story: Sudan's Mercenary child-soldiers in Yemen (NYT)
---- David Kirkpatrick of the New York Times caused an international stir by estimating that 20 percent of Sudanese fighters in Yemen may be 13-17, i.e. child soldiers. The percentage may be as high as 40%. That these child soldiers appear to have been paid for by Saudi Arabia at a time when, because of the murder of dissident journalist Jamal Khashoggi, Saudi Arabia is in bad odor anyway, contributed to the sensation. Virtually every Arabic newspaper and news site is leading with the Times story. … Sudan, a country of 40 million with a GDP of only $110 bn., is said to have 10,000 fighters in Yemen, with the first contingent entering at Aden in October of 2015, about six months after the Saudis launched their air war on Yemen.  The vast majority of these fighters are not regular army troops but Janjawid mercenaries from Dar Fur ("Rapid Support Forces") whose salaries are paid by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Sudan leader Omar al-Bashir is said to have demanded from these Gulf countries $2 billion for every 1,000 Sudanese troops deployed in Yemen. [Read More]  And please read the original article by David D. Kirkpatrick, "On the Front Line of the Saudi War in Yemen: Child Soldiers From Darfur," New York Times [December 28, 2018] [Link]. Many pictures and maps accompany this useful New York Times article, "Saudi Strikes, American Bombs, Yemeni Suffering" [December 27, 2018] [Link].
 
The War in Afghanistan
C.I.A.'s Afghan Forces Leave a Trail of Abuse and Anger
By Mujib Mashal, New York Times [December 31, 2018]
---- At a time when the conventional Afghan military and police forces are being killed in record numbers across the country, the regional forces overseen by the C.I.A. have managed to hold the line against the most brutal militant groups, including the Haqqani wing of the Taliban and also Islamic State loyalists. But the units have also operated unconstrained by battlefield rules designed to protect civilians, conducting night raids, torture and killings with near impunity, in a covert campaign that some Afghan and American officials say is undermining the wider American effort to strengthen Afghan institutions. Those abuses are actively pushing people toward the Taliban, the officials say. And with only a relatively small American troop contingent left — and that perhaps set to drop further on President Trump's orders — the strike forces are increasingly the way that a large number of rural Afghans experience the American presence. … For months, The New York Times has investigated the human toll of the C.I.A.-sponsored forces on communities. Times journalists researched frequent complaints — at times almost weekly — that these units had raided and killed civilians, and The Times went to the sites of half a dozen of their raids, often less than 24 hours after the force had left. The investigation found details of a C.I.A. mission with tactical successes that have come at the cost of alienating the Afghan population. One former senior Afghan security official bluntly accused the strike forces of war crimes. [Read More].
 
War With Iran?
Fear, Hate And Violence: The Human Cost Of US Sanctions On Iran
By Alan Knight and Shahrzad Khayatian, Worldbeyondwar.org [December 24, 2018]
---- In the US, however, this suffering in Iran will be invisible. You won't see it on the screens of the 24/7 mass-market corporate broadcasts. You won't find it on the pages of the newspapers of record. It won't be debated in Congress. And if something does make it onto YouTube, it will be ignored, downplayed, denied or buried in a lifeless statistic. The importance of giving a name and face to suffering cannot be exaggerated. We respond to human experience; we ignore statistics. In this series of articles we will follow the lives of middle class Iranians, that middle class Americans can easily identify with, as they live through US imposed sanctions. The stories begin with the implementation of the first tranche of sanctions in August 2018, but first some context. [Read More]
 
War With North Korea?
For North Korea, Verifying Requires Reconciling: The Lesson from A Troubled Past
By Leon V. Sigal, 38North [December 14, 2018]
[FB – Leon Sigal is the author of several books and articles on the US-North Korea negotiations of the 1990s.  This is a major essay, a useful background study for the evolving Trump negotiations with North Korea.]
---- The usual story going around Washington is that North Korea has no intention to denuclearize or to provide a complete and accurate declaration of all its nuclear facilities and inventory and allow the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) access to verify that declaration. According to this story, North Korea reneged on promises to take these steps in the past, and instead, temporarily suspended production of plutonium, impeded unfettered access for IAEA inspectors, secretly sought the means to enrich uranium, expelled the inspectors, and resumed plutonium production when its enrichment activity was challenged. This narrative is incomplete and misleading, because it ignores the crucial link between Pyongyang's willingness to accept US requests for verification and Washington's willingness to take steps to end enmity with North Korea. There is, in short, another way to interpret the troubled history of US-North Korean negotiations on verification. … If there is one takeaway from this history of verification in North Korea, it is that cooperation begets cooperation. The test of that proposition will come prior to a North Korean declaration of its fissile material and nuclear weapons stocks when the United States seeks access to the North's nuclear test sites, uranium mines, facilities to refine the ore into metal and turn it into a gas to run through centrifuges, and enrichment plants and reactors, to determine how much fissile material it could have produced. Any attempt to secure access to its nuclear facilities, not to mention its nuclear materials and weapons, will require a sustained US effort to end enmity with North Korea. The message from Pyongyang seems clear: no verification without reconciliation. [Read More].  And for Part II of this article, go here.
 
GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHAOS
The Green New Deal Is Good for the Planet—and the Democratic Party
By Mike Konczal, The Nation [December 19, 2018]
---- We don't have much time to tackle climate change. A new report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finds that we need to reduce carbon emissions by 45 percent in the next 12 years to keep the earth from heating up "only" 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. This isn't a problem for future generations; this is an emergency now. Into this crisis comes a demand for a Green New Deal, a call to mobilize the federal government to tackle this threat. Led by the young organizers of the Sunrise Movement, the campaign received a signal boost when Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined its members during a sit-in at Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi's office. The fact that the earth is rapidly warming is reason enough to pay attention. But there are three additional reasons why the Green New Deal should excite Democrats and progressives. First, it proves that the grass roots can drive the Democratic agenda. … Second, a Green New Deal helps solve the Democrats' ideas problem. … Finally, we are not prepared for the next recession. With low interest rates, corporate balance sheets bloated with cash that companies won't spend, and workers without the power to demand higher wages, the next recession will be just as devastating as the previous one and will require an even bigger response. [Read More] The import of the Green New Deal, and the strategic thinking behind it, is explained in this article by Naomi Klein that was in the CFOW newsletter last month, "The Game-Changing Promise of a Green New Deal," The Intercept [November 27 2018] [Link]. The Democratic Party leadership, however, has set off in the wrong direction; read "Climate Crisis is "Existential Threat," House Democrats Say — but Protecting Turf Comes First," by Kate Aronoff, The Intercept [December 30 2018] [Link].
 
The Infiltrator: How an Undercover Oil Industry Mercenary Tricked Pipeline Opponents Into Believing He Was One of Them
By Alleen Brown, The Intercept [December 30, 2018]
---- For months, a man calling himself Joel Edwards had posed as a pipeline opponent, attending protests, befriending water protectors, and paying for hotel rooms, supplies, and booze. He told some people he had a job with a hotel that allowed him to travel, others that he was a freelance journalist reporting on the pipeline resistance. But five former contractors for TigerSwan, the secretive security firm hired by Energy Transfer to guard the pipeline, confirmed to The Intercept that Joel was an undercover intelligence operative. His real name was Joel Edward McCollough, and he had been sent to collect information on the protesters, [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES/"THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR"
Justice for Julian Assange, Test of Western Democracy
By Nozomi Hayase, Antiwar.com [December 29, 2018]
---- This has been the 7th year that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange spent Christmas in confinement inside Ecuador's London embassy. … In December 2015, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded that Assange was being "arbitrarily deprived of his freedom and demanded that he be released". Yet the UK government's refusal to comply with the UN finding has allowed this unlawful detention to continue. This cruel persecution of Assange represents a deep crisis of Western democracy. As injustice against this Western journalist prevails, the legitimacy of traditional institutions has weakened. The benevolent Democracy that many were taught to believe in has been shown to be an illusion. It has been revealed as a system of control, lacking enforcement mechanisms in law to deal with real offenders of human rights violations, who for example illegally invade countries under the pretext of fighting terrorism.  [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
New Studies Show Pundits Are Wrong About Russian Social-Media Involvement in US Politics
By Aaron Maté, The Nation [December 27, 2018]
---- The release of two Senate-commissioned reports has sparked a new round of panic about Russia manipulating a vulnerable American public on social media. Headlines warn that Russian trolls have tried to suppress the African-American vote, promote Green Party candidate Jill Stein, recruit "assets," and "sow discord" or "hack the 2016 election" via sex-toy ads and Pokémon Go.  The reports, from the University of Oxford's Computational Propaganda Research Project and the firm New Knowledge, do provide the most thorough look at Russian social-media activity to date. … There is no indication that the disinformation spread by employees of a St. Petersburg troll farm has had a discernible impact on the US electorate. The barrage of claims to the contrary is but one element of an infinitely larger chorus from failed political elites, sketchy private firms, shadowy intelligence officials, and credulous media outlets that inculcates the Western public with fears of a Kremlin "sowing discord." Given how divorced the prevailing alarm is from the actual facts—and the influence of those fueling it—we might ask ourselves whose disinformation is most worthy of concern. [Read More]
 
25 Ways The Canadian Health Care System Is Better Than Obamacare
By Ralph Nader, Nader.org [December 27, 2018]
---- Dear America: Costly complexity is baked into Obamacare. No health insurance system is without problems but Canadian-style single-payer— full Medicare for all— is simple, affordable, comprehensive and universal. In the early 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson enrolled 20 million elderly Americans into Medicare in six months. There were no websites. They did it with index cards! Below please find 25 ways the Canadian health care system is better than the chaotic U.S. system. Replace it with the much more efficient Medicare-for-all: everybody in, nobody out, free choice of doctor and hospital. It will produce far less anxiety, dread, and fear. Love, Canada. [Read More] For some discussion of the proposed USA single-payer healthcare ideas, read "Medicare Will Be Good for Everyone — Except CEOs," an interview with Robert Pollin, in Jacobin Magazine [December 2018] [Link]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Biggest Stories of 2018: Israel announced Apartheid, Shot Thousands of Civilians
---- 2018 was in many ways a turning point for the position of Israel in the system of Western, liberal, capitalist democracies. It had long sat uneasily among France, Britain, and the United States, inasmuch as it was founded on a formal racial supremacist principle that Jews must rule the state. Racism is important in the other democracies, as well, but it is not typically enshrined in the constitution. The French Rights of Man mentioned nothing about race. … Somewhat astonishingly, the assemblage of far-right Israeli parties that rules Israel has managed to worsen its wretched human rights record in 2018 and to depart from liberal capitalist democracy almost entirely. Not only is Israel not the only democracy in the Middle East (that distinction now belongs to Tunisia), it isn't a democracy at all in the sense of a state of equal citizens able to vote for the government that rules them. [Read More] For more on the state of Israel's democracy and the forthcoming election, read Ariel Gold (Code Pink), "Elections Don't Make Israel a Democracy" [December 29, 2018]  [Link]
 
Nearly 300 Palestinians killed, 29,000 injured in 2018
By Maureen Clare Murphy, Electronic Intifada [December 27, 2018]
---- Israeli occupation forces and settlers have killed 295 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza since the beginning of the year, according to a UN monitoring group. Fourteen Israelis were killed by Palestinians during the same period, in addition to a baby who died days after his premature birth following the shooting and critical injury of his mother. More than 29,000 Palestinians were injured during 2018 – the highest number of injuries in a single year since the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs began collecting data in 2005. Nearly 60 of those Palestinians killed and 7,000 of those injured were children. Twenty-eight members of armed groups were among the fatalities, as were 15 perpetrators or alleged perpetrators of attacks against Israelis in the West Bank, according to OCHA. More than 60 percent of the fatalities and nearly 80 percent of the injuries took place in the context of the Great March of Return – mass protests held regularly along Gaza's eastern and northern perimeter since 30 March. [Read More]
 
A Day, a Life: When a Medic Was Killed in Gaza, Was It an Accident?
By David M. Halbfinger, New York Times [December 30, 2018]
---- A young medic in a head scarf runs into danger, her only protection a white lab coat. Through a haze of tear gas and black smoke, she tries to reach a man sprawled on the ground along the Gaza border. Israeli soldiers, their weapons leveled, watch warily from the other side. Minutes later, a rifle shot rips through the din, and the Israeli-Palestinian drama has its newest tragic figure. For a few days in June, the world took notice of the death of 20-year-old Rouzan al-Najjar, killed while treating the wounded at protests against Israel's blockade of the Gaza Strip. Even as she was buried, she became a symbol of the conflict, with both sides staking out competing and mutually exclusive narratives. To the Palestinians, she was an innocent martyr killed in cold blood, an example of Israel's disregard for Palestinian life. To the Israelis, she was part of a violent protest aimed at destroying their country, to which lethal force is a legitimate response as a last resort. Read More]

Sunday, December 23, 2018

CFOW Newsletter - Trump and Syria; CFOW Yemen Resolution Passed in Hastings

Concerned Families of Westchester Newsletter
December 23, 2018
 
Hello all – Happy holidays to all; and please come to the CFOW holiday party on Sunday, December 30th from 6 to 9 p.m. It's always a good party, a time to see old friends and make new ones.  The festivities will be at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society, 12 Elm St. in Dobbs; and it's a pot-luck – please bring something to eat/drink to share.  See you there!
 
Last Tuesday the Hastings Board of Trustees voted to support the CFOW Resolution on Yemen.  The Resolution calls on the United States to end its military support for the horrible war being carried out by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.  The Resolution is framed as a message to our congressional representatives Eliot Engel and Nita Lowey, and to Senator Schumer.  Engel and Lowey will be chairs of important House committees when Congress reconvenes on January 3rd, and the Resolution asks them to use their new powers to hold hearings, call witnesses, subpoena records, and otherwise shine some light on the US role in this war, just as Sen. William Fulbright did for the Vietnam War in 1966. You can read the Resolution on the CFOW Facebook page. It is our hope to meet with staff at Lowey's and Engel's offices.  We also hope that other towns and villages will adopt similar resolutions.
 
Trump, Syria, and Afghanistan
The big news this week was President Trump's announcement that US troops would be leaving Syria asap, and that half of the 14,000 US troops in Afghanistan would also be withdrawn. Like the rest of the world, we were caught by surprise by this.  But unlike most of the political elite and the mainstream media, we and many other US peace groups welcomed the troop withdrawal, even it was delivered by our arch foe, President Trump.  In our leaflet for Saturday's vigil, posted on our Facebook page, we stated
 
Since its beginning in 2001, Concerned Families of Westchester has called for an end to the war in Afghanistan. And since the beginning of US intervention in the civil war in Syria, we have called for the United States to work for a negotiated settlement of the conflict and to bring our troops home.
And now President Trump declares that all the troops now in Syria, and half of the troops now in Afghanistan will be coming home. We support that. We also look forward to the day when the remaining troops now in Afghanistan will come home.
 
Twenty-four hours later, this still looks right to us.  But in this interval a lot has been written about why President Trump pulled the troops and what (benefits or disasters) this might lead to.  Additionally, the resignation of Secretary of Defense James Mattis in protest over Trump's action has generated an additional line of debate/concern about President Trump's impetuous foreign policy now having no "adults in the room" to curb his lunatic impulses.  I've linked several good/useful articles and essays about these issues below.
 
In addition to the vast uncertainty now before us, the President's action is immediately deficient on (at least) three grounds.  The first, as expressed by antiwar Democrats Rep. Barbara Lee and Ro Khanna and others, is that the troop withdrawal was decided upon with little or no preparation to deal with the many practical questions that will now arise, and that we have little or no knowledge about how all this will be implemented.  These concerns probably ask more than we can expect from President Trump, but this is not the way to ensure a just and durable peace.
 
Our leaflet for yesterday's vigil also stated that "there is more to making peace than simply stopping the slaughter."
 
Our government needs to work with the political and military forces in both countries, and with the governments of neighboring countries, to stop the fighting in those areas and achieve economic and political equity among neighbors. We need to meet the humanitarian needs of the people of Syria and Afghanistan, and to provide reconstruction assistance to each country, after so many years of destroying their civil societies and means of self-support.
 
While the current administration and Congress is no more likely to help with the repair of the damage we've done in the Middle East than the US did in the 1970s (in violation of its promises) to assist with the reconstruction of Vietnam, this is a debt that we/the peace movement will not forget.
 
Finally, there are serious concerns about a possible/likely Turkish attack on the Kurdish self-governing zone in northern Syria. We pay no attention when such concerns are raised hypocritically by those who want US forces to stay in Syria indefinitely, to fight Assad or the Russians or the Iranians, but for the great many of us who admire what the Kurds have done, the likelihood of a Turkish attack on them is a great tragedy. Analysis linked below describes possible (not unrealistic) ways that this crisis may be prevented.  These scenarios suggest that the Syrian government and/or the Russians may be prepared to offer the Kurds protection against Turkey; but most probably at the expense of the loss of Kurdish autonomy, which is/was the point of their Rojava enterprise.  There may not be anything the US government could do to prevent a Turkish attack if it wanted to, but the available evidence suggests that the Turks have already been given the green-light by President Trump.  We will learn more soon.
 
News Notes
CFOW stalwart Nick Mottern has an important article on the website Truthout about retail giant Amazon's efforts to win a $10 billion contract with the Pentagon to create a global "brain," "a weapon of unprecedented surveillance and killing power, a profoundly aggressive weapon that should not be allowed to be created."  Simultaneously, an on-line petition hosted by Roots Action calls on Amazon employees to refuse this and other military work.  For additional information on the future of automated warfare, read "Weaponised AI is coming. Is algorithmic forever wars our future?" Read up on this stuff!
 
In addition to the CFOW Resolution on Yemen, last Tuesday the Hastings Board of Trustees also passed a resolution supporting state legislative action that would give all immigrants in New York the opportunity to get a drivers licenses, whatever their immigration status. While the primary goal is to enable immigrants to get to work and do what must be done, there are many reasons why this is in the interest of ALL New Yorkers, including traffic safety.  Governor Cuomo failed to include this issue is his "next 100 days" speech, and advocates urge us to urgel him (518-478-8390) to make it a legislative priority.  To learn more about the issue and the coalition working to make all this happen, go here.
 
I love this picture, and it's showing up all over. For me it represents the invincibility of the human spirit. But make up your own caption.
 
CFOW Nuts & Bolts
Please consider getting involved with Concerned Families of Westchester.  We meet for a protest/rally each Saturday in Hastings, from 12 to 1 p.m., at the VFW Plaza (Warburton and Spring St.)  Our leaflet and posters for our rallies are usually about war or climate change, but issues such as racial justice or Trump's immigration policies are often targeted, depending on current events. We (usually) meet on the first Sunday of each month, from 7 to 9 p.m., at the Dobbs Ferry Historical Society.  Our weekly newsletter is archived at https://cfow.blogspot.com/; and news of interest and coming events is posted on our CFOW Facebook page.
 
Please Support CFOW
CFOW's expenditures are small, but if you would like to support our work financially, please send a check to CFOW, PO Box 364, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706.  Thanks!
 
This Newsletter
Articles linked in the CFOW newsletter are intended to illuminate some of the main action-issues about which we are concerned.  Coming mostly from the "dissenting media," they provide an alternative to the perspectives of the mainstream media.  In addition to the excellent Featured Essays, I especially recommend the sets of articles on Syria and on Yemen; good articles on the fossil fuel outlaws and on the Green New Deal; and good articles ("Our History") on Martin Luther King (birthday coming up) and on the slaughter in the Third World during the so-called years of peace during the Cold War. Read on!
 
Rewards!
This week's rewards reflect the seasonal celebrations of commodity consumption.  First up is CFOW favorite Roy Zimmerman, who has a slew of good songs on his website.  Check out this one for its Holiday Spirit. And the Puppini Sisters are also newsletter favorites, and they have lots of Christmas songs, including this one, "Santa Baby."  Enjoy!
 
Best wishes,
Frank Brodhead
For CFOW
 
FEATURED ESSAYS
A Podcast in the Making: Getting Emotional About Labor
By Naomi Klein, The Intercept [December 20 2018]
---- Does the world need another podcast? Probably not. But I find myself needing a free-form space to think through the contours of our historical moment — from the epic social and ecological stakes to the savviest strategies for getting ourselves out of this mess. With that in mind, I recently wrangled two of my most brilliant and busiest friends — author and Princeton professor Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor and filmmaker and writer Astra Taylor — around a wooden table at a college radio station to start that conversation. There may have been tequila. There was definitely gallows humor. More than anything else, we found ourselves getting emotional about labor — about the fact that being a decent human is increasingly being griped about as "emotional labor"; about the Dickensian working conditions suffered by the women boxing up our holiday crap; about the fact that caging children is fast becoming a booming career path; and about the tremendous promise of a different kind of work (and leisure) under a Green New Deal. We also tried to figure out why some things feel too mean — and too meaningful — to say on Twitter. [Read More]
 
(Video) Noam Chomsky's Manufacturing Consent revisited [30th anniversary]
From Aljazeera [December 22, 2018]
---- For many of us who work at The Listening Post, Chomsky's ideas on the media in Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media have provided us with a guide, full of cautionary tales and ideas that are still controversial to this day. The book was published in 1988 - a year before the end of the Cold War when it was announced that western liberal democracy had triumphed, heralding the end of ideology, authoritarianism, and propaganda. In the past 30 years, we have seen the mass communications industry multiply, providing an illusion of choice, echoing the rhetorics of freedom - of press, of expression - but not necessarily yielding the pluralism liberal democracies had promised. In that way, the book continues to resonate. But like all revered texts, Manufacturing Consent also calls upon us as active readers, journalists, citizens to interrogate its premises. Does the book's denunciatory tone risk overstate the power of the media establishment? Does it underestimate the critical faculties of the public? Is the media so homogenous an entity that power can be wielded top-down? Where are the lapses, the blind spots? Where do journalists find pockets of power that serve to disrupt? We spoke to three journalists who have their careers being disruptive and asked them about the ideas that had influenced them in Chomsky and Herman's book: Matt Taibbi, whose reporting for Rolling Stone has provided one of the most critical accounts of US political history in recent years; Indian editor-in-chief Aman Sethi who questions the premises of Chomsky's book and Amira Hass, the Haaretz correspondent for the Occupied Territories. [See the Program]
 
None of Us Deserve Citizenship
By Michelle Alexander, New York Times [December 21, 2018]
---- Late last month, 19-year-old Maryury Elizabeth Serrano-Hernandez reportedly scaled a wall along the United States-Mexico border while eight months pregnant and gave birth within hours of placing her feet on American soil. She was part of a widely publicized Central American caravan and traveled more than 2,000 miles from Honduras propelled by the dream of giving her new baby, as well as her 3-year-old son, a life free from the violence and grinding poverty she endured back home. … For some Americans, Ms. Serrano-Hernandez's story is nothing short of heroic, given the suffering she endured and the extraordinary obstacles she overcame to give her children a chance at a better life. For others, her story represents everything that's wrong with our immigration system. … No matter what side of the debate one gravitates toward, stories like Ms. Serrano-Hernandez's highlight the moral quagmire that we've created by treating the migration of desperately poor people as a problem that can best be addressed by border walls, tear gas, detention camps, militarized policing and mass deportation. [Read More]
 
Let Them Eat Heritage
By Michael Press, Hyperallergic [December 22, 2018]
---- Reconstruction efforts in Iraq and Syria have been a top-down process, as several architectural experts have warned. Their agendas are set not by the needs of communities so much as the interests of national governments. And it is in the interests of those governments — not only the Iraqi and Syrian governments themselves, but also Russia, the UAE, and others — to promote the restoration of cultural heritage. Heritage tourism is very lucrative. Heritage also allows governments to burnish their image and questionable legitimacy, to consolidate their power after civil wars, and to project a false sense of normalcy. And funding heritage allows other countries to pose as the saviors of civilization. There is much less symbolic value, or money, in practical things. And so we read feel-good stories of signs of the return of normalcy, in the form of rebuilt historic buildings or book fairs or music concerts. But not of the rebuilding of homes or of basic infrastructures, like water, electricity, and transportation. Culture is important, but it's hard to enjoy it when you can't find food to eat or a place to sleep … or a city to return home to. [Read More] [h/t LS]
 
TRUMP AND SYRIA
What Motivated Trump to Do This?
Bolton's Hawkish Syria Plan Backfired, Pushing Trump to Get Out
By Spencer Ackerman andKimberly Dozier, The Daily Beast [December 21, 2018]
---- A fateful decision by National Security Adviser John Bolton to expand the United States' goals in Syria backfired, and is a key reason why President Donald Trump ordered a total withdrawal of U.S. troops, two senior administration officials told The Daily Beast. Bolton in September added a second mission to the already open-ended operation in Syria: In addition to destroying the so-called Islamic State, U.S. troops would stay in Syria indefinitely, forcing Iranian forces there to eventually withdraw. … The U.S. officials said that Turkey used Bolton and Jeffrey's expanded mission as an opportunity to manufacture a crisis that proved to be decisive. [Read More] Also useful is "US diplomats shaken by Trump decision to exit Syria," bDecember 19, 2018] [Link]
 
Some Things That Might Happen Next
With Trump leaving, Syrian Kurds seeking Support of Damascus, Moscow against Turkey
---- Trump's precipitous US troop withdrawal, in the absence of any political settlement in the region, likely spells an end to Kurdish semi-autonomy. Turkey is talking about invading and destroying the YPG as terrorists. So either you are willing to see the experiment end or you are willing to support a US military presence that keeps the experiment going. … Russia is said to be pinning its hopes for avoiding a confrontation with Turkey on such a deal between the Kurds and Damascus, allowing the establishment of a Syrian Army zone separating the Kurds from the Turks and forestalling a Turkish invasion. Russia is said by the article to have told Erdogan he can't invade the Syrian Kurdish northeast, and that he will just have to be satisfied with an SAA buffer with the Kurds. The Kurds, having lost their US ally, will strive to find new patrons and arrangements that might allow their cooperatives and ideals to survive. Whether they can succeed is the big question. [Read More]  Also useful is "Despite Assurances From Trump, the U.S. Battle Against ISIS in Eastern Syria Is Far From Over," by Ali Younes, et al., The Intercept [December 20 2018] [Link].
 
The Shape of the New Middle East?
A New Middle East: Winners and Losers from Trump's Abrupt Syria Withdrawal
---- Trump shook up the Washington establishment and Middle Eastern and world politics on Wednesday by abruptly announcing by Tweet a full and immediate withdrawal of US military forces from northeast Syria. Trump's motives for what he does are never easy to fathom. He may have been driven by a desire to please his base, which has been shaken this fall by a massive blue wave in the House midterms and a series of legal scandals sending members of Trump's circle to prison and threatening Trump and his family members themselves. Trump campaigned in 2016 on contradictory principles, but one of his planks was to "give Syria to Putin" if the latter would defeat ISIL (the so-called Islamic State Group.) … It may be that Trump has decided that he doesn't want to risk an escalation with Turkey over the leftist Kurds (did someone tell him they are anti-capitalists?), and it may be that Erdogan offered the quid pro quo of a $3 billion deal for Patriots if only the US would get out and allow Turkey to have a straight shot at the Syrian Kurds. So who are the losers from a US withdrawal from Syria: [Read More]
 
Adults In The Room?
Mattis was no Shining Knight: From backing Yemen War to Whitewashing Khashoggi Murder
---- If you were going to judge Mattis's performance as Secretary of Defense, you'd have to look at his performance with regard to military challenges. Mattis basically followed through on the policies toward ISIL set by the Obama administration and by his predecessor Ash Carter. …There is, however, a difference between Obama policies toward ISIL and those of Mattis. … In Afghanistan during the past two years there has been a steady worsening of the security situation on the ground. Mattis years ago said that it was "fun" to kill Taliban who mistreated their women. Fun or not, he hasn't been effective at it. It is now estimated that 40% – 50% of the country is under Taliban rule. Some 28,000 Afghanistan National Army troops have been killed since 2015, which is not exactly a win. Trump's dropping of the mother of all bombs on some radicals had no long term effect. Mattis said he sought a political solution that did not involve withdrawing US troops from that country. Mattis was losing Afghanistan…. [Read More]
 
THE WAR IN YEMEN
Hesitant Hope for the Fate of Yemen
By Chris Gelardi, The Nation [December 20, 2018]
---- When it comes to Yemen, there are dual realities. For Yemeni civilians living through the world's worst humanitarian crisis, relief can't come soon enough; along with the bombing and shelling from combatants, torture, cholera, and starvation are now bearing down with previously unthinkable urgency. But for those with power over the conflict—both in Yemen and abroad—"world's worst humanitarian crisis" is less concrete. It's an epithet to ignore, or a bargaining chip, or a distant problem, rather than a matter of life and death. For much of the past year, as desperation reached new heights in Yemen, the gulf between these realities widened. In November 2017, Saudi Arabia, a major player in the conflict, made a strategic decision to tighten its stranglehold on the country, further restricting civilian access to food and aid; a year later, in November 2018, Yemen likely had its deadliest month of the war. But over the past few weeks, much of that changed. In an opportune coincidence, parties to Yemen's conflict convened on Capitol Hill and in a castle in Sweden—and in a matter of days, the military and geopolitical conditions were realigned, allowing room for hope. Now Yemen's war is at a critical moment, and the fate of 28 million people hangs in the balance. [Read More]
 
Chaos in Yemen: A Conversation With Isa Blumi
By Gunar Olsen, The Nation [December 21, 2018]
---- In Yemen, nearly 13 million people, or about half its population, could soon be on the brink of famine. More than 22 million people rely on sparse humanitarian aid to survive. Cholera has infected more than a million people in the past two years, constituting the largest and fastest-spreading outbreak of the waterborne disease in modern history. The United Nations has called the situation in Yemen the "the worst manmade humanitarian crisis in the world." This disaster is by no means coincidental. Rather, it is the result of a massive bombing campaign and aerial and naval blockade waged by a coalition of 10 countries led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. From the war's first day, the United States has provided essential support to its clients in the coalition. American-made bombs, dropped from Saudi fighter jets that are refueled in midair by American planes, have destroyed critical infrastructure and killed countless civilians, from children in school buses to families at wedding ceremonies—all targeted with the help of American intelligence agencies. [Read More]
 
WAR & PEACE
(Video) Bacevich on Mattis & Why We Need to End Our Self-Destructive, Mindless Wars in Middle East
From Democracy Now! [December 21, 2018]
---- Secretary of Defense James Mattis has announced he will resign at the end of February, in a letter publicly rebuking President Trump's foreign policy. Mattis resigned one day after President Trump ordered the withdrawal of all 2,000 U.S. troops from Syria and on the same day that reports emerged that Trump has ordered the withdrawal of about 7,000 troops from Afghanistan. The New York Times reports Mattis is the first prominent Cabinet member to resign in protest over a national security issue in almost 40 years. Much of the Washington establishment expressed shock over Mattis's resignation. We speak with Andrew Bacevich, a retired colonel and Vietnam War veteran. He's the author of several books, including his latest, "Twilight of the American Century." His other books include "America's War for the Greater Middle East: A Military History" and "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War." He is professor emeritus of international relations and history at Boston University. [See the Program]
 
Why 'Overmatch' Is Overkill
By Michael T. Klare December 20
---- For the 40-odd years of the Cold War, the United States and its allies were governed by the overriding strategy of containment: a scheme to obstruct the Soviet Union's advances around the world and eventually trigger its collapse. Every aspect of US foreign and military policy—and much of America's economic, technological, and cultural behavior—was subordinated to this all-inclusive concept. Once the Cold War ended, however, US strategists lacked a unifying theme for military planning and spending, and so they flirted with one imperfect substitute after another—the campaign against "rogue states," the "Global War on Terror," and so on. But now, with Donald Trump in the White House and a new cast of hawks at the Pentagon, military leaders have landed on a new grand strategy: overmatch. … With virtually no public or congressional discussion, overmatch has become the driving principle of US foreign and military policy. This means, at the very least, that US military spending will continue to exceed that of all potential adversaries and that the country's arsenals will be perpetually replenished with new and more capable weapons. [Read More]
 
GLOBAL WARMING/CLIMATE CHAOS
Destroying Civilization [Global warming/fossil fuels]
By Yves Engler, ZNet [December 22, 2018]
---- Is it simply business as usual or a corporate conspiracy to destroy the planet? However one characterizes it our planet is being cooked so already wealthy people can make even more profit. Last Friday the New York Times published a front-page story titled "The Oil Industry's Covert Campaign to Rewrite American Car Emissions Rules." The article pointed out that Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Marathon Oil, Koch Industries and other oil/refining interests won "rollbacks" to vehicle fuel mileage rules that "have gone further than the more modest changes automakers originally lobbied for." The legislative changes are expected to "increase greenhouse gas emissions in the United States by more than the amount many midsize countries put out in a year." … The private automobile has risen to dominance in large part because of its ability to draw together a wide array of powerful corporate interests from steel makers to real estate developers, rubber companies to big box retailers. During the automobile's embryonic phase, the oil industry was already big business. At that time, oil was mainly used to fuel the kerosene lamp, a business destroyed by the emergence of gas and electrical illumination. The powerful oil interests of the day, led by the Rockefeller family, were bailed out of this crisis and set up for life with the advent of the automobile. And as barrel upon barrel was drained from the earth and pumped into gas tanks, big oil swam in its profits. So, in many respects, oil interests lobbying against restrictions on automakers is simply business as usual, given their history of promoting automobility. But, given the dangers of climate disturbances, 'business as usual' takes on the appearance of a criminal corporate conspiracy to destroy civilization. [Read More]
 
CIVIL LIBERTIES/"THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR"
Supreme Court Slaps down Trump Automatic Denial of Asylum to Migrants
From Agence France Presse [December 23, 2018]
---- The Supreme Court dealt President Donald Trump's attempt to crack down on illegal immigration a blow Friday when it rejected a White House bid to implement his asylum ban on Central Americans. The high court declined to overturn a block placed by the San Francisco federal appeals court on Trump's executive order to automatically reject asylum requests from migrants crossing the US border from Mexico. The court made no comment in its ruling, but noted that four of the nine justices were in favor of lifting the lower court's stay and letting Trump enforce the ban, while lawsuits over it go ahead. The four backing the president were Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. [Read More]
 
The New Role of the US Navy as Brig for the World
---- Approximately 400-foot vessels, they are known as National Security Cutters and have been refashioned not as hospital ships but as prison ships. They, too, are patrolling the southern waters of the Americas. Their mission is the apprehension and detention of drug smugglers, part of a multinational effort to stem the narcotics trade. They detain prisoners of the "drug war" on board, theoretically as a prelude to their future charging and prosecution, usually in the United States. During the first 20 years of this drug interdiction program, the U.S. detained around 200 individuals per year on board such ships. Then, in 2012, Washington escalated its efforts by launching a Coast Guard-led multinational campaign. It would soon be overseen by Marine General John Kelly, who became head of U.S. Southern Command as that year ended. A further and more pronounced expansion of the program came when he was appointed secretary of DHS, the Coast Guard's mother agency. In 2017, as shipboard detentions soared, Kelly described the policy as an effort to stem the "existential" threat to the nation that drug traffickers posed. [Read More]
 
THE STATE OF THE UNION
The Green New Deal Is Good for the Planet—and the Democratic Party
By Mike Konczal, The Nation [December 19, 2018]
---- We don't have much time to tackle climate change. A new report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finds that we need to reduce carbon emissions by 45 percent in the next 12 years to keep the earth from heating up "only" 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit. This isn't a problem for future generations; this is an emergency now. Into this crisis comes a demand for a Green New Deal, a call to mobilize the federal government to tackle this threat. Led by the young organizers of the Sunrise Movement, the campaign received a signal boost when Congresswoman-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez joined its members during a sit-in at Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi's office. The fact that the earth is rapidly warming is reason enough to pay attention. But there are three additional reasons why the Green New Deal should excite Democrats and progressives. [Read More]
 
The Battle Over NAFTA 2.0 Has Just Begun
By Lori Wallach, The Nation [December 21, 2018]
----After over a year of renegotiations of the North American Free Trade Agreement by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, the NAFTA 2.0 text signed on November 30 revealed improvements for which progressives have long campaigned, the addition of damaging terms that we oppose, and critical unfinished business. It's no surprise that the administrations of Donald Trump, Justin Trudeau, and Enrique Peña Nieto failed to deliver a transformational replacement for the corporate-rigged trade-pact model that NAFTA hatched in the early 1990s. But if progressives secure swift and certain enforcement of the agreement's new labor standards—and succeed in incorporating some other key improvements—the final package that will head to Congress in 2019 could end some of NAFTA's continuing, serious damage to people across North America. And that would be a big deal. [Read More]
 
ISRAEL/PALESTINE
Congress must reject Israel Anti-Boycott Act
[December 19, 2018]
---- Today the US Congress is weighing draft legislation based on problematic logic that conflates a call for businesses to stop operating in West Bank settlements, which are unlawful under the 1949 Geneva Conventions that prohibit transferring civilians into occupied territory, with a boycott of Israel. Companies should fulfill their human rights responsibilities by ending operations in the settlements – yet the Israel Anti-Boycott Act (S. 720) would impose criminal penalties on businesses and nonprofits who stop doing business with Israel or Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory, erasing the distinction between Israel and the West Bank that the US has long recognized. The act expands the scope of the Export Administration Act (EAA), which currently bars Americans from joining boycotts against US allies "fostered or imposed" by a foreign country, to apply to boycotts called for by an "international government organization" like the United Nations. The EAA's broader scope is an apparent response to the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, which is preparing to name businesses that have enabled or profited from settlements, including in the West Bank, and urge them to avoid the "adverse impact" of their activities on human rights and their contributing to the "establishment or maintenance of Israeli settlements." [Read More]
 
OUR HISTORY
MLK Day Today: The Legacy of the Man and the Myth 
---- Long gone are the days when white American radicals turned their collective backs on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968), and embraced Malcolm X and the Black Panthers. In those heady days during the late 1960s, King sounded, at least to young protesters against the War in Vietnam, like a reformer who belonged to the church, not a revolutionary from "the hood." Indeed, King was a Baptist preacher and a civil rights activist who insisted on the power of love— he meant agape not eros— and who was not a spokesman for Black Power, guerrilla warfare or violent revolution, though he wanted total "war" through non-violent means to achieve social and economic equality. "The American racial revolution," he wrote in 1967—a year before he died—"has been a revolution to 'get in' rather than to overthrow. We want a share in the American economy." This January, when we celebrate Martin Luther King, Jr. Day—which was first observed in 1986—we might look back at the man who worried about language and about figures of speech as much as he worried about moral issues, and who insisted "a leader has to be concerned with the problems of semantics." [Read More]
 
The Lethal Crescent - Where the Cold War was hot.
By Daniel Immerwahr, The Nation [December 20, 2018]
---- Paul Chamberlin's eye-opening The Cold War's Killing Fields offers us a precise, painful account of the Cold War as narrated from the Changchuns of the world rather than the Berlins. His focus is not on the capitals where grand strategies were spun but on the blood-soaked locales where those strategies took their greatest toll. By Chamberlin's calculations, more than 20 million people died in conflicts related to the Cold War. Of course, not every one of those conflicts had its origins in the superpower rivalry. But even when Washington and Moscow had little to do with starting a war, they nearly always had a hand in finishing it—by sending troops, advisers, weapons, or cash. Chamberlin isn't the first historian to observe that the Cold War ran hot outside Europe. Orwell himself imagined the fighting taking place within a "rough quadrilateral" whose "vague frontiers" stretched from Southeast Asia to North Africa. But what's so valuable about Chamberlin's book is that it draws the separate wars together into one intelligent, crisply written narrative. Doing so drives home just how relentlessly murderous the Cold War was. [Read More]